[CentOS] performance and interrupts

I am playing around with irqbalance to tune my 8 core system so I came across this page, http://kb.fusionio.com/KB/a65/irqbalance-avoid-overloading-cpu-0-with-interrupt-requests.aspx Now, lets say I disable irqbalance which will stop my autobalance and I pin all of my interrupts to core 0 and pin

[CentOS] In the press, once again

May be a little bit off topic, but this gave me hard laugh: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/09/24/sysadmin_file_tools/ Windows admins use a virtualized CentOS machine to copy files because their own tools are not able to handle copying a bigger amount of data. :) Cheers, Timo

Re: [CentOS] performance and interrupts

On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 08:57 -0400, Mag Gam wrote: > I am playing around with irqbalance to tune my 8 core system so I came > across this page, > http://kb.fusionio.com/KB/a65/irqbalance-avoid-overloading-cpu-0-with-interrupt-requests.aspx > > Now, lets say I disable irqbalance which will stop my

Re: [CentOS] In the press, once again

+1 Just Awesome.ROFL.too funny :) Thanks for the link On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Timo Schoeler wrote: > May be a little bit off topic, but this gave me hard laugh: > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/09/24/sysadmin_file_tools/ > > Windows admins use a virtualized CentOS mach

Re: [CentOS] In the press, once again

thus Tom Bishop spake: > +1 Just Awesome.ROFL.too funny :) > > > Thanks for the link Maybe stuff for then next newsletter...? > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Timo Schoeler > wrote: > >> May be a little bit off topic, but this gave me hard laugh: >> >> http://www.theregister.co.u

Re: [CentOS] In the press, once again

* Timo Schoeler (timo.schoe...@riscworks.net) wrote: > May be a little bit off topic, but this gave me hard laugh: > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/09/24/sysadmin_file_tools/ > > Windows admins use a virtualized CentOS machine to copy files because > their own tools are not able to handle co

Re: [CentOS] CentOS, Firefox, and Java Plugin

CCing the CentOS group on this... maybe someone there knows how to handle the error. On 09/23/2010 03:19 PM ken wrote: > On 09/23/2010 01:29 PM Mathieu Baudier wrote: >>> As it turns out, I don't have the Argeo version. If I'm still >>> having >> But you have the java browser plugin? Sorry to n

Re: [CentOS] CentOS, Firefox, and Java Plugin

> Apparently I don't have the java plugin browser installed.  I've tried > to install it using the rpm.bin file at > , > but it's erroring out: "/bin/sh: bad interpreter: Text file busy". If you want to keep it simple, I would n

Re: [CentOS] CentOS, Firefox, and Java Plugin

Quoting Mathieu Baudier : > > Apparently I don't have the java plugin browser installed.  I've tried > > to install it using the rpm.bin file at > > , > > but it's erroring out: "/bin/sh: bad interpreter: Text file busy". Have

Re: [CentOS] In the press, once again

Thank you *SO* much! I needed some real world evidence to prove that syncing large amounts of data across windows is a PITA! I'm currently doing something so similar! And I use linux to do it, and no one can understand why. That link has been printed, and strategically left on someones desk, with

Re: [CentOS] In the press, once again

On 24 September 2010 14:23, Timo Schoeler wrote: > Windows admins use a virtualized CentOS machine to copy files because > their own tools are not able to handle copying a bigger amount of data. :) Although I read the article with some amusement, I have to wonder what's wrong with rsync (has a Win

Re: [CentOS] In the press, once again

On 9/24/2010 10:37 AM, Hakan Koseoglu wrote: > On 24 September 2010 14:23, Timo Schoeler wrote: >> Windows admins use a virtualized CentOS machine to copy files because >> their own tools are not able to handle copying a bigger amount of data. :) > Although I read the article with some amusement,

[CentOS] necessary/unused rpm packages

Is there a way to identify if an rpm package is unused, or how much it is used? I would like to reduce my load time by removing unused packages in my kickstart, but do not want to cause problems for users on active systems by guessing which ones are not necessary (I load everything with kickstart

Re: [CentOS] In the press, once again

> May be a little bit off topic, but this gave me hard laugh: > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/09/24/sysadmin_file_tools/ VERY nice! Thank you for the link! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS, Firefox, and Java Plugin

Mathieu Baudier wrote: >> Apparently I don't have the java plugin browser installed.  I've tried >> to install it using the rpm.bin file at >> , >> but it's erroring out: "/bin/sh: bad interpreter: Text file busy". > > If you wan

Re: [CentOS] In the press, once again

On 09/24/2010 08:37 AM, Hakan Koseoglu wrote: > On 24 September 2010 14:23, Timo Schoeler wrote: > >> Windows admins use a virtualized CentOS machine to copy files because >> their own tools are not able to handle copying a bigger amount of data. :) >> > Although I read the article with

Re: [CentOS] In the press, once again

On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 09:54 -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote: > On 09/24/2010 08:37 AM, Hakan Koseoglu wrote: > > On 24 September 2010 14:23, Timo Schoeler > > wrote: > >> Windows admins use a virtualized CentOS machine to copy files because > >> their own tools are not able to handle copying a bigger

Re: [CentOS] CentOS, Firefox, and Java Plugin

On 09/24/2010 10:53 AM Barry Brimer wrote: > Quoting Mathieu Baudier : > >>> Apparently I don't have the java plugin browser installed. I've tried >>> to install it using the rpm.bin file at >>> , >>> but it's erroring out: "/

Re: [CentOS] In the press, once again

> > Until Cygwin's developers decide the join the rest of the window's > > universe in having an *uninstaller* it will remain "not installed - > > ever" on many people's systems, including mine. > > IMO, a windows system with Cygwin and Cygwin tools isn't > really a Windows system anymore;

Re: [CentOS] In the press, once again

It was funny, but it would have been more efficient to use tar over netcat instead of CP or rsync to initially populate the directory. It would be a steady data stream to the network and wouldn't beat up on the file system as bad as rsync would. Good read none the less. :) - Original Mess

[CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

On a CentOS 5 server, I am having a hard time configuring BIND to answer to 4 IP addresses for 2 domain names. Currently, I have four IP addresses, for sake of discussion they are: 1.1.1.1 1.1.1.2 1.1.1.3 1.1.1.4 Additionally, I have two domain names. For sake of discussion: exampleA.com exampleB

Re: [CentOS] necessary/unused rpm packages

At Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:15:58 -0700 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > > > Is there a way to identify if an rpm package is unused, or how much it is > used? > > I would like to reduce my load time by removing unused packages in my > kickstart, but do not want to cause problems for users on active

Re: [CentOS] In the press, once again

On 9/24/2010 11:54 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > >>> On 24 September 2010 14:23, Timo Schoeler >>> wrote: Windows admins use a virtualized CentOS machine to copy files because their own tools are not able to handle copying a bigger amount of data. :) >>> Although I read the article

Re: [CentOS] CentOS, Firefox, and Java Plugin

On 9/24/2010 11:28 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >>> Apparently I don't have the java plugin browser installed. I've tried >>> to install it using the rpm.bin file at >>> , >>> but it's erroring out: "/bin/sh: bad interpreter: T

Re: [CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

- Original Message - | On a CentOS 5 server, I am having a hard time configuring BIND to | answer to 4 IP addresses for 2 domain names. | | Currently, I have four IP addresses, for sake of discussion they are: | 1.1.1.1 | 1.1.1.2 | 1.1.1.3 | 1.1.1.4 | | Additionally, I have two domain nam

Re: [CentOS] In the press, once again

On 9/24/2010 12:08 PM, James A. Peltier wrote: > It was funny, but it would have been more efficient to use tar over netcat > instead of CP or rsync to initially populate the directory. It would be a > steady data stream to the network and wouldn't beat up on the file system as > bad as rsync w

Re: [CentOS] In the press, once again

- Original Message - | On 9/24/2010 12:08 PM, James A. Peltier wrote: | > It was funny, but it would have been more efficient to use tar over | > netcat instead of CP or rsync to initially populate the directory. | > It would be a steady data stream to the network and wouldn't beat up | >

Re: [CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

> Have a read for the listen on directive for BIND which tells BIND what > interfaces/IP Addresses to bind to. Thanks, I am aware that Apache can be told to listen only to specific addresses. Can BIND be told to listen on all addresses? Your post implies that this is the default (which makes sense

Re: [CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

Maybe a Round-Robin configuration ? 2010/9/24 Dotan Cohen > > Have a read for the listen on directive for BIND which tells BIND what > > interfaces/IP Addresses to bind to. > > Thanks, I am aware that Apache can be told to listen only to specific > addresses. Can BIND be told to listen on all ad

Re: [CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 19:26, Eric Viseur wrote: > Maybe a Round-Robin configuration ? > Thank you Eric, but I may have been unclear. There is only one physical server, but it answers to four IP addresses. -- Dotan Cohen http://gibberish.co.il http://what-is-what.com

Re: [CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

On 9/24/2010 12:21 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote: >> Have a read for the listen on directive for BIND which tells BIND what >> interfaces/IP Addresses to bind to. > > Thanks, I am aware that Apache can be told to listen only to specific > addresses. Can BIND be told to listen on all addresses? Your post >

Re: [CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 19:38, Les Mikesell wrote: > You are making it much more complicated than necessary. That is what I suspected! I know that when Linux gets difficult, it is because I'm doing it wrong! > I'd configure > apache to use named virtual hosts and listen on all addresses (but yo

Re: [CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

- Original Message - | > Have a read for the listen on directive for BIND which tells BIND | > what | > interfaces/IP Addresses to bind to. | | Thanks, I am aware that Apache can be told to listen only to specific | addresses. Can BIND be told to listen on all addresses? Your post | impl

[CentOS] grep contents of file on remote server

Hello, I am attempting to grep the contents of a key file I have SCP'd to a remote server. I am able to cat it: [code] [bluethu...@lbsd2:~]$:ssh r...@sum1 cat /root/id_rsa.pub r...@lcent01.summitnjhome.com's password: ssh-rsa B3NzaC1yc2EBIwAAAQEApnUSYyrM96qIBZKjwSNYycgeSv/FAKE-KEY-DATA-

Re: [CentOS] CentOS, Firefox, and Java Plugin

Les Mikesell wrote: > On 9/24/2010 11:28 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Apparently I don't have the java plugin browser installed. I've tried to install it using the rpm.bin file at , but it's erroring out: "

Re: [CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

On 9/24/2010 12:43 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote: > >> and bind to listen on all addresses and >> answer for all your domains. >> > > So, then, the association of a FQDN with any particular IP address is > only done in the domain name's control panel where the nameservers are > set? What's a control panel

Re: [CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 19:49, James A. Peltier wrote: > BIND has listen on directives as well, but if this is a single box > configuration > it's not necessarily required as it will listen on all interfaces. > Yes, I actually do want it to listen on all addresses (only one NIC), I don't know wh

Re: [CentOS] CentOS, Firefox, and Java Plugin

On 9/24/2010 12:55 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >>> Well, other than that openjdk has not supplied/supported the java >>> browser plugin since last year, and the "workaround" is to install > Sun's, er, >>> sorry, Oracle's java >> >> Has Oracle been any more sensible about building an RHEL-styl

Re: [CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 19:59, Les Mikesell wrote: > What's a control panel? It is the web-based interface for the domain name registrar, in which one configures the name servers for the domain name that he bought from them. >  Bind is going to want a zone file for each > domain where it is the

Re: [CentOS] grep contents of file on remote server

On 9/24/2010 12:50 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote: > Hello, > > I am attempting to grep the contents of a key file I have SCP'd to a > remote server. I am able to cat it: > > [code] > [bluethu...@lbsd2:~]$:ssh r...@sum1 grep `cat /root/id_rsa.pub` Put single quotes around the whole command you want to sen

Re: [CentOS] In the press, once again

On 24 September 2010 18:04, Brunner, Brian T. wrote: > No Windows functionalities are lost by installing Cygwin. > Cygwin has the SAME uninstall that Windows does: install CentOS. cwrsync comes with an uninstallable package and works OK, makes copying loads of files across Windows boxen bearable.

Re: [CentOS] CentOS, Firefox, and Java Plugin

Les Mikesell wrote: > On 9/24/2010 12:55 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Well, other than that openjdk has not supplied/supported the java browser plugin since last year, and the "workaround" is to install Sun's, er, sorry, Oracle's java >>> >>> Has Oracle been any more sensible a

Re: [CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

On 9/24/2010 1:07 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote: > >> But any >> instance of bind can be primary for any number of domains. The >> association with the IP address(es) that will receive the queries >> happens when you register the domain into the public dns system and you >> can register the same server(

Re: [CentOS] CentOS, Firefox, and Java Plugin

On 9/24/2010 1:15 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> That's interesting... Well, no, it's strange. Does openjdk still have >> the sun name in the right place? And I thought RH had made their >> version of eclipse work with gjc before deciding to put Sun java in >> their update stream and later goin

Re: [CentOS] performance and interrupts

Thanks for the reply. I am just playing around to understand this. On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 9:43 AM, JohnS wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 08:57 -0400, Mag Gam wrote: >> I am playing around with irqbalance to tune my 8 core system so I came >> across this page, >> http://kb.fusionio.com/KB/a65/

Re: [CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 20:18, Les Mikesell wrote: > Probably a waste of time.  If anyone cares, they'll track down the > domain and IP range ownership anyway (there are sites that do it > automatically).  So unless you've used company aliases in the domain > registration and gotten separate isp c

Re: [CentOS] CentOS, Firefox, and Java Plugin

On Fri, 24 Sep 2010, Mathieu Baudier wrote: To: CentOS mailing list From: Mathieu Baudier Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS, Firefox, and Java Plugin Apparently I don't have the java plugin browser installed.  I've tried to install it using the rpm.bin file at

Re: [CentOS] CentOS, Firefox, and Java Plugin

On Fri, 24 Sep 2010, Les Mikesell wrote: > To: centos@centos.org > From: Les Mikesell > Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS, Firefox, and Java Plugin > > On 9/24/2010 12:55 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Well, other than that openjdk has not supplied/supported the java browser plugin since la

[CentOS] mcelog

Ok, we've got a new machine that's throwing ECC errors. I've gotten new memory overnighted to me from the manufacturer, and replaced it, oops, not that end of the bank, as their support told me, this end of the bank, as the mobo manual I found online shows (Supermicro). Still throwing errors. Ok,

Re: [CentOS] CentOS, Firefox, and Java Plugin

On 9/24/2010 2:23 PM, Keith Roberts wrote: > > Well yes, it does work OK. The point being though it's an > old (stable) release of Eclipse, but nothing near the current > Eclipse 3.6.0 Helios release. > > I'm in the middle of moving now, but when the dust settles I > will put my 'Installing Eclipse

[CentOS] Question on installing .run file

I am trying to automate the install of the ati driver package. Basically all I do is hit return about 6 times and take all the defaults. I tried to do this in a file that I then made executable with 744: sh ati-driver-installer-10-8-x86.x86_64.run << EOF EOF but then it starts like it

Re: [CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

Thank you for all the help so far. To conclude: I have one physical server that answers to the following IP addresses: 1.1.1.1 1.1.1.2 1.1.1.3 1.1.1.4 I need 1.1.1.1 & 1.1.1.2 to be the name servers for exampleA.com, and 1.1.1.3 & 1.1.1.4 to be the nameservers for exampleB.com. I have these files:

Re: [CentOS] CentOS, Firefox, and Java Plugin

On Fri, 24 Sep 2010, Les Mikesell wrote: > To: centos@centos.org > From: Les Mikesell > Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS, Firefox, and Java Plugin > > On 9/24/2010 2:23 PM, Keith Roberts wrote: >> >> Well yes, it does work OK. The point being though it's an >> old (stable) release of Eclipse, but no

Re: [CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

- Original Message - | Thank you for all the help so far. To conclude: | I have one physical server that answers to the following IP addresses: | 1.1.1.1 | 1.1.1.2 | 1.1.1.3 | 1.1.1.4 | | I need 1.1.1.1 & 1.1.1.2 to be the name servers for exampleA.com, and | 1.1.1.3 & 1.1.1.4 to be the

Re: [CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

- Original Message - | - Original Message - | | Thank you for all the help so far. To conclude: | | I have one physical server that answers to the following IP | | addresses: | | 1.1.1.1 | | 1.1.1.2 | | 1.1.1.3 | | 1.1.1.4 | | | | I need 1.1.1.1 & 1.1.1.2 to be the name servers fo

Re: [CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 22:06, James A. Peltier wrote: > formatting for NS records is incorrect.  It should just read > >                   NS ns1.exampleA.com. >                   NS ns2.exampleA.com. > Thanks. (I added the periods) > where is your ns1.exampleA.com entry? > where is your ns2.ex

Re: [CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

Ah, some better examples here: http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/Deployment_Guide-en-US/s1-bind-zone.html How is this file: # cat /var/named/exampleA.com.hosts $ORIGIN exampleA.com. $TTL 1h exampleA.com. IN SOA ns1.exampleA.com. ns2.exampleA.com. ( 1; Serial - in

Re: [CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

Am 24.09.2010 22:12, schrieb Dotan Cohen: > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 22:06, James A. Peltier wrote: >> formatting for NS records is incorrect. It should just read >> >> NS ns1.exampleA.com. >> NS ns2.exampleA.com. >> > > Thanks. (I added the periods) > >> wher

Re: [CentOS] grep contents of file on remote server

At Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:50:11 -0400 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Hello, > > I am attempting to grep the contents of a key file I have SCP'd to a > remote server. I am able to cat it: > > [code] > [bluethu...@lbsd2:~]$:ssh r...@sum1 cat /root/id_rsa.pub > r...@lcent01.summitnjhome.com's pass

Re: [CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

At Fri, 24 Sep 2010 19:43:11 +0200 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 19:38, Les Mikesell wrote: > > You are making it much more complicated than necessary. > > That is what I suspected! I know that when Linux gets difficult, it is > because I'm doing it wrong! > > > > I

Re: [CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

At Fri, 24 Sep 2010 21:05:25 +0200 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 20:18, Les Mikesell wrote: > > Probably a waste of time.  If anyone cares, they'll track down the > > domain and IP range ownership anyway (there are sites that do it > > automatically).  So unless you'

Re: [CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 22:24, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/ > > That is a good source to read up about bind configuration. > > As a sidenote please be aware, that if someone directly queries your > ns1.exampleA.com for exampleB.com zone records he will get proper > an

Re: [CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 22:24, Robert Heller wrote: > Which is still meaningless.  Some name servers serve *hundreds* of web > sites, many competing with each other.  Often large hosting companies > will serve hundreds of web sites, all with the *same* IP address and > many in competion with each

Re: [CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 22:24, Robert Heller wrote: >> So, then, the association of a FQDN with any particular IP address is >> only done in the domain name's control panel where the nameservers are >> set? > > It is in bind's database (zone files).  In named.conf you associate > domains (all but

Re: [CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

At Fri, 24 Sep 2010 21:58:09 +0200 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Thank you for all the help so far. To conclude: > I have one physical server that answers to the following IP addresses: > 1.1.1.1 > 1.1.1.2 > 1.1.1.3 > 1.1.1.4 > > I need 1.1.1.1 & 1.1.1.2 to be the name servers for exampleA.co

Re: [CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

At Fri, 24 Sep 2010 22:12:44 +0200 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 22:06, James A. Peltier wrote: > > formatting for NS records is incorrect.  It should just read > > > >                   NS ns1.exampleA.com. > >                   NS ns2.exampleA.com.

Re: [CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

On 9/24/2010 3:39 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote: > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 22:24, Robert Heller wrote: >>> So, then, the association of a FQDN with any particular IP address is >>> only done in the domain name's control panel where the nameservers are >>> set? >> >> It is in bind's database (zone files).

Re: [CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 22:41, Robert Heller wrote: > You need: > > ns1.exampleA.com. IN      A       1.1.1.1 > ns2.exampleA.com. IN      A       1.1.1.2 > Here I have found conflicting information, it seems that some sources suggest this instead: ns1 IN A 1.1.1.1 ns2 I

Re: [CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 22:41, Robert Heller wrote: > With the rest of the IN A records for exampleA.com (and correspondingly > for exampleB.com).  You need *addresses* for your name servers as well > as for your web servers. I see. >  And you might also want to have www. > address records as w

Re: [CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 22:47, Les Mikesell wrote: > I think that's reasonable - but note that from the rest of the world's > perspective the ns1, ns2 IP's are going to come from the glue records > from the upstream DNS that would have been added when you registered the > servers as primary for th

Re: [CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

- Original Message - | On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 22:41, Robert Heller | wrote: | > You need: | > | > ns1.exampleA.com. IN A 1.1.1.1 | > ns2.exampleA.com. IN A 1.1.1.2 | > | | Here I have found conflicting information, it seems that some sources | suggest this instead: | ns1 IN A 1.1.1.1 |

Re: [CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

- Original Message - | - Original Message - | | On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 22:41, Robert Heller | | wrote: | | > You need: | | > | | > ns1.exampleA.com. IN A 1.1.1.1 | | > ns2.exampleA.com. IN A 1.1.1.2 | | > | | | | Here I have found conflicting information, it seems that some | |

Re: [CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 23:13, James A. Peltier wrote: > | > You need: > | > > | > ns1.exampleA.com. IN A 1.1.1.1 > | > ns2.exampleA.com. IN A 1.1.1.2 > | > > | > | Here I have found conflicting information, it seems that some sources > | suggest this instead: > | ns1 IN A 1.1.1.1 > | ns2 IN A 1.

Re: [CentOS] In the press, once again

On 9/24/2010 10:54 AM, Benjamin Franz wrote: > Until Cygwin's developers decide the join the rest of the window's > universe in having an *uninstaller* it will remain "not installed - > ever" on many people's systems, including mine. It is completely > unacceptable that it is happy to install, but

Re: [CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

On 9/24/2010 4:02 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote: > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 22:41, Robert Heller wrote: >> You need: >> >> ns1.exampleA.com. IN A 1.1.1.1 >> ns2.exampleA.com. IN A 1.1.1.2 >> > > Here I have found conflicting information, it seems that some sources > suggest this inste

Re: [CentOS] In the press, once again

On 24/9/10 2:16 PM, "Warren Young" wrote: > On 9/24/2010 10:54 AM, Benjamin Franz wrote: >> Until Cygwin's developers decide the join the rest of the window's >> universe in having an *uninstaller* it will remain "not installed - >> ever" on many people's systems, including mine. It is completely

Re: [CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

All right, I think this should do it: $ORIGIN exampleA.com. $TTL 86400 exampleA.com. IN SOA ns1.exampleA.com. ns2.exampleA.com. ( 2; Serial - increment me 10800 3600 604800

Re: [CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

- Original Message - | All right, I think this should do it: | | $ORIGIN exampleA.com. | $TTL 86400 | exampleA.com. IN SOA ns1.exampleA.com. ns2.exampleA.com. ( | 2; Serial - increment me | 10800 | 3600 | 604800 | 38400 ) | IN NS ns1.exampleA.com. | IN NS ns2.exampleA.com. | IN A 178.63.65

Re: [CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 23:29, James A. Peltier wrote: > Looks good.  you can change your 10800 3600 604800 and 38400 to hours, days > or weeks represented by 1h, 1d or 1w respectively  to make it easier than > calculating seconds. :) > Thank you! -- Dotan Cohen http://gibberish.co.il http:/

Re: [CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

At Fri, 24 Sep 2010 23:02:21 +0200 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 22:41, Robert Heller wrote: > > You need: > > > > ns1.exampleA.com. IN      A       1.1.1.1 > > ns2.exampleA.com. IN      A       1.1.1.2 > > > > Here I have found conflicting information, it

Re: [CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 00:06, Robert Heller wrote: > When you have an $ORIGIN statement, it defines a suffix to automatically > add to any name that does not end in a '.'.  You can do either, > depending on how gratiously verbose you want to be.  Of course, being > verbose sort of defeats the who

[CentOS] Raid 10 questions...2 drive

I have been reading lots of stuff but trying to find out if a raid10 2drive setup is any better/worse than a normal raid 1 setupI have to 1Tb drives for my data and a seperate system drive, I am only interested in doing raid on my data... So i setup my initial test like this mdadm -v --c

Re: [CentOS] Raid 10 questions...2 drive

On 10-09-24 10:27 PM, Tom Bishop wrote: > I have been reading lots of stuff but trying to find out if a raid10 > 2drive setup is any better/worse than a normal raid 1 setupI have to > 1Tb drives for my data and a seperate system drive, I am only interested > in doing raid on my data... > > >

Re: [CentOS] Raid 10 questions...2 drive

RAID10 requires at least 4 drives does it not? Since it's a strip set of mirrored disks, the smallest configuration I can see is 4 disks, 2 mirrored pairs stripped. On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Tom Bishop wrote: > I have been reading lots of stuff but trying to find out if a raid10 2drive >

Re: [CentOS] Raid 10 questions...2 drive

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Digimer wrote: > On 10-09-24 10:27 PM, Tom Bishop wrote: > > I have been reading lots of stuff but trying to find out if a raid10 > > 2drive setup is any better/worse than a normal raid 1 setupI have to > > 1Tb drives for my data and a seperate system drive, I

Re: [CentOS] Question on installing .run file

On 25/09/10 05:55, Jerry Geis wrote: > How might I automate such an install script. Might I suggest expect: http://oreilly.com/catalog/expect/chapter/ch03.html Cheers, ak. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listin

Re: [CentOS] necessary/unused rpm packages

On Fri, 24 Sep 2010, Alice Anderson wrote: Is there a way to identify if an rpm package is unused, or how much it is used?   look for rpmorphan package -- Jim Wildman, CISSP, RHCE j...@rossberry.com http://www.rossberry

Re: [CentOS] Configuring BIND to answer to two domain names (four IP addresses)

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:28:41PM +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote: > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 22:24, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > > http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/ > > > > That is a good source to read up about bind configuration. > > > > As a sidenote please be aware, that if someone directly queries your

Re: [CentOS] Raid 10 questions...2 drive

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Digimer wrote: > On 10-09-24 10:27 PM, Tom Bishop wrote: >> I have been reading lots of stuff but trying to find out if a raid10 >> 2drive setup is any better/worse than a normal raid 1 setupI have to >> 1Tb drives for my data and a seperate system drive, I am