Thanks. That third link especially helped.
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Tom H wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Matthew Topper wrote:
>> On Sat, 18 Sep 2010 17:42:59 +0200 Timo Schoeler
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 09/18/2010 05:13 PM, Matthew Topper wrote:
>>> > I'm playing with software
On 17/09/2010 22:52, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
>> Marcelo M. Garcia wrote:
>>
I was thinking of copying the old root partition with
sudo cp -a -P /* /mnt/hd
>>> I think the command rsync is a better approach for this task. It has
>>> much more features, for example
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
a german IT news site [0] today posted that Amazon Linux AMI is based on
CentOS 5.5 -- is that true?
Maybe this would be stuff for the next newsletter... ;)
Cheers,
Timo
http://www.golem.de/1009/78088.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version
If i will use nat on a xen vm what should i set in the config file?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> If i will use nat on a xen vm what should i set in the config file?
http://wiki.kartbuilding.net/index.php/Xen_Networking#Routed_Networking_with_NAT_2
HTH,
Timo
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
´>> If i will use nat on a xen vm what should i set in the config file?
>
> http://wiki.kartbuilding.net/index.php/Xen_Networking#Routed_Networking_with_NAT_2
>
> HTH,
>
> Timo
Sorry, I sent the Debian-side of life off my wiki.
There's CentOS-style stuff e.g. here:
http://www.nikhef.nl/pub/proje
On my Centos-5.5 (x64) based desktop the optical mouse I originally
configured during the system install has died. In
/etc/sysconfig/hwconf this is configured as:
class: MOUSE
bus: USB
detached: 0
device: input/mice
driver: genericwheelusb
desc: "Microsoft Microsoft 3-Button Mouse with IntelliEye
.223 has port 80 open and it accepts connection
when i'm connecting to .221 and that suppose to foward it to .223 then
it doesn't work
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Robert Spangler
wrote:
> On Thursday 16 September 2010 16:03, alexus wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to do some simple tcp port forwardi
When I was first learning iptables, I found "Rusty's Remarkably
Unreliable Guides" to be an excellent resource on how iptables works.
He covers each part of iptables and does it in a clear and easy to
understand manner. If I remember correctly, the guides are also
entertaining.
http://people.netf
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, Ausmus, Matt wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: "Ausmus, Matt"
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] iptables
>
> When I was first learning iptables, I found "Rusty's Remarkably
> Unreliable Guides" to be an excellent resource on how iptables works.
> He covers each part of iptable
It appears to be, based on the testing AMI I've deployed.
Eric Feldhusen
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Timo Schoeler
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a german IT news site [0] today posted that Amazon Linux AMI is based on
> CentOS 5.5 -- is that true?
>
> Maybe this would be stuff for the next newsletter...
http://blogs.computerworld.com/16997/oracle_rips_red_hat_and_sort_of_launches_a_new_linux
oracle: just another centos wanna-be?
rday
--
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
T
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Eric Feldhusen
wrote:
> It appears to be, based on the testing AMI I've deployed.
What AMI id is this, please?
Thanks,
-- Chad
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 09/20/10 10:24 AM, alexus wrote:
> .223 has port 80 open and it accepts connection
> when i'm connecting to .221 and that suppose to foward it to .223 then
> it doesn't work
wait, those are both on the same network segment.
normally, port forwarding is used in conjunction with NAT, where the
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> http://blogs.computerworld.com/16997/oracle_rips_red_hat_and_sort_of_launches_a_new_linux
>
> oracle: just another centos wanna-be?
>
Um, this is news? I thought Oracle pushed "Unbreakable Linux" out the door
at *least* last year.
mark
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > http://blogs.computerworld.com/16997/oracle_rips_red_hat_and_sort_of_launches_a_new_linux
> >
> > oracle: just another centos wanna-be?
> >
> Um, this is news? I thought Oracle pushed "Unbreakable Linux" out
> the door
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>> >
>> > http://blogs.computerworld.com/16997/oracle_rips_red_hat_and_sort_of_launches_a_new_linux
>> >
>> > oracle: just another centos wanna-be?
>> >
>> Um, this is news? I thought Oracle pushed
On 09/20/2010 07:42 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> http://blogs.computerworld.com/16997/oracle_rips_red_hat_and_sort_of_launches_a_new_linux
>
> oracle: just another centos wanna-be?
>
> rday
>
take social and random discussions like this elsewhere, the CentOS users
list is not the place for it
And you are a moderator?
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Karanbir Singh
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 9:22 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Oracle's Unbreakable Enterprise Kernel for
OracleLinux!!!
On 0
On 09/20/2010 08:24 PM, mattias wrote:
> And you are a moderator?
I am yes. Your point being ?
- KB
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 09/20/2010 08:24 PM, mattias wrote:
> > And you are a moderator?
>
> I am yes. Your point being ?
karanbir's right, my post wasn't related to centos so it wasn't
appropriate here.
rday
--
===
Ehm sorry
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Robert P. J. Day
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 9:32 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Oracle's Unbreakable Enterprise Kernel for
OracleLinux!!!
On Mon, 20 Sep 20
Top posting, I'll apologize also.
Hey, I appreciate the moderation - I've mentioned before, the general
Redhat list, we've gotten spams, and it takes days or weeks before the
alleged moderator gets around to answering a number of us and does
something.
mark
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Robe
>From fedora list:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 4:13 AM, Zbigniew Fiedorowicz
wrote:
> Further story:
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/09/15/linux_kernel_regression_bug/
>
> This is a very serious problem which puts multiuser 64-bit Linux systems
> absolutely at the mercy of their least responsible
On 09/20/2010 09:20 PM, Dave wrote:
>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/09/15/linux_kernel_regression_bug/
>
> Any equivalent for centos yet?
>
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4518
We are tracking the issue here.
- KB
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Ron Blizzard wrote:
>> A few weeks ago I asked about firewalls and family filters. Lanny
>> Marcus, I believe, suggested OpenDNS. Just wanted to thank him (and
>> everyone here) for their suggestions.
>
> Ron
Hi,
I have a small question with sendmail and tls verification.
The tls verify fails on our internal/external sendmail servers.
For example:
STARTTLS=server, relay=mx1.imt-systems.com [89.146.219.60],
version=TLSv1/SSLv3, verify=FAIL, cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA, bits=256/256
STARTTLS=server, r
Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 09/20/2010 09:20 PM, Dave wrote:
>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/09/15/linux_kernel_regression_bug/
>> Any equivalent for centos yet?
>>
>
> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4518
>
> We are tracking the issue here.
>
Oh cool, two other schools recently had a d
On 09/21/2010 12:32 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
> Will there be a special case for this particular issue like an early
> release of a Centos fixed kernel instead of waiting for the powers that
> be at Redhat?
There is a kernel in the c5-testing repo ( details in the issue report )
that Tru put to
Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 09/21/2010 12:32 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
>> Will there be a special case for this particular issue like an early
>> release of a Centos fixed kernel instead of waiting for the powers that
>> be at Redhat?
>
> There is a kernel in the c5-testing repo ( details in the
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Chad Woolley wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Eric Feldhusen
> wrote:
>> It appears to be, based on the testing AMI I've deployed.
>
> What AMI id is this, please?
I'm curious, because the in the EC2 AWS console AMI browser, the only
his for "Amazon Im
e.g. what packages are in them, as well as other groups or
group-related options which may exist...
Thanks,
-- Chad
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 07:42:41PM -0700, Chad Woolley wrote:
> e.g. what packages are in them, as well as other groups or
> group-related options which may exist...
"man yum"; look for grouplist and groupinfo. grouplist
will give you a list of known groups and groupinfo will
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Chad Woolley wrote:
> e.g. what packages are in them, as well as other groups or
> group-related options which may exist...
yum groupinfo Base
man yum
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/m
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Matthew Topper wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Tom H wrote:
>>>
>>> I need to find some good reference on GRUB, which seems difficult
>>> because most things I can find are about GRUB2, and CentOS has 0.97
>>
>> The commands installed grub into the mbr o
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 7:52 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 07:42:41PM -0700, Chad Woolley wrote:
>> e.g. what packages are in them, as well as other groups or
>> group-related options which may exist...
>
> "man yum"; look for grouplist and groupinfo. grouplist
>
36 matches
Mail list logo
