On 07/09/2010 17:47, Steve Huff wrote:
> On Sep 7, 2010, at 11:28 AM, Gabriel Tabares wrote:
>
>> tomcat-6.0.26-1.13
>> adm-app-conf-18-2010.09.01
>> jdk-1.6.0_20-2.0
>> ant-1.8.1-1
>
> there's your problem. in the specfile, these dependencies should be
> specified as:
>
> Requires: tomcat>= 6.
Hello all,
Got myself the Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic control book
http://lartc.org/howto/
All the commands in the guide do not survive reboots.
Could someone point me in the right direction, where I can find
CentOS/Redhat specific documentation on the whole
/etc/sysconfig/network* setup?
On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 11:26 +0200, Coert Waagmeester wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Got myself the Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic control book
> http://lartc.org/howto/
>
> All the commands in the guide do not survive reboots.
>
> Could someone point me in the right direction, where I can find
> Cen
Todd Denniston wrote:
> is there an available package for CentOS5 which provides the metafont
> command, or a replacement? What is the name and which repo? please.
The command is mpost not metapost.
I have /usr/bin/mpost in the tetex-3.0-33.8.el5_5.5 package
under Centos-5.5
--
Timothy Murphy
Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Todd Denniston wrote:
>
>> is there an available package for CentOS5 which provides the metafont
>> command, or a replacement? What is the name and which repo? please.
>
> The command is mpost not metapost.
> I have /usr/bin/mpost in the tetex-3.0-33.8.el5_5.5 package
> unde
Every few days I see in the logwatch on my Centos-5.5 web-server
what seems like a rather feeble break-in attempt.
Eg today I see
---
403 Forbidden
/phpMyAdmin/scripts/setup.php: 2 Time(s)
/phpmyadmin/scripts/setup.php: 2 Time(s)
404 Not Found
/P
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 01:33:18PM +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Every few days I see in the logwatch on my Centos-5.5 web-server
> what seems like a rather feeble break-in attempt.
That is what it is, and since it's so feeble, it's barely helpful to know
about it.
> In fact, I'm not clear how o
>
> Every few days I see in the logwatch on my Centos-5.5 web-server what
seems
> like a rather feeble break-in attempt.
> Eg today I see
> ---
> 403 Forbidden
>/phpMyAdmin/scripts/setup.php: 2 Time(s)
>/phpmyadmin/scripts/setup.php: 2 Time(s)
> 404
On 09/05/2010 11:01 PM, Chuck wrote:
> I've been trying for 2 weeks to download the dvd iso torrent... Shows a
> ton of seeders, few leechers, but very poor performance.. (I'm correctly
> setup for torrents and get fast downloads normally) Only like 4%
> downloaded and crawling. I've tried the trac
Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Every few days I see in the logwatch on my Centos-5.5 web-server
> what seems like a rather feeble break-in attempt.
> Eg today I see
> ---
> 403 Forbidden
>/phpMyAdmin/scripts/setup.php: 2 Time(s)
>/phpmyadmin/scripts/setup.php: 2
Good morning all, I ran an 'yum update' and have been receiving the
following errors:
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Determining fastest mirrors
Could not retrieve mirrorlist
http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=5&arch=x86_64&repo=addons error was
[Errno 4] IOError:
Could not retrieve mirrorlist
I don't quite understand why all this fuss about some DVD ISOs...
At least the Portuguese mirrors work very nicely...
Here's an example:
ftp://ftp.di.uminho.pt/pub/centos/5.5/
Regards
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/
From: Timothy Murphy
> Every few days I see in the logwatch on my Centos-5.5 web-server
> what seems like a rather feeble break-in attempt.
> Eg today I see
I get proxy scans and phpmyadmin (and others) vulnerabilities scans everyday...
They just get 404s in return...
You can check the IPs in
Giles Coochey wrote:
> The likelihood is that someone ran a vulnerability scanner against all
> your available services, logwatch found evidence of that vulnerability
> scan, and you should check whether any other vulnerabilities were scanned
> for and perhaps found...
>
> To do that you should m
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Every few days I see in the logwatch on my Centos-5.5 web-server
>> what seems like a rather feeble break-in attempt.
>> In fact, I'm not clear how one should deal with logwatch entries
>> in general.
>> Is there any document giving advice on this?
>
> We run fail2ban.
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 02:47:46PM +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Thanks, I'll try that.
> I had heard of fail2ban , but was slightly put off by the strange name;
> what exactly is the name meant to convey?
"to" as in the sense of "moving to", or "converting to". Failures (login
failures normally,
Timothy Murphy wrote:
> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>>> Every few days I see in the logwatch on my Centos-5.5 web-server
>>> what seems like a rather feeble break-in attempt.
>
>>> In fact, I'm not clear how one should deal with logwatch entries
>>> in general.
>>> Is there any document giving advice
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote, On 09/08/2010 07:05 AM:
> Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> Todd Denniston wrote:
>>
>>> is there an available package for CentOS5 which provides the metafont
>>> command, or a replacement? What is the name and which repo? please.
>> The command is mpost not metapost.
>> I have /
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 11:26:21AM +0200, Coert Waagmeester wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Got myself the Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic control book
> http://lartc.org/howto/
>
> All the commands in the guide do not survive reboots.
>
> Could someone point me in the right direction, where I can find
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>Giles Coochey wrote:
>
>> The likelihood is that someone ran a vulnerability scanner against all
>> your available services, logwatch found evidence of that vulnerability
>> scan, and you should check whether any other vulnerabilities were scanned
>> for
On 9/8/2010 9:52 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 02:47:46PM +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> Thanks, I'll try that.
>> I had heard of fail2ban , but was slightly put off by the strange name;
>> what exactly is the name meant to convey?
> "to" as in the sense of "moving to", or
Hi All;
I have a GPL question - sorry if it's way off topic.
We're pushing on a system that collects a variety of data points and pulls
them into a single report. One of the modules we use is a 3rd party tool that
generates an html report which equates to one of the pages on the report
that's
On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 15:15 -0600, Kevin Kempter wrote:
>
> In this scenario is the code that generates all the other
> modules/pages of the
> report subject to the GPL as well?
When in doubt, talk to a lawyer.
Having said that:
It's my understanding that when you use GPL software only within
On 9/8/2010 4:15 PM, Kevin Kempter wrote:
> Hi All;
>
> I have a GPL question - sorry if it's way off topic.
>
>
> We're pushing on a system that collects a variety of data points and pulls
> them into a single report. One of the modules we use is a 3rd party tool that
> generates an html report wh
2010/9/8 casey roberts :
> Good morning all, I ran an 'yum update' and have been receiving the
> following errors:
>
> Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
> Determining fastest mirrors
> Could not retrieve mirrorlist
> http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=5&arch=x86_64&repo=addons error was
> [Errno 4]
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Bill Campbell
> Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 12:17 PM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Interpreting logwatch
> While fail2ban and swatch are good tools, apache mod
/usr/share/doc/initscripts-8.45.30/sysconfig.txt covers the syntax of
sysconfig files.
also browsing through /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup* scripts will
give some good info (eg ifup-routes).
Dominik Zyla wrote:
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 11:26:21AM +0200, Coert Waagmeester wrote:
Hell
On 08/09/10 19:26, Coert Waagmeester wrote:
> Could someone point me in the right direction, where I can find
> CentOS/Redhat specific documentation on the whole
> /etc/sysconfig/network* setup?
Might want to have a look at
/usr/share/doc/initscripts-8.45.30/sysconfig.txt
Kal
John Doe wrote:
>> Every few days I see in the logwatch on my Centos-5.5 web-server
>> what seems like a rather feeble break-in attempt.
> Maybe just make sure your set apache ServerSignature to Off...
Thanks for the suggestion.
I looked at my /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf
and I saw that ServerSi
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Bill Campbell wrote:
> I think it's a mistake to discount any attacks involving php as
> the vast majority of the systems I have had to clean up after
> cracks have been compromised through php vulnerabilities, usually
> in conjunction with weak user level password
30 matches
Mail list logo
