On Tue, 31 Aug 2010, kalinix wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: kalinix
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.5,
> not booting latest kernel but older one instead
>
> On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 07:23 +0100, Keith Roberts wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 30 Aug 2010, fred smith wrote:
>>
>>> To: centos@cento
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010, Keith Roberts wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Aug 2010, fred smith wrote:
>
>> To: centos@centos.org
>> From: fred smith
>> Subject: [CentOS] Centos 5.5, not booting latest kernel but older one instead
snip
>> # grub.conf generated by anaconda
>> #
>> # Note that you do not have to rer
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:20:46 -0500
Monty Shinn wrote:
> That being said, do you all have any information about how long it takes
> for their training platform to catch up to their release? Which is to
> say, if RHES 6 is released on day 1, at what point will they start
> training on RHES6?
B
Hi everybody.
I have an HP StorageWorks array connected to one of my servers,
connected via an LSI controller (lspci reports: SCSI storage controller:
LSI Logic / Symbios Logic SAS1068E PCI-Express Fusion-MPT SAS (rev 08))
on an HP DL385 running CentOS 5.5 x86_64.
I have set up multipath and
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote on 31.08.2010 11:43:50:
> Gabriel Tabares
> Gesendet von: centos-boun...@centos.org
>
> 31.08.2010 11:44
>
> Bitte antworten an
> CentOS mailing list
>
> An
>
> CentOS mailing list
>
> Kopie
>
> Thema
>
> [CentOS] Automatically detecting LUNs without a re
> Hi everybody.
>
> I have an HP StorageWorks array connected to one of my servers,
> connected via an LSI controller (lspci reports: SCSI storage controller:
> LSI Logic / Symbios Logic SAS1068E PCI-Express Fusion-MPT SAS (rev 08))
> on an HP DL385 running CentOS 5.5 x86_64.
>
> I have set up mu
Hi,
I have to install a production server with postgresql.. with few hundreds of
MB (2-300)
would u advice me to partitioning the disk ?
The server will be under vmware environment with SAN as storage.
--
--
Lewis
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.
On 31/08/2010 11:07, Andreas Reschke wrote:
>
> centos-boun...@centos.org wrote on 31.08.2010 11:43:50:
>
> > Gabriel Tabares
> > Gesendet von: centos-boun...@centos.org
> >
> > 31.08.2010 11:44
> >
> > Bitte antworten an
> > CentOS mailing list
> >
> > An
> >
> > CentOS mailing list
> >
> > K
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:35 PM, admin lewis wrote:
> Hi,
> I have to install a production server with postgresql.. with few hundreds
> of MB (2-300)
> would u advice me to partitioning the disk ?
> The server will be under vmware environment with SAN as storage.
>
>
> --
> --
> Lewis
>
> __
> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:20:46 -0500
> Monty Shinn wrote:
>
>> That being said, do you all have any information about how long it takes
>> for their training platform to catch up to their release? Which is to
>> say, if RHES 6 is released on day 1, at what point will they start
>> training on RHE
At Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:56:19 -0400 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> my church just got some ibm x335's donated. Cent 5 is only relaly
> dvd's. I do have a windows server using IIS for internal stuff. How
> would i setup a local repo for the dvd so i can point the net install
> iso to the
At Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:24:19 -0400 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 08:41:31PM -0500, Larry Vaden wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 8:18 PM, fred smith
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Below is some info that shows the problem. Can anyone here provide
> > > helpful suggestions on
I have a large (1.5TB) partition with millions of files on it. e2fsck has
been running nearly 12 hours and is still on "Checking directory structure".
Any tips for speeding this along?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/ma
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 08:14:23AM -0500, Sean Carolan wrote:
> I have a large (1.5TB) partition with millions of files on it. e2fsck has
> been running nearly 12 hours and is still on "Checking directory structure".
> Any tips for speeding this along?
Yes -- use ext4. Otherwise, it's inevitable
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 02:08:44PM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
> The error was from my programs not anything core to centos.
run ulimit -n $value befor start your programs.
--
Dominik Zyla
pgp4i9CgnCPi1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing
Yep, same answer here, I had RHEL4.8 on a 2.6 TB MSA, and you just leave it
going over the weekend.
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 08:14:23AM -0500, Sean Carolan wrote:
> > I have a large (1.5TB) partition with millions of files on it. e2fsck
>
On Aug 26, 2010, at 12:00 PM, centos-requ...@centos.org wrote:
>> ?Is there someplace can I find *detailed* release notes on the differences
>> between -164 and -194 kernels to help in looking for the problem, pinning it
>> down, and submitting a patch (and/or building my own kernel), or should
On Aug 31, 2010, at 9:36 AM, Glenn Eychaner wrote:
> On Aug 26, 2010, at 12:00 PM, centos-requ...@centos.org wrote:
>
>>> ?Is there someplace can I find *detailed* release notes on the differences
>>> between -164 and -194 kernels to help in looking for the problem, pinning
>>> it down, and sub
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:46:26PM -0500, Robert wrote:
>
>
> On 08/30/2010 09:24 PM, fred smith informed us:
>
> another curious thing I just noticed is this: the list of kernels
> available
> > at boot time (in the actual grub menu shown at boot) IS NOT THE SAME LIST
> > THAT APPEARS IN GRUB.
On Aug 31, 2010, at 9:14 AM, Sean Carolan wrote:
> I have a large (1.5TB) partition with millions of files on it. e2fsck has
> been running nearly 12 hours and is still on "Checking directory structure".
> Any tips for speeding this along?
Disable fsck for that file system then google for on
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 09:13:07PM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 08/30/2010 07:24 PM, fred smith wrote:
> > Aug 30 22:09:08 fcshome kernel: md: created md1
> ...
> > Aug 30 22:09:08 fcshome kernel: md: kicking non-fresh sda2 from array!
> ...
> > Aug 30 22:09:08 fcshome kernel: md: created md0
> Yep, same answer here, I had RHEL4.8 on a 2.6 TB MSA, and you just leave it
> going over the weekend.
I kind of figured as much; we're letting ours run during the week so
that hopefully the partition will be ready for weekend backup jobs.
Thanks for the feedback.
___
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Brent L. Bates wrote:
> Use the XFS file system and never have to worry about fsck again. You'll
> have a fast, more reliable, and more robust file system with over a decade and
> exabytes of use under its belt that you will never have to wait for fsck
> again
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 09:40 -0400, Glenn Eychaner wrote:
>
> * Mon Dec 21 2009 Jarod Wilson [2.6.18-183.el5]
> [...]
> < - [sound] alsa hda driver update for rhel5.5 (Jaroslav Kysela) [525390]
>
> How do I go about backing out this change (reverting the alsa hda drivers in
> the -194 kernel t
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 08:18:26AM -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
> At Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:24:19 -0400 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 08:41:31PM -0500, Larry Vaden wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 8:18 PM, fred smith
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Below is some i
On Aug 31, 2010, at 9:40 AM, Glenn Eychaner wrote:
> On Aug 31, 2010, at 9:36 AM, Glenn Eychaner wrote:
>
>> On Aug 26, 2010, at 12:00 PM, centos-requ...@centos.org wrote:
>>
?Is there someplace can I find *detailed* release notes on the
differences between -164 and -194 kernels to
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 08:50:34AM -0500, Sean Carolan wrote:
> > Use the XFS file system and never have to worry about fsck again.
> > You'll
> > have a fast, more reliable, and more robust file system with over a decade
> > and
> > exabytes of use under its belt that you will never have to
Sean Carolan wrote:
> I have a large (1.5TB) partition with millions of files on it. e2fsck has
> been running nearly 12 hours and is still on "Checking directory
> structure".
> Any tips for speeding this along?
Kill it. And make sure it doesn't try to do it. There's a known bug with
fsck (at l
fred smith wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 08:18:26AM -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
>> At Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:24:19 -0400 CentOS mailing list
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 08:41:31PM -0500, Larry Vaden wrote:
>> > > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 8:18 PM, fred smith
>> > > wrote:
> drive when t
At Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:44:53 -0400 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 09:13:07PM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > On 08/30/2010 07:24 PM, fred smith wrote:
> > > Aug 30 22:09:08 fcshome kernel: md: created md1
> > ...
> > > Aug 30 22:09:08 fcshome kernel: md: kicking non-fre
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010, fred smith wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: fred smith
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.5,
> not booting latest kernel but older one instead
>
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 08:18:26AM -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
>> At Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:24:19 -0400 CentOS mailing l
On 08/31/2010 06:19 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 08:14:23AM -0500, Sean Carolan wrote:
>
>> I have a large (1.5TB) partition with millions of files on it. e2fsck has
>> been running nearly 12 hours and is still on "Checking directory structure".
>> Any tips for speedin
Stack size was only a problem for the 32 bit OS and not 64 bit. If one
is dealing with a terabyte or more of data, I don't see them using a 32 bit
OS. I really don't see any really good reasons for using anything but 64 bit
any more, if the hardware supports it.
--
Brent L. Bates (UNIX
Brent L. Bates wrote:
> Stack size was only a problem for the 32 bit OS and not 64 bit. If
> one is dealing with a terabyte or more of data, I don't see them using a 32
> bit OS. I really don't see any really good reasons for using anything
but 64
> bit any more, if the hardware supports it.
On 31/08/2010 11:20, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>>Hi everybody.
>>
>> I have an HP StorageWorks array connected to one of my servers,
>> connected via an LSI controller (lspci reports: SCSI storage controller:
>> LSI Logic / Symbios Logic SAS1068E PCI-Express Fusion-MPT SAS (rev 08))
>> on an HP
On 08/31/2010 06:44 AM, fred smith wrote:
>
> there are only two drives in this mirrored array, sda and sdb. if I need
> to re-add them both (which, if I understand mdadm correctly, is what your
> suggestion above would do) how does it know which one is the correct one
> to re-sync the array with?
> Stack size was only a problem for the 32 bit OS and not 64 bit. If one
> is dealing with a terabyte or more of data, I don't see them using a 32 bit
> OS.
Huh;
/dev/mapper/Raid5-Media
3.3T 3.1T 216G 94% /Media
% uname -sr
Linux 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5PAE
> I really d
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 08:55:47AM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 08/31/2010 06:44 AM, fred smith wrote:
> >
> > there are only two drives in this mirrored array, sda and sdb. if I need
> > to re-add them both (which, if I understand mdadm correctly, is what your
> > suggestion above would do) h
> To extend his comment: There is a bug in e2fsck for filesystems with
> many hardlinks. It could take *weeks* or longer, if it finishes at all,
> to run on a large filesystem with lots of hardlinks.
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov/msg02180.html
Awesome.
On 8/31/2010 11:24 AM, fred smith wrote:
>
>> Most importantly, the "mdmonitor" service should have emailed the root
>> user to notify you that your arrays are broken. You should find out why
>> you aren't getting that email.
>
> actually, root got it, but I'm rather lax about checking root's emai
On 8/31/2010 11:04 AM, Stephen Harris wrote:
>> Stack size was only a problem for the 32 bit OS and not 64 bit. If one
>> is dealing with a terabyte or more of data, I don't see them using a 32 bit
>> OS.
>
> Huh;
>
> /dev/mapper/Raid5-Media
>3.3T 3.1T 216G 94% /Me
On Aug 31, 2010, at 7:27 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Sean Carolan wrote:
>> I have a large (1.5TB) partition with millions of files on it. e2fsck has
>> been running nearly 12 hours and is still on "Checking directory
>> structure".
>> Any tips for speeding this along?
>
> Kill it. And make su
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:37:45AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 8/31/2010 11:24 AM, fred smith wrote:
> >
> >> Most importantly, the "mdmonitor" service should have emailed the root
> >> user to notify you that your arrays are broken. You should find out why
> >> you aren't getting that email.
According to the release notes this bug has been fixed in version 1.40:
http://e2fsprogs.sourceforge.net/e2fsprogs-release.html#1.40
E2fsprogs 1.40 (June 29, 2007)
There was a floating point precision error which could cause e2fsck to
loop forever on really big filesystems with a large inode count
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:40:55 -0500
Sean Carolan wrote:
> According to the release notes this bug has been fixed in version 1.40:
>
> http://e2fsprogs.sourceforge.net/e2fsprogs-release.html#1.40
> E2fsprogs 1.40 (June 29, 2007)
> There was a floating point precision error which could cause e2fsck
> According to the release notes this bug has been fixed in version 1.40:
>
> http://e2fsprogs.sourceforge.net/e2fsprogs-release.html#1.40
> E2fsprogs 1.40 (June 29, 2007)
> There was a floating point precision error which could cause e2fsck to
> loop forever on really big filesystems with a large
Hi, guys
The keypad, i.e. the arrow keys, page up, page down, home, end and so on, does
not work, which is very annoying. My system is CentOS 5.5. Is there any one who
can help?
Thank you very much!
regards,
fanping
_
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:48:17AM -0400, Boris Epstein wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> If you have had experience hosting GFS/GFS2 on CentOS machines could
>> you share you general impression on it? Was it realiable? Fast? Any
>> issues or concern
Korganizer has been working fine for years for me. But just recently
it's started missing alarms... I mean I set an alarm for an event but
the window for it is never popped.
I googled around and found that other were having this problem back in
2007 and 2005, but there's no mention of it in recen
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 05:12:24PM -0400, Boris Epstein wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:48:17AM -0400, Boris Epstein wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> If you have had experience hosting GFS/GFS2 on CentOS machines could
> >> you share you
>
>
> Nope, Red Hat backports the necessary bits from the newer kernels into
> their 2.6.18 "stable" release, so you should be all set.
>
> Ray
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
This is int
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010, Tru Huynh wrote:
> CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0659 Moderate
>
> Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0659.html
Hi Tru,
Thank you so much for doing these updates, I really appreciate them! How
is Karanbir doing? I hope he gets back in t
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 05:36:42PM -0400, Boris Epstein wrote:
> >
> >
> > Nope, Red Hat backports the necessary bits from the newer kernels into
> > their 2.6.18 "stable" release, so you should be all set.
> >
> > Ray
> > ___
> > CentOS mailing list
> >
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 09:13:07PM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 08/30/2010 07:24 PM, fred smith wrote:
> > Aug 30 22:09:08 fcshome kernel: md: created md1
> ...
> > Aug 30 22:09:08 fcshome kernel: md: kicking non-fresh sda2 from array!
> ...
> > Aug 30 22:09:08 fcshome kernel: md: created md0
Hi,
I am having problem in configuring iptables for PostgreSQL server. I
added following rule to iptables to allow connections to default
PostgreSQL port (5432):
{{{
sudo /sbin/iptables -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp
-p tcp -s 10.0.0.0/24 --dport 5432 -j ACCEPT
}}}
After this
There was a rule above this 5432 blocking connections. Somehow I
missed it and noticed it only after posting this message. Fixed and
it's working now.
--
Thanks,
CS
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Carlos S wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am having problem in configuring iptables for PostgreSQL server. I
>
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 04:48:01PM +0100, Gabriel Tabares wrote:
> From there, I went to
> http://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/html/Online_Storage_Reconfiguration_Guide/rescan-scsi-bus.html
>
> Where it says :
>
> "In order for |rescan-scsi-bus.sh| to work properly, |LUN0|
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 8/31/2010 11:04 AM, Stephen Harris wrote:
>
>>> Stack size was only a problem for the 32 bit OS and not 64 bit. If
>>> one
>>> is dealing with a terabyte or more of data, I don't see them using a 32 bit
>>> OS.
>>>
>> Huh;
>>
>> /dev/mapper/Raid5-Media
>>
58 matches
Mail list logo
