On 08/27/2010 09:08 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
> However, you could possibly lock down PHP further to reduce the
> possibility of such apps working by using the disabled_function
> setting to disable the riskier functions which allow
> shell/command/file operations. Of course depending on how ag
On 27/08/2010 15:48, Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
> On Friday 27 August 2010, Kevin Thorpe wrote:
>>On 27/08/2010 15:19, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> I'm trying to nuke a Dell Optiplex GX620. I've got a perfectly good dban
>>> 1.0.4 that I've used a bunch of times... but on this machine, it says
>>
Greetings Folks,
I am after any recommendations or experiences using Label printers to print
barcodes with CentOS, we currently using Star TSP700's but they're not clear
enough for the scanners we have. There seems to be plenty of choice but not
much Linux support going on, 'Never had anyone as
On 28 August 2010 12:52, Colin Coles wrote:
> I am after any recommendations or experiences using Label printers to print
> barcodes with CentOS, we currently using Star TSP700's but they're not clear
> enough for the scanners we have. There seems to be plenty of choice but not
> much Linux suppo
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 12:08:49PM +0800, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
> On 8/24/10, Keith Roberts wrote:
> > So bolting down PHP really tight should address these hacks?
>
> As others have mentioned, this is trying to take advantage of a poorly
> written PHP script that doesn't sanitize/check the i
2010/8/28 Hakan Koseoglu
> Zebra printers work for us but we generate ZPL output ourselves and a
> raw queue is good enough for our purposes. I have to say the CUPS in
> CentOS5/Upstream is not very good at printing to Zebra printers using
> ZPL. More upto date CUPS does a better job, I had more
> > > I've tried that too and it was a good suggestion
> > > as su now crashes only if you enter a wrong password.
> > > I've also tried to rebuild rpmforge srpm with no luck.
> > > Could you really make this thing work? I mean did it
> > > actually block anything after a series of failed logins?
>
Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
> On 28 August 2010 12:52, Colin Coles wrote:
>
>> I am after any recommendations or experiences using Label printers to print
>> barcodes with CentOS, we currently using Star TSP700's but they're not clear
>> enough for the scanners we have. There seems to be plenty of c
cornel panceac wrote:
>
>
> 2010/8/28 Hakan Koseoglu mailto:ha...@koseoglu.org>>
>
> Zebra printers work for us but we generate ZPL output ourselves and a
> raw queue is good enough for our purposes. I have to say the CUPS in
> CentOS5/Upstream is not very good at printing to Zebra prin
2010/8/28 Chris Geldenhuis
> >
>
> Read the printer's manual and work out the character strings required to
> genarate the label size, coding etc that you require and then code a
> program or script to produce that. I do not have the manual with me at
> present so cannot be more specific.
>
> Chr
Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
> On 8/24/10, Keith Roberts wrote:
>> So bolting down PHP really tight should address these hacks?
>
> As others have mentioned, this is trying to take advantage of a poorly
> written PHP script that doesn't sanitize/check the input before using.
> However, you could pos
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Ron Blizzard wrote:
> I've got kids who are growing older and I want to build a Linux box to
> filter Internet access. I've got six computers on the Internet, plus
> the laptops -- most run Windows. I'm not sure if it's called a
Ron: We have IPCop running on an In
Hi everyone,
I am answering this here as I found a workaround.
I could not solve the solution when using the Juniper as the DNS server,
so I reverted to using bind and that fixed the issue.
Thanks for the help, everybody.
Regards,
Gabriel
> I've just joine the list as I am having an issue
On 25/08/2010 17:44, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On 8/23/2010 10:08 AM, Gabriel Tabares wrote:
>>
>> Some servers do, some don't.
> Have you tried google's DNS servers 8.8.8.8 IP and one more IP I can't
> recollect exactly
On 25/08/2010 14:39, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Gabriel Tabares wrote:
>> On 23/08/2010 21:25, Keith Roberts wrote:
>>> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Gabriel Tabares wrote:
From: Gabriel Tabares
On 23/08/2010 13:28, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> Both files are the default ones from CentOS:
On 27/08/2010 19:11, Ski Dawg wrote:
Stefano Sasso wrote:
> 2010/8/27 Ski Dawg:
>> After spending a little bit of time searching around today, I have run
>> across 2 that seem like good options, cfengine and puppet.
>>
>> Does anyone have any thoughts about either of thes
I had set the initdefault as 5
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 08/28/2010 05:29 PM, ganu MailList wrote:
> I had set the initdefault as 5
So, X11 should start up.
Could you elaborate your question? What's happening (or not happening)?
Timo
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailm
At Sat, 28 Aug 2010 17:38:41 +0200 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On 08/28/2010 05:29 PM, ganu MailList wrote:
> > I had set the initdefault as 5
>
> So, X11 should start up.
>
> Could you elaborate your question? What's happening (or not happening)?
I think the OP is seeing the console log
On 8/28/10 10:29 AM, ganu MailList wrote:
> I had set the initdefault as 5
>
5 comes after 1,2,3, etc.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 8/28/10 9:23 AM, Gabriel Tabares wrote:
>On 25/08/2010 17:44, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> On 8/23/2010 10:08 AM, Gabriel Tabares wrote:
>>>
>>> Some servers do, some don't.
>> Have you tried google's DNS servers
On Sat, 28 Aug 2010, Gabriel Tabares wrote:
> Have you looked into bcfg2? Of all the options have looked into, it
> looks like the best for what I want.
>
> My experience with Spacewalk is that is not ready yet and that it takes
> too much effort to set it up. It will probably be worth it but I ca
Gabriel Tabares wrote:
> On 23/08/2010 13:28, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>
>>> Both files are the default ones from CentOS:
>>>
>>>
>> So what do the host names look like that the application
>> attempts to resolve, fully qualified or not? What does your
>> cli based query look like?
>
On Sat, 28 Aug 2010, Bob McConnell wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Bob McConnell
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Strange Apache log entry
>
> The best way to attack this problem is to take a close look at the known
> issues and make sure your code doesn't expose any of them. Start by
> reading
Hello again
I playing litle with qemu and networking
I have read how to do it but can't get it work
I use this command
Qemu -net nic -net=tap,if=tap0
But will not work
Something with
option "if" is not valid for net
The command looks so here
Qemu -m 256 vpostmaster.mvdk -curses -net nic
-net=tap,
On 08/28/2010 12:50 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 8/28/10 10:29 AM, ganu MailList wrote:
>> I had set the initdefault as 5
>>
>
> 5 comes after 1,2,3, etc.
I do hope you were making a joke and not really claiming that
the system progresses through runlevels 2, 3, and 4 on its
way to runlevel 5.
-
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 01:29:02AM +0200, mattias wrote:
> Hello again
> I playing litle with qemu and networking
> I have read how to do it but can't get it work
> I use this command
> Qemu -net nic -net=tap,if=tap0
> But will not work
> Something with
> option "if" is not valid for net
Did you
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 12:46:57AM -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 01:29:02AM +0200, mattias wrote:
> > Hello again
> > I playing litle with qemu and networking
> > I have read how to do it but can't get it work
> > I use this command
> > Qemu -net nic -net=tap,if=tap0
> > But
28 matches
Mail list logo
