Re: [CentOS] Best location in filesystem to have a samba share

2010-08-26 Thread John Doe
From: Kevin Thorpe > On 25/08/2010 03:03, David McGuffey wrote: > > Everyone in the family has a digital camera or cell phone and they seem > > to be leaving picture files all over their home folders, and laptops > > with no sense of year/month/day taken or what they are about. > > Looking t

[CentOS] Help with Linux offline cached credentials on a Windows domain

2010-08-26 Thread Scott Ehrlich
I have modified the native config files both Ubuntu and CentOS systems (laptops) to allow them to be added to a genuine Windows Active Directory domain. When on the network logins work fine.   Take the systems off the network, and the user, even though their credentials are cached, cannot log in.

Re: [CentOS] Best location in filesystem to have a samba share

2010-08-26 Thread Rob Townley
The next time they buy a camera memory card, recommend to them to buy an eye.fi card (it is uLinux based). Set all the cards to store in MMDD format. Set up your own ftp server to receive the uploads directly from the camera. Even though the eye.fi SD memory card runs uLinux itself, eye.fi doe

Re: [CentOS] Strange Apache log entry

2010-08-26 Thread Keith Roberts
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Gordon Messmer wrote: > To: CentOS mailing list > From: Gordon Messmer > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Strange Apache log entry > > On 08/24/2010 04:25 AM, Keith Roberts wrote: >> >> So bolting down PHP really tight should address these hacks? > > No. This vulnerability would be i

Re: [CentOS] I have a question about the 389 ds

2010-08-26 Thread sync
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Whitney, Matthew wrote: > A good place to start would probably be here: > http://www.ldapsource.com/content/ldap_schema.html. > > > > - Matt > Thanks . At last I refer to that website and the problem is solved ... > > *From:* sync [mailto:jian...@g

Re: [CentOS] CentOS or other Linux Internet Router/Gateway

2010-08-26 Thread [xfg]
Several weeks ago I've moved away from IPCop for a while until v. 2.0 will come out of beta and have addons available. Currently running pfSense with transparent proxy / filtering for ads, spyware, porn, etc ... But you're right in choosing IPCop. There was nothing coming close to it when I fac

Re: [CentOS] Is oprofile still working?

2010-08-26 Thread Peter Kjellstrom
On Monday 16 August 2010, Hywel Richards wrote: > Mindaugas Riauba wrote: ... > > Check https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467651 > > > > It looks like in CentOS oprofile is built against older version of > > binutils. When I installed the same version of binutils and oprofile > > from

[CentOS] Set default file/dir permissions?

2010-08-26 Thread Tim Nelson
Greetings all- I have a system running CentOS 5.5 x86_64. It's serving NFS for several 'frontend' boxes in a web application setup. All data is stored in specific dir but written by different users. When the webapp attempts to read this information, it may or may not have permissions to this da

Re: [CentOS] Set default file/dir permissions?

2010-08-26 Thread Kwan Lowe
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Tim Nelson wrote: > Greetings all- > > I have a system running CentOS 5.5 x86_64. It's serving NFS for several > 'frontend' boxes in a web application setup. All data is stored in specific > dir but written by different users. When the webapp attempts to read th

Re: [CentOS] Set default file/dir permissions?

2010-08-26 Thread Jorge Fábregas
On Thursday 26 August 2010 10:35:08 Tim Nelson wrote: > I've looked at and tested umask but it only seems to allow/disallow > specific permissions, not force permissions. Am I missing something? How > can I force all files/dirs created under a specific directory to have the > permissions (and owner

Re: [CentOS] Set default file/dir permissions?

2010-08-26 Thread Tim Nelson
- "Jorge Fábregas" wrote: > On Thursday 26 August 2010 10:35:08 Tim Nelson wrote: > > I've looked at and tested umask but it only seems to allow/disallow > > specific permissions, not force permissions. Am I missing something? > How > > can I force all files/dirs created under a specific direc

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 66, Issue 8

2010-08-26 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ..

Re: [CentOS] Set default file/dir permissions?

2010-08-26 Thread Kwan Lowe
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Tim Nelson wrote: [snip] > > ACL's do indeed look like the method I'd prefer. Are ACL's part of the > filesystem (dependent on ext{2,3,4} etc?) or are they part of the file/inode? > My primary reason for asking is I'd like to know if when backing up this > data

Re: [CentOS] Set default file/dir permissions?

2010-08-26 Thread Jorge Fábregas
On Thursday 26 August 2010 11:56:41 Tim Nelson wrote: > ACL's do indeed look like the method I'd prefer. Are ACL's part of the > filesystem (dependent on ext{2,3,4} etc?) or are they part of the > file/inode? My primary reason for asking is I'd like to know if when > backing up this data, will the

Re: [CentOS] Set default file/dir permissions?

2010-08-26 Thread Jorge Fábregas
On Thursday 26 August 2010 12:17:05 Jorge Fábregas wrote: > AFAIK, the "tar" command on CentOS 5 is not aware of these and you need to > use one called "star" Check your CentOS release level. I just checked now and on 5.5 the tar command (man tar) shows some options for acl and selinux (you ne

[CentOS] Backing up pass words

2010-08-26 Thread Todd Cary
I am currently running CentOS 4 and want to install CentOS 5. To do that, I plan to install a new HD in my server box onto which CentOS will be installed. I will then copy the "home" directory from the old drive or from a backup on a USB drive, however I am not sure how to handle the Users/

Re: [CentOS] Screensaver timer failure

2010-08-26 Thread Mark
2010/8/22 Tsuyoshi Nagata : > Hi Mark! > (2010/08/23 7:47), Mark wrote: >> I have my screensaver set to activate after 2 hours, but it never does. > > #Appliation Issue > After 2hr, another problem would be happened in your box. > Many case some application rubs the CPU, these are high priority tha

Re: [CentOS] Backing up pass words

2010-08-26 Thread Mark
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Todd Cary wrote: >  I am currently running CentOS 4 and want to install CentOS 5. > To do that, I plan to install a new HD in my server box onto > which CentOS will be installed.  I will then copy the "home" > directory from the old drive or from a backup on a USB

Re: [CentOS] Screensaver timer failure

2010-08-26 Thread Robert
On 08/26/2010 01:06 PM, Mark informed us: > > After yet another test yesterday where I just left the machine idle > for over 3 hours and the screensaver did not activate, I concluded > that mplayer was not part of the problem and rebooted. > > Screensaver now works just fine (same kernel, with or

Re: [CentOS] Backing up pass words

2010-08-26 Thread Dan Carl
On 8/26/2010 12:40 PM, Todd Cary wrote: >I am currently running CentOS 4 and want to install CentOS 5. > To do that, I plan to install a new HD in my server box onto > which CentOS will be installed. I will then copy the "home" > directory from the old drive or from a backup on a USB drive, >

[CentOS] miro from rpmforge appears to have dep solving issues

2010-08-26 Thread Rob Kampen
Hi folks, Anyone know the whereabouts of libgtkembedmoz.so()(64bit) as it is needed by miro-1.0-1.el5.rf.x86_64 (rpmforge) I tried a whatprovides and have looked at epel as well as rpmforge - no luck. While I'm asking, I'm looking for an internet HD TV viewer - miro looked interesting - any oth

Re: [CentOS] miro from rpmforge appears to have dep solving issues

2010-08-26 Thread Mark Pryor
It's part of mozilla-devel-1.4.3-0.9.1.legacy.i386.rpm might be in FC9 if not elsewhere. -- Mark --- On Thu, 8/26/10, Rob Kampen wrote: > From: Rob Kampen > Subject: [CentOS] miro from rpmforge appears to have dep solving issues > To: "CentOS mailing list" > Date: Thursday, August 26, 2010

Re: [CentOS] miro from rpmforge appears to have dep solving issues

2010-08-26 Thread John R Pierce
On 08/26/10 3:25 PM, Mark Pryor wrote: > It's part of > mozilla-devel-1.4.3-0.9.1.legacy.i386.rpm > > might be in FC9 if not elsewhere. > seems a little odd that rpmforge would have a package with dependencies that aren't in either the base distribution or rpmforge. __

[CentOS] cfengine vs. puppet

2010-08-26 Thread Ski Dawg
Hello All, I have been tasked with getting some configuration management system running at work. We have about 20 web servers running (some virtual and some physical), and we are trying to come up with a tool that will assist setting up new boxes as we bring them online, as well as maintaining ex

Re: [CentOS] miro from rpmforge appears to have dep solving issues

2010-08-26 Thread Mark Pryor
Hello, 2nd try. It's in thunderbird-2.0.0.24-6.el5.centos.i386 (rpmforge) see below --- On Thu, 8/26/10, Rob Kampen wrote: > From: Rob Kampen > Subject: [CentOS] miro from rpmforge appears to have dep solving issues > To: "CentOS mailing list" > Date: Thursday, August 26, 2010, 3:15 PM > Hi

Re: [CentOS] cfengine vs. puppet

2010-08-26 Thread Dave
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Ski Dawg wrote: > Does anyone have any thoughts about either of these tools? Is there > definite advantage to using one over the other from your experience? > Is there a another tool that I should be evaluating? There's been some discussion, not too recent: http:

Re: [CentOS] miro from rpmforge appears to have dep solving issues

2010-08-26 Thread Rob Kampen
Mark Pryor wrote: Hello, 2nd try. It's in thunderbird-2.0.0.24-6.el5.centos.i386 (rpmforge) see below --- On Thu, 8/26/10, Rob Kampen wrote: From: Rob Kampen Subject: [CentOS] miro from rpmforge appears to have dep solving issues To: "CentOS mailing list" Date: Thursday, August 26, 201

Re: [CentOS] PAM_shield locking me out?

2010-08-26 Thread Rob Kampen
Dag Wieers wrote: On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Rob Kampen wrote: Yesterday I installed pam_shield and followed the testing suggested and thought all was well. today I find that I cannot get to my email account, I can login via ssh okay (uses keys) but su and sudo give segmentation faults. I am gue