Re: [CentOS] best way something thinks to upgrade dovecot to 1.2.* 2.0.* via atrpms, atrpms-testing

ATrpms have dovecot 2.0 rpms for CentOS5(RHEL5) ATrpms dovecot-2.0-0.3_108_beta4.el5.i386.rpm Using Repository is best way. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] I have a question about the 389 ds

On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Ross Walker wrote: > On Aug 24, 2010, at 1:32 AM, sync wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Whitney, Matthew < > mwhit...@pima.edu> wrote: > >> I don't believe there is a VNC client out there that will get its >> settings from an LDAP server. You cou

Re: [CentOS] best way something thinks to upgrade dovecot to 1.2.* 2.0.* via atrpms, atrpms-testing

(2010年08月25日 08:23), fakessh wrote: > what to do with errors: correct the error in the configuration file ? Sorry for poor response. You can list configration file by rpm command. "rpm -qc dovecot" I was update successfully from 1.2 to 2.0. because of no local setting with dovecot. (baseurl=http

Re: [CentOS] I have a question about the 389 ds

Greetings, On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 1:17 PM, sync wrote: > > > > But I have a problem on how to create  a custom attribute in DS to hold > geometry . > > Could someone can give me some suggestions  or  where is the   manual > about  how to create   new  attribute ? > +1 I too am a little bit con

[CentOS] process eggcups

hi all, Just wondering how starts the process eggcups? I have done a "service cups stop" but eggcups is still running. I then do "chkconfig cups off" and reboot and its still running. How do I stop it from running? Thanks, Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list

[CentOS] aide rpm requirement

I normally don't have yum upgrade anything automatically, but a server that I didn't set up does just that. Last night, aide was upgraded, and then failed to run due to "libgcrypt mismatch". Shouldn't the rpm spec file for aide deal with the libgcrypt problem (meaning I think it should be part

[CentOS] Updates offered annoyance

Hi all, I downloaded latest CentOS 5.5 DVD i386 image from one of FTP's in a list. I've burned that image to DVD and created new DVD to use for fresh installations. Now when I install fresh CentOS 5.5 (in VM) I am getting info that there are 50 packages updates. This is ok when I have good inter

Re: [CentOS] Updates offered annoyance

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 02:14:02PM +0200, Aleksandar Stoisavljevic wrote: > > This is ok when I have good internet speed (@work) but when I am home, this > update takes a lot of time. Welcome to life on the internet. > I guess I can skip updates but I wasn't experiencing such annoyance w

Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem

> Not sure if it is RDNS. > > I had similar issues on Fedora, and for me it was to do with IP6. > > Konqueror web browser took ages to load a page. IIRC Firefox handled > it OK. > > Try Googling for 'uninstalling ipv6 linux' > I already tried that. The /etc/sysconfig/network has the IPV6_ENABLE=n

Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem

On 23/08/2010 21:25, Keith Roberts wrote: > On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Gabriel Tabares wrote: > > >> To: centos@centos.org >> From: Gabriel Tabares >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem >> >> On 23/08/2010 13:28, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> Both files are the default ones

Re: [CentOS] Updates offered annoyance

On 8/25/10 7:14 AM, Aleksandar Stoisavljevic wrote: > Hi all, > > I downloaded latest CentOS 5.5 DVD i386 image from one of FTP's in a list. > > I've burned that image to DVD and created new DVD to use for fresh > installations. > Now when I install fresh CentOS 5.5 (in VM) I am getting info that

Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem

On 8/25/10 7:26 AM, Gabriel Tabares wrote: > >> Not sure if it is RDNS. >> >> I had similar issues on Fedora, and for me it was to do with IP6. >> >> Konqueror web browser took ages to load a page. IIRC Firefox handled >> it OK. >> >> Try Googling for 'uninstalling ipv6 linux' >> > I already tried

Re: [CentOS] Updates offered annoyance

At Wed, 25 Aug 2010 07:19:25 -0500 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 02:14:02PM +0200, Aleksandar Stoisavljevic wrote: > > > > This is ok when I have good internet speed (@work) but when I am home, this > > update takes a lot of time. > > Welcome to life on th

Re: [CentOS] Best location in filesystem to have a samba share

On 25/08/2010 03:03, David McGuffey wrote: > Everyone in the family has a digital camera or cell phone and they seem > to be leaving picture files all over their home folders, and laptops > with no sense of year/month/day taken or what they are about. > > Looking to consolidate all the family pic

Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem

Gabriel Tabares wrote: > On 23/08/2010 21:25, Keith Roberts wrote: >> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Gabriel Tabares wrote: >>> From: Gabriel Tabares >>> On 23/08/2010 13:28, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >>> > Both files are the default ones from CentOS: > Keith, the issue happens resolving internal IP addre

Re: [CentOS] Updates offered annoyance

Robert, On 25 August 2010 14:24, Robert Heller wrote: > The main problem is that yum is NOT well written to deal with a slow > and *unreliable* dial-up interface -- it in fact behaves extremly Grab a copy of a repository at work, copy it home and set up a local repository. Yum will be perfectly h

Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem

On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Gabriel Tabares wrote: > To: centos@centos.org > From: Gabriel Tabares > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem > > On 23/08/2010 21:25, Keith Roberts wrote: >> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Gabriel Tabares wrote: >> >> >>> To: centos@centos.org >>> From: Gabriel Tabare

Re: [CentOS] Updates offered annoyance

Les Mikesell wrote, On 08/25/2010 08:29 AM: > On 8/25/10 7:14 AM, Aleksandar Stoisavljevic wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I downloaded latest CentOS 5.5 DVD i386 image from one of FTP's in a list. >> >> I've burned that image to DVD and created new DVD to use for fresh >> installations. >> Now when I ins

Re: [CentOS] Updates offered annoyance

At Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:41:11 +0100 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Robert, > > On 25 August 2010 14:24, Robert Heller wrote: > > The main problem is that yum is NOT well written to deal with a slow > > and *unreliable* dial-up interface -- it in fact behaves extremly > Grab a copy of a reposit

Re: [CentOS] Updates offered annoyance

On Wed, August 25, 2010 16:19, Robert Heller wrote: > At Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:41:11 +0100 CentOS mailing list > wrote: > >> >> Robert, >> >> On 25 August 2010 14:24, Robert Heller wrote: >> > The main problem is that yum is NOT well written to deal with a slow >> > and *unreliable* dial-up interfa

Re: [CentOS] Updates offered annoyance

Greetings, On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Robert Heller wrote: > > My 'work' is at home (dialup).  The local library is only good for > about 1.5mbits/sec (about 150kbytes/sec).  I don't have enough free > disk space for a full repo on either my laptop or my desktop. > Perhaps it's time for y

Re: [CentOS] Dovecot attack

On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 08/23/2010 03:58 PM, Rob Kampen wrote: >>> pam_shield is available from RPMforge and requires a minimum of >>> configuration. >> Never heard of this one before - just installed and simple to configure. >> I note that version 0.9.3 was released April

Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem

On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Gabriel Tabares > One more thing, if this is the case, why does the nslookup respond > straight away? Is the destination server trying to somehow validate the > host where the connection came from? It's entirely possible (and probable) that the mail server is at

Re: [CentOS] Updates offered annoyance

At Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:28:04 +0200 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > On Wed, August 25, 2010 16:19, Robert Heller wrote: > > At Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:41:11 +0100 CentOS mailing list > > wrote: > > > >> > >> Robert, > >> > >> On 25 August 2010 14:24, Robert Heller wrote: > >> > The main problem is

Re: [CentOS] Dovecot attack

On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Rob Kampen wrote: > Dag Wieers wrote: > >> pam_shield is available from RPMforge and requires a minimum of >> configuration. > > Never heard of this one before - just installed and simple to configure. > I note that version 0.9.3 was released April 2010 and includes a > su

Re: [CentOS] PAM_shield locking me out?

On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Rob Kampen wrote: > Yesterday I installed pam_shield and followed the testing suggested and > thought all was well. > today I find that I cannot get to my email account, I can login via ssh okay > (uses keys) but su and sudo give > segmentation faults. I am guessing due to t

Re: [CentOS] Updates offered annoyance

> My 'work' is at home (dialup). The local library is only good for > about 1.5mbits/sec (about 150kbytes/sec). I don't have enough free > disk space for a full repo on either my laptop or my desktop. While not currently supported by the main CentOS project (AFAIK), there are presto repos out t

Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem

On 8/23/2010 10:08 AM, Gabriel Tabares wrote: > > One more thing, if this is the case, why does the nslookup respond > straight away? Is the destination server trying to somehow validate the > host where the connection came from? Some servers do, some don't. The ones that do are often just trying

Re: [CentOS] i can't install centos on my poweredge 2950

well i transfer the initrd on another computer and i can see the megaraid_sas module. another strange when i install with DVd it works like a charm :( but i would like to install my server with cobbler with all the task in my kickstart done. that s really very very strange during the boot proce

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 66, Issue 7

- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20100825/fee735d9/attachment-0001.bin -

Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem

Greetings, On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 8/23/2010 10:08 AM, Gabriel Tabares wrote: > > Some servers do, some don't. Have you tried google's DNS servers 8.8.8.8 IP and one more IP I can't recollect exactly Regards, Rajagopal _

Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem

On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Les Mikesell wrote: > To: centos@centos.org > From: Les Mikesell > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem > > On 8/23/2010 10:08 AM, Gabriel Tabares wrote: >> >> One more thing, if this is the case, why does the nslookup respond >> straight away? Is the destina

[CentOS] System beeps in kernel 2.6.18-194

So, just today I noticed a problem with kernel 2.6.18-194 (CentOS 5.5) on several Intel DP965LT systems; the system beeps (such as terminal beeps) are no longer passed through to the external speakers. This is a problem because in our situation the boxes are distant from their monitor/k

Re: [CentOS] System beeps in kernel 2.6.18-194

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Glenn Eychaner wrote: >        So, just today I noticed a problem with kernel 2.6.18-194 (CentOS 5.5) > on several Intel DP965LT systems; the system beeps (such as terminal beeps) > are no longer passed through to the external speakers.  This is a problem > beca

Re: [CentOS] Strange Apache log entry

On 08/24/2010 04:25 AM, Keith Roberts wrote: > > So bolting down PHP really tight should address these hacks? No. This vulnerability would be in a PHP application. I don't believe you could configure PHP in such a way that this would no longer be a problem.

Re: [CentOS] System beeps in kernel 2.6.18-194

Akemi Yagi wrote, On 08/25/2010 05:56 PM: > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Glenn Eychaner wrote: >> Is there someplace can I find *detailed* release notes on the differences >> between -164 and -194 kernels to help in looking for the problem, > > You can find kernel changelog diffs here (ma

[CentOS] System beeps in kernel 2.6.18-194

Akemi Yagi amyagi at gmail.com wrote: > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Glenn Eychaner wrote: >> So, just today I noticed a problem with kernel 2.6.18-194 (CentOS 5.5) on >> several Intel DP965LT systems; the system beeps (such as terminal beeps) are >> no longer passed through to the external

Re: [CentOS] process eggcups

Hi Jerry, (2010年08月25日 21:05), Jerry Geis wrote: > I have done a "service cups stop" but eggcups is still running. Run App. [System]->[Preferences]->[More Preferences]->[Sessions] In Sessions, Select [Current Session] Scroll running programs, find eggcups, then select it. Pull down Style:Res

Re: [CentOS] process eggcups

Tsuyoshi Nagata wrote: > Hi Jerry, > (2010年08月25日 21:05), Jerry Geis wrote: > >> I have done a "service cups stop" but eggcups is still running. >> > > Run App. > [System]->[Preferences]->[More Preferences]->[Sessions] > In Sessions, > Select [Current Session] > Scroll running program

Re: [CentOS] Updates offered annoyance

On 26/08/10 00:03, Todd Denniston wrote: > And if you are maintaining more than one machine at home, you need to realize > that you don't need to > waste the time twice to update the same thing on two machines. Assuming your > home machines are > networked together. Good Point. I run a 'fat' s