Re: [CentOS] best ways to do mysql backup

2010-08-15 Thread Tuptus
Nic by się nie stało gdyby Agnello George nie napisał: > we have multiple servers approx 10 and each has about 100 GB of data in > the /var/lib/mysql dir , excluding tar , mysqldump and replication how do > we > take backup for these databases on to a remote machine and store them > datewise , (

Re: [CentOS] best ways to do mysql backup

2010-08-15 Thread Tang Jianwei
why not mysqldump + binlog + rsync? Tang Jianwei On 08/15/2010 03:51 AM, Agnello George wrote: we have multiple servers approx 10 and each has about 100 GB of data in the /var/lib/mysql dir , excluding tar , mysqldump and replication how do we take backup for these databases on to a remote

[CentOS] FreeNx doesn't work?

2010-08-15 Thread gaohu
I have installed freenx with this article http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/FreeNX but when I use freenx-client on windows to connect to server, I always get an "freenx Authentication failed." client err log output as this: NX> 203 NXSSH running with pid: 1584 NX> 285 Enabling check on switch comm

Re: [CentOS] FreeNx doesn't work?

2010-08-15 Thread b.j. mcclure
IIRC, nx defaults to /home/user/.ssh/authorized_keys2 whereas we always use /home/user/.ssh/authorized_keys. I would ensure nx is configured to look in the correct directory for the public key. We have zero windows boxes in my shop so I do not know how or if windows can be configured with key aut

Re: [CentOS] FreeNx doesn't work?

2010-08-15 Thread Jim Perrin
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 11:17 AM, gaohu wrote: > I have installed freenx with this article > > http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/FreeNX > > but when I use freenx-client on windows to connect to server, > I always get an "freenx Authentication failed." You appear to have missed a step or configured th

Re: [CentOS] best ways to do mysql backup

2010-08-15 Thread nux
Tuptus writes: > > Nic by się nie stało gdyby Agnello George nie napisał: >> we have multiple servers approx 10 and each has about 100 GB of data in >> the /var/lib/mysql dir , excluding tar , mysqldump and replication how do >> we >> take backup for these databases on to a remote machine and s

Re: [CentOS] FreeNx doesn't work?

2010-08-15 Thread gaohu
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 11:17 AM, gaohu wrote: > I have installed freenx with this article > > http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/FreeNX > > but when I use freenx-client on windows to connect to server, > I always get an "freenx Authentication failed." You appear to have missed a step or configured the

Re: [CentOS] FreeNx doesn't work?

2010-08-15 Thread Les Mikesell
gaohu wrote: > I have installed freenx with this article > > http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/FreeNX > > but when I use freenx-client on windows to connect to server, > I always get an "freenx Authentication failed." > > client err log output as this: > NX> 203 NXSSH running with pid: 1584 > NX>

[CentOS] FreeNx doesn't work?

2010-08-15 Thread gaohu
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 11:17 AM, gaohu wrote: > I have installed freenx with this article > > http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/FreeNX > > but when I use freenx-client on windows to connect to server, > I always get an "freenx Authentication failed." You appear to have missed a step or configured the

[CentOS] how many folks are *seriously* using ACLs?

2010-08-15 Thread Robert P. J. Day
i'm just curious -- how many people here are using ACLs as a regular and significant part of their sys admin? rday -- Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA Top-notch, inexpens

Re: [CentOS] how many folks are *seriously* using ACLs?

2010-08-15 Thread Scott Robbins
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 04:45:02PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > i'm just curious -- how many people here are using ACLs as a regular > and significant part of their sys admin? We use it on an FTP server, as it seemed to be the easiest way to make some directories read-only to some people

Re: [CentOS] how many folks are *seriously* using ACLs?

2010-08-15 Thread Jay Leafey
Robert P. J. Day wrote: i'm just curious -- how many people here are using ACLs as a regular and significant part of their sys admin? rday I use ACLs extensively at work. Usually it is designed to grant write access to developers or groups of developers to working directories. -- Jay Le

Re: [CentOS] how many folks are *seriously* using ACLs?

2010-08-15 Thread Szabo Akos
Hi! On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 16:45 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > i'm just curious -- how many people here are using ACLs as a regular > and significant part of their sys admin? For samba, with more then five users... Indispensable! :) -- Szabo Akos signature.asc Description: This is a digita

Re: [CentOS] best ways to do mysql backup

2010-08-15 Thread Jerry Franz
On 08/15/2010 09:49 AM, n...@li.nux.ro wrote: > Tuptus writes: > > >> Nic by się nie stało gdyby Agnello George nie napisał: >> >>> we have multiple servers approx 10 and each has about 100 GB of data in >>> the /var/lib/mysql dir , excluding tar , mysqldump and replication how do >>> w

Re: [CentOS] how many folks are *seriously* using ACLs?

2010-08-15 Thread Barry Brimer
> i'm just curious -- how many people here are using ACLs as a regular > and significant part of their sys admin? I use it in web hosting .. use ACLs to grant access to the user running the web server only on files that need it. Great for protecting write access. __

[CentOS] Yum broken after x86_64 upgrade

2010-08-15 Thread listmail
Hi All, I just upgraded a machine from CentOS 5.3 32-bit to CentOS 5.5 x86_64 using the updater on the release disk. Now that the machine is running 64-bit, I notice that Yum is broken, failing with the following error: ~~~ There was a problem importing one of the Python modules required to run yu

Re: [CentOS] Yum broken after x86_64 upgrade

2010-08-15 Thread Robert Heller
At Sun, 15 Aug 2010 16:09:13 -0700 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Hi All, > > I just upgraded a machine from CentOS 5.3 32-bit to CentOS 5.5 x86_64 using > the updater on the release disk. Now that the machine is running 64-bit, I > notice that Yum is broken, failing with the following error:

Re: [CentOS] Yum broken after x86_64 upgrade

2010-08-15 Thread listmail
On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 19:57:04 -0400, Robert Heller wrote > At Sun, 15 Aug 2010 16:09:13 -0700 CentOS mailing list > wrote: > > Is there really an updater that goes from 32-bit to 64-bit? Or is > it a CentOS 5.3 64-bit to CentOS 5.5 64-bit? Well, the system was 32-bit, and it came up running a

Re: [CentOS] Yum broken after x86_64 upgrade

2010-08-15 Thread Mark
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 5:16 PM, listmail wrote: > On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 19:57:04 -0400, Robert Heller wrote >> At Sun, 15 Aug 2010 16:09:13 -0700 CentOS mailing list >> wrote: >> > >> Is there really an updater that goes from 32-bit to 64-bit?  Or is >> it a CentOS 5.3 64-bit to CentOS 5.5 64-bit

Re: [CentOS] Yum broken after x86_64 upgrade

2010-08-15 Thread listmail
On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 17:20:41 -0700, Mark wrote > > > It might help if you gave us some real information, like what > hardware you're running, which actual version of CentOS and the > kernel you are > (and were) running, etc. Otherwise we're stabbing for a needle in a > haystack. > > I don't ev

Re: [CentOS] Yum broken after x86_64 upgrade

2010-08-15 Thread Robert Heller
At Sun, 15 Aug 2010 17:30:31 -0700 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 17:20:41 -0700, Mark wrote > > > > > It might help if you gave us some real information, like what > > hardware you're running, which actual version of CentOS and the > > kernel you are > > (and were) runnin

Re: [CentOS] Yum broken after x86_64 upgrade

2010-08-15 Thread listmail
On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 20:46:04 -0400, Robert Heller wrote > > You should not have done this. I guessing that the CentOS 5.5 > installer is not bulleted proofed for this case (eg it assumed that you > know what you were doing). In any case, this is not a supported way > to go (documented or not).

[CentOS] Mark facility in CentOS

2010-08-15 Thread Daniel Bareiro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all! This is my first message to the list. Some time ago I'm user of Debian GNU/Linux and recently I also started to use CentOS GNU/Linux. Does anyone know how to enable the mark facility on CentOS? According to what I was seeing, unlike Debian GN

Re: [CentOS] Mark facility in CentOS

2010-08-15 Thread JohnS
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 02:08 +, Daniel Bareiro wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi all! > > This is my first message to the list. Some time ago I'm user of Debian > GNU/Linux and recently I also started to use CentOS GNU/Linux. > > Does anyone know how to enable t

Re: [CentOS] how many folks are *seriously* using ACLs?

2010-08-15 Thread Rajagopal Swaminathan
Greetings, On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > >  i'm just curious -- how many people here are using ACLs as a regular > and significant part of their sys admin? > I have used the ext3 (with acl mount option), gfs filesystem on centos cluster with over 300 users -- of whi