On Sat, 2010-08-07 at 19:06 -0400, MGW-Discussions wrote:
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> How do I verify where the sources should be after the rpm install?
>
> How do I install only the headers, since that phrase keeps popping up
> but like many things on the net, no one ever actually verifies the
On Sat, 2010-08-07 at 20:39 -0300, Eduardo Grosclaude wrote:
> Dear List,
> After some googling around without any results, I'm quite puzzled.
> Since some past update I can't precise, kernel 2.6.164 works fine,
> however 2.6.194 has some sound problem in my somewhat old and beaten
> Toshiba lapt
JohnS wrote:
> rpm -qa | grep kernel
>
> Look here that is *NOT* what you need!
>
> I'm listing all of them to make sure you are up to date...of which you
> are not...
>
> yum update kernel kernel-headers kernel-devel
> Reboot the Machine to make sure your on the newest kernel.
>
>
> Now for Vi
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 9:01 AM, MGW-Discussions
wrote:
>
> Do I need to restart the system when the headers and sources are installed?
>
That is generally a good idea since the kernel, headers and devel rpms
are installed all at the same time. Otherwise you won't be running
the newly installed ke
more a terminology usage question than anything else, but in a
couple of weeks, i'll be teaching the first of a few sessions on RHEL
admin and, unsurprisingly, i'll be using centos (as i've done in the
past).
when i asked the organizer to identify the specific version of RHEL
that was being u
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
:
>
> when i asked the organizer to identify the specific version of RHEL
> that was being used at the client site, i was told 5.3 so i can easily
> install 5.3 on the classroom machines, but i'm curious about something
> and i'll have my
Can anyone recommend a commercial off site remote backup service with a
client (preferably FOSS) for CentOS 5, preferably that allows encryption
of the data being backed up?
Small scale, I'm primarily looking to just back up my mail folder on my
server.
I've been backing it up to local hd via
- "Michael A. Peters" wrote:
> Can anyone recommend a commercial off site remote backup service with
> a
> client (preferably FOSS) for CentOS 5, preferably that allows
> encryption
> of the data being backed up?
>
> Small scale, I'm primarily looking to just back up my mail folder on
> my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Michael A. Peters spake:
> Can anyone recommend a commercial off site remote backup service with a
> client (preferably FOSS) for CentOS 5, preferably that allows encryption
> of the data being backed up?
>
> Small scale, I'm primarily looking
Michael A. Peters writes:
> Can anyone recommend a commercial off site remote backup service with a
> client (preferably FOSS) for CentOS 5, preferably that allows encryption
> of the data being backed up?
>
> Small scale, I'm primarily looking to just back up my mail folder on my
> server.
>
At Sun, 8 Aug 2010 12:11:35 -0400 (EDT) CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
>
> more a terminology usage question than anything else, but in a
> couple of weeks, i'll be teaching the first of a few sessions on RHEL
> admin and, unsurprisingly, i'll be using centos (as i've done in the
> past).
>
>
>>
>> i just don't want to teach off of 5.3, only to find out later that
>> they've been keeping up to date and 5.5 would have been a more
>> appropriate choice. thanks for any tips.
>
> On a certain level there really isn't much difference from a general
> admin POV -- it does not really make s
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 09:18:58AM -0700, Mark wrote:
>
> Check /etc/redhat-release; also uname -a if you know which kernel to look for.
Actually, a combination of "uname -a" for kernel rev and then
"rpm -q centos-release" is a more much sane and accurate method
to identify
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 01:29:48PM -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
>
> Depends. Most people do update as new updates come out. Doing 'yum
> update' regularly will update to newer point releases automagically.
> Some people (for various reasons) don't regularly update their systems.
>
> Look in /etc
On 08/08/10 9:11 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>when i asked the organizer to identify the specific version of RHEL
> that was being used at the client site, i was told 5.3 so i can easily
> install 5.3 on the classroom machines, but i'm curious about something
> and i'll have my contact look i
May be. cat /etc/redhat-release is the easy way
Greets
Enviado desde mi BlackBerry de Claro.
-Original Message-
From: "John R. Dennison"
Sender: centos-boun...@centos.org
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 12:56:33
To: Robert Heller
Reply-To: CentOS mailing list
Cc: CentOS mailing list
Subject:
Greetings,
On 8/8/10, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> Can anyone recommend a commercial off site remote backup service with a
> client (preferably FOSS) for CentOS 5, preferably that allows encryption
> of the data being backed up?
>
> Small scale, I'm primarily looking to just back up my mail folder
Greetings,
> On 8/8/10, Michael A. Peters wrote:
Better news still, It seems centos rpms are available for x86(32/64
bits) and ppc arch at (hopefully) at an yum repository
http://packages.sw.be/rdiff-backup/
Again, I have never touched it...
Regards,
Rajagopal
___
I do find this behaviour very odd... if you are not intending to get support
from redhat why not just install CentOS in the beginning so you can still
get updates? Ah well...
Sent from Android Mobile
On 8 Aug 2010 18:58, "John R Pierce" wrote:
> On 08/08/10 9:11 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>> wh
On 08/08/10 1:12 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
>
> I do find this behaviour very odd... if you are not intending to get
> support from redhat why not just install CentOS in the beginning so
> you can still get updates? Ah well...
>
>
fairly often, its due to some perceived vendor requirements on th
I have a 2.9 MB MP3 file. Would like to use about the first 10%, to
embed sound on a web page. The Packages I have in Applications > Sound
& Video don't seem to be able to edit the file like that. Is there a
Package I can get from a Yum Repository that will do that? Using
CentOS 5.5 (32 bit). T
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 04:29:41PM -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> I have a 2.9 MB MP3 file. Would like to use about the first 10%, to
> embed sound on a web page. The Packages I have in Applications > Sound
> & Video don't seem to be able to edit the file like that. Is there a
> Package I can get f
Lanny Marcus writes:
> I have a 2.9 MB MP3 file. Would like to use about the first 10%, to
> embed sound on a web page. The Packages I have in Applications > Sound
> & Video don't seem to be able to edit the file like that. Is there a
> Package I can get from a Yum Repository that will do that?
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 3:46 PM, wrote:
>
> Lanny Marcus writes:
>
> > I have a 2.9 MB MP3 file. Would like to use about the first 10%, to
> > embed sound on a web page. The Packages I have in Applications > Sound
> > & Video don't seem to be able to edit the file like that. Is there a
> > Packag
On Sun, 8 Aug 2010, John R. Dennison wrote:
> To: Lanny Marcus
> From: John R. Dennison
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: Package to truncate .mp3 file
>
> On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 04:29:41PM -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> I have a 2.9 MB MP3 file. Would like to use about the first 10%, to
>> embed so
I created a filter and verified it with fail2ban-regex against
actual lines in my log and it works. During restarts of fail2ban,
only some previous ip's get banned immediately whereas some need a
reoccurrence despite the jail's config specification of maxretry and
findtime suggesting the entries ma
ditto. I second that motion.
Peace,
Allan
Mark wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 3:46 PM, wrote:
>> Lanny Marcus writes:
>>
>>> I have a 2.9 MB MP3 file. Would like to use about the first 10%, to
>>> embed sound on a web page. The Packages I have in Applications > Sound
>>> & Video don't seem to
Unless the curriculum covers updates.
Peace,
Allan
James Hogarth wrote:
>>> i just don't want to teach off of 5.3, only to find out later that
>>> they've been keeping up to date and 5.5 would have been a more
>>> appropriate choice. thanks for any tips.
>> On a certain level there really isn
Hi Alexander
(2010/08/07 17:13), Alexander Stepanovitch Pyatkin wrote:
> It looks like that the iocharset=cp1251,codepage=866 is not working in
Some mount option are changed in centos5 by noticed in blog/wiki.
CentOS4(kernel2.6.9 ) mount iocharset=yyy,codepage=xxx
CentOS5(kernel2.6.18) mount utf8
Hi all,
this is my first post on this list, hope someone can help me.
I have to run a dhcp server on CentOS release 5.5 (Final).
# yum list| grep -i dhcp
dhcp.x86_64 12:3.0.5-23.el5 installed
dhcp-devel.x86_64 12:3.0.5-23.el5 installed
dhcpv6-client.x86_641.0.10-18.el5 in
2010/8/9 Richard Gliebe :
> Hi all,
>
> this is my first post on this list, hope someone can help me.
>
> I have to run a dhcp server on CentOS release 5.5 (Final).
>
> # yum list| grep -i dhcp
> dhcp.x86_64 12:3.0.5-23.el5 installed
> dhcp-devel.x86_64 12:3.0.5-23.el5 installed
>
> I have to run a dhcp server on CentOS release 5.5 (Final).
>
> # yum list| grep -i dhcp
> dhcp.x86_64 12:3.0.5-23.el5 installed
> dhcp-devel.x86_64 12:3.0.5-23.el5 installed
> dhcpv6-client.x86_64 1.0.10-18.el5 installed
>
> after starting the dhcpd daemon, the windows Clients on
I have a Debian machine with four users that I plan on migrating to
CentOS. As per Debian habits the UIDs start with 1000.
Is it enough to reuse the Debian /etc/shadow and /etc/passwd files
over? Or will I need to configure some other things? I had considered
just creating four new users starting
On 08/08/10 10:47 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> I have a Debian machine with four users that I plan on migrating to
> CentOS. As per Debian habits the UIDs start with 1000.
>
> Is it enough to reuse the Debian /etc/shadow and /etc/passwd files
> over? Or will I need to configure some other things? I h
Spett.le Cliente,
dal 9 Agosto 2010 al 29 Agosto 2010UT non sarò in grado di leggere le email
inviate a questo indirizzo.
Per urgenze compilare il form sul nuovo sito della Computer srl
http://www.computersrl.com/home/component/jforms/4/88.html
o chiamare il numero 0438.450500
Grazie
Giusepp
Spett.le Cliente,
dal 9 Agosto 2010 al 29 Agosto 2010UT non sarò in grado di leggere le email
inviate a questo indirizzo.
Per urgenze compilare il form sul nuovo sito della Computer srl
http://www.computersrl.com/home/component/jforms/4/88.html
o chiamare il numero 0438.450500
Grazie
Giusepp
Greetings,
2010/8/9 Giuseppe Corazzin :
> Spett.le Cliente,
>
> dal 9 Agosto 2010 al 29 Agosto 2010UT non sarò in grado di leggere le email
> inviate a questo indirizzo.
> Per urgenze compilare il form sul nuovo sito della Computer srl
> http://www.computersrl.com/home/component/jforms/4/88.ht
On 08/08/10 11:08 PM, Giuseppe Corazzin wrote:
> Spett.le Cliente,
>
> dal 9 Agosto 2010 al 29 Agosto 2010UT non sarò in grado di leggere le email
> inviate a questo indirizzo.
> Per urgenze compilare il form sul nuovo sito della Computer
> srlhttp://www.computersrl.com/home/component/jforms/4
On 8/9/10 7:25 AM Eero Volotinen wrote:
>
> it is working on any other os?
I'll try it this afternoon, when I'm onside.
>
> is the dhcp binded to correct interface?
Yes.
# ifconfig eth0
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1A:64:B6:1D:1C
inet addr:192.168.100.2 Bcast:192.168.10
On 8/9/10 7:42 AM Barry Brimer wrote:
> How about firewalling ... does your firewall allow for a DHCP server?
firewall isn't active inside the LAN.
Regards
Richard
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
2010/8/9 Richard Gliebe :
> On 8/9/10 7:42 AM Barry Brimer wrote:
>> How about firewalling ... does your firewall allow for a DHCP server?
>
> firewall isn't active inside the LAN.
firewall can cause problems on windows machines.. maybe you can try
for example ubuntu livecd and test if dhcp client
On 8/9/10 8:49 AM Eero Volotinen wrote:
> 2010/8/9 Richard Gliebe :
>> On 8/9/10 7:42 AM Barry Brimer wrote:
>>> How about firewalling ... does your firewall allow for a DHCP server?
>> firewall isn't active inside the LAN.
>
> firewall can cause problems on windows machines.. maybe you can try
>
42 matches
Mail list logo
