On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 15:49, Keith Roberts wrote:
> Give me a temporary login (sent directly via email) as
> u...@centos-55-32-minimal, and I'll see if I can login and run Nautilus from
> here.
>
> Are there any other X apps that you can run on the remote box that will work
> over ssh -X ?
>
Tha
2010/8/6 Dotan Cohen :
> I need to open a Nautilus window on a headless server, but no matter
> what I try it complains about the display:
>
> ✈dcl:~$ xhost + localhost
> localhost being added to access control list
> ✈dcl:~$ ssh -X u...@ip.address
> [u...@centos-55-32-minimal ~]$ export DISPLAY=lo
Title: iocharset, codepage issue in CentOS 5.5
Dear Colleges.
The OS is CentOS 5.5. The locale is CP1251 or ISO8859-5, Language used is Russian.
It looks like that the iocharset=cp1251,codepage=866 is not working in this version of CentOS, but it works in CentOS 4.6. When trying to moun
how to ensure systems users have strong passwords enabled
--
Regards
Agnello D'souza
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Minimum of 8 characters consisting of numbers, letters and special
characters
2010/8/7 Agnello George
> how to ensure systems users have strong passwords enabled
>
> --
> Regards
> Agnello D'souza
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> htt
Am 07.08.2010 15:12, schrieb Agnello George:
> how to ensure systems users have strong passwords enabled
For services using PAM configure pam_passwdqc[1].
[1] http://www.openwall.com/passwdqc/
Alexander
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
ht
Thanks good information alexander
2010/8/7 Alexander Dalloz >
> Am 07.08.2010 15:12, schrieb Agnello George:
>
> > how to ensure systems users have strong passwords enabled
>
> For services using PAM configure pam_passwdqc[1].
>
> [1] http://www.openwall.com/passwdqc/
>
> Alexander
>
>
> __
On 07/08/10 14:12, Agnello George wrote:
> how to ensure systems users have strong passwords enabled
>
Take a look at the section on password policies here:
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/OS_Protection#head-c09e77a13f234131e96f8d3cb95dca1f7ff41427
___
Listee's...
I have a 5.5 box and I have formatted a partition as ext4 however I
can't mount it, the mount command is telling me its an unknown file
system type. fsck tells me the partition is a clean ext4 partition but
I can't mount it.
Some reasearch has lead me to believe the problem is that ex
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 16:50:18 +0100
James Bensley wrote:
> Listee's...
>
> I have a 5.5 box and I have formatted a partition as ext4 however I
> can't mount it, the mount command is telling me its an unknown file
> system type. fsck tells me the partition is a clean ext4 partition but
> I can't mo
On 7 August 2010 16:57, Laurent Wandrebeck wrote:
> Use mount -t ext4dev.
Sorry, I forgot to mention; I have reformatted the drive as ext4dev
and it still wont mount, unknown file system type again! I verified it
was OK with fsck and it says it is a clean ext4dev partition?
--
Regards,
James.
On 08/07/2010 06:10 PM, James Bensley wrote:
> On 7 August 2010 16:57, Laurent Wandrebeck wrote:
>
>> Use mount -t ext4dev.
>>
> Sorry, I forgot to mention; I have reformatted the drive as ext4dev
> and it still wont mount, unknown file system type again! I verified it
> was OK with fsck and it sa
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 17:10:13 +0100
James Bensley wrote:
> On 7 August 2010 16:57, Laurent Wandrebeck wrote:
> > Use mount -t ext4dev.
>
> Sorry, I forgot to mention; I have reformatted the drive as ext4dev
> and it still wont mount, unknown file system type again! I verified it
> was OK with fsc
On 7 August 2010 17:27, Bernard Lheureux wrote:
> Did you first "modprobe ext4dev" before trying to mount it ?
[nf5...@eros ~]$ modprobe ext4
FATAL: Module ext4 not found.
[nf5...@eros ~]$ modprobe ext4dev
FATAL: Module ext4dev not found.
--
Regards,
James.
http://www.jamesbensley.co.cc/
Th
On 7 August 2010 17:41, Laurent Wandrebeck wrote:
> so a mount -t ext4 should work, as kernel-2.6.18-194.8.1.el5 provides
> /lib/modules/2.6.18-194.8.1.el5/kernel/fs/ext4/ext4.ko.
This is probably going ot provide the answer (to you atleast, its not
so clear to me);
`uname -r` tells me I'm on
At Sat, 7 Aug 2010 18:48:05 +0100 CentOS mailing list wrote:
>
> On 7 August 2010 17:27, Bernard Lheureux wrote:
>
> > Did you first "modprobe ext4dev" before trying to mount it ?
>
> [nf5...@eros ~]$ modprobe ext4
> FATAL: Module ext4 not found.
> [nf5...@eros ~]$ modprobe ext4dev
> FATAL: M
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 18:55:35 +0100
James Bensley wrote:
> On 7 August 2010 17:41, Laurent Wandrebeck wrote:
>
> > so a mount -t ext4 should work, as kernel-2.6.18-194.8.1.el5 provides
> > /lib/modules/2.6.18-194.8.1.el5/kernel/fs/ext4/ext4.ko.
>
> This is probably going ot provide the answer (
I have installed the source rpms on CentOS 5.5 due to virtualbox upgrade
not functioning. (the old one that comes with centos works fine,
however, I wanted to newer one.)
Whenever I run the driver installation script it fails with an
indication that it could not find the sources.
How do I corre
On 08/07/2010 10:55 AM, James Bensley wrote:
> On 7 August 2010 17:41, Laurent Wandrebeck wrote:
>
>
>> so a mount -t ext4 should work, as kernel-2.6.18-194.8.1.el5 provides
>> /lib/modules/2.6.18-194.8.1.el5/kernel/fs/ext4/ext4.ko.
>>
> This is probably going ot provide the answer (to
On 08/07/2010 11:05 AM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
> On 08/07/2010 10:55 AM, James Bensley wrote:
>
>> On 7 August 2010 17:41, Laurent Wandrebeck wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> so a mount -t ext4 should work, as kernel-2.6.18-194.8.1.el5 provides
>>> /lib/modules/2.6.18-194.8.1.el5/kernel/fs/ext4/ext4
At Sat, 7 Aug 2010 18:55:35 +0100 CentOS mailing list wrote:
>
> On 7 August 2010 17:41, Laurent Wandrebeck wrote:
>
> > so a mount -t ext4 should work, as kernel-2.6.18-194.8.1.el5 provides
> > /lib/modules/2.6.18-194.8.1.el5/kernel/fs/ext4/ext4.ko.
>
> This is probably going ot provide the
[nf5...@eros boot]$ sudo cat /boot/grub/menu.lst
# grub.conf generated by anaconda
#
# Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this file
# NOTICE: You have a /boot partition. This means that
# all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /boot/, eg.
# root
On 7 August 2010 19:10, Jerry Franz wrote:
> Correction: I forgot that on CentOS you want /boot/grub/grub.conf instead.
[nf5...@eros /]$ ls -l /boot/grub/menu.lst
lrwxrwxr-- 1 root root 11 Oct 27 2008 /boot/grub/menu.lst -> ./grub.conf
Same difference :p
--
Regards,
James.
http://www.jamesbe
At Sat, 7 Aug 2010 19:10:53 +0100 CentOS mailing list wrote:
>
> [nf5...@eros boot]$ sudo cat /boot/grub/menu.lst
> # grub.conf generated by anaconda
> #
> # Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this file
> # NOTICE: You have a /boot partition. This means that
> #
At Sat, 7 Aug 2010 19:13:55 +0100 CentOS mailing list wrote:
>
> On 7 August 2010 19:10, Jerry Franz wrote:
> > Correction: I forgot that on CentOS you want /boot/grub/grub.conf instead.
>
> [nf5...@eros /]$ ls -l /boot/grub/menu.lst
> lrwxrwxr-- 1 root root 11 Oct 27 2008 /boot/grub/menu.lst
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 11:10 AM, James Bensley wrote:
> I only have one kernel listen which is why I assume I am behind, I
> think yum has been getting new kernels but not building them and
> editing the grub meun. vmlinuz-2.6.18-92.el5 and
> initrd-2.6.18-92.el5.img is the only kernel in /boot?
On 7 August 2010 19:33, Akemi Yagi
>
> Please show the output of:
>
> rpm -qa kernel\* kmod\* | sort
>
[nf5...@eros /]$ rpm -qa kernel\* kmod\* | sort
kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5
kernel-2.6.18-164.10.1.el5
kernel-2.6.18-164.15.1.el5
kernel-2.6.18-194.8.1.el5
kernel-2.6.18-92.el5
kernel-headers-2.6.
On 7 August 2010 19:23, Robert Heller wrote:
> sauron.deepsoft.com% rpm -qf /lib/modules/2.6.18-194.8.1.el5
> kernel-2.6.18-194.8.1.el5
> sauron.deepsoft.com% rpm -ql kernel-2.6.18-194.8.1.el5 | grep boot
> /boot/.vmlinuz-2.6.18-194.8.1.el5.hmac
> /boot/System.map-2.6.18-194.8.1.el5
> /boot/config
2010/8/7 MGW-Discussions :
>
> I have installed the source rpms on CentOS 5.5 due to virtualbox upgrade
> not functioning. (the old one that comes with centos works fine,
> however, I wanted to newer one.)
>
> Whenever I run the driver installation script it fails with an
> indication that it coul
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 11:49 AM, James Bensley wrote:
> On 7 August 2010 19:33, Akemi Yagi
>>
>> Please show the output of:
>>
>> rpm -qa kernel\* kmod\* | sort
>>
>
> [nf5...@eros /]$ rpm -qa kernel\* kmod\* | sort
> kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5
> kernel-2.6.18-164.10.1.el5
> kernel-2.6.18-164.15.1
On 7 August 2010 19:59, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> They are all installed. Are you using RAID by any chance? Your
> grub.conf indicates that is from the second drive.
/dev/sda1 / (ext3)
/dev/sda2 /storage (the ext4 in question, hardware RAID5 3.4TB)
/dev/sdb1 /boot (ext3)
It seems like grub and/or yum
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010, James Bensley wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: James Bensley
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] ext4?
>
> [nf5...@eros boot]$ sudo cat /boot/grub/menu.lst
> # grub.conf generated by anaconda
> #
> # Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this file
> # N
On 7 August 2010 20:10, Keith Roberts
> FWIW, I have installed GRUB to separate boot partition -
> not the MBR of the first hard drive.
>
> Whenever there is a kernel update, I have to mount and
> manually edit the /boot/grub/grub.conf file on the boot
> partition. Yum does not update it, as it do
On Saturday 07 August 2010 11:50, James Bensley wrote:
> I have a 5.5 box and I have formatted a partition as ext4 however I
> can't mount it, the mount command is telling me its an unknown file
> system type. fsck tells me the partition is a clean ext4 partition
> but I can't mount it.
Are you t
At Sat, 7 Aug 2010 20:24:47 +0100 CentOS mailing list wrote:
>
> On 7 August 2010 20:10, Keith Roberts
> > FWIW, I have installed GRUB to separate boot partition -
> > not the MBR of the first hard drive.
> >
> > Whenever there is a kernel update, I have to mount and
> > manually edit the /boot
At Sat, 7 Aug 2010 20:06:11 +0100 CentOS mailing list wrote:
>
> On 7 August 2010 19:59, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> > They are all installed. Are you using RAID by any chance? Your
> > grub.conf indicates that is from the second drive.
>
> /dev/sda1 / (ext3)
> /dev/sda2 /storage (the ext4 in question
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010, James Bensley wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: James Bensley
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] ext4?
>
> On 7 August 2010 19:59, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> They are all installed. Are you using RAID by any chance? Your
>> grub.conf indicates that is from the second drive.
>
> /dev/
Thanks for the reply.
How do I verify where the sources should be after the rpm install?
How do I install only the headers, since that phrase keeps popping up
but like many things on the net, no one ever actually verifies the
process for making sure you have them installed, nor how to do it in t
Dear List,
After some googling around without any results, I'm quite puzzled. Since
some past update I can't precise, kernel 2.6.164 works fine, however 2.6.194
has some sound problem in my somewhat old and beaten Toshiba laptop.
-Audacious plays OK but other applications have problems.
-For insta
39 matches
Mail list logo
