> I am trying to find "something" (php prefered) that I can stick onto a
> Centos apache server that would allow me to browse a selected file system
> by employees through a web-browser "explorer like" interface.
AjaXplorer is a mature and pretty well supported web files explorer,
with plugins for
Mark wrote:
> I recently updated to OpenOffice 3.2 and I noticed that it, and the
> latest Evolution, seem to be incredibly slow for some operations.
>
> E.g., in OO, about half the time when I'm editing something, it takes
> anywhere from 10-30 seconds for OO to respond to a click on one of the
>
Frank Thommen wrote:
> I'm experiencing similar problems on a DELL Optiplex 740 with the same
> CPU (AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5000+ @ 2.60 GHz, 4 GB RAM, 80
> GB Hitachi Deskstar 7K80 HD). But in my case the slowness is not
> restricted to OO, but the whole systems is slowed down.
Just went to update a couple systems this morning, and first one machine
took nearly 15 min to find the mirrors (and it should be getting it all
from our own repo, actually), and then the next one showed about 8-10
mirrors down, including Harvard and VCU. Anyone know what's going on?
mark
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 19:07 +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
> On 04/08/10 10:08, JohnS wrote:
> >
> >
> > UPDATE !
> >
> > Replying to my self those you see missing are not on Red Hats Public
> > Mirror Site so evidently those are not built to go in CentOs.
> >
> > I presume those come out in the fa
On 08/05/2010 02:44 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Just went to update a couple systems this morning, and first one machine
> took nearly 15 min to find the mirrors (and it should be getting it all
> from our own repo, actually), and then the next one showed about 8-10
> mirrors down, including Harv
Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 08/05/2010 02:44 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Just went to update a couple systems this morning, and first one machine
>> took nearly 15 min to find the mirrors (and it should be getting it all
>> from our own repo, actually), and then the next one showed about 8-10
>>
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 10:07:33AM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> http://mirror.harvard.edu, not exactly an obscure mirror, and it times
> out.
Doesn't look to be a mirror.harvard.edu in DNS.
> >From yum -d9 update:
yum update runs instantly for me from NYC just now. Yum was working a
half-ho
> And it's still going. What we have here is a massive problem with the
> mirrors.
>
> So, any *real* idea what's going on?
>
> mark
Other then http://mirror.harvard.edu/ everything referenced in your
test is showing as up.
--
Drew
"Nothing in life is to be feared. It is only to be unde
Has anyone ever tried to mass replace installed RedHat RPMS with their
equivalent CentOS versions or vice versa?
I was thinking of generating a list of all packages and then running
RPM or yum with a 'replace' option.
The reason for doing this:
Years ago I was tasked with building a RHEL4 system.
On 8/5/2010 10:07 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
> I do not believe it's a local yum issue. I tried to point firefox to
> http://mirror.harvard.edu, not exactly an obscure mirror, and it times
> out. As I work for an agency of the US gov't, and we have *fat* pipes,
> it's not likely to be on our en
James Pearson wrote:
> Frank Thommen wrote:
>
>> I'm experiencing similar problems on a DELL Optiplex 740 with the same
>> CPU (AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5000+ @ 2.60 GHz, 4 GB RAM, 80
>> GB Hitachi Deskstar 7K80 HD). But in my case the slowness is not
>> restricted to OO, but the w
On 08/05/2010 03:07 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> And it's still going. What we have here is a massive problem with the
> mirrors.
I cant reproduce the issue, but from the looks of things, you seem to
have a bad network locally to you. I'd doubt the whole internet had
fallen apart at exactly the
On 08/05/2010 03:24 PM, Kwan Lowe wrote:
> I've seen posts that RHEL -> CentOS is at least possible. That is,
> take a RHEL system and get it to update via YUM and CentOS
> repositories. I have not seen the reverse, however.
you might want to speak with your Red Hat support / sales guys as well
Frank Thommen wrote:
>>Can you post the output of lspci and lsmod ?
>
> sorry, forgot to copy-paste these in my original post:
>
> [r...@shelley ~]# lspci
> ...
> 00:10.1 Audio device: nVidia Corporation MCP51 High Definition Audio
> (rev a2)
>
> [r...@shelley ~]# lsmod
> ...
> snd_hda_intel
On 08/05/2010 10:24 AM, Kwan Lowe wrote:
> Has anyone ever tried to mass replace installed RedHat RPMS with their
> equivalent CentOS versions or vice versa?
> I've seen posts that RHEL -> CentOS is at least possible. That is,
> take a RHEL system and get it to update via YUM and CentOS
> reposit
mark
the FAQ suff is a good idea...
in fact, when people singup, they should have to agree to list rules or be
pointed to them on signup.
i wonder though, seriously, does the "teach a man to fish" principle really
apply?
ie LMGTFY type stuff or ???
or cluesticks?
;->
as far as lazy, it is
m.r...@5-cent.us a écrit :
> Just went to update a couple systems this morning, and first one machine
> took nearly 15 min to find the mirrors (and it should be getting it all
> from our own repo, actually), and then the next one showed about 8-10
> mirrors down, including Harvard and VCU. Anyone k
Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote, On 08/05/2010 12:40 AM:
> That's the thing, I don't think I can tolerate a slightly behind copy
> on the system. The transaction once done, must remain done. A
> situation where a node fails right after a transaction was done and
> output to user, then recovered to a sligh
At Thu, 5 Aug 2010 10:07:33 -0400 CentOS mailing list wrote:
>
> Karanbir Singh wrote:
> > On 08/05/2010 02:44 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> >> Just went to update a couple systems this morning, and first one machine
> >> took nearly 15 min to find the mirrors (and it should be getting it all
>
Steve Huff wrote:
>
> On Aug 5, 2010, at 10:07 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> I do not believe it's a local yum issue. I tried to point firefox to
>> http://mirror.harvard.edu, not exactly an obscure mirror, and it times
>> out. As I work for an agency of the US gov't, and we have *fat* pipes,
>>
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 11:04 -0400, Todd Denniston wrote:
> You speak of transactions in a way that makes me think you are dealing with
> databases.
> If this is the case, then I suggest you take a few searches over to the drbd
> archives** and look for
> database issues, IIRC in some cases you a
JohnS wrote, On 08/05/2010 11:24 AM:
> On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 11:04 -0400, Todd Denniston wrote:
>> You speak of transactions in a way that makes me think you are dealing with
>> databases.
>> If this is the case, then I suggest you take a few searches over to the drbd
>> archives** and look for
>
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 10:13:50AM -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
>
> yum update runs instantly for me from NYC just now. Yum was working a
> half-hour back from NY too.
Same here, from both NYC (roadrunner), and work (Verizon commercial,
LIC).
--
Scott Robbins
PGP keyID EB3467D6
( 1B48 077D 6
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Tom Georgoulias
wrote:
> On 08/05/2010 10:24 AM, Kwan Lowe wrote:
>> Has anyone ever tried to mass replace installed RedHat RPMS with their
>> equivalent CentOS versions or vice versa?
>
>> I've seen posts that RHEL -> CentOS is at least possible. That is,
>> take
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 07:49:36AM -0700, R-Elists wrote:
> mark
>
> the FAQ suff is a good idea...
>
> in fact, when people singup, they should have to agree to list rules or be
> pointed to them on signup.
I co-moderate an ancient beginners' list on yahoo--we have something
like that, but it'
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 7:35 AM, James Pearson
wrote:
> Frank Thommen wrote:
>>>Can you post the output of lspci and lsmod ?
>>
>> sorry, forgot to copy-paste these in my original post:
>>
>> [r...@shelley ~]# lspci
>> ...
>> 00:10.1 Audio device: nVidia Corporation MCP51 High Definition Audio
>> (
Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 07:49:36AM -0700, R-Elists wrote:
>> mark
>>
>> the FAQ suff is a good idea...
>>
>> in fact, when people singup, they should have to agree to list rules or
>> be pointed to them on signup.
>
> I co-moderate an ancient beginners' list on yahoo--we have
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 08/05/2010 03:24 PM, Kwan Lowe wrote:
>> I've seen posts that RHEL -> CentOS is at least possible. That is,
>> take a RHEL system and get it to update via YUM and CentOS
>> repositories. I have not seen the reverse, however.
>
> you mig
Mark wrote:
> I'm not having sound problems
>
> 00:05.0 Audio device: nVidia Corporation MCP61 High Definition Audio (rev a2)
It might still be worth adding 'enable_msi=0' to the 'options
snd-hda-intel' line in /etc/modprobe.conf to see if it makes any
difference after a reboot ...
James
On 8/4/2010 11:40 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
>
>> It is good for 2 things - you can snapshot for local 'back-in-time'
>> copies without using extra space, and you can do incremental
>> dump/restores from local to remote snapshots.
>
> That sounds good... and bad at the same time because I add ye
James Pearson wrote:
> Frank Thommen wrote:
>>> Can you post the output of lspci and lsmod ?
>> sorry, forgot to copy-paste these in my original post:
>>
>> [r...@shelley ~]# lspci
>> ...
>> 00:10.1 Audio device: nVidia Corporation MCP51 High Definition Audio
>> (rev a2)
>>
>> [r...@shelley ~]# ls
On 8/4/2010 8:08 PM, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> I am trying to find "something" (php prefered) that I can stick onto a
> Centos apache server that would allow me to browse a selected file system
> by employees through a web-browser "explorer like" interface.
>
> I know I can do this thro
Mark wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 7:35 AM, James Pearson
> wrote:
>> Frank Thommen wrote:
Can you post the output of lspci and lsmod ?
>>> sorry, forgot to copy-paste these in my original post:
>>>
>>> [r...@shelley ~]# lspci
>>> ...
>>> 00:10.1 Audio device: nVidia Corporation MCP51 High
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 11:49:07AM -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
> have to type something halfway intelligent to join the list, but
> really don't seem to have actually read the FAQ.
No one reads FAQs. They're a relic of the old guard (what, read the FAQ
and monitor a newsgroup for a week before
Frank Thommen wrote:
>
> The problem was reported for
>
> 00:10.1 Audio device: nVidia Corporation MCP51 High Definition Audio
> (rev a2)
>
> it seems you're lucky having the MCP61 ;-)
The MCP61 still uses the snd_hda_intel driver, and the upstream ALSA
'fix' is to blacklist all NVidia chipse
> AjaXplorer is a mature and pretty well supported web files explorer,
> with plugins for various authentications and backends:
> http://www.ajaxplorer.info/
with some instructions for CentOS here:
http://www.argeo.org/mediawiki/index.php/AjaXplorer#How_To_Install_on_RHEL.2FCentOS_5
Note especial
disagree, we read them all the time.
if we didnt, then we would be wasting time & money purchasing very hi tech
and then wasting time and money not being able to use it or spinning wheels
looking for docs etc.
i think the problem is more that rules are not enforced in many lists...
or nobody wa
On 8/5/10, Todd Denniston wrote:
> You speak of transactions in a way that makes me think you are dealing with
> databases.
That's part of the application suite. Although we do suggest to
clients to have different servers for each particular use, some of
them are budget constraints and fortunatel
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 8/4/2010 8:08 PM, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
>>
>> I am trying to find "something" (php prefered) that I can stick onto a
>> Centos apache server that would allow me to browse a selected file
>> system by employees through a web-browser "explorer like" interface.
>>
>> I kno
R-Elists wrote:
>
> disagree, we read them all the time.
Come on, did he need ?
#insert "old_guard.h"
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 8/6/10, Les Mikesell wrote:
> But even if you have live replicated data you might want historical
> snapshots and/or backup copies to protect against software/operator
> failure modes that might lose all of the replicated copies at once.
That we already do, daily backups of database, configura
On 8/5/2010 10:54 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> I co-moderate an ancient beginners' list on yahoo--we have something
>> like that, but it's almost useless. They say they read it, they even
>> have to type something halfway intelligent to join the list, but
>> really don't seem to have actually
the point is enforcement somehow...
why not require a small yearly donation for access to the list ???
12 bucks a year? or more ?
donations cannot be taken back yet lusers can be moderated or terminated
and to come back, they donate again
- rh
> But what's the point? When you give away goo
R-Elists wrote:
>
> the point is enforcement somehow...
>
> why not require a small yearly donation for access to the list ???
>
> 12 bucks a year? or more ?
>
> donations cannot be taken back yet lusers can be moderated or terminated
> and to come back, they donate again
The simple answer is mode
huh? it was sincere
we are on your side bunky... :-)
insert foot in backside;-)
lighten up homes
- rh
>
> Come on, did he need ?
>
> #insert "old_guard.h"
>
> mark
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.cent
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> The simple answer is moderation. If, say, 3, or 5 regular posters complain
> about someone, they get a canned warning message; the luser does it a
> second time, they get dropped from the list. They rejoin, and do it again,
> they get dropped and banned for at least six m
On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Les Mikesell wrote:
> The part I have trouble understanding is that while it seems
> perfectly acceptable to be dumb about most coding languages and ask
> for a canned routine to do something you are too lazy to write for
> yourself, the same does not apply to shell commands
R-Elists wrote:
>> Come on, did he need ?
>>
>> #insert "old_guard.h"
>>
> huh? it was sincere
>
> we are on your side bunky... :-)
>
> insert foot in backside;-)
>
> lighten up homes
Hey, I worked long and hard to become a curmudgeon, and that was with a
stirling example to follow
well taken
i think centos should make manatory donation for support list or a few of
their lists...
revenue will do centos project/people good.
then moderate
- rh
>
> The simple answer is moderation. If, say, 3, or 5 regular
> posters complain about someone, they get a canned warning
> m
On 8/5/2010 12:12 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
>
>> What you want is difficult to accomplish even in a local file system. I
>> think it would be unreasonably expensive (both in speed and cost) to put
>> your entire data store on something that provides both replication and
>> transactional guaran
On 8/5/2010 12:31 PM, R-Elists wrote:
>
> well taken
>
> i think centos should make manatory donation for support list or a few of
> their lists...
What's a support list and how does it relate to CentOS where every
request for change is countered with "our policy is to be bug-for-bug
compatible
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 10:31 -0700, R-Elists wrote:
> well taken
>
> i think centos should make manatory donation for support list or a few of
> their lists...
Ahh ok so you want mind paying a fee to join my list and everybody
elses?
You had hell got to be crazy. Is not Open Source to be free?
On 8/5/2010 12:25 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> The part I have trouble understanding is that while it seems
>> perfectly acceptable to be dumb about most coding languages and ask
>> for a canned routine to do something you are too lazy to write for
>> your
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 8/5/2010 12:25 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
>> On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>
>>> The part I have trouble understanding is that while it seems
>>> perfectly acceptable to be dumb about most coding languages and ask
>>> for a canned routine to do something you are to
On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 8/5/2010 12:25 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
>> On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>
>>> The part I have trouble understanding is that while it seems
>>> perfectly acceptable to be dumb about most coding languages and
>>> ask for a canned routine to
On 8/5/2010 11:51 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> When someone says, "I'm writing a shell script, and hereabouts I need
>> $TOOL to do such and such," a good answer is usually forthcoming.
>>
>> When someone says, "Tell me how to script this $PROJECT," the
>> commmunity usually points the OP off to Goog
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 02:02:51PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
> Mike, you seem to be misunderstanding - the lusers, like Hadi (sp?), are
> asking us to do their work for them, not help them to learn what they need
> to do it themselves.
It goes beyond that.
The issue that
> When someone says, "I'm writing a shell script, and
> hereabouts I need $TOOL to do such and such," a good answer
> is usually forthcoming.
>
> When someone says, "Tell me how to script this $PROJECT," the
> commmunity usually points the OP off to Google/Manual.
The difference is (as before
On 8/5/2010 1:02 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> I don't think it is the nature of the requests that are different
>> (although coders perhaps have to know more to even ask a reasonable
>> question), just the responses. Coders seem much more likely to try to
>> make their work available to other
On 08/05/2010 11:23 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> No, the part I don't understand is why you can't ignore any request
> where you are unwilling or unable to help. If everyone did, there would
> only be one or two messages on this thread instead of the current mess.
>
>
+1
--
Benjamin Franz
On 8/5/2010 12:02 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On 8/4/2010 8:08 PM, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
>>>
>>> I am trying to find "something" (php prefered) that I can stick onto a
>>> Centos apache server that would allow me to browse a selected file
>>> system by employees through
Benjamin Franz wrote:
> On 08/05/2010 11:23 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> No, the part I don't understand is why you can't ignore any request
>> where you are unwilling or unable to help. If everyone did, there would
>> only be one or two messages on this thread instead of the current mess.
>>
> +1
On 8/5/2010 1:17 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
>
> Hadi had been asked, repeatedly, to at least make a minimal
> effort on his own; to date there has been *no* evidence of that
> happening.
So where would he have found an answer to the question that sparked this
thread of non-answ
On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Les Mikesell wrote:
> To: centos@centos.org
> From: Les Mikesell
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source
>
> On 8/5/2010 12:25 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
>> On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>
>>> The part I have trouble understanding is tha
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 8/5/2010 1:17 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
>> The world is full of what seems an entire generation of people
>> that possess an air of entitlement from those around them and
>> expect people to instantly drop what they are doing and do
>> their jobs / sc
On 8/5/2010 1:36 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Benjamin Franz wrote:
>> On 08/05/2010 11:23 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> No, the part I don't understand is why you can't ignore any request
>>> where you are unwilling or unable to help. If everyone did, there would
>>> only be one or two messages on
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 10:20:38AM -0700, R-Elists wrote:
>
> the point is enforcement somehow...
Enforcement = suppression and suppression -> consequences
not elimination of the issue.
>
> why not require a small yearly donation for access to the list ???
>
> 12 bucks a year? or more ?
No
On 8/5/2010 1:13 PM, Warren Young wrote:
>
>>> When someone says, "I'm writing a shell script, and hereabouts I need
>>> $TOOL to do such and such," a good answer is usually forthcoming.
>>>
>>> When someone says, "Tell me how to script this $PROJECT," the
>>> commmunity usually points the OP off t
On Tuesday, August 03, 2010 12:07:58 am Edward Diener wrote:
> I boot from the installation DVD, with an already existing CentOS 5.5
> system on my hard disks. I have separate boot, root, and home
> partitions. I have moved the boot partition and now I need to
> re-initialize grub from rescue mo
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 01:40:10PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> So where would he have found an answer to the question that sparked this
> thread of non-answers: the one about installing a redhat version that
> didn't support USB on a USB disk?
There seems to be a disconnect here, and
no, i probably would join your list because it might be straight up doody.
right? eh? ;-)
open source doesnt mean free tech support to triple portion idiot morons on
an email list
present company excluded, of course ;-)
- rh
>
> Ahh ok so you want mind paying a fee to join my list and
>
On 8/6/10, Les Mikesell wrote:
> If you are going to do that, why not also rely on the database engine's
> replication which is aware of the transactions? Databases rely on
> filesystem write ordering and fsync() actually working - things that
> aren't always reliable locally, much less when cl
On 8/5/2010 2:50 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
>
>> So where would he have found an answer to the question that sparked this
>> thread of non-answers: the one about installing a redhat version that
>> didn't support USB on a USB disk?
>
> There seems to be a disconnect here, and for the life of
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 13:14 -0700, R-Elists wrote:
> no, i probably would join your list because it might be straight up doody.
Ok elaborate for me some more on this so I can get a complete idea in
English.
Do you mean "would not" in place of would?
Do you mean to say it could be straight up sh
At Thu, 5 Aug 2010 11:11:27 -0700 (PDT) CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> > On 8/5/2010 12:25 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> >> On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Les Mikesell wrote:
> >>
> >>> The part I have trouble understanding is that while it seems
> >>> perfectly
JohnS wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 13:14 -0700, R-Elists wrote:
>> no, i probably would join your list because it might be straight up
>> doody.
> Do you mean to say it could be straight up shit? That it?
>
> I only Speak English and Gullah and there is no such word as "doody".
> Maybe a "do'
On 8/5/2010 3:52 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
>
>> The DB will offer a more optimized alternative. A VM image won't.
>
> I'm not quite sure what's the connection here. The database runs
> within the VM and is stored in the virtual disk. I'm not using VM to
> substitute for a database replication b
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 05:11:51PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> JohnS wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 13:14 -0700, R-Elists wrote:
> >> no, i probably would join your list because it might be straight up
> >> doody.
>
> > Do you mean to say it could be straight up shit? That it?
> >
> >
On Thursday, August 05, 2010 05:26:12 pm Scott Robbins wrote:
> Often used, by children in insults such as doodie-head.
Perhaps the phrase 'doodie thread' should be coined.
"Don't feed the trolls if you don't want a doodie thread." Dun G. Hill,
author, in 'I feel a draught'
Hey guys,
Where is a good place people here have used with luck to find devs interested
in work?
I have a simple need involving an Axis M1031-W Camera I need an interface
programmed
for...
Thanks!
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://l
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>Hey guys,
>Where is a good place people here have used with luck to find devs
>interested in work?
The Seattle Unix Group has a moderated mailing list for members
interested in jobs, contract work, etc. Send a message to the
list at slug-j...@seaslu
Hi,Kevin
(2010/08/04 23:44), CS_DBA wrote:
> Anyone know if the Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 4500MHD will support
> dual monitors with CentOS ?
Not supported GMA4500MHD(G45) with CentOS.
This hardware is equipped with notebook and blue-ray home pc.
CentOS/Upstream hardware supports until G40
Hi
Using apache (either webdav or index) destroys the file permissions, on top
of that I have to add the user that runs apache (nobody) to the group
permissions
having access to the file system.
Most of my file systems do not have global access, only owner/group ...
especially when it comes to d
Hi guys,
I'm trying to figure out something wherein excluded repositories for
the yum-fastestmirror plugin are still being used by the system.
To illustrate:
[r...@sales ~]# cat /etc/yum/pluginconf.d/fastestmirror.conf
[main]
enabled=1
verbose=0
socket_timeout=3
hostfilepath=/var/cache/yum/timed
85 matches
Mail list logo
