On 20/07/10 03:08, Rob Kampen wrote:
> Still no joy - I am at a loss to know what to check - if I boot a 194
> kernel no sound, 164 kernel is fine - why the regression?
> Same configs, same modules loaded but now no sound - what can I check to
> determine problem and find a solution?
> no errors i
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010, Frank Cox wrote:
> It may yet be too early to get a definite answer about this, but I'm
> wondering what the status of the formerly patented bytecode interpreter
> in freetype will be in RHEL/Centos 6 and possibly future updates to
> RHEL/Centos 5.
CentOS just rebuilds source
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20/07/2010 02:17, Markus Falb wrote:
> #$ setfacl -m u:mf:r bla
> #$ getfacl bla
...
> It is readable by mf like intended.
>
> #$ chmod go-rwx bla
...
> It is not readable no more by mf which was not intended.
> Obviously the mask:: is cleared, b
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> I want to add a sleep() to a module. It tells me it can't find ;
> if I tell it "/usr/include/time.h", it gives me a ton of errors (I *have*
> put the #include just above where I call sleep, not up at the top).
>
> Any clues as to what I'm doing wrong? With kernel
> /vmli
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:41:07AM -0400, Fred Wittekind wrote:
> Two web servers, both virtualized with CentOS Xen servers as host
> (residing on two different physical servers).
> GFS used to store home directories containing web document roots.
>
> Shared block device used by GFS is an ISCSI
Hi all.
I have uploaded a PDF and DVI version of the Kickstart
manual for anyone to download and use.
I created this for my own personal use when learning to
write kickstart files.
You can grab the bits from here:
http://www.karsites.net/centos/anyuser/kickstart-PDF-manual.php
Feedback or an
James Pearson wrote:
> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> I want to add a sleep() to a module. It tells me it can't find ;
>> if I tell it "/usr/include/time.h", it gives me a ton of errors (I
>> *have*
>> put the #include just above where I call sleep, not up at the top).
>>
>> Any clues as to what I'm do
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Keith Roberts wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I have uploaded a PDF and DVI version of the Kickstart
> manual for anyone to download and use.
>
> I created this for my own personal use when learning to
> write kickstart files.
>
> You can grab the bits from here:
>
> http://
I'm configuring some monitoring for a particular java/tomcat
application. We have noticed the occasional "Cannot allocate memory"
error. When this occurs apache still seems to return a "200 OK"
status code. Anyone know how to configure this so that when java has
an error, apache will also return
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 2:55 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
> On 20/07/10 03:08, Rob Kampen wrote:
>
>> Still no joy - I am at a loss to know what to check - if I boot a 194
>> kernel no sound, 164 kernel is fine - why the regression?
>> Same configs, same modules loaded but now no sound - what can I check
On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 06:24 -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
> While this may induce a reluctance to change matters too
> much, a closer to the 'leaf node' package such as freetype may
> be 'doable' if you ask, and as I recall, RFE it in their
> Bugzilla;
Upon checking the redhat bugzilla, I found th
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Kwan Lowe wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Kwan Lowe
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Kickstart User Guide in PDF & DVI format
>
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Keith Roberts wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> I have uploaded a PDF and DVI version of the Kickstart
>> manual for an
Ned Slider wrote:
On 20/07/10 03:08, Rob Kampen wrote:
Still no joy - I am at a loss to know what to check - if I boot a 194
kernel no sound, 164 kernel is fine - why the regression?
Same configs, same modules loaded but now no sound - what can I check to
determine problem and fin
Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 2:55 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
On 20/07/10 03:08, Rob Kampen wrote:
Still no joy - I am at a loss to know what to check - if I boot a 194
kernel no sound, 164 kernel is fine - why the regression?
Same configs, same modules loa
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 06:24 -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
>> While this may induce a reluctance to change matters too
>> much, a closer to the 'leaf node' package such as freetype may
>> be 'doable' if you ask, and as I recall, RFE it in their
>> Bugzilla;
> Up
In the last month - definitely after going to 5.5 - I've tried to fsck a
drive (340 days, or some such, unchecked). 960G RAID 5, I *think*,
possibly serial port attachment to a JetStore RAID array. Every time I
try, it gets to 70.0%, and stops. As in, I left it run last night, having
started it lat
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:57 PM, wrote:
> Note that my manager tried to run one on another server, also attached to
> a JetStore, and it also stopped at the exact same point. This has never
> happened before, and fsck has handled these in the past.
>
> Anyone seen anything like this, and/or have
On 07/20/2010 10:57 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> In the last month - definitely after going to 5.5 - I've tried to fsck a
> drive (340 days, or some such, unchecked). 960G RAID 5, I *think*,
> possibly serial port attachment to a JetStore RAID array. Every time I
> try, it gets to 70.0%, and stops
On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 13:26 -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
> File the bug on that product [rhel 6/beta] as well, and
> explain why it would be the right thing to do, and what the
> needed fix are, (preferably with patches), and why taht is a
> low risk, high gain decision, and it will flow into Cent
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:10:45AM -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote:
>
> I've seen e2fsck hang on large arrays (terabyte range) before,
> particularly if you have lots of hard links. It's a bug in fsck.
I've see that too. Glad it's not just on my systems ... sorta.
Whit
_
Kwan Lowe wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:57 PM, wrote:
>
>> Note that my manager tried to run one on another server, also attached
>> to
>> a JetStore, and it also stopped at the exact same point. This has never
>> happened before, and fsck has handled these in the past.
>>
>> Anyone seen any
I just installed centos on a Dell that used to have 2 internal disks, but I
removed one just before the install. Now when I boot it, it stops and
outputs a message complaining about the missing disk and I have to hit F1 to
get it to continue booting.
Is there some bios setting that is causing this
Benjamin Franz wrote:
> On 07/20/2010 10:57 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> In the last month - definitely after going to 5.5 - I've tried to fsck a
>> drive (340 days, or some such, unchecked). 960G RAID 5, I *think*,
>> possibly serial port attachment to a JetStore RAID array. Every time I
>> try,
> I just installed centos on a Dell that used to have 2 internal disks, but I
> removed one just before the install. Now when I boot it, it stops and
> outputs a message complaining about the missing disk and I have to hit F1 to
> get it to continue booting.
>
> Is there some bios setting that is c
At Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:56:16 -1000 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
>
>
> I just installed centos on a Dell that used to have 2 internal disks, but I
> removed one just before the install. Now when I boot it, it stops and
> outputs a message complaining about the missing disk and I have to hit F1
Robert Heller wrote:
> At Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:56:16 -1000 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>>
>> I just installed centos on a Dell that used to have 2 internal disks,
>> but I removed one just before the install. Now when I boot it, it stops
and
>> outputs a message complaining about the missing disk
On 07/20/2010 10:26 AM, R P Herrold wrote:
>
> Reading that and the companion mentioned in the last comment,
> my takeaway is that fonts in fedora are (or were) bad [I trust
> m miller's judgment here, and have for a long time, as he is
> a thoughtful analyst]
Which fonts? All of the fonts I use
This is not a "Dell-specific BIOS hack". Dear child, ask your folks about
PCs. I think it was only this decade that PCs would actually boot
*without* a keyboard. EVERY PC EVER MADE before would not.
Nah! Every BIOS since I remember (at least from 1990) had a choice on
the first page, Standard BI
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 03:31:48PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> This is not a "Dell-specific BIOS hack". Dear child, ask your folks about
> PCs. I think it was only this decade that PCs would actually boot
This decade being the 2010s? :-)
> *without* a keyboard. EVERY PC EVER MADE before woul
On Tuesday, July 20, 2010 02:56:16 pm Dave wrote:
> I just installed centos on a Dell that used to have 2 internal disks, but I
> removed one just before the install. Now when I boot it, it stops and
> outputs a message complaining about the missing disk and I have to hit F1 to
> get it to continue
> This is not a "Dell-specific BIOS hack". Dear child, ask your folks about
> PCs. I think it was only this decade that PCs would actually boot
> *without* a keyboard. EVERY PC EVER MADE before would not.
>
Nah! Every BIOS since I remember (at least from 1990) had a choice on
the first page,
On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 12:46 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> Which fonts? All of the fonts I use on Fedora (pretty much all the
> defaults) look significantly better than a default Windows desktop,
> and
> better than OS X, IMO.
See the discussion here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?
On Tuesday, July 20, 2010 03:50:39 pm Stephen Harris wrote:
> I'm sure sufficient googling would find even older examples.
Yep, especially single-board computers (typically ISA capable, but also capable
of not being in a slot (like an Advantech PCA-6145 i486 board used in lots of
embedded PC app
On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 15:31 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Robert Heller wrote:
> > At Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:56:16 -1000 CentOS mailing list
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I just installed centos on a Dell that used to have 2 internal disks,
> >> but I removed one just before the install. Now when I boot i
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 07/20/2010 10:26 AM, R P Herrold wrote:
>>
>> Reading that and the companion mentioned in the last comment,
>> my takeaway is that fonts in fedora are (or were) bad [I trust
>> m miller's judgment here, and have for a long time, as he is
>> a thought
At Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:49:23 +0100 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
>
> This is not a "Dell-specific BIOS hack". Dear child, ask your folks about
> PCs. I think it was only this decade that PCs would actually boot
> *without* a keyboard. EVERY PC EVER MADE before would not.
>
> Nah! Every BIOS si
At Tue, 20 Jul 2010 15:31:48 -0400 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> Robert Heller wrote:
> > At Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:56:16 -1000 CentOS mailing list
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I just installed centos on a Dell that used to have 2 internal disks,
> >> but I removed one just before the install. Now when
At Tue, 20 Jul 2010 15:50:34 -0400 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, July 20, 2010 02:56:16 pm Dave wrote:
> > I just installed centos on a Dell that used to have 2 internal disks, but I
> > removed one just before the install. Now when I boot it, it stops and
> > outputs a message com
On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 16:26 -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
>
> A PowerEdge with plain old SATA disks will complain about a missing disk
> as well -- we had a disk die and everytime it booted while we waited for
> the replacement it would stop complaining that the disk was missing (we
> had software
On 07/20/2010 01:06 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
>
> read the bugs -- I just summarised, and for the reasons stated
> in the prior post
I did. The bug you linked to said nothing about any specific font. It
referenced another bug in RH Bugzilla where Matthew Miller complained
that freetype with BCI e
On 07/20/2010 12:57 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 12:46 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>> Which fonts? All of the fonts I use on Fedora (pretty much all the
>> defaults) look significantly better than a default Windows desktop,
>> and
>> better than OS X, IMO.
>
> See the discussion
Hi all,
I'm new to LDAP and want to use nss_ldap (version 253) against a centos
directory server (version 8.1.0) running on the same host. The great
mystery is, that as root everything works find, but as any other local
user, it does not:
root$ getent passwd
[...]
ldap:x:55:55:LDAP User:/var/lib/l
On Mon, July 19, 2010 16:01, James Hogarth wrote:
> Sent from Android mobile
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: "James Hogarth"
> Date: 19 Jul 2010 21:00
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Problem with yum
> To: "CentOS mailing list"
>
> With the kernel logging an out of memory error? My f
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> The answer depends on what kind of Dell this is. Is it a PowerEdge server?
> Some sort of embedded RAID controller (PowerEdge and Precision workstations
> both have those)? More information required to fully answer.
>
Precision WorkStation
Thanks for all the discussion, but keyboard is not the issue.
I guess I should edit the bios settings and look for a way to tell it "hey,
you've only got one disk now, be happy."
best,
Dave
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.or
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 at 11:34am, Dave wrote
> Thanks for all the discussion, but keyboard is not the issue.
>
> I guess I should edit the bios settings and look for a way to tell it "hey,
> you've only got one disk now, be happy."
All Dell desktops I've dealt with (including the Precision T3400 I
Hi We use AoE disks for some of our systems. Currently, a 15.65Tb filesystem
we have is full, I then extended the LVM by a further 4Tb but resize4fs could
not handle a filesystem over 16Tb (CentOS 5.5). I then reduced the lvm by the
same amount, and attempted to create a new LV, but get this er
Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 03:31:48PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> This is not a "Dell-specific BIOS hack". Dear child, ask your folks about
>> PCs. I think it was only this decade that PCs would actually boot
>
> This decade being the 2010s? :-)
The calendar is '1' base
Hello
after several days of searching, I have not found a definitive answer to the
problem samba Migrating from 3.0.x to 3.3.x. (Migrating from 3.0.x to 3.3.x
Can Fail to Update passdb.tdb Correctly (bug # 6195) .
passdb.tdb break occurs in the file where the new samba starts.
Any suggestions or
Hello all,
Today, I ran across a directory in /etc/ on one of our servers whose
permissions where set to 600 (drw---) with root being the owner.
The directory is for the firewall package for the server, so it is not
something malicious. Checking some other systems, they also have this
director
Ski Dawg wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Today, I ran across a directory in /etc/ on one of our servers whose
> permissions where set to 600 (drw---) with root being the owner.
> The directory is for the firewall package for the server, so it is not
> something malicious. Checking some other systems,
On 07/20/10 4:54 PM, Larry Brower wrote:
> Ski Dawg wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Today, I ran across a directory in /etc/ on one of our servers whose
>> permissions where set to 600 (drw---) with root being the owner.
>> The directory is for the firewall package for the server, so it is not
>>
At Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:38:32 -0400 (EDT) CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 at 11:34am, Dave wrote
>
> > Thanks for all the discussion, but keyboard is not the issue.
> >
> > I guess I should edit the bios settings and look for a way to tell it "hey,
> > you've only got one dis
At Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:40:25 -0400 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 16:26 -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
>
> >
> > A PowerEdge with plain old SATA disks will complain about a missing disk
> > as well -- we had a disk die and everytime it booted while we waited for
> > the
At Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:57:11 -0700 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On 07/20/10 4:54 PM, Larry Brower wrote:
> > Ski Dawg wrote:
> >> Hello all,
> >>
> >> Today, I ran across a directory in /etc/ on one of our servers whose
> >> permissions where set to 600 (drw---) with root being the owne
Robert Heller wrote:
> At Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:57:11 -0700 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>
>> On 07/20/10 4:54 PM, Larry Brower wrote:
>>> Ski Dawg wrote:
Hello all,
Today, I ran across a directory in /etc/ on one of our servers whose
permissions where set to 600 (drw---)
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 07:34:14AM -0700, Warren Young wrote:
> On 3/6/2010 4:04 PM, nate wrote:
> >
> > if you can upload source code,
> > you can upload a precompiled binary
>
> True, but most attacks are automated, and try to attack as wide a range
> of machines as possible.
>
> If I were to
On 07/20/2010 05:17 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
>> um... on a directory, the X bit means you can LS the contents of the
>> directory. of course, root ignores this anyways and overrides it.
>
> Note that execute access is only needed on a directory if you want to
> list its contents (eg ls). If you
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:34:17AM -1000, Dave wrote:
> Thanks for all the discussion, but keyboard is not the issue.
Of course it isn't. It's probably that you've configured the BIOS
to mirror the two disks, and with one disk missing it's bitching
and moaning at you.
The whole keyboard chatter
I've HP 520 laptop. I installed CentOS 5.5 a few days back. The laptop has
some weird placing of touchpad that is frustrating me while typing.
Please advise me how to disable touchpad on CentOS 5.5.
--
Regards,
- samoak.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@c
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 06:26:15PM -0400, Bob McConnell wrote:
> Stephen Harris wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 03:31:48PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> >> This is not a "Dell-specific BIOS hack". Dear child, ask your folks about
> >> PCs. I think it was only this decade that PCs would actual
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 05:45:36PM -0600, Ski Dawg wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Today, I ran across a directory in /etc/ on one of our servers whose
> permissions where set to 600 (drw---) with root being the owner.
Heheheheh. That machine is so broken. Even 0700 would be unbelievably
broken
>
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 07:36:17PM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> You and John are both incorrect. Read access is sufficient to get a
> list of files and directories in a given directory. The execute bit on
> a directory is required to access the directory's contents. If a
> directory is '
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 08:30:48PM -0700, Keith Keller wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:20:57PM -0400, Stephen Harris wrote:
> > Basically nothing non-root running will work properly on these machines.
> > And if everything is designed to run as root then the architect has
> > shown other issues
On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 20:08 -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
> > Which makes me wonder why would you ever shut it down in the first
> > place? I sure would not wait a week on a disk replacement much less
> > more than 24 hours.
>
> First of all WD was not going to send us a new disk unless we sent t
OK I believe I've resolved it. I knew I was in test mode, but wasn't
expecting those messages. Running the command out of test mode just works.
Should have tried that earlier, never mind I'll know next time.
Phil.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@ce
> Well, they would not even let you pay for it and overnight it to you
> then send the old one back for another drive so you could break even? It's
> an utmost priority if you have all common hardware to keep replacement disks
> on site no matter who you work for or company.
Which is why you'll a
On 07/20/2010 08:30 PM, Keith Keller wrote:
>
> IOW, ls will work fine, but ls -l will not. (To be specific, a plain
> old /bin/ls will work fine. If you have any ls options that need to read
> the contents of the directory, like -l or -F, it'll b0rk.)
Well, to be *specific*, reading the content
On 07/20/2010 08:20 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 05:45:36PM -0600, Ski Dawg wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Today, I ran across a directory in /etc/ on one of our servers whose
>> permissions where set to 600 (drw---) with root being the owner.
>
> Heheheheh. That machine is
On 07/20/2010 02:11 PM, Nicolai Stange wrote:
>
> The only entries in my /etc/ldap.conf are those:
> tls_cacertfile /etc/nss/ca.example.org-cert.pem
> tls_cert /etc/nss/nss-cert.pem
> tls_key /etc/nss/nss-key.pem
I don't think that can possibly be true. If you don't have a uri
specified, you won
70 matches
Mail list logo
