On 7/15/10, Victor Padro wrote:
> AFAIK, VT-d is only implemented LGA 1156/P55 and 34XX Chipsets:
> http://www.intel.com/products/server/chipsets/3400-3420/3400-3420-overview.htm
AFAIK from the last couple of weeks of looking for suitable parts,
some of the desktop Q series chipsets (Q35, Q45 acc
No-one else has anything to say about this problem?
>
Linedata Limited
Registered Office: 85 Gracechurch St., London, EC3V 0AA
Registered in England and Wales No 3475006 VAT Reg No 710 3140 03
-Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Do you see the slow behaviour (10 MiB/s) for all of the device or only
for the
> part that is >2T?
>
> Why use a partition table at all? run dd directly against the device. If
this
> is slow then you have a controller side problem.
very true, back to "Go" :(
Peter Kjellstrom
Sent by:
On 7/14/10, William Warren wrote:
> On 7/14/2010 1:16 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
>> Googling up a really old 2005 newsgroup thread says some people had 24
>> physical NIC (6x 4quad) in a system before and one person vaguely
>> remembers a hard 256 limit which would make sense if physical
>> i
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 09:05:38PM -0600, Brian Marshall wrote:
> My config files can be referenced on my forum post
> https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flat&topic_id=27153&forum=42
Your /etc/nscd.conf is only configured to cache passwd/group/hosts. It's
not configured
> The problem I am having is that shadow does not seem to get cached by
> nscd. Here's how I have tracked this down.
NSCD not caching shadow user credentials is a fact. There is nothing wrong
with your configuration. NSCD just does not do what you seem to expect
from it. You can't make it what yo
> Your /etc/nscd.conf is only configured to cache passwd/group/hosts. It's
> not configured to cache shadow.
>
> (I don't know if nscd _can_ be configured to cache shadow or not; never
> tried)
> rgds
> Stephen
The nscd is a "name service caching daemon" and not an authentication
credentials ca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499204
Given I can boot the install disk and chroot in, there must be away around Grub
while still keeping LVM installed.
Any ideas?
Screen says:
Booting Centos (2.6.18-194.3.1.el5)
root (hd0,0)
Filesystem type is ext2fs, partition type 0x83
kern
When launching oowriter and other apps, I get this error:
_IceTransSocketUNIXConnect: Cannot connect to non-local host myh.dom.tld
The app -- oowriter or whatever I happen to be invoking-- starts okay.
But this error message tells me something's not right.
Curiously, the "hostname" command yiel
Jason Pyeron wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499204
>
> Given I can boot the install disk and chroot in, there must be away around
> Grub
> while still keeping LVM installed.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Screen says:
>
> Booting Centos (2.6.18-194.3.1.el5)
>
> root (hd0,0)
> Filesyst
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us
> Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 9:29
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Grub booting issue
>
> Jason Pyeron wrote:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show
Jason Pyeron wrote:
>> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us
>> Jason Pyeron wrote:
>> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499204
>> >
>> > Given I can boot the install disk and chroot in, there must be away
>> > around Grub while still keeping LVM installed.
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us
> Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 10:09
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Grub booting issue
>
> Jason Pyeron wrote:
> >> [mailto:centos-boun...@cento
I'm not looking to move virtual machines between physical platforms; just
want some protection between applications sharing a physical server.
They'll all be using local disk in one form or another.
Much the easiest to manage is just having the virtual machine use a file
in dom0 as its disk. Wit
Had some trouble getting Centos x64 installed as a guest in my new Centos
5.5 x64 server using Xen (thanks again for all the help getting the
hardware virtualization turned on and confirmed yesterday!).
When I chose OS Linux, and whatever they called the detailed OS subtype I
chose the Red Hat Ent
To the list:
1) Someone off the list (thanks!) offered to send me an RT kernel based
on 2.6.23.X. So I thought why not try to build a standard / server type
based on the standard 2.6.23 version.
2) Red Hat 6 Beta 2 is based on a similar starting point
3) I was not going to fix something Red H
Yes but I have worked in many organizations that use directory services for
authentication and my machines with them have always cached authentication data
so I can login if I'm not online. I can't expect laptop users to always have a
network connection. If Mac OS and Windows can manage to cache
The virtualization manual doesn't seem to say; does one have to do
anything to get the Centos 5.5 paravirtualization drivers installed? Or is
it sufficient to specify a paravirtualized guest, and the Centos install
will then detect that and load the right things?
And, is there a way to check in th
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 09:25:55AM -0600, Seth Bardash wrote:
> Officially, Red Hat does not support rebuilds of its kernel with
> configurations other than the one Red Hat ships.
In other news; water is wet, flames are hot, night follows day.
But back to our lead story where RedHat only supp
Brian Marshall wrote, On 07/15/2010 11:37 AM:
> Yes but I have worked in many organizations that use directory services for
> authentication and my machines with them have always cached authentication
> data so I can login if I'm not online. I can't expect laptop users to always
> have a network
David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
> Had some trouble getting Centos x64 installed as a guest in my new Centos
> 5.5 x64 server using Xen (thanks again for all the help getting the
> hardware virtualization turned on and confirmed yesterday!).
>
> When I chose OS Linux, and whatever they called the detailed
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 02:52 +, Ru-Benz Cáceres wrote:
>
> I want to take the exams of redhat.. I´m starting now..
> What advices I can get from you list?
>
>
> __
> Explore the seven wonders of the world Learn more!
>
> _
Hi Todd,
Yes, I have already used authconfig to enable caching. If you have any
questions about my configs I have a forum post with more details up there
including the related ldap, and pam config files.
https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flat&topic_id=27153&forum=42
T
In using virt-install, and then virt-viewer to create a CentOS 5.5 x64 guest
(in my case for KVM), using the text mode for the install, it failed on me
in a similar way just if I added extra package groups - just stalled. It
went forward successfully if I just went with the standard default at that
On Thu, July 15, 2010 11:19, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> In using virt-install, and then virt-viewer to create a CentOS 5.5 x64
> guest
> (in my case for KVM), using the text mode for the install, it failed on me
> in a similar way just if I added extra package groups - just stalled. It
> went forward
It seems there are some bugs discussed around this.
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2132
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488597
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599192
That being said, it does not seem like nscd is the way to solve this. Or at
very leas
On 07/15/2010 08:37 AM, Brian Marshall wrote:
> Yes but I have worked in many organizations that use directory
> services for authentication and my machines with them have always
> cached authentication data so I can login if I'm not online. I can't
> expect laptop users to always have a network co
Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> In using virt-install, and then virt-viewer to create a CentOS 5.5 x64
> guest
> (in my case for KVM), using the text mode for the install, it failed on me
> in a similar way just if I added extra package groups - just stalled. It
> went forward successfully if I just went wi
On 07/15/2010 09:15 AM, Brian Marshall wrote:
>
> The problem still remains, when the LDAP server is offline there is
> no shadow data cached so LDAP users can not authenticate on cached
> data despite caching and local auth sufficient being enabled in
> authconfig .
Most LDAP servers don't provi
On 07/15/2010 04:57 AM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
>
> Given I can boot the install disk and chroot in, there must be away around
> Grub
> while still keeping LVM installed.
What do you mean? Do you think that LVM is causing the problem in some way?
Where is the filesystem containing /boot located?
>
Then am I misinterpreting the fact that getent shadow returns data on ldap
users when ldap is up but not when it's down? I guess I don't understand where
that shadow data comes from when LDAP is up.
I just did some brief testing on installing sssd and there's a ton of fedora
packages I'll need
I think I'm more confused than before.
On 07/14/2010 06:59 PM, Kwan Lowe wrote:
> The clients cannot be upgraded for several more months, possibly over
> a year from now. They do not support NFS3.
Is that to say that they are Red Hat 2.1, from 1995? (not RHEL 2.1)?
> The Windows server does
> su
Does the fact that I am testing without SSL, TLS or Kerberos enabled have any
effect on this? I figured I'd do the security and encryption last.
I'm grasping at straws at this point. I'm starting feel like maybe LDAP was not
such a great idea since linux clients can't operate in the absence of
On 7/15/10 9:15 AM, "Brian Marshall" wrote:
> Hi Todd,
>
> Yes, I have already used authconfig to enable caching. If you have any
> questions about my configs I have a forum post with more details up there
> including the related ldap, and pam config files.
> https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/
On Jul 15, 2010, at 11:46 AM, Gary Greene wrote:
> On 7/15/10 9:15 AM, "Brian Marshall" wrote:
>> Hi Todd,
>>
>> Yes, I have already used authconfig to enable caching. If you have any
>> questions about my configs I have a forum post with more details up there
>> including the related ldap, and
On 7/15/10 11:29 AM, "Brian Marshall" wrote:
>
> On Jul 15, 2010, at 11:46 AM, Gary Greene wrote:
>
>> On 7/15/10 9:15 AM, "Brian Marshall" wrote:
>>> Hi Todd,
>>>
>>> Yes, I have already used authconfig to enable caching. If you have any
>>> questions about my configs I have a forum post with
On Jul 15, 2010, at 12:37 PM, Gary Greene wrote:
> On 7/15/10 11:29 AM, "Brian Marshall" wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 15, 2010, at 11:46 AM, Gary Greene wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/15/10 9:15 AM, "Brian Marshall" wrote:
Hi Todd,
Yes, I have already used authconfig to enable caching. If you have
If I type "xm console 6", say (when I have a virtual machine 6 running),
what should I get?
The documentation seems to indicate that I should get something that
behaves like a telnet to a serial console.
What I actually get is a connection that might show me a couple of lines
of output that do lo
If I can log in to the guest through the console, I can of course find out
what IP DHCP has assigned it. If I configure a static IP I can of course
connect to the system there (if it runs services, the firewall allows it,
all the usual caveats).
Does there happen to be any way to determine from d
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:03 PM, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
> If I can log in to the guest through the console, I can of course find out
> what IP DHCP has assigned it. If I configure a static IP I can of course
> connect to the system there (if it runs services, the firewall allows it,
> all the u
On Thu, July 15, 2010 14:08, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:03 PM, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
>> If I can log in to the guest through the console, I can of course find
>> out
>> what IP DHCP has assigned it. If I configure a static IP I can of
>> course
>> connect to the system the
On 7/15/10 11:49 AM, "Brian Marshall" wrote:
> On Jul 15, 2010, at 12:37 PM, Gary Greene wrote:
>> On 7/15/10 11:29 AM, "Brian Marshall" wrote:
>>> On Jul 15, 2010, at 11:46 AM, Gary Greene wrote:
On 7/15/10 9:15 AM, "Brian Marshall" wrote:
> Hi Todd,
>
> Yes, I have already us
Am 15.07.2010 19:26, schrieb Brian Marshall:
> Then am I misinterpreting the fact that getent shadow returns data on ldap
> users when ldap is up but not when it's down? I guess I don't understand
> where that shadow data comes from when LDAP is up.
/etc/nsswitch.conf
Alexander
___
> What you're looking for is information on sitecustomize. Look at
> /usr/lib/python2.4/site.py for more information.
>
> --
> Gary L. Greene, Jr.
> IT Operations
> Minerva Networks, Inc.
> Cell: (650) 704-6633
> Phone: (408) 240-1239
>
> ___
> CentOS
On Jul 15, 2010, at 2:12 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> Am 15.07.2010 19:26, schrieb Brian Marshall:
>
>> Then am I misinterpreting the fact that getent shadow returns data on ldap
>> users when ldap is up but not when it's down? I guess I don't understand
>> where that shadow data comes from wh
Am 15.07.2010 22:16, schrieb Brian Marshall:
> On Jul 15, 2010, at 2:12 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>
>> Am 15.07.2010 19:26, schrieb Brian Marshall:
>>
>>> Then am I misinterpreting the fact that getent shadow returns data on ldap
>>> users when ldap is up but not when it's down? I guess I don't
On Jul 15, 2010, at 2:27 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> Am 15.07.2010 22:16, schrieb Brian Marshall:
>> On Jul 15, 2010, at 2:12 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>>
>>> Am 15.07.2010 19:26, schrieb Brian Marshall:
>>>
Then am I misinterpreting the fact that getent shadow returns data on ldap
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Gordon Messmer
> Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 13:25
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Grub booting issue
>
> On 07/15/2010 04:57 AM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> >
> > Given
On 7/15/10 1:14 PM, "Brian Marshall" wrote:
>> What you're looking for is information on sitecustomize. Look at
>> /usr/lib/python2.4/site.py for more information.
>>
>> --
>> Gary L. Greene, Jr.
>> IT Operations
>> Minerva Networks, Inc.
>> Cell: (650) 704-6633
>> Phone: (408) 240-1239
>>
>>
On 07/15/2010 02:08 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
>
> No, but lilo does not support lvm.
As long as /boot isn't on the LVM, it shouldn't need to.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 07/15/2010 01:14 PM, Brian Marshall wrote:
>
> I don't have a file /usr/lib/python2.4/site.py
On a 64 bit system, it'll be /usr/lib64/python2.4/site.py
The easiest way to extend the path is to set the PYTHONPATH environment
variable.
# env PYTHONPATH=/usr/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages py
On 07/15/2010 10:26 AM, Brian Marshall wrote:
> Then am I misinterpreting the fact that getent shadow returns data on
> ldap users when ldap is up but not when it's down?
It would be unusual, but not impossible for "getent shadow ..." to have
the password hashes available. If that is the case, y
On 07/15/2010 10:32 AM, Brian Marshall wrote:
> Does the fact that I am testing without SSL, TLS or Kerberos enabled
> have any effect on this?
No, it doesn't.
> I'm grasping at straws at this point. I'm starting feel like maybe
> LDAP was not such a great idea since linux clients can't operate i
On 07/15/2010 05:09 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> Did you build it from source or were you trying to install one of the
> binary packages? You'll definitely want to build from source.
I take that back. Don't build it from source, that's silly.
Install the EPEL repo. You can then "yum install s
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Gordon Messmer
> Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 19:57
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Grub booting issue
>
> On 07/15/2010 02:08 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> >
> > No, b
On Jul 15, 2010, at 6:15 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 07/15/2010 05:09 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>>
>> Did you build it from source or were you trying to install one of the
>> binary packages? You'll definitely want to build from source.
>
> I take that back. Don't build it from source, that
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
> Much the easiest to manage is just having the virtual machine use a file
> in dom0 as its disk. Without pre-allocating, this lets me over-commit
> somewhat to cover unknown future needs, for example.
One sees this a lot in the writeups; one assumes
On 07/15/2010 05:21 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
>
> I have read in many places that I cannot do it, since
> root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00
>
> I will try, if you think it could work.
It should be fine. lilo will load the kernel and initrd into RAM from
the /boot partition. Only the kernel cares abou
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:06 PM, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
>
> My dom0 /var/log/messages doesn't have anything on assignments to guests.
> bs004 (ID 9), for example, currently has 192.168.1.143, but there's
> nothing about that IP in dom0 /var/log/messages.
>
> Are you maybe running a dhcp server
59 matches
Mail list logo
