> Did not know that both had stopped. Conflicting IP addresses was just a
> suggestion. May not be the problem at all. With bonding, breaking one
> might break both down at the MAC level ...
>
> Hmmm ... which bond mode are you using?
Why mode 4 of course.
>
>> The box with the problem just so
Hi, guys:
I attempt to compile a kernel on CentOS 5.3 i386 which is installed in the
Virtualbox machine,
and its kernel version is 2.6.18-128.el5 ,the new kernel version is
2.6.34.1
All make procedure is running ok.
I can generate initrd image with no problem too.
But, when I try booting this k
On 07/08/2010 05:08 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
>> Hmmm ... which bond mode are you using?
>
> Why mode 4 of course.
Ouch. Never used that mode.
mode=4 (802.3ad)
IEEE 802.3ad Dynamic link aggregation. Creates aggregation groups that
share the same speed and duplex settings. Utilizes all slaves
On Thursday, July 08, 2010 05:09 PM, Kahlil Hodgson wrote:
> On 07/08/2010 05:08 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
>>> Hmmm ... which bond mode are you using?
>>
>> Why mode 4 of course.
>
> Ouch. Never used that mode.
Huh? Like why? It's the recommended mode unless the switch does not
suppoprt it or
Christopher Chan wrote:
> On Thursday, July 08, 2010 05:09 PM, Kahlil Hodgson wrote:
>> On 07/08/2010 05:08 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
Hmmm ... which bond mode are you using?
>>> Why mode 4 of course.
>> Ouch. Never used that mode.
>
> Huh? Like why? It's the recommended mode unless the swi
On Wednesday 07 July 2010 21:32:45 Phil Manuel wrote:
> /usr/bin/system-config-time
>
> (from the system-config-date RPM package)
>
> It will work in text mode.
>
> (Essentially /etc/sysconfig/clock is the config file that also needs
> updating)
Is /etc/sysconfig/clock really essential? I just
HiChristopher,
On 08/07/10 10:25, Christopher Chan wrote:
>>> Why mode 4 of course.
> Huh? Like why? It's the recommended mode unless the switch does not
> suppoprt it or the boards don't.
I never realised this is the recommended mode. Do you have pointers
where it is recommended so that I can re
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
> Christopher Chan wrote:
>> On Thursday, July 08, 2010 05:09 PM, Kahlil Hodgson wrote:
>>> On 07/08/2010 05:08 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
> Hmmm ... which bond mode are you using?
Why mode 4 of course.
>>> Ouch. Never used that mode.
>> Huh? Like why?
I am not using Samba 3.x. I am using Samba3x-3.3.8. As I understand it,
RHEL provided this branch so that Windows 7 could join a Samba domain.
That aside, It does not seems to me that the error message indicates that
it cannot resolve where the PDC is. What method is Windows 7 trying to use
tha
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 07:51 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> I think some bridge or vlan scenarios require promiscuous mode (and the
> corresponding disabling of hardware acceleration). Maybe the real issue is
> that
> something accidentally disabled it and you now only work when tcpdump
> re-e
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:42 AM, sync wrote:
> Hi, guys:
>
> I attempt to compile a kernel on CentOS 5.3 i386 which is installed in the
> Virtualbox machine,
> and its kernel version is 2.6.18-128.el5 ,the new kernel version is
> 2.6.34.1
>
> All make procedure is running ok.
> I can generate ini
Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
> HiChristopher,
>
> On 08/07/10 10:25, Christopher Chan wrote:
Why mode 4 of course.
>> Huh? Like why? It's the recommended mode unless the switch does not
>> suppoprt it or the boards don't.
> I never realised this is the recommended mode. Do you have pointers
> where
JohnS wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 07:51 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> I think some bridge or vlan scenarios require promiscuous mode (and the
>> corresponding disabling of hardware acceleration). Maybe the real issue is
>> that
>> something accidentally disabled it and you now only work wh
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
>> Christopher Chan wrote:
>>> On Thursday, July 08, 2010 05:09 PM, Kahlil Hodgson wrote:
On 07/08/2010 05:08 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
>> Hmmm ... which bond mode are you using?
> Why mode 4 of course.
Ouch. Never used t
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 08:13 -0500, Doug Coats wrote:
> I am not using Samba 3.x. I am using Samba3x-3.3.8. As I understand
> it, RHEL provided this branch so that Windows 7 could join a Samba
> domain.
>
> That aside, It does not seems to me that the error message indicates
> that it cannot res
>
>
> I think as long as persist in chasing pointless ends, you will continue
> to fail.
>
> DNS & AD are not at issue here. Samba 3 cannot provide AD services.
>
> If resolution is a problem, it may be that you don't have nmb running on
> your Samba server and you probably want it to be a wins ser
How can I slow down dd?
I don't want to slow down the pc, when generating a big file [~40
GByte].
Does ionice work properly?
Thank you for any help! :\
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 10:34 -0500, Doug Coats wrote:
>
> I think as long as persist in chasing pointless ends, you will
> continue
> to fail.
>
> DNS & AD are not at issue here. Samba 3 cannot provide AD
> services.
>
> If r
Jozsi Avadkan wrote:
> How can I slow down dd?
>
> I don't want to slow down the pc, when generating a big file [~40
> GByte].
>
> Does ionice work properly?
>
Yes, with CentOS 5.5 and the default scheduler.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
ht
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 05:51:12PM +0200, Jozsi Avadkan wrote:
> Does ionice work properly?
It works fine.
--
Dominik Zyla
pgpsTpENjp4im.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinf
>
> I think you are being vague (similar error).
>
> What is the exact error?
>
> What is the output of 'testparm -sv' ?
>
> Craig
>
Sorry for being to vague.
Here is the XP Pro error I get when I try to join the domain.
A domian controller for the domain admin could not be contacted.
Esure that
> Sorry for being to vague.
>
> Here is the XP Pro error I get when I try to join the domain.
> A domian controller for the domain admin could not be contacted.
> Esure that the domain name is typed correctly.
> If the name is correct, click on the Details for troubleshooting
> information.
>
> Det
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 12:03 -0500, Doug Coats wrote:
> I think you are being vague (similar error).
>
> What is the exact error?
>
> What is the output of 'testparm -sv' ?
>
>
> Craig
>
> Sorry for being to vague.
>
> He
On 07/08/2010 05:34 PM, Doug Coats wrote:
...
> Has anyone been able to get Samba3x.3.3.8 to work as a PDC?
It worked for me in a test setup I had a month ago:
Made a copy of our main CentOS 5 server, replace samba with samba3x,
and I was able to join XP and W7 (with registry patch) to the domain
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 12:03 -0500, Doug Coats wrote:
> Here is the testparm -sv you requested.
>
> For a short explaination of the IP's listed. We have two domains.
> One served by 192.168.6.1 and one by 192.168.5.1. I am currantly
> upgrading the 192.168.6. network to Windows 7. Or atleast
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 13:44 -0400, JohnS wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 12:03 -0500, Doug Coats wrote:
>
>
> > Here is the testparm -sv you requested.
> >
> > For a short explaination of the IP's listed. We have two domains.
> > One served by 192.168.6.1 and one by 192.168.5.1. I am currantly
>
>
> His problem is WINS resolution doesn't tell the workstations which
> computer is the domain controller and that is what he needs to fix
> (first by designating a domain controller and then by making sure that
> WINS is functioning well).
>
> Craig
>
Thanks for all the help. I agree that WINS
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 10:50 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 13:44 -0400, JohnS wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 12:03 -0500, Doug Coats wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Here is the testparm -sv you requested.
> > >
> > > For a short explaination of the IP's listed. We have two domains.
Alle,
I've noticed recently that during my nightly mrepo runs, I get failures
like this:
mirror: Access failed: 404 Not Found (/centos/5.5/updates/i386/RPMS)
mrepo: Mirroring failed for
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5.5/updates/i386/RPMS/ with message:
Failed with return code: 256
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 12:58 -0500, Doug Coats wrote:
>
> His problem is WINS resolution doesn't tell the workstations
> which
> computer is the domain controller and that is what he needs to
> fix
> (first by designating a domain controller and then
a 'network' is 192.168.x assuming that you are using class C subnet
> masks (255.255.255.0) and so you should have a WINS server on EACH
> network (192.168.4, 192.168.5, 192.168.6, etc.)
>
> Cross network browsing is somewhat of a hit or miss and not reliable...
> for a number of reasons such as t
On 7/8/2010 1:15 PM, Craig White wrote:
>
> a 'network' is 192.168.x assuming that you are using class C subnet
> masks (255.255.255.0) and so you should have a WINS server on EACH
> network (192.168.4, 192.168.5, 192.168.6, etc.)
I thought the point of WINS was to have a single address that would
>
>
> I do think that I have hit upon an issue. The WINS data for samba is kept
> in /var/cache/samba.dat but it is updated dynamically with nmdb. It has
> dated data. When I moved the server I changed the server name slightly and
> so the WINS data points to the old name at the current IP. In
Doug Coats wrote:
>>
>>
>> I do think that I have hit upon an issue. The WINS data for samba is
>> kept in /var/cache/samba.dat but it is updated dynamically with nmdb.
It has
>> dated data. When I moved the server I changed the server name slightly
>> and so the WINS data points to the old name
With the WINS data cleared. for the past 20 min. (I did it before I wrote
about it) Neither PDC has reported to WINS. So no wonder my PC's can't find
their domain.
So how do I make sure that 192.168.6.1 is added to wins.dat. I could do it
manually but I would rather it communicate the way that
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 13:41 -0500, Doug Coats wrote:
> I agree that preferred master should have been set to yes. I made
> that change with but still no joy.
>
> I don't mean to be contrary but our cross subnet browsing has been
> working since 2003 when we set up this network. It has been v
>
>
> Um, does a timing issue come into play here? If the local clock is not
> within a few seconds, we can't connect to AD (we are going through
> kerborous). Is there time data in the cache?
>
>mark
Both the XP box and the Windows 7 use the PDC server as their time server so
they are se
> ---
> Ok since you say the interdomain networking is functioning (triangle
> routing) have a read at this:
>
> http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/domain-member.html#id2573732
>
>
> John
>
> all else that fails put that machine on another known working Subnet and
> have a g
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 13:43 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 7/8/2010 1:15 PM, Craig White wrote:
> >
> > a 'network' is 192.168.x assuming that you are using class C subnet
> > masks (255.255.255.0) and so you should have a WINS server on EACH
> > network (192.168.4, 192.168.5, 192.168.6, etc.)
>
On 7/8/2010 1:52 PM, Doug Coats wrote:
> With the WINS data cleared. for the past 20 min. (I did it before I
> wrote about it) Neither PDC has reported to WINS. So no wonder my PC's
> can't find their domain.
> So how do I make sure that 192.168.6.1 is added to wins.dat. I could do
> it manually
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 13:52 -0500, Doug Coats wrote:
> With the WINS data cleared. for the past 20 min. (I did it before I
> wrote about it) Neither PDC has reported to WINS. So no wonder my
> PC's can't find their domain.
>
> So how do I make sure that 192.168.6.1 is added to wins.dat. I coul
On 7/8/2010 2:12 PM, Craig White wrote:
>
>> I thought the point of WINS was to have a single address that would
>> collate the names/addresses from all your networks.
>>
>>> The important thing is to get the WINS working on EACH network. It's
>>> also easiest to have your PDC be the WINS server -
I just did a checkconfig on the PDC in question 192.168.6.1. And I noticed
something that might be nothing but it puzzles me. The nmb service is set
to "off" at all run levels. If I check the nmb status it says that it is
stopped. Doesn't Samba need that for net-bios support? I am probably
sho
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 14:12 -0500, Doug Coats wrote:
>
> As I said in another post I changed the machine name to an entirely
> different format and I didn't copy any domain information from the
> prior machine(meaning I didn't try to migrate the information placed
> in the smbpasswd). Since all
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 14:29 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> > WINS is a broadcast based protocol and thus it only works on the local
> > network and each subnet/network MUST necessarily have master browser
> > elections. The WINS server on each subnet would serve as a clearing
> > house for name res
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 14:36 -0500, Doug Coats wrote:
> I just did a checkconfig on the PDC in question 192.168.6.1. And I
> noticed something that might be nothing but it puzzles me. The nmb
> service is set to "off" at all run levels. If I check the nmb status
> it says that it is stopped. Doe
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 14:36 -0500, Doug Coats wrote:
> I just did a checkconfig on the PDC in question 192.168.6.1. And I
> noticed something that might be nothing but it puzzles me. The nmb
> service is set to "off" at all run levels. If I check the nmb status
> it says that it is stopped. Do
Doug Coats wrote:
> mark wrote:
>> Um, does a timing issue come into play here? If the local clock is not
>> within a few seconds, we can't connect to AD (we are going through
>> kerborous). Is there time data in the cache?
>
> Both the XP box and the Windows 7 use the PDC server as their time serv
On 7/8/2010 2:36 PM, Doug Coats wrote:
> I just did a checkconfig on the PDC in question 192.168.6.1. And I
> noticed something that might be nothing but it puzzles me. The nmb
> service is set to "off" at all run levels. If I check the nmb status it
> says that it is stopped. Doesn't Samba nee
>
> How 'bout with the server that's supposed to be the master, above the two
> other PDCs?
>
>mark
>
It is set up to NTP to the same external servers so they should all be in
sync.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 14:29 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 7/8/2010 2:12 PM, Craig White wrote:
> >
> >> I thought the point of WINS was to have a single address that would
> >> collate the names/addresses from all your networks.
> >>
> >>> The important thing is to get the WINS working on EACH ne
On 7/8/2010 2:43 PM, JohnS wrote:
>
>>> WINS is a broadcast based protocol and thus it only works on the local
>>> network and each subnet/network MUST necessarily have master browser
>>> elections. The WINS server on each subnet would serve as a clearing
>>> house for name resolution for each subn
>
> Netbios can use multiple network transports, some of which only have
> broadcasts to support name resolution. Each subnet will elect a master
> browser to collect the names and respond to queries. As an extension
> for the IP protocol which is routeable, the WINS service accepts the
> lists
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 14:55 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> > Correct and Not Correct... How about that? There really is no right or
> > wrong in either of you twos answer. The right way is Wins on every SN
> > to pass to the MB. That's my opinion.
>
> So what do you do on a VPN connection that
On 7/8/2010 3:11 PM, JohnS wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 14:55 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>>> Correct and Not Correct... How about that? There really is no right or
>>> wrong in either of you twos answer. The right way is Wins on every SN
>>> to pass to the MB. That's my opinion.
>>
>> So w
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 15:31 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> > And your getting at what? How does this relate to the OPs problem?
>
> I'm getting at your assertion that a Wins server on every subnet is
> "right" being impractical in most networks. And like the OPs problem
> it has to do with a
On 7/8/2010 4:00 PM, JohnS wrote:
>
>> Windows name resolution has next to nothing to do with ip routing. If
>> your routing works you can make windows name resolution work over it,
>> but it isn't automatic.
>
> If it does not work then it want happen as in getting routed to the
> wins server.
To the Linux Community at Large:
I reported to this list back in January, 2010 that the standard x86_64
kernel, when built from the src.rpm and modified for AMD K8 / K10
Extensions would not build. I reported this here and to Red Hat via
Bugzilla ID number 558367. RH AS / Centos 5.3 worked fine
Hello,
I have two EC2 instances and I would like to setup some sort of
failover strategy for them.
They currently act as load balancers, forwarding layer 7 traffic using
haproxy and stunnel
to other EC2 instances. One of these load balancers currently has an
elastic IP assigned
with an A record po
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 at 3:39pm, Seth Bardash wrote
> I am beginning to wonder if Red Hat is getting too big? Or that it just
> does not care. Other ideas less pleasant come to mind Today, the
> old bug was still marked as new (6+ months and counting). I entered a
> new bug report for RH 5.5 for
After a little bit of research I feel a little vindicated. It seems that
Samba3x seporated out nmb. On Samba 3.0 the nmb service does not show up in
the chkconfig. It simply starts and stops with smb.
On Samba3x it seporates out nmb and it does not start by itself. So based
on my experience I
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 18:10 -0500, Doug Coats wrote:
>
> After a little bit of research I feel a little vindicated. It seems
> that Samba3x seporated out nmb. On Samba 3.0 the nmb service does not
> show up in the chkconfig. It simply starts and stops with smb.
>
> On Samba3x it seporates out
On 07/08/10 1:31 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> I'm getting at your assertion that a Wins server on every subnet is
> "right" being impractical in most networks. And like the OPs problem
> it has to do with a windows client being able to resolve a windows name
> on a different subnet.
>
I've neve
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 06:35:47PM -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
> It has been stated many times and on many fora that Red Hat's bugzilla is
> not a mechanism for support. They are under no obligation to address
> issues raised there. Is it nice when they do? Absolutely.
There are two i
On 07/08/10 2:39 PM, Seth Bardash wrote:
> To the Linux Community at Large:
>
> I reported to this list back in January, 2010 that the standard x86_64
> kernel, when built from the src.rpm and modified for ...
I don't understand how you think that this is a bug. you modified
something and it bro
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> This is an implicit contract that runs across all open
> source software projects.
"implicit contract" ?
You know 'Whit' -- you deserve congratulations
You were just promoted into the 'hot air windbag' 'internet
lawyer' 'I am entitled to it, just bec
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:42 AM, sync wrote:
> > Hi, guys:
> >
> > I attempt to compile a kernel on CentOS 5.3 i386 which is installed in
> the
> > Virtualbox machine,
> > and its kernel version is 2.6.18-128.el5 ,the new kernel version is
>
On Thursday, July 08, 2010 09:40 PM, JohnS wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 07:51 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> I think some bridge or vlan scenarios require promiscuous mode (and the
>> corresponding disabling of hardware acceleration). Maybe the real issue is
>> that
>>something accidentall
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 17:07 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 07/08/10 1:31 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> > I'm getting at your assertion that a Wins server on every subnet is
> > "right" being impractical in most networks. And like the OPs problem
> > it has to do with a windows client being able to
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 at 8:16pm, Whit Blauvelt wrote
> On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 06:35:47PM -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
>
>> It has been stated many times and on many fora that Red Hat's bugzilla is
>> not a mechanism for support. They are under no obligation to address
>> issues raised there.
I had a corrupted installation of OpenOffice.org 3.1.
When I used "yum remove openoffice.org-core" the response was "package
openoffice.org-core available but not installed", but then, when I
used "yum install openoffice.org-core there was a long list of
Transaction Check Errors. I then removed
op
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 08:16:05PM -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
>
> Besides, the poster here is making a serious point about Red Hat losing
> sales.
If the OP is making a serious point about RH losing sales, perhaps he
should tell RedHat about it, instead of posting trollbait to an
unrelated maili
I've still been keeping this one simmering back burner and trying to
figure the workflow for getting a system up and running with minimal
user interaction. I do realize the PXE agents don't have any concept
of tagged vlans. The thought was more along the lines of having the
ability to specify a tag
73 matches
Mail list logo
