Re: [CentOS] Samba and " (and maybe other characters) in paths/files

On 06/25/10 22:48, Tom H wrote: > On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Miguel Medalha wrote: >>> I have samba installed on my server, with a fileshare. When connecting to >>> samba, using windows, filesnames with " (double quotes) in them become >>> gibberish on the windows client. >> Since Window

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading MySQLdb

Hi, (2010年06月27日 03:15), Susan Day wrote: > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/SQLAlchemy-0.6beta2-py2.6.egg/sqlalchemy/dialects/mysql/mysqldb.py No-way to upgrade to latest python(2.6), MySQL(5.1), sqlalchemy(0.6). in public centos site.Upstream policy keep running with older version until 2014. Y

Re: [CentOS] wine 1.2 on centos

On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Janez Kosmrlj wrote: > Hi, > > Has anyone tried the latest wine 1.2 RC on CentOS 5.5. > > We have some applications that don't work with the latest stable release. > They require at least 1.1.34, but i would like to try 1.2. > > If someone has tried 1.2 on centos.

[CentOS] centos 5.5 on optiplex 745

Hi, we have some old dell optiplex 745 machines which have the Intel 965q chipset. The problem is, that they freeze as soon as the system tries to start the X system. It happens even before any log is written. This happens almost every time (for some reason it sometimes work, but 99% it fails). Whe

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading MySQLdb

2010/6/28 Tsuyoshi Nagata : > Hi, > Your answer is just install MySQL5.1 from source code.(make install) > next time requies B, B requires C,... That's a horrible idea. At least use the package management system so that dependencies can be tracked properly. Installing from source builds directly

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading MySQLdb

On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Susan Day wrote: > Hi; > I've got MySQLdb installed (bridge to Python) and I can't figure out how to > upgrade it. I did a find and got these paths: > > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/SQLAlchemy-0.6beta2-py2.6.egg/sqlalchemy/dialects/mysql/mysqldb.py > /usr/lib/p

Re: [CentOS] Using CentOS on commercial product.

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 02:15:46PM +0900, Shinobu Takasugi wrote: > Hello, > > Thank you Jerry. > > I think FreeBSD is good OS too. > But we prefer CentOS for compatibility with Red Hat. > I use both.I like FreeBSD somewhat better, but because of the closeness to RHEL, some things are more

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization as cheap redundancy option?

On 6/25/2010 8:33 AM, Brian Mathis wrote: > - VMware Server seems like it's EOL, even though vmware hasn't > specifically said so yet Given that there are known serious bugs in 2.0.2[*] and that release is now 8 months old, that seems plausible to me. But another plausible explanation is that t

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading MySQLdb

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 08:54:49AM -0400, Jim Perrin wrote: > 2010/6/28 Tsuyoshi Nagata : > > Your answer is just install MySQL5.1 from source code.(make install) > That's a horrible idea. At least use the package management system so > that dependencies can be tracked properly. Installing from s

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization as cheap redundancy option?

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 07:25:59AM -0600, Warren Young wrote: > On 6/25/2010 8:33 AM, Brian Mathis wrote: > > - VMware Server seems like it's EOL, even though vmware hasn't > > specifically said so yet > > Given that there are known serious bugs in 2.0.2[*] and that release is > now 8 months old,

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization as cheap redundancy option?

On 6/28/2010 7:34 AM, Whit Blauvelt wrote: > > If you look on their site, they clearly specify that they do not offer a > paid support option for VMware Server, that it's community supported only. > Does that seem like an attitude towards a product they plan to update? It fits completely with a lo

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization as cheap redundancy option?

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Warren Young wrote: > On 6/25/2010 8:33 AM, Brian Mathis wrote: >> - VMware Server seems like it's EOL, even though vmware hasn't >> specifically said so yet > > Given that there are known serious bugs in 2.0.2[*] and that release is > now 8 months old, that seems

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading MySQLdb

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Whit Blauvelt wrote: > But seriously, aside from the nice theory about how each package management > system cures all dependency problems (which isn't 100% true), how many > people have actually found themselves in trouble from, say, building their > own LAMP stac

[CentOS] Can't install Centos with DVD on KVM.

Subject line explains most of it I'm trying to install Centos from a dvd iso, that has been verified on KVM (Fedora 13) box. Virtual machine boots, and will launch anaconda and will test the media, but on the next step after that it says it can't find CD media. ___

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading MySQLdb

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 08:58:45AM -0400, Jim Perrin wrote: > On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Susan Day wrote: > > Hi; > > I've got MySQLdb installed (bridge to Python) and I can't figure out how to > > upgrade it. I did a find and got these paths: > > > > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/SQLAlch

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization as cheap redundancy option?

Why would one use vmware Server 2.x when ESXi is available free of charge, stable, small footprint, ... ? We have about 60 vmware machines here, about 20 of them already converted to ESXi and running fine. I would never think about going back to Server 2.x or even GSX, especially when using v

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading MySQLdb

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Whit Blauvelt wrote: > (Wouldn't it be nice if CentOS had 2.6.5 instead 2.4.3? Python improved > dramatically between those two. My systems all get Python 2.6.5 alongside > 2.4.3 because (a) 2.6.5 has a lot of useful features I'm not going to refuse > to use just

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization as cheap redundancy option?

On 6/28/2010 8:25 AM, Warren Young wrote: > On 6/25/2010 8:33 AM, Brian Mathis wrote: >> - VMware Server seems like it's EOL, even though vmware hasn't >> specifically said so yet > > Given that there are known serious bugs in 2.0.2[*] and that release is > now 8 months old, that seems plausible to

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading MySQLdb

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 09:49:21AM -0400, Jim Perrin wrote: > It actually counts for probably 20-30% of all the support necessary on > the irc channels with people trying to update php/mysql or similar > from source. A large part of that problem is that people are asking for support in the wrong

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization as cheap redundancy option?

On 6/28/2010 7:59 AM, guillaume wrote: > Why would one use vmware Server 2.x when ESXi is available free of > charge, stable, small footprint, ... ? I've thought about it, but it's not really the right thing for us. Our VM host has some special hardware in it, driven by custom software which run

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading MySQLdb

On 6/28/2010 9:46 AM, Whit Blauvelt wrote: > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 09:49:21AM -0400, Jim Perrin wrote: > >> It actually counts for probably 20-30% of all the support necessary on >> the irc channels with people trying to update php/mysql or similar >> from source. > > A large part of that problem

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading MySQLdb

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Whit Blauvelt wrote: > Sanity here is relative. If you go to the main support channels for stuff > like Apache or PHP or Python or Postfix or whatever, and you're having > trouble because of some bug that they fixed literally years ago, but which > your distro of

Re: [CentOS] Yum archive for PHP greater than 5.2.1 for CentOS 5.4?

Joseph L. Casale wrote: Whether I like it or not I need to get a version of PHP that is greater than 5.2.1 http://blog.famillecollet.com/pages/Config-en +1 with EPEL this is what I use on my systems too (but disable the repo after installation since they update fast) -- Nicola

Re: [CentOS] Yum archive for PHP greater than 5.2.1 for CentOS 5.4?

Check the centosextra's repo. Josh From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of kOoLiNuS Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 10:54 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Yum archive for PHP greater than 5.2.1 for CentOS 5.4? Joseph L. Casale wrote:

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization as cheap redundancy option?

On Jun 28, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Warren Young wrote: > On 6/28/2010 7:59 AM, guillaume wrote: >> Why would one use vmware Server 2.x when ESXi is available free of >> charge, stable, small footprint, ... ? > > I've thought about it, but it's not really the right thing for us. > > Our VM host has s

Re: [CentOS] Yum archive for PHP greater than 5.2.1 for CentOS 5.4?

I'm sorry, I meant the 'c5-testing' repo. From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Baird, Josh Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 10:57 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Yum archive for PHP greater than 5.2.1 for CentOS 5.4? Check the centosext

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading MySQLdb

Les Mikesell wrote: > On 6/28/2010 9:46 AM, Whit Blauvelt wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 09:49:21AM -0400, Jim Perrin wrote: >> > No, the fact that your ability to 'yum update' and have the right thing > happen is broken is a big problem regardless of who/where you ask for > help. Even if you

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization as cheap redundancy option?

On 06/28/10 8:57 AM, Ross Walker wrote: > Then give VirtualBox a whirl. > Fully supported, works and some say performs better then VMware Server. > I second the emotion on VBox, its a nice piece of work. Read the license carefully, however. Its no longer free for use as a server in a busi

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization as cheap redundancy option?

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 09:06:43AM -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > I second the emotion on VBox, its a nice piece of work. > > Read the license carefully, however. Its no longer free for use as a > server in a business environment, only free for 'personal' use. Larry > needs a new boat. They

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization as cheap redundancy option?

On 6/28/2010 10:15 AM, Warren Young wrote: > On 6/28/2010 7:59 AM, guillaume wrote: >> Why would one use vmware Server 2.x when ESXi is available free of >> charge, stable, small footprint, ... ? > > I've thought about it, but it's not really the right thing for us. > > Our VM host has some special

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading MySQLdb

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:48:48AM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Les Mikesell wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 09:49:21AM -0400, Jim Perrin wrote: > >> > > No, the fact that your ability to 'yum update' and have the right thing > > happen is broken is a big problem regardless of who/where yo

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization as cheap redundancy option?

On 06/28/10 9:19 AM, Whit Blauvelt wrote: > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 09:06:43AM -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > > >> I second the emotion on VBox, its a nice piece of work. >> >> Read the license carefully, however. Its no longer free for use as a >> server in a business environment, only free f

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading MySQLdb

On 6/28/2010 11:24 AM, Whit Blauvelt wrote: >>> No, the fact that your ability to 'yum update' and have the right thing >>> happen is broken is a big problem regardless of who/where you ask for >>> help. Even if you break it yourself, it is bad that it is broken. >> >> As much as I would rather d

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization as cheap redundancy option?

On Jun 28, 2010, at 12:40 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 06/28/10 9:19 AM, Whit Blauvelt wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 09:06:43AM -0700, John R Pierce wrote: >> >> >>> I second the emotion on VBox, its a nice piece of work. >>> >>> Read the license carefully, however. Its no longer free f

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization as cheap redundancy option?

on 6-28-2010 6:34 AM Whit Blauvelt spake the following: > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 07:25:59AM -0600, Warren Young wrote: >> On 6/25/2010 8:33 AM, Brian Mathis wrote: >>> - VMware Server seems like it's EOL, even though vmware hasn't >>> specifically said so yet >> >> Given that there are known serio

[CentOS] Upgrading MySQL

Hi; I'm trying to install django and got this error: django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: MySQLdb-1.2.1p2 or newer is required; you have 1.2.1 So then I tried yum upgrade mysql and got this: No Packages marked for Update Please advise. TIA, Susan

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization as cheap redundancy option?

On 06/28/2010 10:15 AM, Scott Silva wrote: > on 6-28-2010 6:34 AM Whit Blauvelt spake the following: > >> If you look on their site, they clearly specify that they do not offer a >> paid support option for VMware Server, that it's community supported only. >> Does that seem like an attitude tow

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization as cheap redundancy option?

On 6/28/2010 12:39 PM, Benjamin Franz wrote: > > At this point VM Server is in the 'if it breaks you get to keep all the > pieces' mode. Like just about all software, although you might get the chance for a refund on what you paid if you can prove there is a problem with advertised capabilities.

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading MySQLdbyg

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:58:14AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > > That's why I always thoroughly log all stuff installed by hand, along with > > extra configuration steps taken with RPM-installed items, and make sure the > > log's someplace where the next person can find it. In our case we maintai

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading MySQLdbyg

Whit Blauvelt wrote: > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:58:14AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > >> > That's why I always thoroughly log all stuff installed by hand, along >> > with extra configuration steps taken with RPM-installed items, and make >> > sure the log's someplace where the next person can find

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading MySQL

On 28/06/2010 18:21, Susan Day wrote: > Hi; > I'm trying to install django and got this error: > > django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: MySQLdb-1.2.1p2 or newer is > required; you have 1.2.1 > > So then I tried yum upgrade mysql and got this: You should go and talk about this in the djan

[CentOS] Upgrading MySQLdbyg

On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Y'know, I sorta like that idea - say, a script or program that you can > hand it info, such as if you've just built PHP the way I mentioned, and > have it be added to the rpmdb. That would also let you know if you did a > yum updgrade, and if a newer

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading MySQLdbyg

On 6/28/2010 1:01 PM, Whit Blauvelt wrote: > >>> That's why I always thoroughly log all stuff installed by hand, along with >>> extra configuration steps taken with RPM-installed items, and make sure the >>> log's someplace where the next person can find it. In our case we maintain >>> wikis for th

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading MySQLdbyg

R P Herrold wrote: > On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> Y'know, I sorta like that idea - say, a script or program that you can >> hand it info, such as if you've just built PHP the way I mentioned, and >> have it be added to the rpmdb. That would also let you know if you did a >> yum

Re: [CentOS] Dual nw card problem again

on 6-27-2010 2:20 PM Jussi Hirvi spake the following: > I have had problems like this before. Probably there is something > important that I don't know about routing. > > Let me introduce to you "Lasso2", a CentOS 4 www server that has been > working perfectly well for years. > > Now I added a

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading MySQLdbyg

On 6/28/2010 1:43 PM, R P Herrold wrote: > > All RPM needs is for people to read and use the tools, and all > this is done well presently What's the right approach with RPM to have multiple versions of an application installed simultaneously? > "Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to r

Re: [CentOS] Can't install Centos with DVD on KVM.

still stumped. On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 9:51 AM, cliff here wrote: > Subject line explains most of it > > I'm trying to install Centos from a dvd iso, that has been verified on KVM > (Fedora 13) box. > > Virtual machine boots, and will launch anaconda and will test the media, > but on the nex

[CentOS] Upgrading MySQLdbyg

On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > R P Herrold wrote: >> and this random guessing and recordatation to pollute the RPM >> database "varies from ** and ** is better than" using a >> package built from a pre-defined recipe driven by a .spec >> file, just how? > Well, when it insists on

[CentOS] CentOS MD RAID 1 on Openfiler iSCSI

Has anybody tried or knows if it is possible to create a MD RAID1 device using networked iSCSI devices like those created using OpenFiler? The idea I'm thinking of here is to use two OpenFiler servers with physical drives in RAID 1, to create iSCSI virtual devices and run CentOS guest VMs off the

[CentOS] Upgrading MySQLdbyg

On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 6/28/2010 1:43 PM, R P Herrold wrote: >> >> All RPM needs is for people to read and use the tools, and all >> this is done well presently > > What's the right approach with RPM to have multiple versions of an > application installed simultaneously? st

Re: [CentOS] Can't install Centos with DVD on KVM.

On 28/06/2010 20:12, cliff here wrote: > still stumped. > > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 9:51 AM, cliff here Virtual machine boots, and will launch anaconda and will test the > media, but on the next step after that it says it can't find CD media. How about if you dont verify the media ? Are

Re: [CentOS] CentOS MD RAID 1 on Openfiler iSCSI

On 28/06/2010 20:13, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > Has anybody tried or knows if it is possible to create a MD RAID1 > device using networked iSCSI devices like those created using > OpenFiler? I dont use openfiler, but I run a mdraid-10 ( which isnt raid10 ), off locally mounted, remote storage exp

Re: [CentOS] CentOS MD RAID 1 on Openfiler iSCSI

On 6/29/10, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 28/06/2010 20:13, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: >> Has anybody tried or knows if it is possible to create a MD RAID1 >> device using networked iSCSI devices like those created using >> OpenFiler? > > I dont use openfiler, but I run a mdraid-10 ( which isnt raid10

Re: [CentOS] CentOS MD RAID 1 on Openfiler iSCSI

On 28/06/2010 20:31, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > I haven't tried it yet, still researching on which way to go (looked > into Lustre, then glusterFS, then now this). Coincidentally, I just Not sure what you are trying to do here. Lustre, glusterfs, gfs etc solve a different problem than imported re

Re: [CentOS] CentOS MD RAID 1 on Openfiler iSCSI

> > I dont see why not. But you dont dont need openfilter to give you iscsi > capability. CentOS-5.1+ has had the ability to export an iscsi target > itself with all the tooling built in. > AFAIK, Openfiler is CentOS/rPath and has Web-based administration tool, this why some people use it. --

Re: [CentOS] CentOS MD RAID 1 on Openfiler iSCSI

On 6/28/2010 2:50 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 28/06/2010 20:31, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: >> I haven't tried it yet, still researching on which way to go (looked >> into Lustre, then glusterFS, then now this). Coincidentally, I just > > Not sure what you are trying to do here. Lustre, glusterfs,

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading MySQL

2010/6/28 Susan Day > Hi; > I'm trying to install django and got this error: > > django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: MySQLdb-1.2.1p2 or newer is > required; you have 1.2.1 > > So then I tried yum upgrade mysql and got this: > > No Packages marked for Update > > Please advise. > TIA, > Su

Re: [CentOS] PHP version [SOLVED]

Marcelo Roccasalva wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 19:16, Steve Lindemann wrote: >> [...] >> ...or directions for upgrading PHP from 5.1 to 5.2 on 64-bit (I found >> directions for 32-bit)? > > open /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Testing.repo in your prefered editor and write: > > #--

Re: [CentOS] CentOS MD RAID 1 on Openfiler iSCSI

On 28/06/2010 20:55, Les Mikesell wrote: > I think he is looking for redundant, failover remote storage (i.e. > mirrored copies from different iscsi hosts). Sort of like DRBD but with > both copies remote. I think is should work but the timing might be > tricky on retries vs. failure on the is

Re: [CentOS] CentOS MD RAID 1 on Openfiler iSCSI

On 6/29/10, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 28/06/2010 20:31, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: >> I haven't tried it yet, still researching on which way to go (looked >> into Lustre, then glusterFS, then now this). Coincidentally, I just > > Not sure what you are trying to do here. Lustre, glusterfs, gfs etc

Re: [CentOS] CentOS MD RAID 1 on Openfiler iSCSI

On 6/29/10, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 28/06/2010 20:55, Les Mikesell wrote: >> I think he is looking for redundant, failover remote storage (i.e. >> mirrored copies from different iscsi hosts). Sort of like DRBD but with >> both copies remote. I think is should work but the timing might be >> t

Re: [CentOS] Can't install Centos with DVD on KVM.

On 06/28/10 12:12 PM, cliff here wrote: > still stumped. > > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 9:51 AM, cliff here > wrote: > > Subject line explains most of it > > I'm trying to install Centos from a dvd iso, that has been > verified on KVM (Fedora 13) box. > >

Re: [CentOS] CentOS MD RAID 1 on Openfiler iSCSI

On 28/06/2010 21:30, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > Part of my concern with such a setup is the whole data system goes > down too if the storage box dies due to say blown PSU or motherboard > problem. Doesn't it? Depends on how you set it up, if you have 2 machines ( disk nodes ), exporting iscsi. 1

Re: [CentOS] CentOS MD RAID 1 on Openfiler iSCSI

On 06/28/10 12:13 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > Has anybody tried or knows if it is possible to create a MD RAID1 > device using networked iSCSI devices like those created using > OpenFiler? > > The idea I'm thinking of here is to use two OpenFiler servers with > physical drives in RAID 1, to cre

Re: [CentOS] CentOS MD RAID 1 on Openfiler iSCSI

On 6/29/10, Karanbir Singh wrote: > Depends on how you set it up, if you have 2 machines ( disk nodes ), > exporting iscsi. 1 machine ( data node ) doing the import and sets up a > raid1; you can afford to have one of those two machines down. You *cant* > afford to have the data-node down. Thats w

Re: [CentOS] CentOS MD RAID 1 on Openfiler iSCSI

On 6/28/2010 3:25 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > >> I dont see why not. But you dont dont need openfilter to give you iscsi >> capability. CentOS-5.1+ has had the ability to export an iscsi target >> itself with all the tooling built in. > > I'm not sure yet since openFiler seems to provide a few

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading MySQL

> django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: MySQLdb-1.2.1p2 or newer is > required; you have 1.2.1 To identify what package contains a specific file, you can use yum search. For example: yum search MySQLdb returns MySQL-python.x86_64 : An interface to MySQL therefore MySQLdb can be updated

[CentOS] An Interview with Karan

A nice little insight into CentOS : http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20100628#feature Cheers Didi p.s. Sorry if this has already been posted :) -- Hoffmann Geerd-Dietger http://contact.ribalba.de ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http

[CentOS] centos5.5 text install forcing me to add all disks to LVM volgroup

Graphic installer doesn't like my graphics card, so I am using the text installer. I have two physical disks in my system. When I get to the "partitioning type" page, I choose "remove all partitions on selected drives [etc]" and put an asterisk next to sda, no asterisk next to sdb. I want to use s

Re: [CentOS] centos5.5 text install forcing me to add all disks to LVM volgroup

At Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:15:20 -1000 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > > > Graphic installer doesn't like my graphics card, so I am using the text > installer. I have two physical disks in my system. > > When I get to the "partitioning type" page, I choose "remove all partitions > on selected dri

Re: [CentOS] CentOS MD RAID 1 on Openfiler iSCSI

On 6/29/10, Les Mikesell wrote: > If you are looking at openfiler, you might also want to consider > nexentastor. Their community edition is free for up to 12TB of storage. > It's an OpenSolaris/ZFS based system with web management, able to > export cifs/nfs/ftp/sftp/iscsi with support for sna

[CentOS] CentOS 5.3 Xen installation trouble installing FUSE

Hi, I've got CentOS 5.3 installed as a Xen client installed. I've recently been trying to install TrueCrypt on the VM, but am having miserable troubles with the Fuse kernel module. To date, I've installed the following packages: yum install truecrypt yum install fuse However, to launch the fus

Re: [CentOS] CentOS MD RAID 1 on Openfiler iSCSI

On Tuesday, June 29, 2010 10:53 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > On 6/29/10, Les Mikesell wrote: > >> If you are looking at openfiler, you might also want to consider >> nexentastor. Their community edition is free for up to 12TB of storage. >>It's an OpenSolaris/ZFS based system with web mana

Re: [CentOS] CentOS MD RAID 1 on Openfiler iSCSI

On Tuesday, June 29, 2010 04:53 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > On 6/29/10, Karanbir Singh wrote: >> Depends on how you set it up, if you have 2 machines ( disk nodes ), >> exporting iscsi. 1 machine ( data node ) doing the import and sets up a >> raid1; you can afford to have one of those two mac

Re: [CentOS] CentOS MD RAID 1 on Openfiler iSCSI

On 6/29/10, Christopher Chan wrote: >> The only problem is their HA is commercial only and costs more than >> the entire hardware budget I've got for this. Crucially, it relies on >> a failover/heartbeat kind of arrangement. According to some sources, >> the failover delay of a few seconds will ca

Re: [CentOS] CentOS MD RAID 1 on Openfiler iSCSI

Christopher Chan wrote: > On Tuesday, June 29, 2010 10:53 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: >> On 6/29/10, Les Mikesell wrote: >> >>> If you are looking at openfiler, you might also want to consider >>> nexentastor. Their community edition is free for up to 12TB of storage. >>>It's an OpenSolaris