Eric,
On Tuesday, June 22, 2010 you wrote:
> I have recently upgraded to 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5 and within several days
> the machine crashed with the following error (repeating in mcelog):
[...]
> Would this error indicate a motherboard or CPU problem? How can I
> diagnose? or is there something
Hi! Eric
(2010/06/22 13:11), Eric Deis wrote:
> Transaction: Address/Command error
Its mother board (memory controller) problem.
Its *not* DIMM problem.(memtest can't detect this error.)
your data transfer(read/write) sometimes met bit errors.
This is Nehalem cpu's error detecting feature.(MCE)
T
On Tuesday 22 June 2010, Eric Deis wrote:
> I have recently upgraded to 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5 and within several days
> the machine crashed with the following error (repeating in mcelog):
I'm guessing the old kernel just didn't notice.
The below MCEs indicate bad hardware. Since the DIMMs are a lot
On 06/22/10 12:21 AM, Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 June 2010, Eric Deis wrote:
>
>> I have recently upgraded to 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5 and within several days
>> the machine crashed with the following error (repeating in mcelog):
>>
> I'm guessing the old kernel just didn't notice.
On Tuesday 22 June 2010, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 06/22/10 12:21 AM, Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
> > On Tuesday 22 June 2010, Eric Deis wrote:
> >> I have recently upgraded to 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5 and within several days
> >> the machine crashed with the following error (repeating in mcelog):
> >
> > I'
Tim Nelson writes:
> Greetings all-
>
> I have a CentOS 5 (Final) system that is serving up content to several other
> hosts via NFS. The amount of data transferred is rather small as most of the
> files are under 100kb and each export has maybe 100 files that are accessed
> regularly. I'm finding
From: Niki Kovacs
> The MiscFixed fonts don't seem to be available in
> GNOME Terminal anymore.
I can find misc-fixed in gnome terminal and xfontsel...
I have these packages...
bitmap-fonts-0.3-5.1.1
bitstream-vera-fonts-1.10-7
chkfontpath-1.10.1-1.1
dejavu-lgc-fonts-2.10-1
fontconfig-2.4.1-7.e
> Wordpress should:
>
> http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/simple-ldap-login/
I have already tested this Wordpress plugin a few months ago (on
CentOS 5.4 x86_64 with EPEL's Wordpress).
I needed to fiddle a bit with the UI, but quickly got an LDAP
integration working.
As whether it is 100% secure
Florin Andrei wrote on Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:42:46 -0700:
> No, that's fine, really. I was just pointing out that, for some
> Internet-facing systems, this policy may be inadequate, due to the
> fast-changing nature of the Internet.
I disagree. The included Postfix works just fine. You have a ver
On 22/06/2010 09:52, lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> So, this is CentOS 5.0 or 5.1. You should upgrade to at least CentOS 5.2. The
> 5.2 kernel fixes serious performance problems with NFS.
I agree, getting to the latest distro packages is a good idea. There
were some nfs issues in < 5.2
On 22/06/2010 11:31, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Florin Andrei wrote on Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:42:46 -0700:
>
>> No, that's fine, really. I was just pointing out that, for some
>> Internet-facing systems, this policy may be inadequate, due to the
>> fast-changing nature of the Internet.
>
> I disagree.
On 22/06/2010 00:52, Phil Manuel wrote:
> Has anyone looked at using icinga ? I know it replaces the front end of
> nagios, and uses the same (slightly modified ?) backend, using the same
> plugins.
>
Icinga is an interesting project, and there is work going on under the
hood to make it a more
On 21/06/2010 18:05, Les Mikesell wrote:
> I didn't know about that, but the first googled hit says you are
> supposed to be able to write reusable tests in a human-readable language
> which sounds way too unrealistic to ever work. And I want a tool that
> understands network equipment natively
Hi all,
We've got server-based application that runs on CentOS. Until now,
most of our customer's end-users have accessed the application using
either PuTTY or Teraterm. I was asked yesterday to try and find
internationalized add ons or alternatives for our new Asian customers
(Japan, Korea
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 17:11 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Joseph L. Casale
> wrote:
> >>This seems like duplication of effort with the CentOS people, since they
> >>already package DRBD for CentOS 5.x (and it works very well).
> >
> > No its not, the CentOS pac
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 07:23 -0400, Digimer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>We've got server-based application that runs on CentOS. Until now,
> most of our customer's end-users have accessed the application using
> either PuTTY or Teraterm. I was asked yesterday to try and find
> internationalized add
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 9:03 AM, JohnS wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 17:11 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Joseph L. Casale
>> wrote:
>> >>This seems like duplication of effort with the CentOS people, since they
>> >>already package DRBD for CentOS 5.x (and i
On 10-06-22 09:19 AM, JohnS wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 07:23 -0400, Digimer wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We've got server-based application that runs on CentOS. Until now,
>> most of our customer's end-users have accessed the application using
>> either PuTTY or Teraterm. I was asked yesterday
On Jun 21, 2010, at 9:00 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> On 06/19/2010 08:58 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
>>> agree. Karanbir, you used to say that community is about those people
>>> who help the community and not about those who use the community. ihmo
>>> Dag is one of those th
[..]
>> /proc/mounts shows rsize has been negotiated to 1mB
>
> Have you tested the same thing with a Linux NFS server?
>
> The CentOS 5.x kernel has a maximum server [rw]size of 32Kb, so you
> would need to use something with a more recent kernel to get [rw]sizes
> to be 1Mb.
>
Haven't tried wit
On Jun 21, 2010, at 12:26 PM, Alex Still wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Nataraj wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Well, it's been a long time since I've done troubleshooting on large NFS
>> networks, but here's an idea...
>>
>> Are you seeing any kind of packet loss/retransmissions? Take a lo
El lun, 21-06-2010 a las 19:57 -0400, Rick Thomas escribió:
> I have a machine with two net interfaces.
>
> it seems to always pick the wrong one (eth1) as the default route.
>
> I can change it with
>
> route del default
> route add default eth0
>
> after it's up (or in rc.local, o
On 05/25/2010 08:08 AM, Steve Snyder wrote:
> In the course of upgrading from CentOS 5.4 to CentOS 5.5 I changed from
> using the samba (v3.0.x) packages to the samba3x (v3.3.8) packages,
> mostly because the newer version was said to better support Win7. The
> Samba server services Linux, WinXP,
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 09:24 -0400, Digimer wrote:
> On 10-06-22 09:19 AM, JohnS wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 07:23 -0400, Digimer wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> We've got server-based application that runs on CentOS. Until now,
> >> most of our customer's end-users have accessed the app
Hi All:
I'm trying to rebuild the kvm SRPM (kvm-83-164.el5_5.9.src.rpm)
on a centos 5.5 x86_64 and it's failing with the message:
error: Failed build dependencies:
kernel-devel-x86_64 = 2.6.18-194.el5 is needed by kvm-83-164.9.x86_64
I have already run "yum-builddep " and here is the out
Hi,
I need to export NFS shares to all clients in a subnetwork, except
that one client will have different NFS options. I am not sure how to
write subnest mask for this in exports file. For all clients it was
easy as all I had to do was 10.0.0.0/16 or 10.0.0.0/255.255.0.0. How
do I modify exports
On 6/22/2010 6:06 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 21/06/2010 18:05, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> I didn't know about that, but the first googled hit says you are
>> supposed to be able to write reusable tests in a human-readable language
>> which sounds way too unrealistic to ever work. And I want a tool
[...]
>> On some servers this behavior returned despite rsize being set to 32k,
>> I had to set it to 8k to get reasonnable throughput. So there's
>> definitly something fishy going on. This has been reported on over 20
>> machines, so I don't think it's faulty hardware we're seeing.
>>
>> Any tho
On 6/21/2010 11:27 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> Has anyone looked at using icinga ?
>
> The forums are nearly dead, doesn't look like much of the Nagios
> folk jumped ship yet. Archives show next to no activity.
>
> Frankly, if I am migrating away from Nagios, I would likely be compelled
> to put
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 17:44 +0200, Alex Still wrote:
>
> Clients are blade servers. The blade chassis have integrated cisco
> switches, which are plugged to a cisco 6509. The NFS server is on
> another site 40km away, directly connected to another 6509. These
> datacenters are linked via DWDM.
Carlos S wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to export NFS shares to all clients in a subnetwork, except
> that one client will have different NFS options. I am not sure how to
> write subnest mask for this in exports file. For all clients it was
> easy as all I had to do was 10.0.0.0/16 or 10.0.0.0/255.255.0
Hi all,
Does anybody know why unlike so many Linux distros (Fedora, Ubuntu,
OpenSUSE) CentOS does not come with XFS support by default but rather
requires custom modifications after the install in order for you to be
able to support XFS on your CentOS machine? Just seems a little odd
given how muc
On 06/22/2010 08:57 AM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Does anybody know why unlike so many Linux distros (Fedora, Ubuntu,
> OpenSUSE) CentOS does not come with XFS support by default but rather
> requires custom modifications after the install in order for you to be
> able to support XFS on yo
On 06/22/2010 04:57 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Does anybody know why unlike so many Linux distros (Fedora, Ubuntu,
> OpenSUSE) CentOS does not come with XFS support by default but rather
> requires custom modifications after the install in order for you to be
> able to support XFS on yo
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 8:02 AM, David Mansfield wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> I'm trying to rebuild the kvm SRPM (kvm-83-164.el5_5.9.src.rpm)
> on a centos 5.5 x86_64 and it's failing with the message:
>
> error: Failed build dependencies:
> kernel-devel-x86_64 = 2.6.18-194.el5 is needed by kvm-83-
Thanks James.
So does exports list has any priority for loading config. e.g. I have
general rule as 10.0.0.0/16 for read-only and then 10.0.0.20 as
read-write. Then 10.0.0.20 overrides (default) 10.0.0.0/16 options?
--
CS.
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:29 AM, James Pearson
wrote:
> Carlos S wrote:
> Does anybody know why unlike so many Linux distros (Fedora, Ubuntu,
> OpenSUSE) CentOS does not come with XFS support by default but rather
> requires custom modifications after the install in order for you to be
> able to support XFS on your CentOS machine? Just seems a little odd
> given how m
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:35 PM, aurfalien wrote:
> On 06/22/2010 08:57 AM, Boris Epstein wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Does anybody know why unlike so many Linux distros (Fedora, Ubuntu,
>> OpenSUSE) CentOS does not come with XFS support by default but rather
>> requires custom modifications after the
Digimer sent a missive on 2010-06-22:
> Hi all,
>
>We've got server-based application that runs on CentOS. Until now,
> most of our customer's end-users have accessed the application using
> either PuTTY or Teraterm. I was asked yesterday to try and find
> internationalized add ons or alterna
On Jun 22, 2010, at 12:41 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> why does RHEL not support XFS straight out of the box?
i suspect you would be more likely to receive a meaningful answer from one of
these sources:
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/l
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 01:48:42PM -0400, Steve Huff wrote:
>
> On Jun 22, 2010, at 12:41 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
>
> > why does RHEL not support XFS straight out of the box?
>
> i suspect you would be more likely to receive a meaningful answer
> from one of these sources:
>
> https://listman.
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:53 AM, Rajagopal Swaminathan
wrote:
> Greetings,
>
>
> On 6/21/10, Jane Curry wrote:
>>
>> If you want further help, please ask!
>>
>
>
> Havwe you tried Zabbix, the NextGen NMS?
>
+1 to Zabbix
LAMP software, agent for all plataforms, script friendly, SNMP, IPMI,
all t
Thanks! to all who replied.
I solved it by putting identical "GATEWAY=" clauses in each of
/etc/sysconfig/networking/devices/ifcfg-eth0
/etc/sysconfig/networking/devices/ifcfg-eth1
This works without error, even though the gateway IP address in
question is not accessible from e
On Jun 22, 2010, at 11:44 AM, Alex Still wrote:
> [...]
>
>>> On some servers this behavior returned despite rsize being set to 32k,
>>> I had to set it to 8k to get reasonnable throughput. So there's
>>> definitly something fishy going on. This has been reported on over 20
>>> machines, so I do
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 09:25 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 8:02 AM, David Mansfield wrote:
> > Hi All:
> >
> > I'm trying to rebuild the kvm SRPM (kvm-83-164.el5_5.9.src.rpm)
> > on a centos 5.5 x86_64 and it's failing with the message:
> >
> > error: Failed build dependencies:
On 6/22/2010 1:51 PM, Rick Thomas wrote:
> Thanks! to all who replied.
>
> I solved it by putting identical "GATEWAY=" clauses in each of
>
> /etc/sysconfig/networking/devices/ifcfg-eth0
> /etc/sysconfig/networking/devices/ifcfg-eth1
>
> This works without error, even though the gateway
> -Original Message-
> From: Digimer
> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 7:24
> Subject: [CentOS] OT: Recommendation for a good Internationalized
terminalsoftware
>
> Hi all,
>
>We've got server-based application that runs on CentOS.
> Until now, most of our customer's end-users have ac
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 3:02 PM, David Mansfield wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 09:25 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 8:02 AM, David Mansfield
>> wrote:
>> > Hi All:
>> > error: Failed build dependencies:
>> > kernel-devel-x86_64 = 2.6.18-194.el5 is needed by
>> > kvm
So I tried moving the GATEWAY clause into etc/sysconfig/network and
out of the individual ifcfg-eth? files. It works.
So I guess that's the preferred solution, because it puts the
information in a single place. There's no need to make sure two or
more places are synchronized if anything c
On Tuesday 22 June 2010, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
> On 06/22/2010 04:57 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Does anybody know why unlike so many Linux distros (Fedora, Ubuntu,
> > OpenSUSE) CentOS does not come with XFS support by default but rather
> > requires custom modifications after t
On Tuesday 22 June 2010, Boris Epstein wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Does anybody know why unlike so many Linux distros (Fedora, Ubuntu,
> OpenSUSE) CentOS does not come with XFS support by default
It does, try "modinfo xfs" or "yum list xfsprogs".
> but rather
> requires custom modifications after the i
> It's not available in the installer since it's considered a "technology
> preview" by Redhat.
>
... which causes no problem whatsoever. It is normally used for data
partitions, not system partitions.
One can install the OS and then create the necessary partitions with XFS.
Carlos S wrote:
> Thanks James.
>
> So does exports list has any priority for loading config. e.g. I have
> general rule as 10.0.0.0/16 for read-only and then 10.0.0.20 as
> read-write. Then 10.0.0.20 overrides (default) 10.0.0.0/16 options?
I don't believe the order is important - however, I sug
Thanks Guys!
Your advice helped me fix the problem.
Yes, it was the motherboard that was the issue. I update the firmware
and must have had some microcode fixes to support my CPU (John mentioned
the memory controller is in the CPU for Xeon 5500).
Now upon reboot using 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5 no err
Just finished downloading the DVD with bittorrent. Ended up with two iso
files (1 of 2 and 2 of 2). sha1sum checks out on both.
This is the first time I've encountered two DVDs. Will the install
politely ask for DVD #2 when it is time?
___
CentOS ma
DVD2 only contains OpenOffice packages. Unless you need to install these from
the DVD, you should be fine without DVD 2.
Josh
From: centos-boun...@centos.org on behalf of David McGuffey
Sent: Tue 6/22/2010 9:46 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] 2 DV
Had to put exclusive IP address before subnet-masked entry. Thanks for
the pointers.
--
CS.
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 5:06 PM, James Pearson
wrote:
> Carlos S wrote:
>>
>> Thanks James.
>>
>> So does exports list has any priority for loading config. e.g. I have
>> general rule as 10.0.0.0/16 for r
57 matches
Mail list logo
