Hi,
I'm looking a linux freeware for sharing file with a web browser
interface - protect file by password, send link to download by email
Something like the following service:
https://www.yousendit.com/
http://www.hongkiat.com/blog/15-great-free-online-file-sharing-alternati
ves/
The ide
On 06/18/2010 08:42 AM, MOKRANI Rachid wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking a linux freeware for sharing file with a web browser
> interface - protect file by password, send link to download by email
>
> Something like the following service:
>
> https://www.yousendit.com/
>
> http://www.hongkiat.com/bl
hadi motamedi wrote:
> Dear All
> I have one centos server equipped with WiFi . I want to measure data
> rate speed on this connection . Is there any utility on my centos that
> can measure data speed on one specific Ethernet connection when
> transferring large size files through WiFi connection?
Hi,
I would like to announce a set of OCFS2 kABI-tracking kernel module
packages for RHEL5, Scientific Linux 5 and CentOS-5 and kernels. These
packages have been introduced into the ELRepo testing repository
(http://elrepo.org/).
You can find these packages at:
http://elrepo.org/linux
From: John R. Dennison
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 08:09:11PM -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
>> I should care what you believe?
> Is this vitriol really necessary?
I think it is just a reaction to the "I don't believe you at all", which some
people would take as "you are a liar"...
That's the problem
On Wednesday 16 June 2010, Boris Epstein wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 4:05 PM, wrote:
> > Boris wrote:
> >> I am just trying to consider my options for storing a large mass of
> >> data (tens of terrabytes of files) and one idea is to build a
> >> clustered FS of some kind. Has anybody had an
Hello,
I'm having a yum problem updating a system on Centos 5.3, 64-bit ...
i.e. 'yum update' returns "No Packages Marked for Update". Problem
appears to be related to connecting to the mirrors where the
repositories are located but I could be wrong in that. What's confusing
me is that I have
Hi,
I'm currently trying to get a grasp on DNS and Bind. I admit the
documentation is quite confusing, either too laconic or way too
detailed. So I'm trying to start from a working example, and then bite
my way through it.
I have a sample named.conf file from Carla Schroder's Linux Cookbook. I
I just installed centos 5.5 x86_64 on a new HP laptop.
It has the core i5 processor.
only 1 cpu is detected should be 2.
This has happened before. Is upstream not keeping up with
new processors released and updating the kernel?
I'd rather not go through the process again of putting a newer kerne
From: Niki Kovacs
> listen-on
> allow-recursion
> As far as I understand, the purpose of these two stanzas is to limit
> access to the DNS server to 1) the server itself and 2) the local
> 10.11.12.0/24 network. In that case, there seems to be some redundancy
> in the syntax. Correct me if I'm
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 08:22:35PM -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
> Is this vitriol really necessary? I installed ganglia; not a
> single conflict.
Why yes, John, it is. The fine man said outright he didn't believe my honest
account, accusing me of making something up when I was onl
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 08:10:29PM -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 08:01:02PM -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
> >
> > That being said, it's trivial to recompile the F13 RPM for 3.1.2 for
> > centos-5.
>
> And that would be the proper route to go instead of buildi
Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 08:22:35PM -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
>> If you want shiny and new, why not do it properly and build
>> rpms?
>
> On the whole, this list is professional. I like that. But look,
> "./configure, make, make install" is _always_ a proper o
Whit Blauvelt wrote:
>
> You installed without a conflict, good. Perhaps you were installing on a
> 32-bit system rather than a 64-bit? Perhaps your system didn't have some of
> the packages already installed for other functionality that mine did? All I
> can say is that, for my system, yum saw ver
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 08:19:46PM -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
> I just tried a ganglia install from EPEL; absolutely no issues
> at all. Perhaps if you'd bother to actually document these
> conflicts one of us might be able to help. That is if we're
> still willing.
On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 16:10 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
> Ok, so I got the src rpm from el repo. Lessee, first I tried rpmbuild, and
> that failed, because it *required* xen-devel. So I grabbed the tarfile
> from /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES, unbzip2'd it, untar'd it, and did a make.
> And ten o
Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 08:10:29PM -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 08:01:02PM -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
>>> That being said, it's trivial to recompile the F13 RPM for 3.1.2 for
>>> centos-5.
>> And that would be the proper route to go i
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 08:14:02AM -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 08:22:35PM -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
>
> > Is this vitriol really necessary? I installed ganglia; not a
> > single conflict.
>
> Why yes, John, it is. The fine man said outright he didn't beli
MOKRANI Rachid wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking a linux freeware for sharing file with a web browser
> interface - protect file by password, send link to download by email
>
> Something like the following service:
>
> https://www.yousendit.com/
>
> http://www.hongkiat.com/blog/15-great-free-online-
On 18/06/10 14:10, JohnS wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 16:10 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>>
>> Ok, so I got the src rpm from el repo. Lessee, first I tried rpmbuild, and
>> that failed, because it *required* xen-devel. So I grabbed the tarfile
>> from /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES, unbzip2'd it,
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 08:19:46PM -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
> > > If there were a good CentOS build of 3.1.7 I'd happily use it. But getting
> > > stuff from EPEL, which is essentially Redhat testing, is as silly as
> > > mixing
> >
> > Uh, you've confused EPEL and Fedora apparently.
On Friday 18 June 2010, Jerry Geis wrote:
> I just installed centos 5.5 x86_64 on a new HP laptop.
> It has the core i5 processor.
>
> only 1 cpu is detected should be 2.
>
> This has happened before. Is upstream not keeping up with
> new processors released and updating the kernel?
I've used the
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 14:50 +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
> On 18/06/10 14:10, JohnS wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 16:10 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Ok, so I got the src rpm from el repo. Lessee, first I tried rpmbuild, and
> >> that failed, because it *required* xen-devel. So
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Peter Kjellstrom
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 9:19 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Cc: Jerry Geis
Subject: Re: [CentOS] recognizing correct number of cores on CPU
On Friday 18 June 2010, Jerry Geis
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 10:22 -0400, JohnS wrote:
> >
> > http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/BuildingKernelModules#head-b86b6eec08d5719cf1838929f26a64af88e2b7f0
> >
> > rpmbuild -ba --target=i686 --define 'kvariants ""' video4linux-kmod.spec
> >
> > If you don't, then by default the package will be
On 6/18/2010 9:01 AM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
>
If there were a good CentOS build of 3.1.7 I'd happily use it. But getting
stuff from EPEL, which is essentially Redhat testing, is as silly as mixing
>>>
>>> Uh, you've confused EPEL and Fedora apparently.
>
> Hey John,
>
> https://fedorap
Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
> On Friday 18 June 2010, Jerry Geis wrote:
>
>> I just installed centos 5.5 x86_64 on a new HP laptop.
>> It has the core i5 processor.
>>
>> only 1 cpu is detected should be 2.
>>
>> This has happened before. Is upstream not keeping up with
>> new processors released an
On 6/18/2010 8:20 AM, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 08:14:02AM -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 08:22:35PM -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
>>
>>> Is this vitriol really necessary? I installed ganglia; not a
>>> single conflict.
>>
>> Why yes, John
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 14:50 +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
> On 18/06/10 14:10, JohnS wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 16:10 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Ok, so I got the src rpm from el repo. Lessee, first I tried rpmbuild, and
> >> that failed, because it *required* xen-devel. So
On Friday 18 June 2010, Jerry Geis wrote:
> Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
...
> > More information would also be nice (like dmesg output).
> >
> > /Peter
> >
> >> I'd rather not go through the process again of putting a newer kernel
> >> on the machine and having something different out there than "stock
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010, Jerry Geis wrote:
> Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
>> On Friday 18 June 2010, Jerry Geis wrote:
>>
>>> I just installed centos 5.5 x86_64 on a new HP laptop.
>>> It has the core i5 processor.
>>>
>>> only 1 cpu is detected should be 2.
>>>
> dmesg is :
>
> Linux version 2.6.18-194.3.
Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
> On Friday 18 June 2010, Jerry Geis wrote:
>
>> Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
>>
> ...
>
>>> More information would also be nice (like dmesg output).
>>>
>>> /Peter
>>>
>>>
I'd rather not go through the process again of putting a newer kernel
on the ma
I have to rebuild a new Nagios box and thought this might be a good time
to migrate away. I use snmp mostly for everything but with the fork Nagios
endured I wonder about putting any more effort into the project.
I probably should look at OpenNMS again, but the other options I think might
work are
I am a pretty hardcore ZenOSS user.. We use it to monitor over 1000
devices in different fashions - using a combination of SNMP (Linux), WMI
(windows) and SSH (Unix/Aix). While there is a slight learning curve to
get everything working the way you want - it is, in my opinion, the most
powerful ope
JohnS wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 16:10 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
>> Ok, so I got the src rpm from el repo. Lessee, first I tried rpmbuild,
>> and
>> that failed, because it *required* xen-devel. So I grabbed the tarfile
>> from /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES, unbzip2'd it, untar'd it, and d
On 6/18/2010 10:31 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> I have to rebuild a new Nagios box and thought this might be a good time
> to migrate away. I use snmp mostly for everything but with the fork Nagios
> endured I wonder about putting any more effort into the project.
>
> I probably should look at Ope
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 11:34 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Um, what's kernel-rt got to do with anything I said? And actually, the
> first server I'm trying to build this on is a Sunfire, but it's running
> Opterons, and the o/s is 64-bit. I also do *not* have any xen installed.
>
> Fine, I tri
All,
I booted with 2.6.18 kernel with only "noapic acpi=off" I removed the
apci=off
and the kernel still dumps with a bunch of messages about acpi.
I have installed 2.6.34 kernel on the box.
I can boot without the acpi=off and I get all 4 cores on this box.
if I put in the acpi=off it only repo
I am currently running CentOS 4.5 (which, through many Yum updates) now appears
to be CentOD 4.8.
4.8 is still rather old, but I havbe lots of stuff (files and stuff installed).
I would like to install Fedora but I am worried about losing
all the stuff I have. I would have to back everything u
At Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:26:08 + CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
>
>
> I am currently running CentOS 4.5 (which, through many Yum updates) now
> appears to be CentOD 4.8.
>
> 4.8 is still rather old, but I havbe lots of stuff (files and stuff
> installed). I would like to install Fedora but
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 12:26 PM, wrote:
>
> I am currently running CentOS 4.5 (which, through many Yum updates) now
> appears to be CentOD 4.8.
>
> 4.8 is still rather old, but I havbe lots of stuff (files and stuff
> installed). I would like to install Fedora but I am worried about losing
> a
>I am a pretty hardcore ZenOSS user.. We use it to monitor over 1000
>devices in different fashions - using a combination of SNMP (Linux), WMI
>(windows) and SSH (Unix/Aix). While there is a slight learning curve to
>get everything working the way you want - it is, in my opinion, the most
>powerfu
>It depends on what you are doing, but if it is mostly snmp data
>collection and icmp/tcp application monitoring, OpenNMS will probably do
>it out of the box with autodiscovery and no client setup. If you have
>lots of custom nagios client code, you'll probably have to twiddle some
>ugly XML c
tony.chamberl...@lemko.com wrote:
>
> I am currently running CentOS 4.5 (which, through many Yum updates) now
> appears to be CentOD 4.8.
>
> 4.8 is still rather old, but I havbe lots of stuff (files and stuff
> installed). I would like to install Fedora but I am worried about losing
> all the stuf
On 6/18/2010 12:06 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> It depends on what you are doing, but if it is mostly snmp data
>> collection and icmp/tcp application monitoring, OpenNMS will probably do
>> it out of the box with autodiscovery and no client setup. If you have
>> lots of custom nagios client cod
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 08:14:02AM -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
>
> Why yes, John, it is. The fine man said outright he didn't believe my honest
> account, accusing me of making something up when I was only giving the
> facts. He was calling me a liar. He preferred to see my account as a lie so
> a
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 08:25:56AM -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
>
> To get 3.1.7? Disregarding that, I should jump through the hoops of
> recompiling a F13 RPM rather than just compile from the tar? Why? Every
> extra stage like that introduces the chance of incidental errors, of stuff
> that doesn
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 02:29:32PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> And as others have said, /home, and maybe /opt, should *always* be other
> drives, or at least other partitions
Kind of makes you wonder why RH's default install is to shove everything but
boot into one partition these days,
Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 02:29:32PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> And as others have said, /home, and maybe /opt, should *always* be other
>> drives, or at least other partitions
>
> Kind of makes you wonder why RH's default install is to shove everything
> but boot
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 08:41:26AM -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
>
> Now you're threatening to expel me from the community? For posting notes on
> workarounds to get a useful package to work? What's this about? Ganglia's
> working fine for me.
I'm honored that you think I have that much swa
John R. Dennison wrote:
>
>> On the whole, this list is professional. I like that. But look,
>> "./configure, make, make install" is _always_ a proper option. Any serious
>>
>
> No, it's not.
>
indeed, doing exactly this could very well lead to the conflicts he
reported when he trie
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:01:38AM -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
>
> "Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux (EPEL) is a volunteer-based community
> effort from the Fedora project to create a repository of high-quality add-on
> ..."
>
> Enough said.
Apparently not as that bears no indication
MOKRANI Rachid wrote:
> Any idea about a software we can use in our local server ?
>
I've used dokuwiki for this, where I've restricted the access to the
wiki pages to registered users whom are in the appropriate user
groups. the persons sending the files upload them as wiki attachments,
u
John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 08:41:26AM -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> My issues were your building from native source doing the
> standard three-step; it's wrong to do so in an rpm-managed
> distro.
>
Up until now, I had to build the gspca driver separately,
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Whit Blauvelt wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 02:29:32PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
And as others have said, /home, and maybe /opt, should *always* be other
drives, or at least other partitions
Kind of makes you wonder
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 03:15:41PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
> Up until now, I had to build the gspca driver separately, every time I
> upgraded those servers with the cameras attached. I also *always* have to
> do something - mostly reinstall - when I upgrade the boxes, mostly older,
> with
On 6/18/2010 2:05 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Whit Blauvelt wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 02:29:32PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
>>> And as others have said, /home, and maybe /opt, should *always* be other
>>> drives, or at least other partitions
>>
>> Kind of makes you wonder why R
On 06/11/2010 02:17 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Ok, so since there is some level of interest and a few people have
> offered to test, let me get something together and post some details
Our AWS technical reps stopped by our office the other day. They
said the primary issue with CentOS in terms of
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 15:17 -0400, Rob Kampen wrote:
> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> > Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 02:29:32PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > And as others have said, /home, and maybe /opt, should *always* be other
> > > > drives,
On 18/06/2010 20:25, Johnny Tan wrote:
> But since we have a business relation with them already and are
> under NDA, we did tell them we were happy to develop the proper
> AKI/ARIs and give those to CentOS to vet. So they will send us the
> API to do so, shortly.
Please dont communicate to them o
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Not being awkward here, but I'm not going to accept any such thing when
> it does not involve me directly and I am fairly certain that this would
> extend to all the other CentOS developers as well.
heartily concur; I manage the NDAs to which I am even
On 18/06/10 16:34, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
> Fine, I tried running
> rpmbuild -ba --target=x86_64 --without xen video4linux-kmod.spec
Go back and read my last reply, or read the SPEC file again.
If you don't want to build for xen then you must define kvariants on the
rpmbuild command line f
If you deliver more than a few emails to the outside world, especially
if a good portion of those go to Yahoo, you may want to read this message:
http://marc.info/?l=postfix-users&m=127689518629249&w=2
Actually, read the whole thread, it's interesting and the discussion
still continues:
http:/
On 06/18/2010 04:55 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Please dont communicate to them or anyone else that the CentOS project
> or people representing it will agree to be bound under any NDA that they
> didnt sign themselves. And certainly not when done by proxy.
This was definitely not what we communica
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 02:28:36PM -0700, Florin Andrei wrote:
> Fun fact: Postfix-2.3.3 has been released in August 2006. Think about that.
To be fair, RH/CentOS also ships with Sendmail-8.13.8, also from August 2006.
What
a golden month for mail daemons that was.
The door's wide open for some
On 06/18/2010 03:02 PM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
>
> To be fair, RH/CentOS also ships with Sendmail-8.13.8, also from August 2006.
> What
> a golden month for mail daemons that was.
lol
> The door's wide open for someone with the energy to put together a server
> distro based on CentOS but with mode
On 6/18/2010 5:02 PM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
>
>> Fun fact: Postfix-2.3.3 has been released in August 2006. Think about that.
>
> To be fair, RH/CentOS also ships with Sendmail-8.13.8, also from August 2006.
> What
> a golden month for mail daemons that was.
>
> The door's wide open for someone with
Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 02:28:36PM -0700, Florin Andrei wrote:
>
>
>> Fun fact: Postfix-2.3.3 has been released in August 2006. Think about that.
>>
>
> To be fair, RH/CentOS also ships with Sendmail-8.13.8, also from August 2006.
> What
> a golden month for mail dae
On 06/18/2010 03:19 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>
> (reading the EL6 beta 1 release notes) EL6 will be based on 2.6.32, use
> EXT4 by default, have XFS support (in 64bit builds), Apache 2.2.14, gcc
> 4.4, samba 3.0, postgres 8.4, mysql 5.1
and Postfix 2.6.5. Not bad. I could live with that.
--
Flor
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 06:02:10PM -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> The door's wide open for someone with the energy to put together a server
> distro based on CentOS but with modern versions of essential daemons. Yes,
Or wait for RedHat^WCentOS 6, which can't be too far out...
RHEL 2.1: Mar 2002 (A
Stephen Harris wrote:
> RHEL 2.1: Mar 2002 (AS), May 2003 (ES)
> RHEL 3: Oct 2003
> RHEL 4: Feb 2005
> RHEL 5: Mar 2007
> RHEL 6: ??? (previous Beta's have been 5-6 months...)
>
> Funky; in June 2006 RHEL claimed they would slow their release schedule to
> every 2 years (rather than 18 months). O
>
> Is anyone working on this? (No, not Fedora. That's not a server OS.)
>
When i find some package "old" i just get the SRPM from Fedora and i try
to compile it in CentOS (it's very fun!)
although CentOS/RHEL packages seems to be old, RH folks back-port
security / bugfix patches
I use fedor
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010, Florin Andrei wrote:
> On 06/18/2010 03:19 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>>
>> (reading the EL6 beta 1 release notes) EL6 will be based on 2.6.32,
>> use EXT4 by default, have XFS support (in 64bit builds), Apache
>> 2.2.14, gcc 4.4, samba 3.0, postgres 8.4, mysql 5.1
>
> and Pos
At Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:17:22 -0400 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> href="mailto:m.r...@5-cent.us";>m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> cite="mid:40c4699fc9f09a3b67e6c69636e41b14.squir...@host290.hostmonster.com"
> type="cite">
> Whit Blauvelt wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jun
At Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:59:45 -0400 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 02:29:32PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
> > And as others have said, /home, and maybe /opt, should *always* be other
> > drives, or at least other partitions
>
> Kind of makes you wonder why RH's
On 18/06/2010 22:28, Florin Andrei wrote:
> Fun fact: Postfix-2.3.3 has been released in August 2006. Think about that.
While you are doing that - also think about this : Red Hat have a
policy, and they stick with it. Its something that works well for them,
the ISVs around the base and its somethi
On 18/06/2010 23:19, John R Pierce wrote:
> isn't EL6 coming out soon ? beta 1 released in April,
afait ETA on el6 is august'ish this year. but C4 and C5 are still
maintained and in mass production *now*. If there is a clearcut problem
definition as this postfix issue is, then creating ( facil
On 18/06/2010 01:09, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> I should care what you believe? Stay ignorant, if you like. If not, take a
> CentOS system, add the EPEL repository for ganglia, try "yum install
> ganglia", and prepare to see all sorts of package conflicts. Plus it's not
> the current ganglia anyway. Be
On 19/06/2010 02:02, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> ganglia - I still think you don't think you what you are talking about.
s/.*/ganglia - I still think you are confused about the issue./
I blame too much mongodb in one day for crazy language skilz :! ( or in
my case, lack of )
- KB
___
On 18/06/2010 12:04, John Kelly wrote:
> I'm having a yum problem updating a system on Centos 5.3, 64-bit ...
> i.e. 'yum update' returns "No Packages Marked for Update". Problem
> appears to be related to connecting to the mirrors where the
> repositories are located but I could be wrong in tha
Hi Dag,
On 18/06/2010 09:12, Dag Wieers wrote:
> I would like to announce a set of OCFS2 kABI-tracking kernel module
> packages for RHEL5, Scientific Linux 5 and CentOS-5 and kernels.
Can you please stop spamming this list ? A one time announcement here
was plenty. Perhaps setup an announcement
On 17/06/2010 17:58, Dan Carl wrote:
> A capture card and zoneminder would be a more professional grade solution.
While looking for something similar, but a bit lighter weight I came
across http://www.lavrsen.dk/twiki/bin/view/Motion/WebHome recently. Not
nearly as feature rich as ZoneMinder, but
On Sat, 19 Jun 2010, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 18/06/2010 09:12, Dag Wieers wrote:
>> I would like to announce a set of OCFS2 kABI-tracking kernel module
>> packages for RHEL5, Scientific Linux 5 and CentOS-5 and kernels.
>
> Can you please stop spamming this list ? A one time announcement here
>
Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Hi Dag,
>
> On 18/06/2010 09:12, Dag Wieers wrote:
>
>> I would like to announce a set of OCFS2 kABI-tracking kernel module
>> packages for RHEL5, Scientific Linux 5 and CentOS-5 and kernels.
>>
>
> Can you please stop spamming this list ? A one time announcement he
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 02:26:16AM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>
> Can you please stop spamming this list ? A one time announcement here
> was plenty. Perhaps setup an announcement list for elrepo ?
Unless I am missing posts this was a a one-time announcement;
Dag posted a very s
On 19/06/2010 02:37, John R Pierce wrote:
> I don't see this as spamming at all. He's announcing the availability
> of various major packages specific to the EL community, The
> announcement a few days ago was for DRBD.
Do you really want to see all repos announce every package they build
On 19/06/2010 02:49, John R. Dennison wrote:
> Unless I am missing posts this was a a one-time announcement;
> Dag posted a very similar one recently about DRBD. Personally,
> I'd like to continue to see these announcements here.
I am sure elrepo are able to put up an announceme
On 19/06/2010 02:32, Dag Wieers wrote:
> We are not sending every announcement to the CentOS list, that should be
> apparent from looking at the ELRepo lists (where actual announcements
> are being posted in more detail).
But you are still making repeated announcements about packages here - I
dont
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Ski Dawg wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have been doing some searching for information about disabling
> services within a CentOS 5.5 install. I have found a few different
> opinions, and wanted to ask for some feedback.
>
> First off, the system is running a LAMP stack
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 03:20:13AM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> But you are still making repeated announcements about packages here - I
> dont want to see every repo or development unit out there posting emails
> here for feedback about every component they built.
Please keep things in perspec
90 matches
Mail list logo
