From: Whit Blauvelt
> the PNP crew enhances their documentation with some working
> examples, or I learn German
I was able to make some plugins without too much problems (even discovered perl
in the process)...
http://nagiosplug.sourceforge.net/developer-guidelines.html#PLUGOUTPUT
Just copy/pas
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 02:28:51AM -0700, John Doe wrote:
> I was able to make some plugins without too much problems (even discovered
> perl in the process)...
Agreed, it's easy enough to write Nagios plugins. I've done that too.
> Then PNP will "automaticaly" plot these values... but yes, if
Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 02:28:51AM -0700, John Doe wrote:
>
>> I was able to make some plugins without too much problems (even discovered
>> perl in the process)...
>
> Agreed, it's easy enough to write Nagios plugins. I've done that too.
>
>> Then PNP will "automaticaly
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 08:01:26AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> If have firewalling to protect from security issues, why not just run an
> older
> version of cacti?
Sensible suggestion. One, it's not obvious where to find an older version.
Two, hours of attempting to get cacti to work have led
From: Whit Blauvelt
>> Then PNP will "automaticaly" plot these values... but
>> yes, if you have n values, you will get n graphs...
> So PNP is just automagical?
Let me rephrase: once properly setup, it will 'automagicaly' plot any new
data... ^_^
In fact, I had a look at my notes and they are
On 6/16/2010 8:44 AM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 08:01:26AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> If have firewalling to protect from security issues, why not just run an
>> older
>> version of cacti?
>
> Sensible suggestion. One, it's not obvious where to find an older version.
It'
>> Two, hours of attempting to get cacti to work have led me to be
>> underimpressed with the whole project.
>
>That's odd because other than the usual php version issues I've always
>considered cacti to be the easiest of the graphing tools to get working
>- but I haven't tried the most recent ve
There is always ZenOSS. I would definitely take a look at ZenOSS. Very
active, very powerful, nice interface, SMNP/SSH/WMI based monitoring,
etc.
jb
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Joseph L. Casale
Sent: Wednesday, June
On 6/16/2010 10:30 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>>> Two, hours of attempting to get cacti to work have led me to be
>>> underimpressed with the whole project.
>>
>> That's odd because other than the usual php version issues I've always
>> considered cacti to be the easiest of the graphing tools to g
Hey, folks,
Sometimes my workstation bogs down... slows to a crawl. Using gkrellm,
it's obvious the CPU is the laggard. The top utility confirms: the load
average gets up over 4 at times. But this occurs when cpu stepping pegs
the speed at 600MHz. This processor is capable of 1.5GHz and when i
On 6/16/2010 1:47 PM, ken wrote:
> Hey, folks,
>
> Sometimes my workstation bogs down... slows to a crawl. Using gkrellm,
> it's obvious the CPU is the laggard. The top utility confirms: the load
> average gets up over 4 at times. But this occurs when cpu stepping pegs
> the speed at 600MHz. Th
Hi all,
I am just trying to consider my options for storing a large mass of
data (tens of terrabytes of files) and one idea is to build a
clustered FS of some kind. Has anybody had any experience with that?
Any recommendations?
Thanks in advance for any and all advice.
Boris.
___
Boris wrote:
>
> I am just trying to consider my options for storing a large mass of
> data (tens of terrabytes of files) and one idea is to build a
> clustered FS of some kind. Has anybody had any experience with that?
> Any recommendations?
We've been looking at glusterfs here. It's under active
On Tue, June 15, 2010 15:43, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> Am 15.06.2010 20:55, schrieb James B. Byrne:
>
> Are you tackling with that for over 1 year now?
>
Yes. Actually, I have been dealing with this on and off for several
years. I have never found an answer and other things come along
that requ
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 4:05 PM, wrote:
> Boris wrote:
>>
>> I am just trying to consider my options for storing a large mass of
>> data (tens of terrabytes of files) and one idea is to build a
>> clustered FS of some kind. Has anybody had any experience with that?
>> Any recommendations?
>
> We'
Boris Epstein wrote, On 06/16/2010 03:33 PM:
> Hi all,
>
> I am just trying to consider my options for storing a large mass of
> data (tens of terrabytes of files) and one idea is to build a
> clustered FS of some kind. Has anybody had any experience with that?
> Any recommendations?
>
> Thanks i
Boris wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 4:05 PM, wrote:
>> Boris wrote:
>>>
>>> I am just trying to consider my options for storing a large mass of
>>> data (tens of terrabytes of files) and one idea is to build a
>>> clustered FS of some kind. Has anybody had any experience with that?
>>> Any rec
>I am just trying to consider my options for storing a large mass of
>data (tens of terrabytes of files) and one idea is to build a
>clustered FS of some kind. Has anybody had any experience with that?
>Any recommendations?
You haven't actually stated whether you want the backing devices distribut
Hello all,
I have been doing some searching for information about disabling
services within a CentOS 5.5 install. I have found a few different
opinions, and wanted to ask for some feedback.
First off, the system is running a LAMP stack to serve a web
application. It will only be doing email to se
> Hello all,
>
> I have been doing some searching for information about disabling
> services within a CentOS 5.5 install. I have found a few different
> opinions, and wanted to ask for some feedback.
No brainer.
>
> First off, the system is running a LAMP stack to serve a web
> application. It wil
Ski Dawg wrote:
> >From my research, the services that I am thinking of turning off are:
> nfs (already off)
> nfslock
> portmap
> rpccgssd
> rpcidmapd
> rpcsvcgssd
>
all safe to shut off if you're not serving NFS, NIS, etc.
> apci
power management. I believe you need acpid for things like s
On 06/16/2010 03:09 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 6/16/2010 1:47 PM, ken wrote:
>> Hey, folks,
>>
>> Sometimes my workstation bogs down... slows to a crawl. Using gkrellm,
>> it's obvious the CPU is the laggard. The top utility confirms: the load
>> average gets up over 4 at times. But this occurs
The following NSA document provides very good information on the secure
configuration of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5/CentOS 5.x:
Guide to the Secure Configuration of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
http://www.nsa.gov/ia/_files/os/redhat/rhel5-guide-i731.pdf
It goes through almost all the services and
Hi
I want to put up a few cameras connected to a CentOS box.
I currently have a box with one camera and that works (USB),
I can take a pic (the script does that) and see that on a webpage.
However, I want to have a couple of cameras a little further
away (more than 5 meters).
USB has a limit, I
Hi,
Am 17.06.10 08:22, schrieb Jobst Schmalenbach:
> Hi
>
> I want to put up a few cameras connected to a CentOS box.
> I currently have a box with one camera and that works (USB),
> I can take a pic (the script does that) and see that on a webpage.
>
> However, I want to have a couple of camera
Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
> Hi
>
> I want to put up a few cameras connected to a CentOS box.
> I currently have a box with one camera and that works (USB),
> I can take a pic (the script does that) and see that on a webpage.
>
> However, I want to have a couple of cameras a little further
> away (
26 matches
Mail list logo