Anyone recall what kernel runs on the centos 5.5 live cd? Might be worth
trying to boot off that to eliminate local config or modules as a problem
and confirm a kernel only issue.
James
Sent from Android mobile
On Jun 7, 2010 5:12 AM, "MHR" wrote:
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 3:14 PM, John Thomas
>Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 12:19:30 +0200
>From: "Geoff Galitz"
>Subject: [CentOS] OT: SysAdmin Stories
>
>I'm compiling a collection of stories from the systems administrator
>trenches.
>
>Thanks!
>
>-Geoff
>
>-
>Geoff Galitz
>Blankenheim NRW, Germany
>http://eif
On 06/06/2010 11:19 AM, Geoff Galitz wrote:
> I'm compiling a collection of stories from the systems administrator
> trenches.
have you considered a wiki for this ? rather than clogging up the lists.
People could just post their stories there and you get readily editable
content straight out.
-
On Sun, 2010-06-06 at 15:14 -0700, John Thomas wrote:
>
> centos55[r...@home ~]# lsusb
> Bus 002 Device 001: ID :
> Bus 003 Device 001: ID :
> Bus 001 Device 001: ID :
> Bus 001 Device 002: ID 11b0:6888 ATECH FLASH TECHNOLOGY
---
For kicks try unpluging the USB Drive and
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Thanks, all, and with the help of the other admin, the system is up. What
> I had to do was linux rescue, the chroot /mnt/sysimage, grub-install
> /dev/sda
>
> What I didn't get until later was it also needed /boot/grub/grub.conf, and
> then
> ln -s /boot/grub/grub.conf /b
> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Thanks, all, and with the help of the other admin, the system is up.
>> What
>> I had to do was linux rescue, the chroot /mnt/sysimage, grub-install
>> /dev/sda
>>
>> What I didn't get until later was it also needed /boot/grub/grub.conf,
>> and
>> then
>> ln -s /boot/gr
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Thanks, all, and with the help of the other admin, the system is up. What
>> I had to do was linux rescue, the chroot /mnt/sysimage, grub-install
>> /dev/sda
>>
>> What I didn't get until later was it also needed /boo
Hi
We have been using rsyslog and rsyslog-relp for a while however it
seems that in 5.5 there is a newer version of rsyslog. Does anyone
know of a repo where rsyslog-relp exists that is compatible with
rsyslog from 5.5 ?
thanks
___
CentOS mailing list
C
After some reading and testing, I decide to use puppet. It's really
nice. I'll recommend it to others.
Thank you all
Zhihao Lou
On Jun 4, 2010, at 1:10 PM, Gary Greene wrote:
> On 6/3/10 8:27 PM, "Zhihao Lou" wrote:
>> Dear List,
>>
>> I'm trying to set up a lab with multiple workstations r
> I have a machine that has worked fine for years on CentOS5.
> kernel-PAE-2.6.18-164.15.1.el5 is the last "works fine" kernel, but
> kernel-PAE-2.6.18-194.3.1.el5 crashes at boot every time.
>
>
FYI i am having anaconda issues with 2.6.18-194 - basically anaconda
crashes randomly both on x41
Puppet isn't really a "package distribution server," although it can be
used to maintain packages on several systems.. and is an AWESOME tool
for other things like configuration management. A decent size shop
would require more than just Puppet for package management/deployment,
though.
Josh
---
Hi,
I had an issue with this kernel upgrade too. All worked fine until the
194 Kernel then hung on boot on 4 machines all with identical
motherboards. All had USB keyboards, when replaced with PS2 keyboards all
worked fine! What is to blame? - motherboard, kernel or keyboard.. I have
no idea.
Hi,
Since upgrading to "2.6.18-194" I am getting odd messages in the logs.
Such as;
sraid3 kernel INFO task pdflush 259 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
The output from
> grep '120 seconds' /var/log/messages | tr : ' ' | awk '{print $10}' | sort |
> uniq -c
6 nfsd
4 pdflu
on 6-7-2010 1:12 PM Steve Brooks spake the following:
>
> Hi,
>
> Since upgrading to "2.6.18-194" I am getting odd messages in the logs.
> Such as;
>
> sraid3 kernel INFO task pdflush 259 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
>
>
> The output from
>
>> grep '120 seconds' /var/log/messages | t
According to http://www.rpm.org/api/4.4.2.2/specfile.html a
Version: tag can contain a hyphen, as the tarball for the source
I am compiling is named 2.3-pre4 etc.
When I try to build it I get an error about the illegal char?
Anyone know about the discrepancy between the docs and RHEL's
rpmbuild?
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Scott Silva wrote:
> on 6-7-2010 1:12 PM Steve Brooks spake the following:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Since upgrading to "2.6.18-194" I am getting odd messages in the logs.
>> Such as;
>>
>> sraid3 kernel INFO task pdflush 259 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
>>
>>
>> The output from
On Mon, 2010-06-07 at 22:20 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> According to http://www.rpm.org/api/4.4.2.2/specfile.html a
> Version: tag can contain a hyphen, as the tarball for the source
> I am compiling is named 2.3-pre4 etc.
>
> When I try to build it I get an error about the illegal char?
>
On Mon, 2010-06-07 at 22:20 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Ok a follow up... What you want is the release tag not the version
because it will not work in the version tag.
Why I do not know. I tried again with another src.rpm and has to be
release tag for sure. Bombs out with an illegal tag.
J
Searching through the archives, it seems this topic has come up
several times in the past 2.5 years. Did anyone ever take on the
tasks of creating an official CentOS AMI?
We're currently using the RightScale ones, but I think it'd be ideal
to have a clean CentOS AMI with the current kernels.
Kara
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> According to http://www.rpm.org/api/4.4.2.2/specfile.html a
> Version: tag can contain a hyphen, as the tarball for the source
> I am compiling is named 2.3-pre4 etc.
ehh?
Names must not include whitespace and may include a hyphen '-'
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Johnny Tan wrote:
> Searching through the archives, it seems this topic has come up
> several times in the past 2.5 years. Did anyone ever take on the
> tasks of creating an official CentOS AMI?
ummm -- Amazon does not use our kernel, and makes other
changes. This makes it a
>Ok Special Attention here:
>
>Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
>rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
>Checking for unpackaged
>file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/inotify-tools-3.13-3.el5-root-ethan
>Wrote: /home/ethan/rpmbuild/SRPMS/inotify-tools-3.13-3.el5.src.r
>ehh?
>
> Names must not include whitespace and may include a hyphen '-'
> (unlike version and release tags).
>
>That is, version and release are UNLIKE name. name MAY have a
>hyphen. by inference (and as you have seen), version and
>release may not.
Heh, well I had my head so far
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> ehh?
>>
>> Names must not include whitespace and may include a hyphen '-'
>> (unlike version and release tags).
>>
>> That is, version and release are UNLIKE name. name MAY have a
>> hyphen. by inference (and as you have seen), version and
On Mon, 2010-06-07 at 21:47 -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jun 2010, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>
> >> ehh?
> >>
> >>Names must not include whitespace and may include a hyphen '-'
> >>(unlike version and release tags).
> >>
> >> That is, version and release are UNLIKE name. name MAY
25 matches
Mail list logo
