On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 7:37 AM, James Corteciano
wrote:
> Is it possible that the output after doing logrotate could be like the below
> sample. All compressed logs will be keep until 6 months only. I know there
> is man page / docs in internet but I can't get the exact configuration to
> use.
Dear Christopher,
I have sent countless emails to many governmental, non-governmental and
international organizations in the world with the subject "Plea for
Medical Help/Assistance". But surprisingly I get very few replies. Maybe
the replies have been deleted or the emails I sent have been del
"Assistance Requested in Looking for Dr Francis T. Seow, Harvard Law
School Research Fellow"
Maybe you should start by contacting Harvard? This is a list for
CentOS users, have you ever seen this fellow on here before? Maybe you
should search the archives first? I noticed you also posted this
mess
Dear James,
I apologize but I am really not spamming. I am really sending a genuine
medical plea.
On 05/27/2010 06:24 PM, James Bensley wrote:
> "Assistance Requested in Looking for Dr Francis T. Seow, Harvard Law
> School Research Fellow"
>
> Maybe you should start by contacting Harvard? This i
Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) writes:
> Dear James,
>
> I apologize but I am really not spamming. I am really sending a genuine
> medical plea.
You also sent to openbsd-misc and who knows where, so by definition, you
are a spammer. Go away.
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:39 PM, wrote:
> Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) writes:
> > Dear James,
> >
> > I apologize but I am really not spamming. I am really sending a genuine
> > medical plea.
>
> You also sent to openbsd-misc and who knows where, so by definition, you
> are a spammer. Go aw
On 27 May 2010 11:35, Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)
wrote:
> Dear James,
>
> I apologize but I am really not spamming. I am really sending a genuine
> medical plea.
But this isn't a genuine medical forum, someone has lied to you, the
same goes for all the other lists you have been writing to. Yo
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:42:48PM +0400, Sevana Oy wrote:
> Overview
>
unsubscribed
--
Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B
pgphaa8x1iReB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 02:49:30PM +0800, Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First, I would like to apologize for the out-of-topic post. I will keep
> this as short as I possibly could.
unsubscribed
Tru
--
Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)
http://pgp.mit
Ryan and Paul...
Thank you for your suggestions and help I was able to track it down to
three separate things: an improper ACL, nscd, and iptables. Everything is
working fine now. Again, thanks for your insight!
--
Andy Akins
Director of Development
NICUSA, Tennessee A Partnership with Tenne
I have centos 5.4 on an HP laptop, as below the /proc/cpuinfo shows Dual
core,
however, there is only 1 processor listed in /proc/cpuinfo.
Is the OS only using a single core?
jerry
--
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 17
model : 3
model name
On 05/26/2010 08:23 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 05/26/2010 08:44 AM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
>
> [...]
>> The *theoretical* system security improvement of SELinux is trumped by
>> the *practical* observation that I have had existing systems broken by
>> SELinux multiple times on the mere handf
JohnS wrote:
> For others that are saying it want update the boot config then you may
> have something wrong somewhere because it should plain out update it.
>
We know that it should update the boot config. And under most
circumstances, it does. The problem is that under some conditions,
whil
On 05/27/2010 03:47 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> I have centos 5.4 on an HP laptop, as below the /proc/cpuinfo shows Dual
> core,
> however, there is only 1 processor listed in /proc/cpuinfo.
>
> Is the OS only using a single core?
Check the BIOS, I have seen HP desktops that have option in BIOS to tur
How many processors are shown in your process monitor/activity monitor?
--
Regards,
James.
http://www.jamesbensley.co.cc/ - There are only 10 kinds of people in
the world, those who understand trinary, those who don't understand
trinary and those who don't understand trinary.
___
Dear list,
we have a relatively new Sun Storage 7310, where we connect CentOS 5.5
Servers (IBM LS21/LS41 Blades) via Brocade Switches, 4GBit FC. The Blades
boot from SAN via qla2xxx, and have no harddisks at all. We want them to
use multipathing from the very beginning, so /boot and / are alrea
On 5/27/2010 9:25 AM, James Bensley wrote:
> How many processors are shown in your process monitor/activity monitor?
>
>
In order to view the number of cpu's in top, press the '1' key. You will
then see cpu0, cpu1, cpu2, etc. if there is more than 1 core detected.
Ryan Manikowski
___
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 05:55 -0700, Jerry Franz wrote:
> On 05/26/2010 08:23 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > On 05/26/2010 08:44 AM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >> The *theoretical* system security improvement of SELinux is trumped by
> >> the *practical* observation that I have had exis
>
> On 05/27/2010 03:47 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> >/ I have centos 5.4 on an HP laptop, as below the /proc/cpuinfo shows Dual
> />/ core,
> />/ however, there is only 1 processor listed in /proc/cpuinfo.
> />/
> />/ Is the OS only using a single core?
> /
> Check the BIOS, I have seen HP desktops tha
Thanks for all suggestions ~ ^-^
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
sync wrote:
> Thanks for all suggestions ~ ^-^
So, don't leave us hanging by suspenders, tell us what you've decided on!
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> Dear list,
>
> we have a relatively new Sun Storage 7310, where we connect CentOS 5.5
> Servers (IBM LS21/LS41 Blades) via Brocade Switches, 4GBit FC. The Blades
> boot from SAN via qla2xxx, and have no harddisks at all. We want them to
> use multipathing from the very beginning, so /boot and / a
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Jerry Geis wrote:
>>
> Looked in the BIOS and there was no setting.
>
> Top is only showing 1 CPU.
>
What kernel are you running? 'uname -a' output?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/ma
lists-centos wrote:
> Original Message
>
>> Date: Thursday, May 27, 2010 10:38:34 AM -0400
>> From: Jerry Geis
>>
>>> On 05/27/2010 03:47 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
>>>
/ I have centos 5.4 on an HP laptop, as below the /proc/cpuinfo
shows Dual
Jerry Geis wrote:
> lists-centos wrote:
>> Original Message
>>
>>> Date: Thursday, May 27, 2010 10:38:34 AM -0400
>>> From: Jerry Geis
>>>
On 05/27/2010 03:47 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> / I have centos 5.4 on an HP laptop, as below the /proc/cpuinfo
On 05/27/2010 01:47 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> I have centos 5.4 on an HP laptop, as below the /proc/cpuinfo shows Dual
> core,
> however, there is only 1 processor listed in /proc/cpuinfo.
>
> Is the OS only using a single core?
>
> jerry
>
What's the status of ACPI?
Is it enabled in the bios? Is t
> From: Ned Slider
> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 11:16
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] question on CPU
>
> On 05/27/2010 01:47 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> > I have centos 5.4 on an HP laptop, as below the /proc/cpuinfo shows
> > Dual core, however, there is only 1 processor listed in /proc/cpuinfo.
> >
> >
Hi Alexander,
thanks for replying, here's my current multipath.conf:
defaults {
user_friendly_names yes
}
blacklist {
devnode "^(ram|raw|loop|fd|md|dm-|sr|scd|st)[0-9]*"
devnode "^(hd|xvd|vd)[a-z]*"
wwid "*"
}
blacklist_exceptions {
wwid "3600144f0fdf58b5
Updating a system from CentOS 5.4 (current) to 5.5, and I see:
libsepol.scope_copy_callback: zosremote: Duplicate declaration in module:
type/attribute zos_remote_t
libsemanage.semanage_link_sandbox: Link packages failed
semodule: Failed!
Any ideas as to what's going on, or why?
mark "g
On 05/27/2010 05:55 AM, Jerry Franz wrote:
>
> I have *twenty* virtual machines I deploy updates to before it ever
> touches my production systems. Not everything is testable on
> non-production machines.
...
> Now back to fixing the SELinux configuration on a machine I had to put
> in 'permissive'
On 27.5.2010 18.49, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Duplicate declaration in module:
> type/attribute zos_remote_t
Have you seen this (though it is a couple of years old):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467026
- Jussi
--
Jussi Hirvi * Green Spot
Topeliuksenkatu 15 C * 00250 Helsinki * F
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Daniel wrote:
>
> On 05/27/2010 11:49 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Updating a system from CentOS 5.4 (current) to 5.5, and I see:
>>
>> libsepol.scope_copy_callback: zosremote: Duplicate declaration in
>> module:
>> type/attribute zos_remote_t
>> libsemanage.semanage_link_sandbox: Link packages f
Hello,
since I upgraded from CentOS x86_64 5.4 to 5.5, I noticed that Firefox
has become significantly slower on GMail (or Google Apps Mail).
The page becomes slow to scroll as soon as there are more than a few
mails in a conversation (like in a typical CentOS mailing list
thread).
Did anyone el
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> since I upgraded from CentOS x86_64 5.4 to 5.5, I noticed that Firefox
> has become significantly slower on GMail (or Google Apps Mail).
>
> The page becomes slow to scroll as soon as there are more than a few
> mails in a conver
On 05/27/2010 08:51 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 05/27/2010 05:55 AM, Jerry Franz wrote:
>
>> I have *twenty* virtual machines I deploy updates to before it ever
>> touches my production systems. Not everything is testable on
>> non-production machines.
>>
> ...
>
>> Now back to fix
>>
> I am now running stock centos 5.5 x86_64.
>
> jerry
>
Sorry
2.6.18-194.3.1.el5 #1 SMP Thu May 13 13:08:30 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64
x86_64 GNU/Linux
Jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> I had somewhat similar problems. This is a shot in the dark, but do
> you happen to have a Nvidia controller in your system? If so, you may
> have been affected by this bug:
>
> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4335
>
> There is a workaround which solved the problem for me.
Thanks for the hint
Message: 11
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 16:16:45 -0500
From: Andy Akins
Subject: [CentOS] Having trouble with LDAP Authentication...
To: CentOS mailing list
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I?ve google and searched, and have had very little luck...
I have:
1. Installed al
>
> What's the status of ACPI?
>
> Is it enabled in the bios? Is the acpi service installed and running?
>
I see nothing in the bios for ACPI which is odd.
in /proc/acpi/processor there is a CPU0 and CPU1
the info file shows process id: 0 and 1 in each file.
So it looks like its there but /pro
I am looking for a recommendation for a vinyl sign letter cutter that is
supporrted under Linux, specifically Centos. My knowledge of these
machines is nil, but a bit of googling makes it appear that at least
some of them can be made to work using Inkscape.
Does anyone have any recommendations?
-
Postfix 2.3.3 that comes with RH/CentOS is very old, there are lots of
new features in newer versions that appear to be very useful (revised
queue manager with better scheduler as far back as v2.5, etc.).
Latest stable version is 2.7. I was looking for RPM packages and I've
found this site:
ht
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Mathieu Baudier
> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 1:33 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox slower on GMail since update to
> CentOS 5.5
>
> > I had somewhat s
Running postfix 2.7.0 on about 7 machines with CentOS 5.5 from source
works just fine. Extremely happy with it serving up all sorts of
mail. Running it with dovecot 1.2.11 and having a blast.
--Rohan
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Florin Andrei wrote:
> Postfix 2.3.3 that comes with RH/Cent
On 5/27/2010 1:00 PM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
>
>>
>>> I had somewhat similar problems. This is a shot in the dark, but do
>>> you happen to have a Nvidia controller in your system? If
>> so, you may
>>> have been affected by this bug:
>>>
>>> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4335
>>>
>>> There
Daniel wrote:
> On 05/27/2010 12:19 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Daniel wrote:
>>> On 05/27/2010 12:00 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Daniel wrote:
> On 05/27/2010 11:49 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Updating a system from CentOS 5.4 (current) to 5.5, and I see:
>>
>> libsepol.
Les wrote:
> On 5/27/2010 1:00 PM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
>>>
I had somewhat similar problems. This is a shot in the dark, but do
you happen to have a Nvidia controller in your system? If
so, you may have been affected by this bug:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4335
On 5/27/2010 1:39 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Les wrote:
>> On 5/27/2010 1:00 PM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
> I had somewhat similar problems. This is a shot in the dark, but do
> you happen to have a Nvidia controller in your system? If
> so, you may have been affected by this bu
> > nvidia is not fond of the Linux world (compared to ATI).
>
> A more realistic way to say that is that linux is
> intentionally incompatible with a lot of other software.
AIUI, nvidia gives (to the linux world) less information about how to
exploit nvidia capabilities than does ATI, and th
> On 5/27/2010 1:39 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Les wrote:
>>> On 5/27/2010 1:00 PM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
> Thanks for the hint!
> I tried the workaround but unfortunately I still have the problem...
I cured my nvidia driver problems (which re-arose every kernel update
On 5/27/2010 1:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Ah, no, it's not. Brian had it right: nvidia does keep a lot
>>> proprietary, and does *not* pay a lot of attention to writing their
>>> own drivers for Linux.
>>
>> Exactly - and it is linux that intentionally makes it difficult to
>> imposs
> On 5/27/2010 1:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
Ah, no, it's not. Brian had it right: nvidia does keep a lot
proprietary, and does *not* pay a lot of attention to writing their
own drivers for Linux.
>>>
>>> Exactly - and it is linux that intentionally makes it difficult to
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 5/27/2010 1:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, I don't understand what you wrote. How does Linux make it
>> "difficult to impossible"? It's an o/s, with POSIX calls, just like all
>> the other unices. It's not M$, and it's not App
On 5/27/2010 2:06 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>>> Sorry, I don't understand what you wrote. How does Linux make it
>>> "difficult to impossible"? It's an o/s, with POSIX calls, just like all
>>> the other unices. It's not M$, and it's not Apple... so is being neither
>>> making it hard?
>>
>> For
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 14:08, Steve Snyder wrote:
> In the course of upgrading from CentOS 5.4 to CentOS 5.5 I changed from
> using the samba (v3.0.x) packages to the samba3x (v3.3.8) packages,
> mostly because the newer version was said to better support Win7. The
> Samba server services Linux,
Daniel wrote:
> On 05/27/2010 02:38 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Daniel wrote:
>>> On 05/27/2010 12:19 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Daniel wrote:
> On 05/27/2010 12:00 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Daniel wrote:
>>> On 05/27/2010 11:49 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Updatin
On 5/27/2010 2:47 PM, MHR wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On 5/27/2010 1:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>>
>>> Sorry, I don't understand what you wrote. How does Linux make it
>>> "difficult to impossible"? It's an o/s, with POSIX calls, just like all
>>> the oth
Daniel wrote:
> On 05/27/2010 04:12 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Daniel wrote:
>>> On 05/27/2010 02:38 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Daniel wrote:
> On 05/27/2010 12:19 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Daniel wrote:
>>> On 05/27/2010 12:00 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Daniel
On 05/27/2010 04:09 PM, Vnpenguin wrote:
> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 14:08, Steve Snyder wrote:
>> In the course of upgrading from CentOS 5.4 to CentOS 5.5 I changed from
>> using the samba (v3.0.x) packages to the samba3x (v3.3.8) packages,
>> mostly because the newer version was said to better su
I think my sendmail is not correctly set. It says the default is to
disallow relaying.
I am running centos 4.8 and I think sendmail is relaying for anything.
Based on this:
http://www.sendmail.org/~ca/email/chk-89f.html#RELAYING
I added|:
FEATURE(relay_hosts_only)
to my sendmail.mc file and res
On Thu, 27 May 2010, Jerry Geis wrote:
> I think my sendmail is not correctly set. It says the default is to
> disallow relaying.
> I am running centos 4.8 and I think sendmail is relaying for anything.
>
> Based on this:
> http://www.sendmail.org/~ca/email/chk-89f.html#RELAYING
>
> I added|:
> FE
On 5/27/2010 4:16 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> I think my sendmail is not correctly set. It says the default is to
> disallow relaying.
> I am running centos 4.8 and I think sendmail is relaying for anything.
>
> Based on this:
> http://www.sendmail.org/~ca/email/chk-89f.html#RELAYING
>
> I added|:
>
I
> was planning to evaluate devical, but have not tried it yet:
> href="http://www.davical.org/"; target=_blank
> >http://www.davical.org/
I would welcome comments from anyone with
> experience with devical.
DAViCal is excellent. Perhaps more at home on a Debian based disty, but can be
in
CentOS 4.8
Hi All:
We recently had a Sony SDX-500V tape drive fail on one of our servers
running CentOS 4.8. I have now replaced it with a spare SDX-500C. The
problem that I am having now is that the failed drive had ceased
responding to SCSI commands and we have since rebooted the system
which r
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
> CentOS 4.8
>
> Hi All:
>
> We recently had a Sony SDX-500V tape drive fail on one of our servers
> running CentOS 4.8. I have now replaced it with a spare SDX-500C. The
> problem that I am having now is that the failed drive had ceased
>
From: Brian Mathis Sent: May 27, 2010 15:27
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Hugh E Cruickshank
> wrote:
> >
> > I know that I can just reboot the system and kudzu will add the tape
> > drive back in during the boot process however I was wondering if it
> > would be possible to manually run kudz
On 5/27/2010 6:14 PM, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
> CentOS 4.8
>
> Hi All:
>
> We recently had a Sony SDX-500V tape drive fail on one of our servers
> running CentOS 4.8. I have now replaced it with a spare SDX-500C. The
> problem that I am having now is that the failed drive had ceased
> responding
>From Ryan Manikowski Sent: May 27, 2010 18:42
>
> When you say the 'system' no longer recognizes the tape drive, are you
> sure the SCSI controller even detects the tape drive during boot? From
> what I've seen, tape drives use the generic tape driver and get mapped
> to /dev/stX.
I know that
On Thu, 27 May 2010, Jens Neu wrote:
Dear list,
we have a relatively new Sun Storage 7310, where we connect CentOS 5.5 Servers
(IBM LS21/LS41 Blades) via Brocade Switches, 4GBit FC. The Blades boot from SAN
via qla2xxx, and have no harddisks at all. We
want them to use multipathing from the v
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 6:09 AM, Ian Murray wrote:
>
>
> I
> > was planning to evaluate devical, but have not tried it yet:
>
> > href="http://www.davical.org/"; target=_blank
> > >http://www.davical.org/
>
> I would welcome comments from anyone with
> > experience with devical.
>
> DAViCal is ex
70 matches
Mail list logo
