Hi all,
I'm getting a segmentation fault with yum when I try to update a CentOS v5.4
install to v5.5.
What I've done:
* Ran yum clean all.
* Ran yum update yum*
* Ran yum update, and got the segmentation fault.
* Yum suggested running with option --skip-broken, which I did. Still got the
segme
On 05/17/2010 10:46 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
...
> Any other tips, tricks or hints I could try?
Can you strace the yum update process and see what
happens before it crashes?
Mogens
--
Mogens Kjaer, Carlsberg A/S, Computer Department
Gamle Carlsberg Vej 10, DK-2500 Valby, Denmark
Phone: +45 33 27 5
2010/5/17 Sorin Srbu
> Hi all,
>
> I'm getting a segmentation fault with yum when I try to update a CentOS
> v5.4
> install to v5.5.
>
try updating only some of the packages. if there's one package which can not
be updated with yum, rpm -Uvh
--
Among the maxims on Lord Naoshige's wall, there w
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Mogens Kjaer
>Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 10:54 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Yum segmentation fault when updating to CentOS v5.5
>
>On 05/17/2010 10:46 AM, Sorin Srbu w
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of cornel panceac
>Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 10:59 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Yum segmentation fault when updating to CentOS v5.5
>
> I'm getting a segmentation
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Sorin Srbu
>Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 11:22 AM
>To: 'CentOS mailing list'
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Yum segmentation fault when updating to CentOS v5.5
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From:
Philip Manuel wrote:
> Hi
>
> One of our developers has come across an issue with the new release. He
> provided this piece of code to show the problem:-
>
>
> Anyone else seen this or found a bug with these function definitions ?
>
Yes, confirmed. You should file a bug.
_
Hello,
I believe that it is well known that the scroll wheel on the Microsoft
Bluetooth Mouse 5000
does not work on CentOS 5.4. It does, however, work as expected on
Fedora 12 & Ubuntu 9.10
& 10.04. Does anyone know if there is a driver upgrade path for CentOS
that will
fix this problem?
Than
On 16 May 2010 10:39, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 05/15/2010 11:48 PM, Ron Loftin wrote:
>>
>> What would be the proper way to request such a thing?
>
> s/request/offer to do this/ and its game on.
>
> Open an issue at bugs.centos.org, with the details, and we can help from
> there on.
>
> - KB
Wh
> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:13:43 +0200
> From: gavro...@gavroche.pl
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] [Fwd: Re: iptables]
>
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 06:08:45PM -0400, Robert Spangler wrote:
> > On Friday 23 April 2010 15:20, cahit Eyigünlü wrote:
> >
> > > how or why i have re
On May 15, 2010, at 7:13 AM, Dominik Zyla wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 03:02:04PM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
>>>
>>> GATEWAY=74.223.8.177 on /etc/sysconfig/network file ?
>>>
>> Actually I have that in the ifcfg-eth1 and ifcfg-eth2. And this is
>> hte
>> route I get.
>>
>> DEVICE=eth1
>> ONBO
From: "aurfal...@gmail.com"
>Any thoughts on how to copy dirs, subdirs and sym links only w/o contents?
Not sure what you mean by broken but, did you check -k or -K?
Maybe if you give an example...
JD
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
>
> I searched for "Destination nat" just to make sure I did not miss
> something and it looks like what I have above.
>
> Thanks,
>
> jerry
>
Ok - I found out how to enable iptables logging. I can see a connection
from 98.X on port 25 going to .58 as desired.
Then we can see that the return is
On May 17, 2010, at 7:45 AM, John Doe wrote:
> From: "aurfal...@gmail.com"
>> Any thoughts on how to copy dirs, subdirs and sym links only w/o
>> contents?
>
> Not sure what you mean by broken but, did you check -k or -K?
> Maybe if you give an example...
>
> JD
Upon looking at them again, the
Greetings all-
Over the years, I've become incredibly spoiled by 'packages.debian.org' which
allows me to search for a package, view it's description, download it, see
dependencies, see similar packages, etc...
Does such a site or resource exist for CentOS?
Tim Nelson
Systems/Network Support
On 17.5.2010 18.03, Tim Nelson wrote:
> Greetings all-
>
> Over the years, I've become incredibly spoiled by 'packages.debian.org' which
> allows me to search for a package, view it's description, download it, see
> dependencies, see similar packages, etc...
>
> Does such a site or resource exist
>
> - Linux-based solution: Endian Firewall ->
> http://www.endian.com/en/solutions/technology/endianhotspot/
No hotspot functions in the free and open source version of Endian
>
> - FreeBSD-based solution: pfSense (see Captive Portal) ->
> http://www.pfsense.org/index.php?option=com_content&
on 5-14-2010 2:22 AM Tom Brown spake the following:
>>> is there an estimate when centos 5.5 will be released?
>
> as far as i knew it was out - at least it seemed to drop on me on the 10th
>
> eg centos-release-5-5.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
Remember... releases start to mirror before the official an
Don't do NFS localhost mounts from fstab
eg
localhost:/origdir /newdir nfs ro 0 0
(Indeed, don't do localhost NFS mounts at all).
Why? Because at shutdown time nfsd is terminated before the unmounting,
so the shutdown hangs trying to access NFS server localhost. And at boot
time it tries to do
on 5-13-2010 9:37 PM sheraz naz spake the following:
> Hi,
>
> I need to upgrade a system running 4.1 to 4.2, but before I do I want to
> list out all the packages that will be updated/installed/removed. I can
> run up2date -l to get a list of updates but does that show packages that
> need to be
Thanks!
ssh jzhome 'cat /etc/issue'
CentOS release 5.5 (Final)
Kernel \r on an \m
^_^
--
John Maclean
MSc. (DIC) BSc. (Hons)
Linux Systems and Applications
07739 171 531
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/list
Can anyone recommend a decent WMS (Warehouse Management System) that
runs on CentOS decently?
Thank you.
DNK
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Greetings,
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 11:22 PM, dnk wrote:
> Can anyone recommend a decent WMS (Warehouse Management System) that
> runs on CentOS decently?
>
>
Most open source ERPs does that openbravo, adempiere etc. etc.
Regards,
Rajagopal
___
CentOS
Recap of config (There's a "New" section below that covers new
data...)
---
Current config:
CentOS 5, running BIND 9.3.6
*** (We updated everything to most recent versions when this was
initially posted, mid April, and it made no difference in the
symptoms.)
i386
Hardware:
P4, 2.8Ghz, 1G mem
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 11:40 PM, wrote:
> I obviously have more testing to do, but I welcome any comments...
>
I don't have any solution to your problem but ... I have seen
something similar on a Debian box running a local BIND server. Repo
is defined as "ftp.debian.org".
apt-get install giv
Stephen Harris wrote on 05/17/2010 12:15 PM:
> Don't do NFS localhost mounts from fstab
Why would you want to do localhost: NFS mounts anyway?
Phil
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 04:04:45PM -0400, Phil Schaffner wrote:
> Stephen Harris wrote on 05/17/2010 12:15 PM:
> > Don't do NFS localhost mounts from fstab
>
> Why would you want to do localhost: NFS mounts anyway?
'cos the current kernel doesn't allow read-only bind mounts and I need
to present
On Mon, 17 May 2010, Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 04:04:45PM -0400, Phil Schaffner wrote:
>> Stephen Harris wrote on 05/17/2010 12:15 PM:
>>> Don't do NFS localhost mounts from fstab
>>
>> Why would you want to do localhost: NFS mounts anyway?
>
> 'cos the current kernel doesn't
On 05/17/2010 07:49 AM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> Ok - I found out how to enable iptables logging. I can see a connection
> from 98.X on port 25 going to .58 as desired.
> Then we can see that the return is going out eth2 - and - it should be
> going out eth1 based on postrouting.
No, it shouldn't. Yo
On 05/16/2010 09:27 PM, Ron Blizzard wrote:
> The issue came up *after* I had downloaded all the update files. My
> used space was 99%, approximately 230 Megs were shown available at /.
> There was no memory available in my tmpfs directory/partition.
...
> If you think that I have enough informatio
On 05/17/2010 04:03 PM, Tim Nelson wrote:
> Greetings all-
>
> Over the years, I've become incredibly spoiled by 'packages.debian.org' which
> allows me to search for a package, view it's description, download it, see
> dependencies, see similar packages, etc...
>
> Does such a site or resource e
You can try this option!!!
*-d, --dirs* Tell the sending side to include any directories that are
encountered. Unlike *--recursive*, a directory's contents are not copied
unless the directory name specified is "." or ends with a trailing slash
(e.g. ".", "dir/.", "dir/", etc.). Without this option
On Mon, 17 May 2010, Phil Schaffner wrote:
> Stephen Harris wrote on 05/17/2010 12:15 PM:
>> Don't do NFS localhost mounts from fstab
>
> Why would you want to do localhost: NFS mounts anyway?
Perhaps for a restricted 'regrafting' RO overmount down in a
autobuilder's chroot tree, rather than a '
On May 17, 2010, at 5:37 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Mon, 17 May 2010, Phil Schaffner wrote:
>
>> Stephen Harris wrote on 05/17/2010 12:15 PM:
>>> Don't do NFS localhost mounts from fstab
>>
>> Why would you want to do localhost: NFS mounts anyway?
>
> Perhaps for a restricted 'regrafting' RO ove
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 06:41:40PM -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
> On May 17, 2010, at 5:37 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 17 May 2010, Phil Schaffner wrote:
> >
> >> Stephen Harris wrote on 05/17/2010 12:15 PM:
> >>> Don't do NFS localhost mounts from fstab
> >>
> >> Why would you want to do l
On May 17, 2010, at 6:44 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 06:41:40PM -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
>> On May 17, 2010, at 5:37 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 17 May 2010, Phil Schaffner wrote:
>>>
Stephen Harris wrote on 05/17/2010 12:15 PM:
> Don't do NFS localhos
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 06:49:20PM -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
> On May 17, 2010, at 6:44 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 06:41:40PM -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
> >> On May 17, 2010, at 5:37 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, 17 May 2010, Phil Schaffner wrote:
> >>>
>
On 05/17/2010 03:44 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> What about re-mounting the same block device (presumably as ext3) in ro
> mode at another mountpoint?
>
> Or if that complained, maybe created an additional block device under
> /dev with identical major/minor numbers and mounting *that* RO?
>
> Maybe
On 05/17/2010 02:13 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> If there is real interest in something of this nature, I can prolly
> export something like this using a small sinatra.rb app - would someone
> be willing to help with the ui stuff ?
There's already repoview:
https://fedorahosted.org/repoview/
__
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:46 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 05/17/2010 02:13 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> If there is real interest in something of this nature, I can prolly
>> export something like this using a small sinatra.rb app - would someone
>> be willing to help with the ui stuff ?
>
> The
40 matches
Mail list logo
