On 05/08/2010 11:28 PM, JohnS wrote:
> If I were you I would start from scratch and go step by step and set
> it up.
>
> John
I'm in agreement with John here. Your set up looks complex and may be
starting from scratch is the way to go. Looking back though the thread,
your set up might also be u
Robert Heller wrote:
> You just need to do 'yum install gcc gcc-c++ binutils glibc-devel'.
That seems to have done the trick. I do get compile errors, but I think
there's a problem with the code.
Thank you.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
h
On 9 May 2010 12:57, Michael Klinosky wrote:
> Robert Heller wrote:
>> You just need to do 'yum install gcc gcc-c++ binutils glibc-devel'.
> That seems to have done the trick. I do get compile errors, but I think
> there's a problem with the code.
Depending on the requirements of the source code y
aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does setting the autofs timeout=0 create a permanent mount?
>
> What I'm trying to do is get the best of both world;
>
> 1) Have a persistent mount so that users can use autocompletion.
> 2) utilize the benefits of autofs so that when an NFS resource becomes
On May 9, 2010, at 9:49 AM, James Pearson wrote:
> aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Does setting the autofs timeout=0 create a permanent mount?
>>
>> What I'm trying to do is get the best of both world;
>>
>> 1) Have a persistent mount so that users can use autocompletion.
>> 2) utilize the
Am 08.05.10 17:25, schrieb Axel Thimm:
> In a nutshell: ATrpms does try hard to keep CentOS users happy. :)
And thank you for that >:)
Cheers,
Ralph
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
This is an interesting topic.
So, how does one compare the kernel "speed" from RT and Stock kernel?
Is there a benchmark I can use? For example (I know this is wrong):
can I look at /proc/cpuinfo and look at the bogmips and compare and
contrast?
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 7:38 PM, JohnS wrote:
>
Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
> Depending on the requirements of the source code you are trying to
> compile you might have to fetch some development packages for various
> libraries, for example if it uses ncurses, you will want ncurses-devel
> package.
This problem seems (to my semi-newby brain) to be r
Am 09.05.2010 17:48, schrieb Michael Klinosky:
> Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
>> Depending on the requirements of the source code you are trying to
>> compile you might have to fetch some development packages for various
>> libraries, for example if it uses ncurses, you will want ncurses-devel
>> package.
Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> You need to install an additional -devel packages.
Given a list of 10 choices, that would've been at the bottom. I _never_
would have guessed!
> yum provides */Xlib.h
Thank you for today's linux lesson. I'm just delving into compiling
programs.
__
Michael,
On 9 May 2010 16:48, Michael Klinosky wrote:
> Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
>> Depending on the requirements of the source code you are trying to
>> compile you might have to fetch some development packages for various
>> libraries, for example if it uses ncurses, you will want ncurses-devel
>>
Michael Klinosky wrote:
> Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>> You need to install an additional -devel packages.
>
> Given a list of 10 choices, that would've been at the bottom. I _never_
> would have guessed!
>
>> yum provides */Xlib.h
>
> Thank you for today's linux lesson. I'm just delving into comp
At Sun, 09 May 2010 11:48:53 -0400 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
> > Depending on the requirements of the source code you are trying to
> > compile you might have to fetch some development packages for various
> > libraries, for example if it uses ncurses, you will want n
Les Mikesell wrote:
> You can get a
> bunch of them at once if you pick the development-related groups during an
> install or you can do a 'yum grouplist', then 'yum groupinstall ...' for the
> ones you are likely to need.
Benjamin suggested that also.
But, I don't really want tons of extra s
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 7:38 PM, JohnS wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 16:17 -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
>> On May 8, 2010, at 8:35 AM, Mag Gam wrote:
>>
>> > At our Physics research labs we do a lot with low latency networks. We
>> > have been using Centos for over 3 years now and its been great!
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Mag Gam wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 7:38 PM, JohnS wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 16:17 -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
>>> On May 8, 2010, at 8:35 AM, Mag Gam wrote:
>>>
>>> > At our Physics research labs we do a lot with low latency networks. We
>>> > have
Dear All,
I've a new server HP DL 180 G6 with quad core processor, ram 4 GB, hdd
(WDC) 1x750GB Sata.
I was confused when installing CentOS 5 64bit on that server, I take
about two hours to format the ext3 file system. is this normal?
Because when I compare with other sata hard drive in another c
2010/5/10 David Suhendrik :
> Dear All,
> I've a new server HP DL 180 G6 with quad core processor, ram 4 GB, hdd
> (WDC) 1x750GB Sata.
> I was confused when installing CentOS 5 64bit on that server, I take
> about two hours to format the ext3 file system. is this normal?
well, that size of ext3 us
18 matches
Mail list logo
