Re: [CentOS] Installing a CentOS based distro with Raid driver - Citrix XenServer

2010-05-04 Thread Georghy
Phil Schaffner a écrit : > Georghy wrote on 05/03/2010 03:31 AM: > >> Hi everyone, >> I'm trying to install a XenServer on a server (ref:S5000PAL) >> http://www.intel.com/products/server/motherboards/s5000pal/s5000pal-overview.htm >> > > May be a "Fake RAID" rather than true hardware raid.

Re: [CentOS] Math?

2010-05-04 Thread Marcelo M. Garcia
Peter Kjellstrom wrote: > > Ocatave is a free matlab-like tool available from EPEL in packages suitable > for CentOS. > There is also an interesting package called "scipy"[1] from EPEL. Regards mg. [1] http://www.scipy.org/ ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] Installing a CentOS based distro with Raid driver - Citrix XenServer

2010-05-04 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>> May be a "Fake RAID" rather than true hardware raid. See *Is* fake raid onboard, you need the correct chassis midplane w/ the associated DIMM to enable the LSI chip based hardware raid. > I don't realy know >if it is either a good SW or HW RAID but my boss doesn't want me to use >Linux RAID

Re: [CentOS] Math?

2010-05-04 Thread Julio E. Gonzalez P.
Try OCTAVE: http://www.gnu.org/software/octave/ I'm not sure it is the same thing, but maybe also works for you. Julio. Lars Schelde wrote: >> Is there any software package like MATLAB for Windows available for centos? >> > Try MATLAB for Linux. > > > _

[CentOS] question on sendmail.mc file

2010-05-04 Thread Jerry Geis
I tried to set in sendmail.mc file at the LAST line define(`LUSER_RELAY', `local:unknownuser') dnl I did service sendmail restart and got an error on a completely different line. - as a thought I deleted that line and put it on line 2 of the sendmail.mc file. re-ran service sendmail restart and n

Re: [CentOS] Installing a CentOS based distro with Raid driver - Citrix XenServer

2010-05-04 Thread Georghy
Joseph L. Casale a écrit : >>> May be a "Fake RAID" rather than true hardware raid. See >>> > > *Is* fake raid onboard, you need the correct chassis midplane > w/ the associated DIMM to enable the LSI chip based hardware > raid. > should I buy some chipset or is it totally Software or us

Re: [CentOS] question on sendmail.mc file

2010-05-04 Thread Les Mikesell
Jerry Geis wrote: > I tried to set in sendmail.mc file at the LAST line > define(`LUSER_RELAY', `local:unknownuser') dnl > I did service sendmail restart and got an error on a completely > different line. > - > as a thought I deleted that line and put it on line 2 of the sendmail.mc > file. > re-

[CentOS] [SOLVED] Re: Installing a CentOS based distro with Raid driver - Citrix XenServer

2010-05-04 Thread Georghy
Phil Schaffner a écrit : > Georghy wrote on 05/03/2010 03:31 AM: > >> Hi everyone, >> I'm trying to install a XenServer on a server (ref:S5000PAL) >> http://www.intel.com/products/server/motherboards/s5000pal/s5000pal-overview.htm >> > > May be a "Fake RAID" rather than true hardware raid.

Re: [CentOS] Broken upgrade to memcached

2010-05-04 Thread Ralph Angenendt
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 8:38 PM, wrote: > I would have to agree with the repo being misconfigured. If I'm on 5.4, > and look for updates to 5.4, it should *not* tell me that one package > needs updating, but that, and an unnoted dependency, are both actually > 5.5. You do not look for updates on

Re: [CentOS] Broken upgrade to memcached

2010-05-04 Thread m . roth
> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 8:38 PM, wrote: >> I would have to agree with the repo being misconfigured. If I'm on 5.4, >> and look for updates to 5.4, it should *not* tell me that one package >> needs updating, but that, and an unnoted dependency, are both actually >> 5.5. > > You do not look for up

Re: [CentOS] Broken upgrade to memcached

2010-05-04 Thread Ralph Angenendt
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:40 PM, wrote: > I believe I am looking for updates on 5. But, since 5.5 is *not* released, > I should not see bits and pieces that require it. What next, glibc? 5.5 *is* released. Just not by CentOS yet. Ralph ___ CentOS maili

Re: [CentOS] Installing a CentOS based distro with Raid driver - Citrix XenServer

2010-05-04 Thread Drew
> thanks for answering, but it seemed it is quite difficult to know if a > RAID is a Fake or a real HW RAID, > my server (ie S5000PAL) is using 1068 or 1064E RAID chipset to allow > using RAID, I don't realy know > if it is either a good SW or HW RAID but my boss doesn't want me to use > Linux RAID

Re: [CentOS] Broken upgrade to memcached

2010-05-04 Thread m . roth
Ralph wrote: > On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:40 PM, wrote: >> I believe I am looking for updates on 5. But, since 5.5 is *not* >> released, I should not see bits and pieces that require it. What next, >> glibc? > > 5.5 *is* released. Just not by CentOS yet. And your point is? I mean, a) we're talking

Re: [CentOS] Broken upgrade to memcached

2010-05-04 Thread Stephen Harris
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 10:24:25AM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Ralph wrote: > > On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:40 PM, wrote: > >> I believe I am looking for updates on 5. But, since 5.5 is *not* > >> released, I should not see bits and pieces that require it. What next, > >> glibc? > > > > 5.5 *is

Re: [CentOS] Broken upgrade to memcached

2010-05-04 Thread Steve Huff
On May 4, 2010, at 10:24 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > And your point is? I mean, a) we're talking about CentOS yum update, and > b) a 5.5 update showing up before 5.5 is released. mark, from your post here http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2010-May/093953.html i infer that the pack

Re: [CentOS] Broken upgrade to memcached

2010-05-04 Thread m . roth
Steve wrote: > On May 4, 2010, at 10:24 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> And your point is? I mean, a) we're talking about CentOS yum update, and >> b) a 5.5 update showing up before 5.5 is released. > > from your post here > > http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2010-May/093953.html > > i inf

Re: [CentOS] Installing a CentOS based distro with Raid driver - Citrix XenServer

2010-05-04 Thread Georghy
Drew a écrit : >> thanks for answering, but it seemed it is quite difficult to know if a >> RAID is a Fake or a real HW RAID, >> my server (ie S5000PAL) is using 1068 or 1064E RAID chipset to allow >> using RAID, I don't realy know >> if it is either a good SW or HW RAID but my boss doesn't want me

Re: [CentOS] [SOLVED] Re: Installing a CentOS based distro with Raid driver - Citrix XenServer

2010-05-04 Thread Tru Huynh
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 03:03:00PM +0200, Georghy wrote: > (1)Download that driver : > http://downloadcenter.intel.com/Detail_Desc.aspx?agr=Y&ProdId=3117&DwnldID=18570&lang=fra > from the intel support web site > You should have started your installation with "linux dd" and the initrd would have

Re: [CentOS] Installing a CentOS based distro with Raid driver - Citrix XenServer

2010-05-04 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>should I buy some chipset or is it totally Software or using the >hardware I had already ? Well, I don't what chassis you bought with it, and whether or not it has the applicable midplane? Do you? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.

Re: [CentOS] vim and backup files

2010-05-04 Thread Dominik Zyla
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 02:34:11PM -0700, el...@spinics.net wrote: > On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:22:13 -0700, Kwan Lowe > wrote: > > > Check filesystems for space? Temp dir? Maybe try cleaning out your > > .vimrc to see if some cruft in it? Also check /etc/vimrc for > > changes.. Maybe even re-inst

Re: [CentOS] Broken upgrade to memcached

2010-05-04 Thread Frank Cox
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 11:25 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > if I'm upgrading a CentOS 5.4 > system, and there's no CentOS 5.5, I don't see why yum should find a > 5.5 > package. You're missing the point. epel is a repo intended for RHEL, and by a happy coincidence you can use their repo for Cen

Re: [CentOS] Mock Shell Arch Command [[OFFLIST]]

2010-05-04 Thread JohnS
On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 13:40 -0400, Ryan Wagoner wrote: Replying to you off list because this is a topic for the fedora devel list. > Shouldn't it see the correct architecture inside of mock? I thought > that was the point of mock so I could build both i386 and x86_64 > versions on the same syste

Re: [CentOS] nfs4 help needed

2010-05-04 Thread Anne Wilson
On Sunday 02 May 2010 21:09:46 Tom H wrote: > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Anne Wilson wrote: > > Fedora 13 is using nfs4, and there is a problem in opening files > > requiring OpenOffice if accessed over an nfs3 mount, so it's time to > > change. I found a couple of tutorials, and got it *a

Re: [CentOS] vim and backup files

2010-05-04 Thread Mihai T. Lazarescu
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 06:23:42PM +0200, Dominik Zyla wrote: > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 02:34:11PM -0700, el...@spinics.net wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:22:13 -0700, Kwan Lowe > > wrote: > > > > > Check filesystems for space? Temp dir? Maybe try cleaning out your > > > .vimrc to see if so

[CentOS] NIS question

2010-05-04 Thread ann kok
Hi How can we use NIS to control a user in different servers? eg: serverA /home/userA/javaapplication serverB /export/home/userA/javaapplication serverC /vol/home/javaapplication Thank you ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://list

Re: [CentOS] NIS question

2010-05-04 Thread Larry Brower
ann kok wrote: > Hi > > How can we use NIS to control a user in different servers? > > eg: serverA /home/userA/javaapplication > serverB /export/home/userA/javaapplication > serverC /vol/home/javaapplication > > Thank you > Could you be more specific on what you are trying to do ? ___

[CentOS] dhclient.conf being ignored!

2010-05-04 Thread Todd Denniston
It seems that the prominent North American Enterprise Linux vendor has decided that dhclient.conf should be ignored, i.e. ifup-eth causes dhclient to be called with "-cf /etc/dhclient-$(DEVICE).conf", and then ifup-eth/ifdown-eth wipes the file out each time. Through the use of "DHCP_HOSTNAME" i

Re: [CentOS] NIS question

2010-05-04 Thread Ray Van Dolson
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 05:05:40PM -0700, ann kok wrote: > Hi > > How can we use NIS to control a user in different servers? > > eg: serverA /home/userA/javaapplication > serverB /export/home/userA/javaapplication > serverC /vol/home/javaapplication > > Thank you Automounter maps? I gu

Re: [CentOS] Math?

2010-05-04 Thread Rajagopal Swaminathan
Greetings, On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Mathieu Baudier wrote: > I used Scilab when I was a student, which is compatible with matlab: > http://www.scilab.org/ > ++1 Regards, Rajagopal ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.o

[CentOS] heartbeat package in extras trouble with 5.4

2010-05-04 Thread Baird, Josh
I just recently upgraded a box from i386 5.3 -> 5.4. The box has heartbeat packages installed from "extras:" heartbeat-pils-2.1.3-3.el5.centos heartbeat-stonith-2.1.3-3.el5.centos heartbeat-devel-2.1.3-3.el5.centos heartbeat-2.1.3-3.el5.centos The heartbeat daemon no longer starts.. the init scri

Re: [CentOS] question on sendmail.mc file

2010-05-04 Thread Jobst Schmalenbach
Using a trap-all user may seem like a good method to prevent spammers from determining what user accounts are on a system, but will also trap legitimate mail sent to an incorrect address (e.g. via a typo on the username). I would only user a trap-all on an entire domain dedicated to the purpose

Re: [CentOS] heartbeat package in extras trouble with 5.4

2010-05-04 Thread Ryan Manikowski
On 5/4/2010 11:39 PM, Baird, Josh wrote: > I just recently upgraded a box from i386 5.3 -> 5.4. The box has heartbeat > packages installed from "extras:" > heartbeat-pils-2.1.3-3.el5.centos > heartbeat-stonith-2.1.3-3.el5.centos > heartbeat-devel-2.1.3-3.el5.centos > heartbeat-2.1.3-3.el5.centos

Re: [CentOS] gcc? (w/ a bit of "vi vs. emacs")

2010-05-04 Thread Morten Torstensen
Looks like brief is still available, as a rewrite for Windows as a console app. Can be run in linux using winconsole instead of wine. OTOH, I prefer ultraedit for linux (and windows) these days. -- //Morten //mor...@mortent.org ___

Re: [CentOS] Broken upgrade to memcached

2010-05-04 Thread Axel Thimm
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 03:37:52PM +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 8:38 PM, wrote: > > I would have to agree with the repo being misconfigured. If I'm on 5.4, > > and look for updates to 5.4, it should *not* tell me that one package > > needs updating, but that, and an unno