cahit Eyigünlü sent a missive on 2010-04-24:
> I have installed shorewall at late last night and i forget it today
> i've restart my server now i am not able to connect it :D is there any
> way to connect shorewall ?
If you have locked yourself out then you'll need to have physical access to th
Problem is different problem grub load error 2 unfortunatelly
2010/4/24 Simon Billis
> cahit Eyigünlü sent a missive on 2010-04-24:
>
> > I have installed shorewall at late last night and i forget it today
> > i've restart my server now i am not able to connect it :D is there any
> > way to conn
I had a geub loader error 2 on starting centos
and i am able to connect rescue system
this is the result how could i get system work
r...@rescuecd64 ~ # grub
Probing devices to guess BIOS drives. This may take a long time.
Unknown partition table signature
GNU GRUB version 0.97 (640K low
> *shrug*
>
> Looks good to me. I just do not understand why it's such a song and dance,
> rather than, say,
> syslinux /dev/sdb1
> mount /dev/sdb1 /tmp/mnt
> mount -o loop CentOSiso /mnt
> cp -pr /mnt/ /tmp/mnt
>
> mark
>
The last time I installed from a USB key all I did was:-
wget ht
Hi,
Have you try this :
r...@rescuecd64 ~ # grub-install /dev/sda (or some device that
installed CentOS)
2010/4/24 cahit Eyigünlü :
> I had a geub loader error 2 on starting centos
> and i am able to connect rescue system
> this is the result how could i get system work
> r...@rescuecd64 ~ # g
It had solved , the error encounters from thousands of a bad sectors :( i do
not know how it happened but recovery system has repaired after then
mount /dev/sda /mnt ext3
grub-install /dev/sda
has worked thanks
2010/4/24 Wahyu Darmawan
> Hi,
> Have you try this :
> r...@rescuecd64 ~ # grub-in
On 04/23/2010 02:52 PM, Niki Kovacs wrote:
...
> Machine 2 : installer goes a little further, asks about the storage, and
> when I choose the default, it freezes.
I had to boot the installer with nmi_watchdog=0 to avoid it
to freeze during installation.
Mogens
--
Mogens Kjaer, Carlsberg A/S, C
El 23/04/10 21:32, Enrique Verdes escribió:
> Have Centos 5.3 installed in a HP ML110 server. After cloning disk using
> Clonezilla, if I issue a shutdown -h now, or any other command to shut
> down the server (i.e. init 0 or poweroff), instead of shutting down the
> server reboots.
>
> I googled b
rsync'ing ain't working for me. Is this the right syntax?
rsync -avrt rsync://mirror.ovh.net/centos/5.4/updates/i386
--exclude=debug/ updates/
rsync: getaddrinfo: mirror.ovh.net 873: Temporary failure in name resolution
rsync error: error in socket IO (code 10) at clientserver.c(107)
[receiver=2.
>rsync'ing ain't working for me. Is this the right syntax?
>
>rsync -avrt rsync://mirror.ovh.net/centos/5.4/updates/i386
>--exclude=debug/ updates/
>
>rsync: getaddrinfo: mirror.ovh.net 873: Temporary failure in name resolution
^^
Mogens Kjaer a écrit :
> On 04/23/2010 02:52 PM, Niki Kovacs wrote:
> ...
>> Machine 2 : installer goes a little further, asks about the storage, and
>> when I choose the default, it freezes.
>
> I had to boot the installer with nmi_watchdog=0 to avoid it
> to freeze during installation.
>
Wher
Niki Kovacs wrote:
> Mogens Kjaer a écrit :
>> On 04/23/2010 02:52 PM, Niki Kovacs wrote:
>> ...
>>> Machine 2 : installer goes a little further, asks about the storage, and
>>> when I choose the default, it freezes.
>> I had to boot the installer with nmi_watchdog=0 to avoid it
>> to freeze durin
On Apr 22, 2010, at 8:08 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 03:57:01PM -0700, nate wrote:
>> John R Pierce wrote:
>>> Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> I think what you want is a proper storage array with mirrored
> write
> cache.
>
Which is what we have with ZF
Ross Walker wrote:
>
> NFS should always be 'sync' if performance isn't good, then your
> storage isn't good.
Why demand sync on remote storage when you typically don't have it locally?
Programs that need transactional integrity should know when to fsync() and for
anything else there's not mu
On Apr 24, 2010, at 12:43 PM, Les Mikesell
wrote:
> Ross Walker wrote:
>>
>> NFS should always be 'sync' if performance isn't good, then your
>> storage isn't good.
>
> Why demand sync on remote storage when you typically don't have it
> locally?
> Programs that need transactional integrity s
On Apr 23, 2010, at 1:00 PM, James wrote:
>
>> http://sources.redhat.com/cluster/doc/nfscookbook.pdf
>>
>> I think it'd be much easier if you just replicate the data between
>> the servers with rsync or something. GFS sounds like way overkill
>> for a couple of web servers.
>>
> Maybe you're righ
Ross Walker wrote:
> On Apr 24, 2010, at 12:43 PM, Les Mikesell
> wrote:
>
>> Ross Walker wrote:
>>> NFS should always be 'sync' if performance isn't good, then your
>>> storage isn't good.
>> Why demand sync on remote storage when you typically don't have it
>> locally?
>> Programs that need
On Apr 24, 2010, at 4:34 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Ross Walker wrote:
>> On Apr 24, 2010, at 12:43 PM, Les Mikesell
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Ross Walker wrote:
NFS should always be 'sync' if performance isn't good, then your
storage isn't good.
>>> Why demand sync on remote storage when you ty
Ross Walker wrote:
> On Apr 24, 2010, at 4:34 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> Ross Walker wrote:
>>> On Apr 24, 2010, at 12:43 PM, Les Mikesell
>>> wrote:
>>>
Ross Walker wrote:
> NFS should always be 'sync' if performance isn't good, then your
> storage isn't good.
Why demand syn
On Apr 24, 2010, at 4:53 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Ross Walker wrote:
>> On Apr 24, 2010, at 4:34 PM, Les Mikesell
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Ross Walker wrote:
On Apr 24, 2010, at 12:43 PM, Les Mikesell
wrote:
> Ross Walker wrote:
>> NFS should always be 'sync' if performance is
On 23/04/10 10:19, John Doe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I keep getting entries like these in my logs:
>
>network unreachable resolving '0.centos.pool.ntp.org//IN':
> 2001:500:40::1#53: 1 Time(s)
>network unreachable resolving '0.centos.pool.ntp.org//IN':
> 2001:500:e::1#53: 1 Time(s)
>ne
21 matches
Mail list logo
