Re: [CentOS] Slightly OT: which hardware for CentOS file server (Samba, 2 To storage, 50 users)?

On Wednesday, April 14, 2010 02:59 PM, Niki Kovacs wrote: > Niki Kovacs a écrit : > >> >> Since the aim is lowcost, would it be wrong to install that fileserver >> on a no-name desktop PC with a 64bit processor and enough RAM, and then >> simply put 2 x 2 To hard disks in it, either with a mirrorin

Re: [CentOS] Slightly OT: which hardware for CentOS file server (Samba, 2 To storage, 50 users)?

Niki Kovacs wrote: >> And so on. In the end, I decided not to bother and just left. << I think most consultants have one* of those in their pasts. The trick is to cut your losses, as soon as possible. You had a narrow escape there. Best, --- Les Bell [http://www.lesbell.com.au] Tel: +61 2 945

[CentOS] SVN server update

Dear all, i have SVN server 1.4.x working on production. i want to go ahead and update to 1.6.x i'm hoping your experience would help me prevent possible downtime.. is there any issues that may arise from updating the SVN server from one version to another on a production server?

Re: [CentOS] SVN server update

>Dear all, > >i have SVN server 1.4.x working on production. >i want to go ahead and update to 1.6.x > >i'm hoping your experience would help me prevent possible downtime.. >is there any issues that may arise from updating the SVN server from one >version to another on a production server? I upgra

[CentOS] warning: only V3 signatures can be verified, skipping V4 signature

Hello, Anytime when I issue rpm command, there will be a warning massage "warning: only V3 signatures can be verified, skipping V4 signature". For example, [r...@hadoop-datanode44 ~]# rpm -qa | grep -i post postgresql-server-8.3.8-1PGDG.rhel4 warning: only V3 signatures can be verified, skippin

Re: [CentOS] SVN server update

Matt Keating wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> i have SVN server 1.4.x working on production. >> i want to go ahead and update to 1.6.x >> >> i'm hoping your experience would help me prevent possible downtime.. >> is there any issues that may arise from updating the SVN server from one >> version to anothe

Re: [CentOS] iTunes on CentOS??

On 04/13/2010 05:26 PM, ken wrote: > > > Stay tuned (but not necessarily "iTuned"). > Que the sad trombone! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] SVN server update

On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, Les Mikesell wrote: > Matt Keating wrote: >>> Dear all, >>> >>> i have SVN server 1.4.x working on production. >>> i want to go ahead and update to 1.6.x > > You shouldn't have any problem upgrading the server side and it will > be backwards compatible with older clients, but

[CentOS] How Do I ...

All, I've got a machine running CentOS 5.3 and this machine has got 2 - built-in 1 Gig NICs and a expansion card with 4 - 100 Meg NICs. For whatever reason at install time, it made the expansion card eth0 through eth3 and the internal ports eth4 and eth5. And by default the 'machine' is known

Re: [CentOS] How Do I ...

>How can I force the internal NICs to be eth0 and eth1? Edit the hardware address in the ifcfg-ethx scripts and the ips of the nics in question to be on the subnet of choice and arrangement of choice. Add a route statement or I think placing your gateway line in the eth cfg script should do that

Re: [CentOS] How Do I ...

You can go to /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts , edit and move around ifcfg-ethX files Gabe From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of gene.po...@macys.com Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 10:59 AM To: centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS] How Do I ...

Re: [CentOS] How Do I ...

On 4/14/2010 9:58 AM, gene.po...@macys.com wrote: > All, > > I've got a machine running CentOS 5.3 and this machine has got 2 - > built-in 1 Gig NICs and a expansion card with 4 - 100 Meg NICs. For > whatever reason at install time, it made the expansion card eth0 through > eth3 and the internal po

Re: [CentOS] How Do I ...

>The eth? names are assigned in more or less random order at bootup Not exactly "random" but not always as expected:) http://linux.dell.com/files/whitepapers/nic-enum-whitepaper-v3.pdf ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/ma

Re: [CentOS] How Do I ...

On 4/14/2010 10:04 AM, Gabriel Rosca wrote: > You can go to /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts , edit and move around > ifcfg-ethX files > But you can't just rename them. They have the device name inside the file also and are tied to the corresponding NIC by the hardware address. -- Les Mikesel

Re: [CentOS] How Do I ...

From: "gene.po...@macys.com" > I've got a machine running CentOS 5.3 > and this machine has got 2 - built-in 1 Gig NICs and a expansion card with > 4 - 100 Meg NICs. For whatever reason at install time, it made the > expansion card eth0 through eth3 and the internal ports eth4 and eth5. > And by

Re: [CentOS] How Do I ...

On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 15:12 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > >The eth? names are assigned in more or less random order at bootup > > Not exactly "random" but not always as expected:) > http://linux.dell.com/files/whitepapers/nic-enum-whitepaper-v3.pdf --- Nice paper by Michael.. What I do is dis

Re: [CentOS] How Do I ...

>Nice paper by Michael.. What I do is disable all the nics in the bios >via console rdir of drac 3 -5. Enable one at a time to install then >enable the other integrated nics. Then have the the other nic hardware >installed. Can also be done remote or local. It eases the frustration. >Then you h

Re: [CentOS] How Do I ...

Am Mittwoch, den 14.04.2010, 17:58 +0200 schrieb JohnS: > On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 15:12 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > > >The eth? names are assigned in more or less random order at bootup > > > > Not exactly "random" but not always as expected:) > > http://linux.dell.com/files/whitepapers/nic-enum

[CentOS] timeout problem

I found the response below today online to a question I had. For some reason I never got the mail. I am not quite clear on what "DHCP + DFG + 2DNS entries" means when calculating the IP to set for the router: Thanks Re: [CentOS] Yum/WGET/HTTP sourceforge etc. new April 12, 2010 08:10AM On Sun

Re: [CentOS] ClamAV "clamscan" command using huge amount of RAM

> Change to clamd (use clamdscan). Yes, clamscan needs quite a bit of RAM. > > Kai Thank you Kai, our performance looks a lot better now. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] How Do I ...

On 14 Apr 2010, at 17:05, "Joseph L. Casale" wrote: > Or use HP's :) I had the same issue (admittedly with RedHat 5.3) with an HP server with the on board NICs detected last. Just edit the ifcfg-ethX files so that MAC refers to the NIC you want it to be. Ben ___

Re: [CentOS] How Do I ...

On 4/14/2010 11:16 AM, Christoph Maser wrote: > >> Nice paper by Michael.. What I do is disable all the nics in the bios >> via console rdir of drac 3 -5. Enable one at a time to install then >> enable the other integrated nics. Then have the the other nic hardware >> installed. Can also be don

Re: [CentOS] timeout problem

On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 16:23 +, tony.chamberl...@lemko.com wrote: > I found the response below today online to a question I had. > For some reason I never got the mail. I am not quite clear > on what "DHCP + DFG + 2DNS entries" means when calculating the IP > to set for the router: > > Thanks

Re: [CentOS] DRBD,GFS2 and GNBD without all clustered cman stuff

Thanks Juergen for your response. I did not post till now because i've been fighting with all cluster stuff ! :D I mean GFS2. DRBD, mysql and heartbeat work fine in an active/passive configuration. What really does not fit to my needs is the cluster stuff which i have to use only to be able to mo

Re: [CentOS] iTunes on CentOS??

On 04/13/2010 05:26 PM ken wrote: > On 04/13/2010 05:08 PM ken wrote: >> Anyone know how to download and play stuff from itunes.apple.com >> (without having to use Windows or Mac)? >> > > Apparently iTunes installs and runs on wine. I'm gonna try that. Stay > tuned Well, I got wine install

[CentOS] Building an "instant on" X terminal

I got my hands on a HP t5720. This was designed as a thin-client workstation (originally Windows XPembedded, talking to a Windows terminal server). It's not very powerful, with an AMD Geode NX 1500 (1.0 GHz), 256Mb RAM (16MB used for video) and a 512Mb flash "hard disk". I plugged in a USB DVD d

[CentOS] Getting Domainkeys, dkim, and SMTP-AUTH/TLS to play nicely together in sendmail

A while back I struggled to get Domainkeys and DKIM to work properly on my little home server. While I'm sure they weren't necessary in a strict sense, it not only enabled me to learn about the technology but allowed for more of a verification of the email coming from my server. And so this week

Re: [CentOS] iTunes on CentOS??

On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 15:36 -0400, ken wrote: > On 04/13/2010 05:26 PM ken wrote: > > On 04/13/2010 05:08 PM ken wrote: > >> Anyone know how to download and play stuff from itunes.apple.com > >> (without having to use Windows or Mac)? > >> > > > > Apparently iTunes installs and runs on wine. I'm

Re: [CentOS] Building an "instant on" X terminal

>What do people recommend for building this? What would have the quickest >power-on-to-ready time? Well, you could use thin station, I have used it in the past and its pretty slick... ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/ma

Re: [CentOS] Building an "instant on" X terminal

On 4/14/2010 2:38 PM, Stephen Harris wrote: > I got my hands on a HP t5720. This was designed as a thin-client > workstation (originally Windows XPembedded, talking to a Windows terminal > server). It's not very powerful, with an AMD Geode NX 1500 (1.0 GHz), > 256Mb RAM (16MB used for video) and

Re: [CentOS] Building an "instant on" X terminal

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 03:04:26PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 4/14/2010 2:38 PM, Stephen Harris wrote: > > I look at the LTSP code base, but this looks like it wants to run as it's > > own OS; I already have a C5 server in my house, I don't want to build > > LTSP doesn't install another OS on

Re: [CentOS] Building an "instant on" X terminal

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 07:50:42PM +, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > >What do people recommend for building this? What would have the quickest > >power-on-to-ready time? > > Well, you could use thin station, I have used it in the past and its pretty > slick... Hmm... I'll take a look at that. T

[CentOS] Building an "instant on" X terminal

On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, Stephen Harris wrote: > My reading of the ltsp pages is that they prefer to distribute it as > an OS image, with the ltsp components already integrated and that it's > "hard work" to do the integration yourself. > http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/ltsp/index.php?title=Lts

Re: [CentOS] Building an "instant on" X terminal

Install the image for a t5725 from a USB stick. Very cool. http://h2.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/DriverDownload.jsp?lang=en&cc=us&prodNameId=3221864&taskId=135&prodTypeId=12454&prodSeriesId=3221863&lang=en&cc=us&submit=Go%20%BB -- M Reynolds McClatchey JrVP Engineering and Inve

Re: [CentOS] Building an "instant on" X terminal

On 4/14/2010 3:26 PM, Stephen Harris wrote: > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 03:04:26PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: >> On 4/14/2010 2:38 PM, Stephen Harris wrote: >>> I look at the LTSP code base, but this looks like it wants to run as it's >>> own OS; I already have a C5 server in my house, I don't want t

Re: [CentOS] iTunes on CentOS??

Find research and analysis on US healthcare, health insurance, and health policy at: On 04/14/2010 03:48 PM Craig White wrote: > On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 15:36 -0400, ken wrote: >> On 04/13/2010 05:26 PM ken wrote: >>> On 04/13/2010 05:08 PM ken wrote:

Re: [CentOS] Building an "instant on" X terminal

At Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:38:20 -0400 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > I got my hands on a HP t5720. This was designed as a thin-client > workstation (originally Windows XPembedded, talking to a Windows terminal > server). It's not very powerful, with an AMD Geode NX 1500 (1.0 GHz), > 256Mb RAM (1

[CentOS] CentOS 5.x and Fedora

Which Fedora release is the CentOS 5.x kernel based on? I am wanting to know which Fedora rpm's I would have the best luck installing on CentOS 5.x 64 bit. Matt ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] How Do I ...

On 04/15/2010 12:58 AM, gene.po...@macys.com wrote: > I've got a machine running CentOS 5.3 and this machine has got 2 - > built-in 1 Gig NICs and a expansion card with 4 - 100 Meg NICs. For > whatever reason at install time, it made the expansion card eth0 through > eth3 and the internal ports et

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.x and Fedora

Quoting Matt : > Which Fedora release is the CentOS 5.x kernel based on? I am wanting > to know which Fedora rpm's I would have the best luck installing on > CentOS 5.x 64 bit. Fedora Core 6. Please understand that FC6 is no longer supported by Fedora, and hasn't been for a couple of years. ___

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.x and Fedora

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Barry Brimer wrote: > Quoting Matt : > >> Which Fedora release is the CentOS 5.x kernel based on?  I am wanting >> to know which Fedora rpm's I would have the best luck installing on >> CentOS 5.x 64 bit. > > Fedora Core 6.  Please understand that FC6 is no longer

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.x and Fedora

> Which Fedora release is the CentOS 5.x kernel based on?  I am wanting > to know which Fedora rpm's I would have the best luck installing on > CentOS 5.x 64 bit. I am really looking for a Squid 3.1 rpm for CentOS 5.x. Matt ___ CentOS mailing list CentO

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.x and Fedora

On 4/14/2010 5:16 PM, Matt wrote: >> Which Fedora release is the CentOS 5.x kernel based on? I am wanting >> to know which Fedora rpm's I would have the best luck installing on >> CentOS 5.x 64 bit. > > I am really looking for a Squid 3.1 rpm for CentOS 5.x. At least some new stuff is backported

Re: [CentOS] Slightly OT: which hardware for CentOS file server (Samba, 2 To storage, 50 users)?

> And so on. In the end, I decided not to bother and just left. > > :o) > > Niki Good move. Something would have broke after you were done and YOU would surely be the new blame scapegoat. "Everything was working great until HE was here"... ___ CentOS

Re: [CentOS] Building an "instant on" X terminal

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 04:37:21PM -0400, Reynolds McClatchey wrote: > Install the image for a t5725 from a USB stick. Very cool. Huh. A small version of Debian Etch. Boots (once POST has complted) in under 25 seconds. Hmm, old versions of software, and "apt-get upgrade" causes the system to di

Re: [CentOS] Building an "instant on" X terminal

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 05:11:12PM -0400, Robert Heller wrote: > > I got my hands on a HP t5720. This was designed as a thin-client > > What do people recommend for building this? What would have the quickest > > power-on-to-ready time? > > You will *probably* find LTSP's performance disapoint

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.x and Fedora

At Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:56:18 -0500 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Quoting Matt : > > > Which Fedora release is the CentOS 5.x kernel based on? I am wanting > > to know which Fedora rpm's I would have the best luck installing on > > CentOS 5.x 64 bit. > > Fedora Core 6. Please understand tha

[CentOS] burning an image

I downloaded CentOS-5.4-x86_64-bin-DVD.iso but I haven't used Centos before and I've haven't used a -bin-DVD.iso before,every attempt so far to burn one has produced coasters,what do I do to get an image. Thanks david ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@ce

Re: [CentOS] Building an "instant on" X terminal

Stephen Harris wrote: > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 04:37:21PM -0400, Reynolds McClatchey wrote: > Huh. A small version of Debian Etch. Boots (once POST has complted) > in under 25 seconds. > > Hmm, old versions of software, and "apt-get upgrade" causes the system > to die (root disk filled out) but

[CentOS] Apparent BIND problem doing RBL lookups for Postfix

My apologies if I'm posting the wrong place, or am asking a common question. All my looking so far hasn't turned up anything very useful in knowing what to look at, or what to modify. --- CentOS 5, running BIND 9.3.6 i386 Hardware: P4, 2.8Ghz, 1G memory Sata drives - non mirrored etc. Load is li

Re: [CentOS] Building an "instant on" X terminal

Stephen Harris wrote: > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 04:37:21PM -0400, Reynolds McClatchey wrote: >> Install the image for a t5725 from a USB stick. Very cool. > > Huh. A small version of Debian Etch. Boots (once POST has complted) > in under 25 seconds. > > Hmm, old versions of software, and "apt-g

Re: [CentOS] Building an "instant on" X terminal

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 05:26:44PM -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote: > If you aren't adverse to Ubuntu, 10.04 LTS (beta right now but final by > the end of the month) boots in 10 seconds from a hard drive. I've tried > it: It was impressively fast. Will it run in 256Mb RAM and on 512Mb of disk? 'Co

Re: [CentOS] burning an image

At Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:58:40 +1000 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > I downloaded CentOS-5.4-x86_64-bin-DVD.iso but I haven't used Centos > before and I've haven't used a -bin-DVD.iso before,every attempt so far > to burn one has produced coasters,what do I do to get an image. Were you burning

Re: [CentOS] burning an image

On 15/04/10 09:58, david walcroft wrote: > I downloaded CentOS-5.4-x86_64-bin-DVD.iso but I haven't used Centos > before and I've haven't used a -bin-DVD.iso before,every attempt so far > to burn one has produced coasters,what do I do to get an image. I've had graphical apps give me coasters on

Re: [CentOS] Building an "instant on" X terminal

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 07:41:40PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > Stephen Harris wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 04:37:21PM -0400, Reynolds McClatchey wrote: > >> Install the image for a t5725 from a USB stick. Very cool. > > > > Huh. A small version of Debian Etch. Boots (once POST has complte

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.x and Fedora

On 4/14/2010 6:27 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 4/14/2010 5:16 PM, Matt wrote: > >>> Which Fedora release is the CentOS 5.x kernel based on? I am wanting >>> to know which Fedora rpm's I would have the best luck installing on >>> CentOS 5.x 64 bit. >>> >> I am really looking for a Squid 3

Re: [CentOS] Apparent BIND problem doing RBL lookups for Postfix

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 7:36 PM, wrote: > First, someone's going to ask - perhaps Zen's blocking you. I don't > think so. Here's why. > -We're non-commercial, using the definition set my spamhaus, > -mail connects TOTAL are well less than 100K a day. (Less than 10K in > actuality) > -and thus ha

Re: [CentOS] Slightly OT: which hardware for CentOS file server (Samba, 2 To storage, 50 users)?

there are (sadly) a large number of people who are afraid (paranoid?) that you take out a saw and cut off some of the legs of the (high) chair they are sitting on (fig), you just came across one of those. You have a number of options: * go with the flow, make him feel go(o)d ;-) and you might

Re: [CentOS] How Do I ...

;-) in the olden days it was so easy, you had PCI cards and they were named by the slot number, starting with eth0 in PCI slot 1 and so on. Then came the inbuilt nics Then came the PCIx built nics Then came the PCI-e built nics OUCH! ;-) run ifconfig and get all hardware addresses first AND(!) l

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.x and Fedora

A few months ago I had two machines that I changed to CentOS, note I did not say upgrade ;-) one was a FC6 and the other one FC7. I put the CentOS 5.4 DVD in, booted, selected install over other OS. It went OK after I solved a few issues with SOME packages (package-cleanup) Both actually are a D

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.x and Fedora

why dont you download the source and compile it, its really easy. Jobst On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 05:16:52PM -0500, Matt (lm7...@gmail.com) wrote: > > Which Fedora release is the CentOS 5.x kernel based on?  I am wanting > > to know which Fedora rpm's I would have the best luck installing on > >

Re: [CentOS] Building an "instant on" X terminal

Stephen Harris wrote: > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 05:26:44PM -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote: > > >> If you aren't adverse to Ubuntu, 10.04 LTS (beta right now but final by >> the end of the month) boots in 10 seconds from a hard drive. I've tried >> it: It was impressively fast. >> > > Will it

Re: [CentOS] Slightly OT: which hardware for CentOS file server (Samba, 2 To storage, 50 users)?

Greetings, On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: > > IMHO the windows world is full of these guys, they haven't got > a clue, I call them "MCMJ's" (Microsoft Certified Mouse > Jockeys). You meant MCMM? s/Jokeys/Monkeys/g > they feel > threatend by people who have a clue. T

Re: [CentOS] Building an "instant on" X terminal

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Stephen Harris wrote: > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 05:26:44PM -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote: > >> If you aren't adverse to Ubuntu, 10.04 LTS (beta right now but final by >> the end of the month) boots in 10 seconds from a hard drive. I've tried >> it: It was impressivel

Re: [CentOS] Apparent BIND problem doing RBL lookups for Postfix

listserv.traf...@sloop.net wrote: > My apologies if I'm posting the wrong place, or am asking a common > question. All my looking so far hasn't turned up anything very useful > in knowing what to look at, or what to modify. > > --- > CentOS 5, running BIND 9.3.6 > i386 > > Hardware: > P4, 2.8Ghz, 1

Re: [CentOS] Building an "instant on" X terminal

Stephen Harris wrote: > So I thought this would be a great device to build as an "instant on" > type device. Well, as close to instant-on as possible :-) This probably > means a standard C5 build is not suitable (too many processes running; > would take a while to start up). So an "X terminal",

Re: [CentOS] Cloud on CentOS

> For what its worth...I do a little cloud-y type stuff at home. Mostly > spinning up VMs using KOAN/Cobbler and configuration with Puppet. Is that > the kind of thing you are interested in? I am deploying an application for about 200 locations, and I think cloud is what I am looking for

Re: [CentOS] Cloud on CentOS

>> Is there any tutorial/implementation cloud on CentOS? Or anyone with >> experience like to share? >> > There is a rpm image for eucalyptus on CentOS. > http://open.eucalyptus.com/downloads > > Many experience is available from the comunity. Many thanks.. Will look into that website. wL. ___

Re: [CentOS] Cloud on CentOS

>> Is there any tutorial/implementation cloud on CentOS? Or anyone with >> experience like to share? > > Can you be a little more specific. Do you want the Virtualisation, the > Management, the Storage, the Processing. Basically what do you want to > do with the "cloud"? There are so many options