Hey
As some of you might know the new Newsletter [1] has a section
Desktop-Shots. Now I need YOU to send me your desktops so I can put them
online.
Please obfuscate personal details.
Looking forward to seeing your funky workplaces.
Cheers Didi
[1] http://wiki.centos.org/Newsletter/1002
--
H
I have configured my vsftpd instances to use virtual users and map them
to a system user. So all uploads should be written with owner and group
of this system user (let's call it ftpsystemuser).
But in the the last weeks/months it appears that uploads are written
twice, on instance as it should
"Joseph L. Casale" wrote:
>>
It really
is as simple as I wrote out earlier, multiple servers ssh a background job
at
nearly the same time consisting of an rsync command. The destination host
for
this target gets overwhelmed with more than one at a time...
<<
This isn't a complete answer, but a
Dirk H. Schulz wrote on Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:29:53 +0200:
Can you please stop this? You are repeating your messages to the list with
slightly changed subjects and content because you apprently don't get the
answers you want. This is unfriendly, please stop this! And spare lame
excuses.
Did you
On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 07:33 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >> Are you looking for a real job scheduler? If so, it might be overkill,
> >> but you might want to look into software like Sun Grid Engine, Torque,
> >> or Condor (there are quite a few other schedulers out there
JohnS wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 07:33 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Are you looking for a real job scheduler? If so, it might be overkill,
but you might want to look into software like Sun Grid Engine, Torque,
or Condor (there are quite a few other sched
On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 07:34 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> A very long time ago I did some generic job queueing stuff by hooking scripts
> into the unix lpr print spooler which had the advantage that they could be
> submitted from windows boxes through samba by going through the motions of
> pri
Kai,
Am 08.04.10 12:31, schrieb Kai Schaetzl:
> Dirk H. Schulz wrote on Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:29:53 +0200:
>
> Can you please stop this? You are repeating your messages to the list with
> slightly changed subjects and content because you apprently don't get the
> answers you want. This is unfriendly
where to fidn the rpm package
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
epel repo afaik
On 04/08/2010 04:42 PM, mattias wrote:
> where to fidn the rpm package
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
___
CentOS mailing
>This isn't a complete answer, but a possible approach: I'd use a named pipe
>on the destination host. Here's a little experiment to demonstrate.
>
>[u...@dhost temp]$ mkfifo pipe
>[u...@dhost temp]$ while true ; do ` < pipe` ; done
>
>Now, in another xterm:
>
>[u...@dhost temp]$ echo date > pipe
>
Hi,
I'm running a DHCP server on my local network. I've noticed something
that puzzles me. Leases are written to /var/lib/dhcpd/dhcpd.leases, but
only - so it seems to me - if the address is not fixed in any way in
dhcpd.conf.
Here's a few stanzas of my dhcpd.conf :
host babasse{
Hi Les,
>White space could be a tab. '[[:space:]]CP_' should work, but why not use sed
>and be done with it.
ah, worked!. I was thinking way to much into this. I thought that I had to
ignore what I didn't want, but in thie case what I dont want does not have a
space so it would not show up an
Niki Kovacs wrote:
> How comes these machines never appear in dhcpd.leases ? Do the
> respective leases only find their way into /var/log/messages ?
I'd expect because the addresses are hard coded, there is no
reason to keep track of them. the leases file from what I understand
is used to determi
From: Niki Kovacs
> I'm running a DHCP server on my local network. I've noticed something
> that puzzles me. Leases are written to /var/lib/dhcpd/dhcpd.leases, but
> only - so it seems to me - if the address is not fixed in any way in
> dhcpd.conf.
> How comes these machines never appear in dhc
Hey guys,
messing around with a snippet from a mailing list post,
#!/bin/bash
mkfifo -m 666 /var/spool/my_fifo
exec 42<> /var/spool/my_fifo
while true
do
while read -t 5 data <&42
do
echo "data is ($data)"
done
echo "read again"
done
What happe
I ran into this issue on a busy vtund server, it would eventually
deadlock networking
After some detective work it appears to be as a result of this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541224
The bug report has a patch, I applied it to the kernel source and
rebuilt a new kernel RPM
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> This isn't a complete answer, but a possible approach: I'd use a named pipe
>> on the destination host. Here's a little experiment to demonstrate.
>>
>> [u...@dhost temp]$ mkfifo pipe
>> [u...@dhost temp]$ while true ; do ` < pipe` ; done
>>
>> Now, in another xterm:
>>
>
On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 15:57 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> Hey guys,
> messing around with a snippet from a mailing list post,
>
>
> #!/bin/bash
>
> mkfifo -m 666 /var/spool/my_fifo
> exec 42<> /var/spool/my_fifo
>
> while true
> do
> while read -t 5 data <&42
> do
>
I have used lokkit to setup iptables ( I have a big script that does
this) basically just ports I want with "--port=https:tcp" etc...
I wish to allow igmp and add igmp to the lokkit command line?
How do I do that?
I can add this to /etc/sysconfig/iptables:
iptables -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i et
On 04/08/2010 10:57 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> Hey guys,
> messing around with a snippet from a mailing list post,
>
>
> #!/bin/bash
>
> mkfifo -m 666 /var/spool/my_fifo
> exec 42<> /var/spool/my_fifo
>
> while true
> do
> while read -t 5 data<&42
> do
> echo
>Works fine for me. Define "short while" (to a geologist, that could be a
>few millenia). What is the exit code when your script does terminate?
Lol, yeah that was a little weak on my part...
It ran for about a minute.
I am not sure what caused the non 0 exit, I made a new condition based
on a
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:02 AM, John Doe wrote:
> From: Stephen Nelson-Smith
>> I'm trying to remove any limit on open files for a user; I've set
>> username nofiles to unlimited in /etc/security/logins.conf, but now I
>> get "could not open session" if I try to su to the user.
>> singhh
Hello all. I'm in the process of making a small server farm based mostly on
Windows Server 2003. For simplicity's sake, the only non-2003 server will be
a CentOS 5.4 server running only vsftpd, httpd, and mysqld. My plan is to
have this server in a 2003 Server's network receiving a DHCP address fro
OK, I just found this
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=13144
Which says that you cannot use "unlimited" for nofile
It says to do this
*softnofile 63536
*hardnofile 63536
or "more realistically" to do this :
*
On 4/8/2010 1:57 PM, David Lemcoe wrote:
> Hello all. I'm in the process of making a small server farm based mostly
> on Windows Server 2003. For simplicity's sake, the only non-2003 server
> will be a CentOS 5.4 server running only vsftpd, httpd, and mysqld. My
> plan is to have this server in a 2
Sorry for the frequent updates - but I also found this :
http://gnufreakz.wordpress.com/2009/08/12/increase-ulimit-in-centos/
which talks about setting
“fs.file-max = 65536″
in sysctl.conf
Does it have to be set in both sysctl.conf and the /etc/security/limits.conf?
If so, why?
thanks,
-Alan
> On 4/8/2010 1:57 PM, David Lemcoe wrote:
>> Hello all. I'm in the process of making a small server farm based mostly
>> on Windows Server 2003. For simplicity's sake, the only non-2003 server
>> will be a CentOS 5.4 server running only vsftpd, httpd, and mysqld. My
>> plan is to have this server
On 4/8/2010 9:59 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running a DHCP server on my local network. I've noticed something
> that puzzles me. Leases are written to /var/lib/dhcpd/dhcpd.leases, but
> only - so it seems to me - if the address is not fixed in any way in
> dhcpd.conf.
>
> Here's a few sta
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 18:43:33 +0100 Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann wrote:
> Now comes my question, what do people think should belong in
> such a kit. Do you think this is needed?
Most peope are probably not even familiar with the concept of a press kit
so you may want to consider to elaborate on that a b
Checked the firewall, and set the static IP.
Anyone have an idea what the limitations put forth by 2003 would be?
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:12 PM, wrote:
> > On 4/8/2010 1:57 PM, David Lemcoe wrote:
> >> Hello all. I'm in the process of making a small server farm based mostly
> >> on Windows Ser
> On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 18:43:33 +0100 Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann wrote:
>> Now comes my question, what do people think should belong in
>> such a kit. Do you think this is needed?
>
> Most peope are probably not even familiar with the concept of a press kit
> so you may want to consider to elaborate on
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:26:54 -0400 m.roth-x6lchVBUigD1P9xLtpHBDw wrote:
>> Me, I like the idea although I doubt it's really necessary.
>
> Actually, it's probably a good idea. That way, the next time someone
> using CentOS at work has to deal with the press - and there are folks
> who do - they c
Dirk H. Schulz wrote on Thu, 08 Apr 2010 14:55:26 +0200:
> Since the source is no way to go
Try harder. I'm sure you'll get a response sooner or later. You could also
bug it at both the CentOS and RHEL bugzilla. You will need to give clear
reproduction instructions.
Kai
--
Get your web at Co
On 4/8/10 1:26 PM, "David Lemcoe" wrote:
> Checked the firewall, and set the static IP.
>
> Anyone have an idea what the limitations put forth by 2003 would be?
First, please stop top posting. This list has rules about that
Second, can you ping _from the managed switch handling the NAT_ to
On 4/8/2010 3:26 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 18:43:33 +0100 Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann wrote:
>>> Now comes my question, what do people think should belong in
>>> such a kit. Do you think this is needed?
>>
>> Most peope are probably not even familiar with the concept of a press
On 08/04/2010 21:40, Les Mikesell wrote:
> But how can you describe it without mentioning the "Large North American
> Linux vendor" that mostly makes it what it is?
That is a problem I often encounter. For the Newsletter I asked someone
working for the vendor if it would be Ok [1]. Nothing offici
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann
wrote:
> Hey
>
> Looking at the Fedora ML there is some commotion about a Press Kit [1]
> they are constructing. I am thinking about doing something like this
> for CentOS. Now comes my question, what do people think should belong
> in such a
Please verify the network cable from centos or switch port(broken or vlan).
João Rodrigues
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Gary Greene wrote:
> On 4/8/10 1:26 PM, "David Lemcoe" wrote:
> > Checked the firewall, and set the static IP.
> >
> > Anyone have an idea what the limitations put forth by
On 08/04/2010 22:54, Brian Mathis wrote:
> The correct people to ask (or at least research) are the Press. It's
> not a matter of what the CentOS project wants, it's a matter of what
> the Press would want, and then it's up to the CentOS project to
> answer/provide the content they feel represents
40 matches
Mail list logo
