[CentOS] Define an alias with an embeded awk command error ?

Hi, guys: I'm trying to define an alias in .cshrc with the embeded awk command, like this : alias checketh0 "ip add ls eth0 |awk '/inet/{print $2}' |sed -n '1p' " Then i run "source ~/.cshrc" and run "checketh0" command in the terminal , but the result is the following : " inet 192.168.

[CentOS] Is parralel processing automatically done on multi-core CPU's?

Hi, I just noticed this article, http://www.howtoforge.net/fully-utilizing-your-x-core-cpu which uses http://code.google.com/p/ppss/ for parralel processing. So, can anyone tell me if parralel processing happens automatically on CentOS, or would I need to use this script as well? We mainly have D

Re: [CentOS] Is parralel processing automatically done on multi-core CPU's?

On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 1:51 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Hi, > > I just noticed this article, > http://www.howtoforge.net/fully-utilizing-your-x-core-cpu which uses > http://code.google.com/p/ppss/ for parralel processing. > > So, can anyone tell me if parralel processing happens automatically on > Ce

Re: [CentOS] iptables bugs going untended?

You should be aware that such bugs will not get fixed in CentOS, they have to get fixed in RHEL. You cannot rely that if you put a bug in the CentOS bugtracker that is reentered by someone else in the RHEL bugtracker. So, if you want to have this resolved you should file it on the RHEL bugzilla

Re: [CentOS] Define an alias with an embeded awk command error ?

Am 06.03.2010 09:47, schrieb sync: > Hi, guys: > >I'm trying to define an alias in .cshrc with the embeded awk command, > like this : > > alias checketh0 "ip add ls eth0 |awk '/inet/{print $2}' |sed -n '1p' " > > Then i run "source ~/.cshrc" and run "checketh0" command in the terminal , >

[CentOS] SNI Apache

Hello, Anyone knows a repository with apache + mod_ssl + openssl + (other openssl programs) with SNI support. I have tried someone but obtain brutal production server crash, because (now!!! I remember) ssh uses openssl... Anyone knows CentOS compatible posible update? Thanks in advance. --

Re: [CentOS] [Solved] BMC IPMI configuration on centos 5.4 64 BIT Server

hI all , I configured the IPMI Setting with the help of Intel management cd no my imitool as well fence_ipmilan works like an charm on all the 25 nodes. On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote: > Greetings, > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 12:39 AM, Joseph L. Casale > wrote:

[CentOS] Linux printing server?

hello all, is there any other way to setup some kind of service that converts user's printed jobs to pdf files other than ghostscript + samba? if theres none, can any1 help me set ghostscript + samba up? __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 475

Re: [CentOS] Linux printing server?

On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 21:33 +0200, Roland Roland wrote: > is there any other way to setup some kind of service that converts > user's printed jobs to pdf files other than ghostscript + samba? cups-pdf -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com _

[CentOS] compilers a security risk?

I manage a web hosting server that we've recently upgraded, in part so we could accommodate a domain that will enable community mapping. In a recent exchange of mails one developer said: "I could build the package directly on the server machine you have, provided that the potential security r

Re: [CentOS] compilers a security risk?

Dave Stevens wrote: > I don't have enough experience to assess the security issues. Does > anyone have an opinion on this? It would be simple and feasible to > allocate another domain as suggested above. Unless your running an obscure platform having a compiler on the system shouldn't be a big de

Re: [CentOS] compilers a security risk?

On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Dave Stevens wrote: > I don't have enough experience to assess the security issues. Does > anyone have an opinion on this? It would be simple and feasible to > allocate another domain as suggested above. The compilers themselves aren't really a security risk, but

[CentOS] is it possible to recover LVM drive from accidental Fdisk?

Hi all, Does anyone know if it's possible to recover an LVM partition from a drive that was fdisked? I accidently fdisk'd the wrong drive (had to fdisk a lot of 160GB drivers from old servers and one still has important data on that client now wants) by running fdisk /dev/sdc & deleting the partit

Re: [CentOS] is it possible to recover LVM drive from accidental Fdisk?

Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Hi all, > > Does anyone know if it's possible to recover an LVM partition from a drive > that was fdisked? I accidently fdisk'd the wrong drive (had to fdisk a lot > of 160GB drivers from old servers and one still has important data on that > client now wants) by running fdisk