hi, guys:
Today when i typed "mount " command on the server and found this
message:
..
...
192.168.9.252: /home/share/tmp on /net/tmp/share type nfs ( rw, bg,
soft,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,addr=192.168.9.252)
192.168.9.252: /home/share/tmp on /net/tmp/share type nfs ( rw, bg,
soft,rsize=8192,w
Am 20.02.2010 07:03, schrieb Hadi Motamedi:
>
> Dear All
>
> I have put tcpdump trace on port 4957 on my CentOS server , as the following :
>
> #tcpdump port 4957
>
> I want to obtain the payload data to see what is realy being exchanged
> between my CentOS server and the outside network eleme
Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Scenario:
> Centos box with eth1 (10.0.0.0/24) and eth0 (192.168.0.0/24)
> segment on eth0 has access to full bandwidth of uplink
> Both are on 100mbps switches
>
> Requirements:
> bandwith on segment on eth1 needs to be throttled to different speeds
Il 20/02/2010 13.25, Bob McConnell ha scritto:
> Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> Scenario:
>> Centos box with eth1 (10.0.0.0/24) and eth0 (192.168.0.0/24)
>> segment on eth0 has access to full bandwidth of uplink
>> Both are on 100mbps switches
>>
>> Requirements:
>> bandwith on se
11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/atta
> Did you check the output of "/proc/scsi/scsi"?
Yea, it's empty.
> I would do a SCSI rescan using
>
> echo "- - -" > /sys/class/scsi_host/hostX/scan
Tried this and also:
echo 1 > /sys/class/fc_host/host0/issue_lip
Still, nothing is seen by the host. We have also tried changing the
port set
Hello everyone,
I am having some difficulty updating curl on my updated CentOS 5.4 box
(CentOS release 5.4 (Final)).
I have a client that is needing a library (librets) updated. I have
version 1.3.38 installed, but they need 1.3.40. When I try to build
that library, it tells me that it requires c
check your fstab,,, or post it
2010/2/20 sync
> hi, guys:
>
> Today when i typed "mount " command on the server and found this
> message:
>
> ..
> ...
> 192.168.9.252: /home/share/tmp on /net/tmp/share type nfs ( rw, bg,
> soft,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,addr=192.168.9.252)
> 192.168.9.252: /hom
I had a need on a centos 5.4 x86_64 box to try and run with a later totem.
I desired to do this by source.
After installing the packages below my system comes up, I thought
everything was good.
thunderbird comes up firefox comes up. totem works however
there seems to be
an issue with cl
HI All,
I have a dilemma and I would appreciate advice
1. Get a good size case, mobo, processor, etc and put 8 hard drives it in and
RAID them. (yes an 8 port SATA mobo). Running CentOS.
or
2. Get an eSATA enclosure that has room for 8 or 10 drives and just connect it
to box?
I know that RAI
Slack-Moehrle wrote:
> HI All,
>
> I have a dilemma and I would appreciate advice
>
> 1. Get a good size case, mobo, processor, etc and put 8 hard drives it in and
> RAID them. (yes an 8 port SATA mobo). Running CentOS.
>
> or
>
> 2. Get an eSATA enclosure that has room for 8 or 10 drives and just
Hi John,
Yes, I looked into this and I was looking for a solution with a large number of
drives, but at a good cost point.
So you are saying a full fledged PC with an 8-port sata mobo is a better
solution.
--Jason
- Original Message -
From: "John R Pierce"
To: "CentOS mailing list"
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Slack-Moehrle wrote:
> HI All,
>
> I have a dilemma and I would appreciate advice
>
> 1. Get a good size case, mobo, processor, etc and put 8 hard drives it in
> and RAID them. (yes an 8 port SATA mobo). Running CentOS.
>
> or
>
> 2. Get an eSATA enclosure that ha
Hi Rudi,
>>If you're building something on the cheap, then you could get an even cheaper
>>setup with a 4port SATA >>motherboad, and an add 4port SATA PCI / PCI-e card.
True, that would be each drive on its own port, which is optimal.
With 8 ports, I could get 8 x 2tb and and have 8th in RAID
Slack-Moehrle wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Yes, I looked into this and I was looking for a solution with a large number
> of drives, but at a good cost point.
>
> So you are saying a full fledged PC with an 8-port sata mobo is a better
> solution.
>
yeah, its cheaper to go direct connect internal jb
Hi John,
>> So you are saying a full fledged PC with an 8-port sata mobo is a better
>> solution.>
>a bunch of vendors sell 5-in-3 sata hotswap adapters that hold 5 SATA
>drives in 3 HH external bays of a jumbo tower chassis. they seem to run
>about $100. each drive bay has its own sata p
16 matches
Mail list logo