Re: [CentOS] HP Proliant ML150 : how do I access disks ?

On 02/18/2010 08:21 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote: ... > 03:01.0 RAID bus controller: Adaptec AAC-RAID (rev 01) > 03:04.0 SCSI storage controller: Adaptec AIC-7901 U320 (rev 10) You should still try to open the box and check the cables. It might be easier to configure the system if you attach the disks t

Re: [CentOS] unattended fsck on reboot

> > > I don't bother changing the setting for local disks as it is > usually > pretty quick to scan them. You must have a pretty big and/or > slow > file system for fsck to take 2+ hours. > > nate > > >

Re: [CentOS] HP Proliant ML150 : how do I access disks ?

Mogens Kjaer a écrit : > > You should still try to open the box and check the cables. > > It might be easier to configure the system if you attach the > disks to the SCSI controller instead of the RAID controller - > if you don't want to run RAID. > I followed your advice (don't get me wrong:

Re: [CentOS] Problem in gdb

Dear All, We are running CentOS4.4 linux in same manner. We findout the same issue in CentOS Machine also. We posted this queries to Red Hat Support and We posted same queries in CentOS group Their is no difference of using RHEL4 Update 4 and CentOS4.4 Linux? What thinks makes

Re: [CentOS] unattended fsck on reboot

On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Henry Ritzlmayr wrote: > > > > > > > I don't bother changing the setting for local disks as it is > > usually > > pretty quick to scan them. You must have a pretty big and/or > > slow > > file system for fsck to take 2+ hour

[CentOS] best practice: how to setup a central "network installation server"?

Hi, I want to setup a central installation server, but haven't done this before, so I want to find out what would be best practices for this? The server I have already runs as a central repo, which is updated from one or our local centos mirrors, and the other CentOS servers (both i386 & x64), as

Re: [CentOS] unattended fsck on reboot

On 02/18/2010 09:54 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: ... > But, how does one get past this? I know we need to reboot from time to time, > but more than often it's (preferably) not sooner than 6 - 10 months, so fsck > will run. Turn off automatic fsck with "tune2fs -i 0 -c 0" and instead do a manual fsck (re

Re: [CentOS] best practice: how to setup a central "network installation server"?

2010/2/18 Rudi Ahlers : > Hi, > I want to setup a central installation server, but haven't done this before, > so I want to find out what would be best practices for this? > The server I have already runs as a central repo, which is updated from one > or our local centos mirrors, and the other Cent

Re: [CentOS] best practice: how to setup a central "network installation server"?

Am 18.02.2010 10:00, schrieb Rudi Ahlers: > Hi, > > I want to setup a central installation server, but haven't done this > before, so I want to find out what would be best practices for this? > > https://fedorahosted.org/cobbler/ Rainer ___ CentOS

Re: [CentOS] best practice: how to setup a central "network installation server"?

On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote: > > > > See the kickstart at : > > http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/5.2/Installation_Guide/s1-kickstart2-howuse.html > > -- > Eero > ___ > > We already use kickstart files, where needed :) But that

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.3 host not seeing storage device

> Maybe one of you has experienced something like this before. > > I have a host running CentOS5.3, x86_64 version with the standard > qla2xxx driver. Both ports are recognized and show output in dmesg > but they never find my storage device: > > qla2xxx :07:00.1: LIP reset occured (f700). > q

Re: [CentOS] best practice: how to setup a central "network installation server"?

2010/2/18 Rudi Ahlers : > > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Eero Volotinen > wrote: >> >> >> >> See the kickstart at : >> >> http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/5.2/Installation_Guide/s1-kickstart2-howuse.html >> >> -- >> Eero >> ___ >> > > We already

Re: [CentOS] best practice: how to setup a central "network installation server"?

On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote: > > > kickstart file, if you are familiar with text based configurations? > > -- > Eero > ___ > > Is kickstart REALLY the only way? How do I configure the server so that the client can use network

Re: [CentOS] best practice: how to setup a central "network installation server"?

2010/2/18 Rudi Ahlers : > > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Eero Volotinen > wrote: > >> >> kickstart file, if you are familiar with text based configurations? >> >> -- >> Eero >> ___ >> > > Is kickstart REALLY the only way? > How do I configure the

Re: [CentOS] best practice: how to setup a central "network installation server"?

Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Hi, > > I want to setup a central installation server, but haven't done this > before, so I want to find out what would be best practices for this? > > The server I have already runs as a central repo, which is updated from > one or our local centos mirrors, and the other

Re: [CentOS] best practice: how to setup a central "network installation server"?

> Is kickstart REALLY the only way? > How do I configure the server so that the client can use network boot, > without a CD? > See documentation at: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/PXE/PXE_Setup -- Eero ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://li

Re: [CentOS] best practice: how to setup a central "network installation server"?

Rudi Ahlers wrote: > > > > > > kickstart file, if you are familiar with text based configurations? > > Is kickstart REALLY the only way? > > How do I configure the server so that the client can use network boot, > without a CD? Hi You can use PXE. You have to set up a tftp and a DHCP

Re: [CentOS] processor affinity

Adam Grossman sent a missive on 2010-02-17: > On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 13:26 -0500, Adam Grossman wrote: >> On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 18:17 +, Simon Billis wrote: >>> Adam Grossman sent a missive on 2010-02-17: >>> Hello, i am running CentOS 5.4. i have a requirement where i need to

Re: [CentOS] best practice: how to setup a central "network installation server"?

On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Marcelo M. Garcia < marcelo.maia.gar...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Rudi Ahlers wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > kickstart file, if you are familiar with text based configurations? > > > > Is kickstart REALLY the only way? > > > > How do I configure the server so t

Re: [CentOS] processor affinity

From: Simon Billis > To: CentOS mailing list > Sent: Thu, February 18, 2010 11:25:41 AM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] processor affinity > > Adam Grossman sent a missive on 2010-02-17: > > > On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 13:26 -0500, Adam Grossman wrote: > >> On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 18:17 +, Simon Billis w

Re: [CentOS] HP Proliant ML150 : how do I access disks ?

From: Niki Kovacs > Hakan Koseoglu a écrit : > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Niki Kovacs wrote: > >> boot configuration tools (bios, scsi configurator). So far I haven't > > SCSI -> Disk > > > > Go to www.hp.com, , click on Support & Drivers, on Step 2, for product > > type ML 150, click GO

[CentOS] NFS client firewall config?

Hi all, Which ports do I need to have open on an NFS client's firewall to allow it to connect to a remote NFS servers? When I disable iptables (using ConfigServerFirewall), it connects fine, but as soon as I enable it, NFS gives me this error: r...@saturn:[~]$ mount master1.mydomain.co.za:/saturn

Re: [CentOS] processor affinity

John Doe wrote: > From: Simon Billis >> To: CentOS mailing list >> Sent: Thu, February 18, 2010 11:25:41 AM >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] processor affinity >> >> Adam Grossman sent a missive on 2010-02-17: >> >>> On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 13:26 -0500, Adam Grossman wrote: On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 18:17

Re: [CentOS] NFS client firewall config?

Hi You need 2 ports open 2049/udp 2049/tcp but you should read this little howto http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/centos-fedora-rhel-iptables-open-nfs-server-ports/ Per On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 13:00 +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Hi all, > > > Which ports do I need to have open on an NFS client's f

Re: [CentOS] best practice: how to setup a central "network installation server"?

Hi Rudi, Rudi Ahlers sent a missive on 2010-02-18: > Hi, > > I want to setup a central installation server, but haven't done this > before, so I want to find out what would be best practices for this? > > The server I have already runs as a central repo, which is updated > from one or our loc

Re: [CentOS] NFS client firewall config?

On Thursday 18 February 2010 11:00:53 Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Hi all, > > Which ports do I need to have open on an NFS client's firewall to allow it > to connect to a remote NFS servers? > > When I disable iptables (using ConfigServerFirewall), it connects fine, but > as soon as I enable it, NFS giv

Re: [CentOS] processor affinity

John Doe sent a missive on 2010-02-18: > From: Simon Billis >> To: CentOS mailing list >> Sent: Thu, February 18, 2010 11:25:41 AM >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] processor affinity >> >> Adam Grossman sent a missive on 2010-02-17: >> >>> On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 13:26 -0500, Adam Grossman wrote: O

Re: [CentOS] NFS client firewall config?

On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Per Qvindesland wrote: > Hi > > You need 2 ports open 2049/udp 2049/tcp but you should read this little > howto > > http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/centos-fedora-rhel-iptables-open-nfs-server-ports/ > > Per > > uhm > I have added ports 111 & 2049 in both the TC

Re: [CentOS] NFS client firewall config?

On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Tony Molloy wrote: > On Thursday 18 February 2010 11:00:53 Rudi Ahlers wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Which ports do I need to have open on an NFS client's firewall to allow > it > > to connect to a remote NFS servers? > > > > When I disable iptables (using ConfigServ

Re: [CentOS] NFS client firewall config?

On Thursday 18 February 2010 11:23:43 Rudi Ahlers wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Tony Molloy wrote: > > On Thursday 18 February 2010 11:00:53 Rudi Ahlers wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Which ports do I need to have open on an NFS client's firewall to allow > > > > it > > > > > to conn

[CentOS] How to install GOsa on RHEL/CentOS 5

Hi, I just finished to write a tutorial on how to install GOsa on RHEL/CentOS 5: http://www.brucalipto.org/linux/how-to-install-gosa-on-rhelcentos-5 If you see errors on what I wrote please let me know and I will correct as soon as possible. Hope someone will find this useful. Bye Piero -- Stu

Re: [CentOS] unattended fsck on reboot

Rudi Ahlers wrote on Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:54:11 +0200: > The server booted up, ran fsck, then each VM, as it booted up ran fsck as > well - which just slowed down the whole process since there's a 5 minute > delay in starting each VM. Why would you autostart a VM only every 5 minutes? Or did you m

Re: [CentOS] unattended fsck on reboot

At Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:07:27 +0100 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > On 02/18/2010 09:54 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > ... > > But, how does one get past this? I know we need to reboot from time to time, > > but more than often it's (preferably) not sooner than 6 - 10 months, so fsck > > will run. > >

[CentOS] how to push the bounds and get newer packages for centos 5.4?

i've just started looking after a (virtual) centos 5.4 server that's hosted at rackspace and, unsurprisingly, it was set up with all the standard defaults. part of the work i'll be doing involves php and, as i read it, the standard php version with centos 5.4 is php-5.1. if i *wanted* to mov

Re: [CentOS] best practice: how to setup a central "network installation server"?

Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Hi, > > I want to setup a central installation server, but haven't done this > before, so I want to find out what would be best practices for this? > > The server I have already runs as a central repo, which is updated from > one or our local centos mirrors, and the other

Re: [CentOS] how to push the bounds and get newer packages for centos 5.4?

Robert P. J. Day wrote: > i've just started looking after a (virtual) centos 5.4 server that's > hosted at rackspace and, unsurprisingly, it was set up with all the > standard defaults. part of the work i'll be doing involves php and, > as i read it, the standard php version with centos 5.4 is p

Re: [CentOS] how to push the bounds and get newer packages for centos 5.4?

> I use epel (has a lot of different stuff but generally does not have newer > versions of standard packages), rpmforge (sometimes has newer stuff and may > cause some conflicts) remi (up to date ocsinventory-server, php, mysql), and > opennms (Sun JVM 1.5 and opennms).  Normally I leave epel enabl

Re: [CentOS] Linksys 160nl

Am 17.02.2010 19:43, schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us: > I'm finally biting the bullet, and replacing the 12-yr-old box that's been > my firewall/router with an appliance. First, does anyone have any idea > whether the WRT160 nl can use tomato? Second, is there any way, or any > reason, I could/would want

Re: [CentOS] best practice: how to setup a central "network installation server"?

On 2/18/2010 8:49 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > Rudi Ahlers wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I want to setup a central installation server, but haven't done this >> before, so I want to find out what would be best practices for this? >> >> The server I have already runs as a central repo, which is updated from >> o

[CentOS] x86_64 package mess ?

Hi, I just installed CentOS 5.4 on a 64bit-server. It's the first time I work with this sort of hardware. Doing rpm -qa | sort | less shows that most of the packages seem to be installed twice: once for i386 architecture, and then again for x86_64. Is this normal? Or did I mess up something du

Re: [CentOS] x86_64 package mess ?

On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote: > Hi, > > I just installed CentOS 5.4 on a 64bit-server. It's the first time I > work with this sort of hardware. Doing rpm -qa | sort | less shows that > most of the packages seem to be installed twice: once for i386 > architecture, and then aga

Re: [CentOS] x86_64 package mess ?

Niki Kovacs wrote: > Hi, > > I just installed CentOS 5.4 on a 64bit-server. It's the first time I > work with this sort of hardware. Doing rpm -qa | sort | less shows that > most of the packages seem to be installed twice: once for i386 > architecture, and then again for x86_64. > > Is this no

Re: [CentOS] x86_64 package mess ?

Akemi Yagi a écrit : > > There is a FAQ about it: > > http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/General#head-357346ff0bf7c14b0849c3bcce39677aaca528e9 > Thanks. That did the trick. Niki ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listi

Re: [CentOS] x86_64 package mess ?

Niki Kovacs wrote: > Hi, > > I just installed CentOS 5.4 on a 64bit-server. It's the first time I > work with this sort of hardware. Doing rpm -qa | sort | less shows that > most of the packages seem to be installed twice: once for i386 > architecture, and then again for x86_64. > > Is this norm

Re: [CentOS] x86_64 package mess ?

> The 32-bit packages are installed for backward-compatibility with any > 32-bit programs you may want to run. Regarding security, is it less safe to have these *.i386 packages installed? (esp. on a server) (according to the principle that "less is always more secure")

Re: [CentOS] HP Proliant ML150 : how do I access disks ?

Go to the HP.com website and download the SmartStart CD for your system. This has everything you need to configure the raid. The raid on these machines is a 'hardware' raid running through a proprietary raid card. It is 'extremely' robust. However, you must use the HP SmartStart disk (or perhap

Re: [CentOS] best practice: how to setup a central "network installation server"?

On 2/18/2010 8:58 AM, Toby Bluhm wrote: > >>> >>> Generally we would be (re)installing CentOS servers& desktops, but I >>> guess it could be useful for other distro's like Fedora Core / Debian / >>> FreeBSD? / etc. What would be a good option to go for, or could someone >>> point me to a good doc

[CentOS] unattended fsck on reboot

On Thu, 18 Feb 2010, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Rudi Ahlers wrote on Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:54:11 +0200: > >> The server booted up, ran fsck, then each VM, as it booted up ran fsck as >> well - which just slowed down the whole process since there's a 5 minute >> delay in starting each VM. > > Why would yo

Re: [CentOS] x86_64 package mess ?

Mathieu Baudier wrote: >> The 32-bit packages are installed for backward-compatibility with any >> 32-bit programs you may want to run. > > Regarding security, is it less safe to have these *.i386 packages > installed? (esp. on a server) > (according to the principle that "less is always more secu

Re: [CentOS] HP Proliant ML150 : how do I access disks ?

From: John Hinton > Go to the HP.com website and download the SmartStart CD for your system. > This has everything you need to configure the raid. The raid on these > machines is a 'hardware' raid running through a proprietary raid card. > It is 'extremely' robust. However, you must use the HP

Re: [CentOS] HP Proliant ML150 : how do I access disks ?

On 2/18/2010 10:59 AM, John Doe wrote: > From: John Hinton > >> Go to the HP.com website and download the SmartStart CD for your system. >> This has everything you need to configure the raid. The raid on these >> machines is a 'hardware' raid running through a proprietary raid card. >> It is 'e

Re: [CentOS] best practice: how to setup a central "network installation server"?

Have you looked at Cobbler and KOAN? Great tools... On Thu, 18 Feb 2010, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 2/18/2010 8:58 AM, Toby Bluhm wrote: >> Generally we would be (re)installing CentOS servers& desktops, but I guess it could be useful for other distro's like Fedora Core / Debian /

Re: [CentOS] HP Proliant ML150 : how do I access disks ?

On 2/18/2010 9:59 AM, John Doe wrote: > From: John Hinton >> Go to the HP.com website and download the SmartStart CD for your system. >> This has everything you need to configure the raid. The raid on these >> machines is a 'hardware' raid running through a proprietary raid card. >> It is 'extremel

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 60, Issue 4

seamonkey\* Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes D

Re: [CentOS] unattended fsck on reboot

> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Henry Ritzlmayr > wrote: >> nate wrote: > > >> > I don't bother changing the setting for local disks as it is >> > usually pretty quick to scan them. You must have a pretty big >> > and/or slow file system for fsck to take 2+ hours. >> >

Re: [CentOS] Problem in gdb

Balaji wrote: > Dear All, > > We are running CentOS4.4 linux in same manner. > You're running CentOS 4.4 on an Itanium system ?!? I didn't think CentOS built for IA64 Itanic. >> Balaji wrote on 02/16/2010 12:32 AM >>> We are running RHEL4 Update 4 AS IA-64 on a HP rx6600. >>> >>> We are

Re: [CentOS] Problem in gdb

On 02/18/2010 05:24 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > Balaji wrote: >> Dear All, >> >> We are running CentOS4.4 linux in same manner. >> > > You're running CentOS 4.4 on an Itanium system ?!? I didn't think > CentOS built for IA64 Itanic. CentOS-4 has been on IA64 CentOS-5 should be there as well,

Re: [CentOS] unattended fsck on reboot

--- Original message --- > From: > Sent: 18.2.'10, 18:21 > >> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Henry Ritzlmayr >> wrote: >>> nate wrote: >> > >>> > I don't bother changing the setting for local disks as it is >>> > usually pretty quick to scan them. You must have a pret

Re: [CentOS] unattended fsck on reboot

Timo wrote: > --- Original message --- >> From: >> Sent: 18.2.'10, 18:21 >>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Henry Ritzlmayr >>> wrote: nate wrote: >>> > >I don't bother changing the setting for local disks as it is >usually pretty quick to scan them. You must h

Re: [CentOS] unattended fsck on reboot

--- Original message --- > From: > To: centos@centos.org > Sent: 18.2.'10, 18:55 > > Timo wrote: >> --- Original message --- >>> From: >>> Sent: 18.2.'10, 18:21 On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Henry Ritzlmayr wrote: > nate wrote: > > >I don't both

Re: [CentOS] unattended fsck on reboot

Timo wrote: >> From: >> Sent: 18.2.'10, 18:55 >> Timo wrote: >>> --- Original message --- From: Sent: 18.2.'10, 18:21 > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Henry Ritzlmayr > wrote: >> nate wrote: > > >> a) I'm talking about >> work; > > ..my systems at work.

Re: [CentOS] best practice: how to setup a central "network installation server"?

- Original Message > From: Marcelo M. Garcia > To: CentOS mailing list > Sent: Thu, February 18, 2010 7:16:45 AM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] best practice: how to setup a central "network > installation server"? > > Rudi Ahlers wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > kickstart file, if yo

Re: [CentOS] unattended fsck on reboot

m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > It was dumping large amounts of data into his home directory... which was > NFS mounted from the server I needed to reboot. That's why I like HA clusters, our NFS cluster runs on top of CentOS, and if we needed to reboot a node it would have minimal impact, the other syst

Re: [CentOS] unattended fsck on reboot

nate wrote: > m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> It was dumping large amounts of data into his home directory... which >> was >> NFS mounted from the server I needed to reboot. > > That's why I like HA clusters, our NFS cluster runs on top of > CentOS, and if we needed to reboot a node it would have minima

Re: [CentOS] NFS client firewall config?

On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 3:00 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Hi all, > Which ports do I need to have open on an NFS client's firewall to allow it > to connect to a remote NFS servers? > When I disable iptables (using ConfigServerFirewall), it connects fine, but > as soon as I enable it, NFS gives me this

[CentOS] Resizing a PV that belongs within a Volume Group?

Hi, I was wondering if there was a way to extend (ie: grow) a PV that is part of a Volume Group? I currently have a partition on my HD that is being used as a PV for my Volume Group, but would like to make it larger. I have the space on my drive to extend my partition, but using standard tools (

Re: [CentOS] Resizing a PV that belongs within a Volume Group?

On 19/02/10 10:11, Eric B. wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering if there was a way to extend (ie: grow) a PV that is part of > a Volume Group? I currently have a partition on my HD that is being used as > a PV for my Volume Group, but would like to make it larger. I have the > space on my drive to ex

Re: [CentOS] how to push the bounds and get newer packages for centos 5.4?

Les Mikesell wrote on Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:02:20 -0600: > remi (up to date ocsinventory-server, php, mysql) The problem with remi's nice (!) and recommended repo is that he just builds the latest php (5.3.x). That may be possible for 20% of installations, the other 80% may not work on it. I foun

Re: [CentOS] NFS client firewall config?

On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Tony Molloy wrote: > On Thursday 18 February 2010 11:00:53 Rudi Ahlers wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Which ports do I need to have open on an NFS client's firewall to allow > it > > to connect to a remote NFS servers? > > > > When I disable iptables (using ConfigServ

[CentOS] Server HD failed and I think I am hosed

a hd in my server failed. I noticed when I went to SSH in and get a copy of some files in /var/www/html I tried to tar the files and I was told No, read-only file system. I restarted and tried running FSCK manually (without -a or -p) and I get inode errors, short reads, etc. I tried booting t

Re: [CentOS] Server HD failed and I think I am hosed

On Thursday 18 February 2010, "Slack-Moehrle" wrote: > Also, what would have caused this all of the sudden? This box has been > running fine for months. Every hard drive will fail eventually. Some take days. Some take decades. Most fail somewhere in between those extremes. But every single one

Re: [CentOS] how to push the bounds and get newer packages for centos 5.4?

On 2/18/10 1:31 PM, "Kai Schaetzl" wrote: > Les Mikesell wrote on Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:02:20 -0600: > >> remi (up to date ocsinventory-server, php, mysql) > > The problem with remi's nice (!) and recommended repo is that he just > builds the latest php (5.3.x). That may be possible for 20% of >

[CentOS] CentOS magic to Active Directory login?

I've been trying to follow samba, centos, ldap, and other documentation to try and get a CentOS 5 box to permit a user to log into an existing Windows 200x Active Directory domain without necessarily having the box as part of the domain.If it has to be part of the domain, that is fine. The us

Re: [CentOS] CentOS magic to Active Directory login?

On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Scott Ehrlich wrote: > I've been trying to follow samba, centos, ldap, and other > documentation to try and get a CentOS 5 box to permit a user to log > into an existing Windows 200x Active Directory domain without > necessarily having the box as part of the domain

Re: [CentOS] Resizing a PV that belongs within a Volume Group?

Clint Dilks wrote: > On 19/02/10 10:11, Eric B. wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I was wondering if there was a way to extend (ie: grow) a PV that is part of >> a Volume Group? I currently have a partition on my HD that is being used as >> a PV for my Volume Group, but would like to make it larger. I h

Re: [CentOS] CentOS magic to Active Directory login?

I just set up a centos 5.4 server with this a couple of weeks agao, really straight forward, here is the best guide that I found, http://www.linuxmail.info/active-directory-integration-samba-centos-5/ Hope it helps On Thu

Re: [CentOS] how to push the bounds and get newer packages for centos 5.4?

Greetings, On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 5:14 AM, Gary Greene wrote: > On 2/18/10 1:31 PM, "Kai Schaetzl" wrote: > > Any opinions on Jason Litka repo? I happen to have installed PHP 5.2 just yesterday from there Regards, Rajagopal ___ CentOS mailing list