Am Mittwoch, den 20.01.2010, 21:46 +0100 schrieb James Chase:
> I realize this is my fault because once upon a time I installed a
> package using CPAN and probably other admins on the system have as
> well but now whenever I update perl I have to jump through hoops to
> get perl applications to wor
Hi.
Have a problem that i need som help with:
1. Have multipple raids working in a encrypted filesystem in CentOS 5.4 (i386):
script file, crypt.sh
modprobe cryptoloop
losetup -e aes /dev/loop0 /dev/md0
(inserting password here)
then run
mount -t ext3 /dev/loop0 /mnt/raid5
Have been using this i
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 09:41:37AM +0100, Morten Sundstrøm wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Have a problem that i need som help with:
> 1. Have multipple raids working in a encrypted filesystem in CentOS 5.4
> (i386): script file, crypt.sh
>
> modprobe cryptoloop
>
cryptoloop is depracated, and should not be u
Greetings,
>On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Rajagopal Swaminathan
> wrote:
Slightly OT, I wanted to enable blackhole engine in the mysql server
so downloaded the SRPM from Centos Site, setup the rpmbuild envronment
with mighty help from the our own Russ's Owlriver website and tried
building it.
I know about that. Is that the reason it wont work in ubuntu?
If I switch to a new encryption i must copy all the data to a new raid wich is
not possible at the moment.
I need to get this mounted.
/MS
- Original Message -
Fra: "Pasi Kärkkäinen"
Til: "CentOS mailing list"
Sendt: 21. j
I like to try out other distributions of Linux. Today I took a look at
Mint Linux 8 and Fedora 12. I installed and updated each on a small
partition -- actual physical install, not virtual machines. Both
worked great at 1280x1024 (their defaults) but neither would let me
use 1024x768 resolution. Bo
On Thursday 21 January 2010 09:37:11 Ron Blizzard wrote:
> And I'm curious as to how Xorg determines its monitor resolution
> choices when there is no xorg.conf file.
X server queries the monitor for supported resolutions by reading the EDID
data, and uses the best setting available as the defaul
Kai Schaetzl wrote on Tue, 19 Jan 2010 23:31:33 +0100:
> No. I usually see some change in the permissions
> (/var/named/chroot/var/named/ loses group write and named logs some
> complaints but still works) when updating named.
And sure enought that happened with latest bind update today again.
Kai Schaetzl wrote on Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:00:48 +0100:
> I wonder now if the owner of
> that directory should actually be named?
Hm, after looking on other machines that have named installed but not in
use it's excactly the same there. So, if named wants write permission
there, but the rpm alw
Has anyone else running heavily loaded openvz boxes noticed strange behavior
with the latest kernels? Ever since updating to the latest *.164* kernels, we
have mysterious machine lock ups. Sometime there will be an oops message,
other times there will be none. The oops messages aren't the same w
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Kai Schaetzl wrote on Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:00:48 +0100:
>
>
>> I wonder now if the owner of
>> that directory should actually be named?
>>
>
> Hm, after looking on other machines that have named installed but not in
> use it's excactly the same there. So, if named wan
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Kai Schaetzl wrote on Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:00:48 +0100:
>
>> I wonder now if the owner of
>> that directory should actually be named?
>
> Hm, after looking on other machines that have named installed but not in
> use it's excactly the same ther
Brian Mathis wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>
>> Kai Schaetzl wrote on Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:00:48 +0100:
>>
>>
>>> I wonder now if the owner of
>>> that directory should actually be named?
>>>
>> Hm, after looking on other machines that have named insta
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 10:39 +0100, Christopher Thorjussen wrote:
> Just checking 'yum update ecryptfs-utils' gives me alone 54 packages to
> install:
>
> Transaction Summary
> =
> Install 54 Package(s)
> Update 5 Package(s)
> Remove 0 Package(s)
>
> T
Hi folks
[ Please add me CC. Thanks ]
We have here a Jboss app and web server. We signed the SSL-certificate
that end-user don't have ugly error messages. I don't understand why
we need to import the Root-Cert in PEM format?
$ keytool -import -trustcacerts -file rootcert.pem -keystore
myserver.k
Hi everybody,
I have a CentOS 5.4 server I need to se-up as Subversion server. On the server
GNOME keyring has been installed and the integration with Subversion works
fine: I'm asked for the keyring password the first time and that's it.
I am now trying to set it up so that after login the def
From: Anthony Kamau
>Just checking 'yum update ecryptfs-utils' gives me alone 54 packages to
>install:
>Transaction Summary
>=
>Install 54 Package(s)
>Update 5 Package(s)
>Remove 0 Package(s)
>Total download size: 25 M
>Is this ok [y/N]: n
>Exiting on u
Does anyone know why the CentOS 5 package perl-Mail-Box from both
rpmforge and epel is dependent on spamassassin? Looking at the source
from cpan, it appears to be an option rather than a dependency (and is
even commented out of the option list in the makefile).
--
Bowie
Brian Mathis wrote on Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:38:12 -0500:
> I don't think you'd want a compromised named to be able to make
> changes to your authoritative DNS records, which is what could happen
> if you have permissions set that way.
But why does named then report it right after the update?
Jan 2
Bowie Bailey wrote on Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:34:02 -0500:
> # ll /var/named/chroot/var/
> total 24
> drwxr-x--- 4 root named 4096 Aug 25 2004 named
> drwxrwx--- 3 root named 4096 Mar 13 2003 run
that has no group write permission here.
> drwxrwx--- 2 named nam
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, Sven Aluoor wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> [ Please add me CC. Thanks ]
so .. a 'not subscribed' driveby -- also looks to be a
cross-post
> We have here a Jboss app and web server. We signed the SSL-certificate
on a product we do not build
> that end-user don't have ugly error mes
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 09:09:59AM -0500, Chris wrote:
> Has anyone else running heavily loaded openvz boxes noticed strange behavior
> with the latest kernels? Ever since updating to the latest *.164* kernels, we
> have mysterious machine lock ups. Sometime there will be an oops message,
> other
> It seems to be working, but I get this complaint (I see it as a complaint)
> each time named gets restarted - until I give it write permission for that
> directory.
This is RedHat's policy for bind. The working directory does not need to
be writable, and RH's bind maintainer Adam Tkac has
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Am Donnerstag, den 21.01.2010, 17:25 +0100 schrieb Bowie Bailey:
> Does anyone know why the CentOS 5 package perl-Mail-Box from both
> rpmforge and epel is dependent on spamassassin? Looking at the source
> from cpan, it appears to be an option rather than a dependency (and is
> even commented out
Hi folks
I have a Centos 5.3 Box and need to know how to configure a Netgear wg111v2 USB
WLAN adapter. I already have an wireless LAN build with an AP and a windows XP
PC with another Netgear wg111v2 USB adaptor running on it..
Thanks
David___
CentOS
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Davy Leon wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> I have a Centos 5.3 Box and need to know how to configure a Netgear wg111v2
> USB WLAN adapter. I already have an wireless LAN build with an AP and a
> windows XP PC with another Netgear wg111v2 USB adaptor running on it..
Does the
lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote on Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:48:10 +:
> This is RedHat's policy for bind. The working directory does not need to
> be writable, and RH's bind maintainer Adam Tkac has explained this on
> numerous
> occasions.
Thanks for the hint. I cannot see that he explaine
Hi all,
I noticed that my ssh logins to a particular server were taking up to
5 seconds to finally login.
My tcpdump -vv weren't producing much output (not good) and my pings
to and from that host were normal and almost identical to other hosts
on my subnet that had no ssh login delay issue
aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed that my ssh logins to a particular server were taking up to
> 5 seconds to finally login.
This is frequently a DNS issue, is forward+reverse DNS functional?
You can also run SSH in debugging mode on the server, and increase
verbosity on the clien
> aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I noticed that my ssh logins to a particular server were taking up to
>> 5 seconds to finally login.
>
> This is frequently a DNS issue, is forward+reverse DNS functional?
DNS was normal, forward reverse lookups exist and match that host.
I'll turn on
Hello
I have a question, How can I change logos and favicon.ico in Data.fs
file for Conga (Luci) Can anybody help me? Thanks!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
- Original Message
> From: "aurfal...@gmail.com"
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Sent: Thu, 21 January, 2010 20:07:27
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] trouble shooting slow ssh logins
>
> > aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I noticed that my ssh logins to a particular server were
> - Original Message
>> From: "aurfal...@gmail.com"
>> To: CentOS mailing list
>> Sent: Thu, 21 January, 2010 20:07:27
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] trouble shooting slow ssh logins
>>
>>> aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I noticed that my ssh logins to a particular server we
Ran into a confusing situation today. When I mount an xfs filesystem on
a server running centos 5.4 x86_64 with kernel 2.6.18-164.9.1.el5, the
barrier/nobarrier mount option as displayed in /proc/mounts is always
set to "nobarrier"
Here's an example:
[r...@host ~]# mount -o nobarrier /dev/vg1/
On Jan 21, 2010, at 4:04 PM, Tom Georgoulias wrote:
> Ran into a confusing situation today. When I mount an xfs
> filesystem on
> a server running centos 5.4 x86_64 with kernel 2.6.18-164.9.1.el5, the
> barrier/nobarrier mount option as displayed in /proc/mounts is always
> set to "nobarrier"
On 01/21/2010 04:13 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
> On Jan 21, 2010, at 4:04 PM, Tom Georgoulias > wrote:
>
>> Ran into a confusing situation today. When I mount an xfs
>> filesystem on
>> a server running centos 5.4 x86_64 with kernel 2.6.18-164.9.1.el5, the
>> barrier/nobarrier mount option as displ
On 2010-01-21 11:35, Chris wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 09:09:59AM -0500, Chris wrote:
>> Has anyone else running heavily loaded openvz boxes noticed strange behavior
>> with the latest kernels? Ever since updating to the latest *.164* kernels,
>> we
>> have mysterious machine lock ups. Some
I need to provide a means for our people to stop using the mail server
as a file server, a web site with a friendly interface has been asked
for instead of an ftp server.
Anyone know of something/project that exists already?
Thanks!
jlc
___
CentOS maili
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> I need to provide a means for our people to stop using the mail server
> as a file server, a web site with a friendly interface has been asked
> for instead of an ftp server.
>
> Anyone know of something/project that exists already?
Some form of a we
2010/1/22 :
> The DNS server also behaved regarding name/ip addy lookups.
>
> This server is a Zimbra mail server which during install, checks for
> proper DNS configs. I usually check proper functioning DNS by hand
> anyways.
>
> The ipv6 line was strange but I read a while back, some tech note
I have the following update procedure that update mySQL DB over the
internet between source Linux Centos (local machine on my net behind a
DMZ with real IP A.B.C.D) and target Linux fedora (web server
www.myweb.com) every day on a specific time 18:00 through a crontab on
my source linux server
ser
42 matches
Mail list logo
