> > I don't of a website, but you can use checkinstall which will do the job
> on
> > one of your own machines. Be aware that the lastest versions have a bug
> > which makes you jump through a couple extra hoops... but it is the only
> tool
> > to do that, to my knowledge.
I just went and looked
I misunderstood that you were pointing to some GUI tools.
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
From: Rajagopal Swaminathan
> My requirement is simple: I want to install few instances of mysql
> Workbench as successor to other GUI tools for developers whom shall we
> call hmmm... "PHD" (replacing the boss with developer in the PHB).
> and yum has spoiled me to the extent of, what can I say..
On 01/19/2010 12:26 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> ML wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> All of my systems are running 5.4 x64. The are all AMD x64
>> processors with at least 2gb of RAM in each.
>>
>> I am running SSH on a non standard port.
>>
>> When I SSH into ANY of my systems, I get prompted for my passwo
Hi,
is there a way / software to find out which security patches my
different CentOS systems are missing? Maybe with the according
CESA announcement displayed?
TIA,
Frank.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listi
On 01/19/2010 10:32 AM, frank.brodb...@klingel.de wrote:
> is there a way / software to find out which security patches my
> different CentOS systems are missing? Maybe with the according
> CESA announcement displayed?
I am working on a bit of code that would make something like this
possible in
From: "frank.brodb...@klingel.de"
> is there a way / software to find out which security patches my
> different CentOS systems are missing? Maybe with the according
> CESA announcement displayed?
Try the yum-security package...
JD
___
CentOS
Or I can highly recommend configuring a local spacewalk server It is
certainly usable right now overall (even if still under development in some
areas) and the Redhat guys are very quick to squash reported bugs.
Getting it runnign here has made my life much easier in provisioning,
configuring
> is there a way / software to find out which security patches my
> different CentOS systems are missing? Maybe with the according
> CESA announcement displayed?
I'll put in a plug for a software project that I am developer/contributor
for, OpenVAS (Open Vulnerability Assessment Scanner).
http:
Karanbir Singh schrieb am 19.01.2010 11:48:54:
> On 01/19/2010 10:32 AM, frank.brodb...@klingel.de wrote:
> > is there a way / software to find out which security patches my
> > different CentOS systems are missing? Maybe with the according
> > CESA announcement displayed?
>
> I am working on a
On 01/19/2010 11:08 AM, Geoff Galitz wrote:
> I'll put in a plug for a software project that I am developer/contributor
> for, OpenVAS (Open Vulnerability Assessment Scanner).
>
> http://www.openvas.org
>
I look at this a while back, well over a year i think now. And the
problem was that openvas
On 01/19/2010 11:07 AM, frank.brodb...@klingel.de wrote:
>> I am working on a bit of code that would make something like this
>> possible in the near future ( ~ a month or so ). However, till then I'd
>> recommend going with just yum list and if you want, some mangling with
>> yum-changelog will gi
> I look at this a while back, well over a year i think now. And the
> problem was that openvas does not actually test for the Vuln but it
> tries to use content to assume the exploits will not work. That is a
> very risky situation to get into.
In terms of a proper security assessment; this is
Greetings,
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 3:16 PM, John Doe wrote:
> From: Rajagopal Swaminathan
>
> Google pointed to this:
> http://rpms.famillecollet.com/
Thanks. But it doesn't seem to have MySQL Workbench.
Some update:
>From the IRC Channel:
"hi rajsand, yes, akojima managed to get it done, bu
Carlos Santana wrote on Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:54:51 -0600:
> - The wiki page approach is to flush existing rules and then add
> required rules to iptables. Is it possible to add/append required
> rules without flushing existing set of rules
You can add rules on-the-fly at runtime and then use servi
Hoping someone can help me fix something that I apparently messed up, i have
the issue that when I untar a file as root the uid and gid that get set are
not roots'. I had change a user uid and gid to 1000 via usermo -u etc
but somehow it appears to have effected the root user. When I touch fi
it works changing
*
Specifies the path of the work folder, which can be
modified according to the user's needs. The path specified here can be seen
in the Open or Save dialog.
$(work)
*
to
*
Specifies the path of the work
Hi there --
I need to upgrade one of our systems from its current distribution, Fedora Core
7, to the most recent
version distribution, release 5.4, of the CentOS operating system. Can I do an
in-place upgrade of the
operating system without any adverse side-effects? Are there any issues that I
sh
Quoting "Kaplan, Andrew H." :
> Hi there --
>
> I need to upgrade one of our systems from its current distribution,
> Fedora Core
> 7, to the most recent
> version distribution, release 5.4, of the CentOS operating system.
> Can I do an
> in-place upgrade of the
> operating system without an
> Hoping someone can help me fix something that I apparently messed up, i
> have the issue that when I untar a file as root the uid and gid that get
set
> are not roots'. I had change a user uid and gid to 1000 via usermo -u
If I understand you correctly, the user's files were all uid and gid 100
> Hi there --
>
> I need to upgrade one of our systems from its current distribution, Fedora
> Core 7, to the most recent
> version distribution, release 5.4, of the CentOS operating system. Can I
> do an in-place upgrade of the
> operating system without any adverse side-effects? Are there any iss
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Tom Bishop wrote:
> Hoping someone can help me fix something that I apparently messed up, i have
> the issue that when I untar a file as root the uid and gid that get set are
> not roots'. I had change a user uid and gid to 1000 via usermo -u etc
> but somehow
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 1:01 AM, Ian Blackwell wrote:
> Rob Kampen wrote:
>> Carlos Santana wrote:
>>> - What does 'RH-Firewall-1-INPUT' chain means? This also seems to be a
>>> predefined chain, although not mentioned in wiki.
>>> - The wiki page approach is to flush existing rules and then add
>
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 7:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Carlos Santana wrote on Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:54:51 -0600:
>
>> - The wiki page approach is to flush existing rules and then add
>> required rules to iptables. Is it possible to add/append required
>> rules without flushing existing set of rules
So I downloaded the tar file, wget running as root (su -). Looking at
the file permissions owner and group are root but when I untar the file the
new directory and all of the files have the UID and GID set to 1000, which
was another user and not the one that I logged in with.
On Tue, Jan
> So I downloaded the tar file, wget running as root (su -). Looking at
> the file permissions owner and group are root but when I untar the file
> the
> new directory and all of the files have the UID and GID set to 1000, which
> was another user and not the one that I logged in with.
Ri
From: Rajagopal Swaminathan
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 3:16 PM, John Doe wrote:
> > From: Rajagopal Swaminathan
> > Google pointed to this:
> > http://rpms.famillecollet.com/
>
> Thanks. But it doesn't seem to have MySQL Workbench.
Oops, I read mysql bench instead of workbench, my bad...
JD
Tom Bishop schrieb am 19.01.2010 15:53:52:
> So I downloaded the tar file, wget running as root (su -).
> Looking at the file permissions owner and group are root but when I
> untar the file the new directory and all of the files have the UID
> and GID set to 1000, which was another user
Greetings,
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:39 PM, John Doe wrote:
> From: Rajagopal Swaminathan
>> Thanks. But it doesn't seem to have MySQL Workbench.
>
> Oops, I read mysql bench instead of workbench, my bad...
>
Sorry if I have confused you and others.
MySQL Workbench is touted to be a replacemen
Tom Bishop wrote on Tue, 19 Jan 2010 07:43:50 -0600:
> When I touch files
> as root the correct uid and gid are root, however when untaring an archive
> the directory and files are uid and gid =1000.
Untarring *which* files? The standard behavior of tar is to keep the
permissions etc. of the ori
From: Tom Bishop
>So I downloaded the tar file, wget running as root (su -). Looking at the
>file permissions owner and group are root but when I untar the file the new
>directory and all of the files have the UID and GID set to 1000, which was
>another user and not the one that I logged i
I noted centos-release source rpm is missing on repositories, and
after search a bit I found this thread:
http://www.linux-archive.org/centos/272321-centos-release-srpm.html
Anyone have news about this?
Thanks in advance
--
Renato Botelho
___
CentOS m
Thanks guys, the light bulb finally went off, need more sleep ;).so here
is what I think happened, so I run buntu at home on some PC's and had set
the uid to one of my users (my wife) to 1000 for nfs stuff, which is the
defaul range for ubuntu uid's. So when I downloaded the file and untar the
On 1/12/2010 8:40 AM, Anas Alnaffar wrote:
> I have just installed an SVN server on a CentOS 5.4 machine.
> how I can start the SVN server automatically at the boot of the machine.
>
Unless you have some specific reason to run the standalone server, I'd
recommend installing mod_dav_svn and using
Thanks friend, but I don't what I supouse to do there...can you give me an
example for this case:
# ./path/to/pear/pear
as
# pear
Thanks a lot
Saludos Fraternales
_
Atte.
Alberto García Gómez M:.M:.
Administrador de Redes/Webmaster
IPI "Carlos Marx", Matanzas. Cuba
From: Alberto García Gómez
> From: "John Doe"
>> Add /path/to/bin to the PATH variable.
>> See examples in /etc/profile.d/
>> Thanks friend, but I don't what I supouse to do there...can you give me an
>> example for this case:
>> # ./path/to/pear/pear
>> as
>> # pear
Create /etc/profile.d/mype
Carlos Santana wrote on Tue, 19 Jan 2010 08:51:19 -0600:
> 'But it's harder to maintain as a
> script of your own.'. You are also using script, right?
The "as" is ambiguous in this case ;-) Read:
But it's (adding on the fly, no script) harder to maintain as if you use a
script of your own.
Kai
Hello,
I built a system based on centos 5.3, now i'm planing to move to 5.4.
To do it I rebuilt all rpms making some changes.
When I use a common centos 5.3, it automatically detects that 5.4
is available and move update for it when i run yum update. How
does this work? How the system detects new
Renato Botelho wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I built a system based on centos 5.3, now i'm planing to move to 5.4.
> To do it I rebuilt all rpms making some changes.
>
> When I use a common centos 5.3, it automatically detects that 5.4
> is available and move update for it when i run yum update. How
> does t
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Renato Botelho wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I built a system based on centos 5.3, now i'm planing to move to 5.4.
>> To do it I rebuilt all rpms making some changes.
>>
>> When I use a common centos 5.3, it automatically detects that 5.4
>> is avail
Renato Botelho wrote:
> My question is not *how* to update, but how the rpm detects a
> new version is available and automatically update to rpms from
> 5.4 version.
>
I believe it gets the updates from /5/ on the yum repos, not /5.x/
so when /5/ has rolled to be a link to /5.4/ instead of
Hi all,
Until when CentOS-3 will be supported and patches will be released??
Many thanks.
--
CL Martinez
carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Jan 19, 2010, at 1:12 PM, carlopmart wrote:
> Until when CentOS-3 will be supported and patches will be released??
http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/CentOS3#head-21c807565900c774ccbabb405e07c9552a44876c
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_
John R Pierce wrote:
> Renato Botelho wrote:
>
>> My question is not *how* to update, but how the rpm detects a
>> new version is available and automatically update to rpms from
>> 5.4 version.
>>
>>
>
> I believe it gets the updates from /5/ on the yum repos, not /5.x/
> so when /5
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Carlos Santana wrote on Tue, 19 Jan 2010 08:51:19 -0600:
>
>> 'But it's harder to maintain as a
>> script of your own.'. You are also using script, right?
>
> The "as" is ambiguous in this case ;-) Read:
> But it's (adding on the fly, no scrip
On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 14:32 -0600, Carlos Santana wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> > Carlos Santana wrote on Tue, 19 Jan 2010 08:51:19 -0600:
> >
> >> 'But it's harder to maintain as a
> >> script of your own.'. You are also using script, right?
> >
> > The "as" is
I updated my secondary DNS server from 5.3 to 5.4 today. After the
update, named would not start. A bit of investigation found that all of
the files in /var/named/chroot/var/named/data had been turned into links
to themselves!
Fortunately, since this is a secondary DNS, all I had to do was delet
Bowie Bailey wrote on Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:51:40 -0500:
> Has anyone else seen this problem?
No. I usually see some change in the permissions
(/var/named/chroot/var/named/ loses group write and named logs some
complaints but still works) when updating named. I think I've seen this
happen severa
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 05:34:47PM -0800, Peter Blajev wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I increased the size of one of the LUNs and on CentOS 5.4 if I restart
>> iscsi (`service iscsi restart`) I'll see the the new size but this will
>> disconnect all other LUNs.
>>
>> I'm hoping that
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> John R Pierce wrote:
>> Renato Botelho wrote:
>>
>>> My question is not *how* to update, but how the rpm detects a
>>> new version is available and automatically update to rpms from
>>> 5.4 version.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I believe it gets the updates
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> I updated my secondary DNS server from 5.3 to 5.4 today. After the
> update, named would not start. A bit of investigation found that all of
> the files in /var/named/chroot/var/named/data had been turned into links
> to themselves!
>
> Fort
On 1/19/2010 5:26 PM, Brian Mathis wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>> I updated my secondary DNS server from 5.3 to 5.4 today. After the
>> update, named would not start. A bit of investigation found that all of
>> the files in /var/named/chroot/var/named/data had b
On 19/01/10 15:48, Renato Botelho wrote:
> I noted centos-release source rpm is missing on repositories, and
> after search a bit I found this thread:
>
> http://www.linux-archive.org/centos/272321-centos-release-srpm.html
>
> Anyone have news about this?
>
> Thanks in advance
I'll try and get
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 20:46, Wade Blackwell wrote:
> Good afternoon all,
> I have a Broadcom BCM5823KPB-5 PCI crypto card that I would like to
> use on a 2.6.18-164.10.1.el5xen i686 i386 release do assist with crypto
> operations. Does anyone know if there are drivers for this device? I
54 matches
Mail list logo
