[CentOS] advanced routing, 2isp

Guys, please I have no luck with this. I have 2 ISPS. I have working configuration with ip route a 2 routing tables in a way, that matching local subnet uses second provider while all the others are using the first one - main. The main problem I am having is, that I am unable to reach my router v

Re: [CentOS] iptables ... *BSD pf ... pfSense

On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:22:23 +0100 Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator wrote: > http://www.pfsense.org/ > > What do you think? Running in production since 0.9 or so. 1Gbit of traffic, carp failover, multiple vlans, all kinds of VPN, etc. I have to think hard to come up with something that I don't

[CentOS] eME627-5082 laptop and Linux?

Anyone have experience with this laptop running C5 5.4 32 or 64-bit? Any known problems/issues? Thanks. Scott ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Inquiry:yum?

Dear All I want to add "yum" to my CentOS 5.2 so I downloaded the rpm package from the www.pbone.net . But I didn't have success in installing it so please let me know if there is another way to accomplish this job ? Thank you in advance ___ CentOS mailin

Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:yum?

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 11:44:16AM +, hadi motamedi wrote: > Dear All > I want to add "yum" to my CentOS 5.2 so I downloaded the rpm package from > the www.pbone.net . But I didn't have success in installing it so please let > me know if there is another way to accomplish this job ? > Thank you

Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:yum?

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 11:44:16AM +, hadi motamedi wrote: > > Dear All > > I want to add "yum" to my CentOS 5.2 so I downloaded the rpm package from > > the www.pbone.net . But I didn't have success in installing it so please > let >

Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:yum?

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:03:58PM +, hadi motamedi wrote: > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 11:44:16AM +, hadi motamedi wrote: > > > Dear All > > > I want to add "yum" to my CentOS 5.2 so I downloaded the rpm package from > > > the w

Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:yum?

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:03:58PM +, hadi motamedi wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Ray Van Dolson > wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 11:44:16AM +, hadi motamedi wrote: > > > > Dear All > > > > I want to add

Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:yum?

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 4:03 AM, hadi motamedi wrote: > Thanks for your reply . But for unknown reasons the yum is not available on > my CentOS . > [r...@mss-1 tmp]# more /etc/redhat-release > CentOS release 5.2 (Final) > [r...@mss-1 tmp]# yum > -bash: yum: command not found > Can you please let

Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:yum?

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 11:44:16AM +, hadi motamedi wrote: > Dear All > I want to add "yum" to my CentOS 5.2 so I downloaded the rpm package from > the www.pbone.net . But I didn't have success in installing it so please let > me know if there is another way to accomplish this job ? 1)

Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:yum?

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:03:58PM +, hadi motamedi wrote: > > Thanks for your reply . But for unknown reasons the yum is not available on > my CentOS . > [r...@mss-1 tmp]# more /etc/redhat-release > CentOS release 5.2 (Final) This is irrelevant. /etc/redhat-release is a text file an

Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:yum?

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:23 PM, John R. Dennison wrote: > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:03:58PM +, hadi motamedi wrote: > > > > Thanks for your reply . But for unknown reasons the yum is not available > on > > my CentOS . > > [r...@mss-1 tmp]# more /etc/redhat-release > > CentOS release 5.2 (F

Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:yum?

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:31:53PM +, hadi motamedi wrote: > > Please find below : > [r...@mss-1 tmp]# rpm -q centos-release > centos-release-5-2.el5.centos And you conveniently left out the kernel revision that would be returned by the second part of the command I gave you, n

Re: [CentOS] Missing virtio-win in CentOS 5.4

On Dec 1. the drivers are available on the Supplementary channel https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2009-1624.html Any chance to get them for CentOS? Sebastian 2009/10/22 carlopmart > Ray Van Dolson wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 04:14:00PM +0200, Sebastian Marten wrote: > >> Hello, > >>

Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:yum?

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:45 PM, John R. Dennison wrote: > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:31:53PM +, hadi motamedi wrote: > > > > Please find below : > > [r...@mss-1 tmp]# rpm -q centos-release > > centos-release-5-2.el5.centos > >And you conveniently left out the kernel revision that wo

Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:yum?

John R. Dennison wrote: > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:31:53PM +, hadi motamedi wrote: >> Please find below : >> [r...@mss-1 tmp]# rpm -q centos-release >> centos-release-5-2.el5.centos > > And you conveniently left out the kernel revision that would > be returned by the second part

Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:yum?

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 07:54:06AM -0500, mark wrote: > > Wonder if someone was trying to remove yum-updatesd, and got all of yum. Possibly. But one would need to either use "-y" or answer yes at the "are you really silly enough to want me to do this?" yum prompt.

Re: [CentOS] Missing virtio-win in CentOS 5.4

On 23/12/09 12:51, Sebastian wrote: > On Dec 1. the drivers are available on the Supplementary channel > > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2009-1624.html > > Any chance to get them for CentOS? the official centos policy is to only build freely distributable sources published from upstream on

Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:yum?

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:52:50PM +, hadi motamedi wrote: > > Sorry . Here is the complementary data : > [r...@mss-1 tmp]# uname -a > Linux mss-1.iwv 2.6.18-92.el5 #1 SMP Tue Jun 10 18:49:47 EDT 2008 i686 i686 > i386 GNU/Linux Oh, and before I forget. Update that box. It's

Re: [CentOS] partitioning order and IO performance

On Dec 22, 2009, at 10:14 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > Ross Walker wrote: >> Also, for random IO the opposite is true, the rotational latency is >> significantly smaller on the inner tracks than the outer tracks, so >> random OPs perform better there. >> > > um, most all hard disks are CAV, so the

Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:yum?

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:12:16PM +, hadi motamedi wrote: > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:03:58PM +, hadi motamedi wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Ray Van Dolson > > wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 1

[CentOS] CentOS 5 and Fedora Core

If memory serves me correctly I was told CentOS 4.x was based on Fedora Core 3. So when finding a rpm I always looked for one for Fedora Core 3 and then it seemed to install ok on CentOS 4. Is CentOS 5 the same way and if so what Core is it based on? Matt

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 and Fedora Core

Matt wrote: If memory serves me correctly I was told CentOS 4.x was based on Fedora Core 3. So when finding a rpm I always looked for one for Fedora Core 3 and then it seemed to install ok on CentOS 4. Is CentOS 5 the same way and if so what Core is it based on? Matt __

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 and Fedora Core

> If memory serves me correctly I was told CentOS 4.x was based on > Fedora Core 3. So when finding a rpm I always looked for one for > Fedora Core 3 and then it seemed to install ok on CentOS 4. Is CentOS > 5 the same way and if so what Core is it based on? No to both. CentOS 4 was RHEL 4; 5 is

Re: [CentOS] partitioning order and IO performance

On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 09:37 -0500, Ross Walker wrote: > > I think you might be confusing CAV with CLV of optical drives. > > http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constant_Angular_Velocity > > -Ross That was my thought. However, I think most are missing the boat on this. I have always looked at the

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 and Fedora Core

On Wednesday 23 December 2009 14:51:23 Matt wrote: > If memory serves me correctly I was told CentOS 4.x was based on > Fedora Core 3. So when finding a rpm I always looked for one for > Fedora Core 3 and then it seemed to install ok on CentOS 4. Is CentOS > 5 the same way and if so what Core is

[CentOS] fully automatic installation FAI?

Hello, Is anyone running a software package called FAI for Fully Automatic Installation on a CentOS server? I was wondering if there were any issues to running it? Thanks. Dave. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/lis

[CentOS] OT:Which filesystem to use with large files

Hi all, Recently I have installed a centOS 5.4 server to use as a home NAS server. I need to use large files (8GB minimum) inside of it to serve via iSCSI services. Which filesystem do you recommends me to reach maximum performance: xfs, ext3, ext4, gfs2 ?? Thanks. -- CL Martinez ca

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 and Fedora Core

Marko Vojinovic wrote: > On Wednesday 23 December 2009 14:51:23 Matt wrote: >> If memory serves me correctly I was told CentOS 4.x was based on >> Fedora Core 3. So when finding a rpm I always looked for one for >> Fedora Core 3 and then it seemed to install ok on CentOS 4. Is CentOS >> 5 the sam

Re: [CentOS] OT:Which filesystem to use with large files

carlopmart wrote: > Hi all, > > Recently I have installed a centOS 5.4 server to use as a home NAS server. > I need > to use large files (8GB minimum) inside of it to serve via iSCSI services. > Which > filesystem do you recommends me to reach maximum performance: xfs, ext3, > ext4, gfs2 >

Re: [CentOS] fully automatic installation FAI?

Am Mittwoch, den 23.12.2009, 16:46 +0100 schrieb David Mehler: > Hello, > Is anyone running a software package called FAI for Fully Automatic > Installation on a CentOS server? I was wondering if there were any > issues to running it? > Thanks. > Dave. Afiak thats the debian way for automatic inst

Re: [CentOS] OT:Which filesystem to use with large files

Les Mikesell wrote: > carlopmart wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Recently I have installed a centOS 5.4 server to use as a home NAS server. >> I need >> to use large files (8GB minimum) inside of it to serve via iSCSI services. >> Which >> filesystem do you recommends me to reach maximum performance:

Re: [CentOS] OT:Which filesystem to use with large files

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 10:47 AM, carlopmart wrote: > Hi all, > >  Recently I have installed a centOS 5.4 server to use as a home NAS server. I > need > to use large files (8GB minimum) inside of it to serve via iSCSI services. > Which > filesystem do you recommends me to reach maximum performan

Re: [CentOS] OT:Which filesystem to use with large files

Kwan Lowe wrote: > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 10:47 AM, carlopmart wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Recently I have installed a centOS 5.4 server to use as a home NAS server. >> I need >> to use large files (8GB minimum) inside of it to serve via iSCSI services. >> Which >> filesystem do you recommends me

Re: [CentOS] OT:Which filesystem to use with large files

carlopmart wrote: > Kwan Lowe wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 10:47 AM, carlopmart wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Recently I have installed a centOS 5.4 server to use as a home NAS server. >>> I need >>> to use large files (8GB minimum) inside of it to serve via iSCSI services. >>> Which >>> file

Re: [CentOS] partitioning order and IO performance

Ross Walker wrote: > I think you might be confusing CAV with CLV of optical drives. > http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constant_Angular_Velocity > no, I'm not. most HD's ('green drives' complicate this some) spin at a constant RPM, so the rotational latency is the same on the inner and oute

Re: [CentOS] partitioning order and IO performance

On 12/23/2009 07:29 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > Ross Walker wrote: >> I think you might be confusing CAV with CLV of optical drives. >> http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constant_Angular_Velocity >> > > no, I'm not. most HD's ('green drives' complicate this some) spin at > a constant RPM, so t

[CentOS] /dev/video* permissions

Hi all, Does anybody know where those permissions are controlled? I've looked in /etc/udev and everywhere else I could think of and thus far I have seen not a hint... Thanks in advance for all your help. Boris. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] partitioning order and IO performance

Timo Schoeler wrote: > On 12/23/2009 07:29 PM, John R Pierce wrote: >> Ross Walker wrote: >>> I think you might be confusing CAV with CLV of optical drives. >>> http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constant_Angular_Velocity >>> >> no, I'm not. most HD's ('green drives' complicate this some) spin a

Re: [CentOS] OT:Which filesystem to use with large files

>> With LVMs you'd of course lose the flexibility of file-backed targets >> and the ability to do sparse files are you're intending.. >> >> dd if=/dev/zero of=iqn.2009-12.com.mydomain:storage.disk01.foo.foo >> bs=1 count=0 seek=16G > > LVM was my first option and performance it is very very good wi

Re: [CentOS] OT:Which filesystem to use with large files

Kwan Lowe wrote: >>> With LVMs you'd of course lose the flexibility of file-backed targets >>> and the ability to do sparse files are you're intending.. >>> >>> dd if=/dev/zero of=iqn.2009-12.com.mydomain:storage.disk01.foo.foo >>> bs=1 count=0 seek=16G >> LVM was my first option and performance it

[CentOS] donations

The donation page does not seem up to date: *Monetary* CentOS is currently reviewing our cash donation program. If you are looking to make a cash dontation to the CentOS Project, please check back here after August 15th, 2009. I sent an email to the webmaster but did not get a reply. I thoug

Re: [CentOS] donations

On 23/12/09 22:55, Jerry Geis wrote: > The donation page does not seem up to date: > > > *Monetary* > > CentOS is currently reviewing our cash donation program. If you are > looking to make a cash dontation to the CentOS Project, please check > back here after August 15th, 2009. > > I sent an ema

Re: [CentOS] OT:Which filesystem to use with large files

>> I actually prefer backing up LVMs.. I use the snapshot feature which >> means I can backup a live volume. Works well. > > But I can't use snapshot feature because under these lvm partitions there are > ZFS, > NTFS and so on filesystems that linux can't access ... Not sure that I'm understandin

Re: [CentOS] OT:Which filesystem to use with large files

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 2:50 PM, carlopmart wrote: > Kwan Lowe wrote: >> >> I actually prefer backing up LVMs.. I use the snapshot feature which >> means I can backup a live volume. Works well. > > But I can't use snapshot feature because under these lvm partitions there are > ZFS, > NTFS and so

Re: [CentOS] partitioning order and IO performance

On Dec 23, 2009, at 1:29 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > Ross Walker wrote: >> I think you might be confusing CAV with CLV of optical drives. >> http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constant_Angular_Velocity >> > > no, I'm not. most HD's ('green drives' complicate this some) > spin at > a constant RPM

[CentOS] CentOS 5.4 Upgrade installation failure

CentOS 5.3 has been running fairly good except for a slow ethernet connection so I thought I would upgrade to CentOS 5.4 to see if that improved things. I had previously changed fstab and menu.lst to use UUID instead of LABEL in order to insulate myself from partition label changes I wanted to

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.4 Upgrade installation failure

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Edward Diener wrote: > CentOS 5.3 has been running fairly good except for a slow ethernet > connection so I thought I would upgrade to CentOS 5.4 to see if that > improved things. I had previously changed fstab and menu.lst to use UUID > instead of LABEL in order

Re: [CentOS] partitioning order and IO performance

On 12/23/2009 08:15 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > Timo Schoeler wrote: >> On 12/23/2009 07:29 PM, John R Pierce wrote: >>> Ross Walker wrote: I think you might be confusing CAV with CLV of optical drives. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constant_Angular_Velocity >>> no, I'm not. mo

Re: [CentOS] partitioning order and IO performance

Timo Schoeler wrote: >> But these days, nothing should ever be reading from swap, although you >> might write a bit there. If it does, buy some more RAM instead of >> worrying about disk performance. >> > > Sure, absolutely no question; *but* in the (ancient) times it was > important, it wa

Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:yum?

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 2:45 PM, fred smith wrote: > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:12:16PM +, hadi motamedi wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Ray Van Dolson > wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:03:58PM +, hadi motamedi wrote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Ray

Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:yum?

hadi motamedi wrote: > ... > package yum-arch-2.2.2-2.el5.kb is already installed > [r...@mss-1 tmp]# whereis yum > yum: > [r...@mss-1 tmp]# try... # rpm -V yum if the package is intact, there should be no output (after a few seconds of thinking), otherwise it will list anything th

Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:yum?

Yum-Arch is, I think, a red herring. Yum-Arch, according to pbone: "This package only provides the old yum-arch command from yum-2.2.2 It should be used to generate repository informations for Fedora Core < 3 and RedHat Enterprise Linux < 4." So that's not even relevent to CentOS 4 or 5 in any wa

Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:yum?

On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 5:54 AM, Drew wrote: > Yum-Arch is, I think, a red herring. Yum-Arch, according to pbone: > > "This package only provides the old yum-arch command from yum-2.2.2 > It should be used to generate repository informations for Fedora Core < 3 > and RedHat Enterprise Linux < 4."

Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:yum?

hadi motamedi wrote: > Sorry. Can you please let me have the link to one of these CentOS > mirrors to download the yum rpm package? I have used pbone.net > to install the screen rpm for CentOS and so I don't > know any CentOS mirror to make use for this purpose. http://mirror

Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:yum?

On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 6:03 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > hadi motamedi wrote: > > Sorry. Can you please let me have the link to one of these CentOS > > mirrors to download the yum rpm package? I have used pbone.net > > to install the screen rpm for CentOS and so I don't > > know

Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:yum?

> With many thanks for your help , please let me know why I am receiving the > followings ? > [r...@mss-1 tmp]# rpm -Uvh yum-3.2.22-20.el5.centos.noarch.rpm > warning: yum-3.2.22-20.el5.centos.noarch.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: > NOKEY, key ID e8562897 > error: Failed dependencies: >pytho

Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:yum?

hadi motamedi wrote: > With many thanks for your help , please let me know why I am receiving > the followings ? > [r...@mss-1 tmp]# rpm -Uvh yum-3.2.22-20.el5.centos.noarch.rpm > warning: yum-3.2.22-20.el5.centos.noarch.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: > NOKEY, key ID e8562897 > error: Failed depen

Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:yum?

On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 06:00:18AM +, hadi motamedi wrote: > > Sorry. Can you please let me have the link to one of these CentOS mirrors to > download the yum rpm package? I have used pbone.net to install the screen > rpm for CentOS and so I don't know any CentOS mirror to make use for this >

Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:yum?

On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 6:22 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > hadi motamedi wrote: > > With many thanks for your help , please let me know why I am receiving > > the followings ? > > [r...@mss-1 tmp]# rpm -Uvh yum-3.2.22-20.el5.centos.noarch.rpm > > warning: yum-3.2.22-20.el5.centos.noarch.rpm: Header

Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:yum?

hadi motamedi wrote: > I tried for the other engaged rpm packages one-by-one . But at last , > only the following one remained as unresolved : > [r...@mss-1 tmp]# rpm -Uvh > yum-fastestmirror-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm > warning: yum-fastestmirror-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm: Header V3

Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:yum?

On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 6:56 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > hadi motamedi wrote: > > I tried for the other engaged rpm packages one-by-one . But at last , > > only the following one remained as unresolved : > > [r...@mss-1 tmp]# rpm -Uvh > > yum-fastestmirror-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm > > warni

Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:yum?

> I tried for the other engaged rpm packages one-by-one . But at last , only > the following one remained as unresolved : > [r...@mss-1 tmp]# rpm -Uvh yum-fastestmirror-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm > warning: yum-fastestmirror-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm: Header V3 DSA > signature: NOKEY, ke

Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:yum?

On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 6:59 AM, Barry Brimer wrote: > > I tried for the other engaged rpm packages one-by-one . But at last , > only > > the following one remained as unresolved : > > [r...@mss-1 tmp]# rpm -Uvh > yum-fastestmirror-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm > > warning: yum-fastestmirror-1.