Thanks for the reply
2009/12/21 Juan Carlos Díaz Fernández :
> Or maybe implementing dyndns if you can
>
This sounds very interesting and it seems GNUDIP is one such. but it
seems too dated.
it is possible for me to run a dyndns service on a static IP. but can
you provide a bit more of gory deta
Greetings,
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Jake wrote:
>
> I think it really depends on the type of monitoring you'd like to do and the
> type of tool you're trying to use now. For example, we use Nagios to monitor
> our systems. With Nagios, you could use passive checks. This is where the
> pro
Greetings,
>
> Perhaps ntop?
>
Gosh! answer for a person handling hundreds of servers and PB of
data!!! I am blessed indeed. :)
Yes I am right now trying to get my claws into it just few minutes
back I yum-med it in to my system. saw some graphs...
The key issue here is dynamic IP addresses
In
> I'm not sure what would cause that, but I'd use rsync over ssh instead of sftp
> anyway - and use the -P option to permit restarting.
If it were up to me, we'd take that route. The software the client is
using is WinSCP which does have a restart feature, however it's not
working for us. I'm wo
Hello,
2009/12/22 Rajagopal Swaminathan
> Thanks for the reply
>
> 2009/12/21 Juan Carlos Díaz Fernández >:
> > Or maybe implementing dyndns if you can
> >
>
> This sounds very interesting and it seems GNUDIP is one such. but it
> seems too dated.
>
In the past I had a dyndns mounted using bi
Sean Carolan wrote on Tue, 22 Dec 2009 03:08:53 -0600:
> The software the client is
> using is WinSCP which does have a restart feature, however it's not
> working for us.
Tell him to switch WinSCP to SCP mode.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: ht
Greetings,
> 2009/12/22 Rajagopal Swaminathan
again,
>> Thanks for the reply
>>
>
> In the past I had a dyndns mounted using bind + dhcpd. You can see an
> example here:
>
> http://www.howtoforge.com/fedora_dynamic_dns
The dhcp server is not under my control, far from it is from different ISP
> Tell him to switch WinSCP to SCP mode.
>
> Kai
Tried that, it still fails the same way. Here's the short list of
what I've tried to troubleshoot this:
Used SCP via the gui and command line
Used SFTP via the gui and command line
Ran yum update to bring all packages up to date
Tried stock CentOS
Hello,
The dhcp server is not under my control, far from it is from different ISPs
>
Uh! Sorry, I was not thinking about it.
> Also, you can use an external dyndns service like dyndns.org and ddclient
to
> update info.
Is is possibile to run on'e own dyndns service?
>
Yes, I see the tool you m
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Sean Carolan
> Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 6:13 AM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] SFTP - stalled - on large files
>
> > Tell him to switch WinSCP to SCP mode.
Greetings,
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 8:48 PM, Gabriel Rosca wrote:
> I personal use zabbix ... On all the servers ( Windows, Linux ) with dynamic
> IP I use dyndns ...
>
I just tried to configure, make install zabbix server and agent on a centos box
But I seem to miss the front end URL mentioned
Hi folks,
I have run into a confusing problem.
My initial problem is: Conga does not offer "Add a virtual machine
service". So I googled and found a RedHat advisory on that:
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1623.html
which points updates that should fix this.
I checked on my cluster, but
Sean Carolan wrote on Tue, 22 Dec 2009 05:12:52 -0600:
> Here's the short list of
> what I've tried to troubleshoot this:
which means it doesn't only fail for your client from outside but also for
you from within your network?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Inte
Sean Carolan wrote:
> At this point I don't know what else to try. I'm thinking that it's
> either a problem with VMWare, or perhaps our load balancer that is
> routing the packets back and forth. Hopefully one of the vendors will
Load balancer... is that set up to maintain connections, or will
> Just an idea or thought on it. You never said what the file size was or did
> you? My idea is that is, there not a file size limitation on transfer to
> and from the server? I thought there was? Check you vsftpd.conf out or
> what ever ftp server your running for the size limitation. Maybe s
> Load balancer... is that set up to maintain connections, or will it, like
> IBM's
> WebSeal, go to whichever server is next/least used in the middle of a
> connection?
It's set to use "least connection" but there is only one server behind
the virtual IP at the moment.
I'm reasonably sure at t
Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
>
> Alternatively, it there a possibility of installing some agent and
> getting the MAC address of one of the server behind the router. First
> a diagram
>
> central location (main monitoring -- Centos box0+monitoring server)
> |
> |
> (Internet)
> |
> |
> +--link1ad
Hi All,
Hi All,
MySQL 5.0.77 on CentOS 5.4
MySQL is running, my Wordpress stuff is working, but I cannot connect to the
server from my house. This server is in my house, however, but on a public IP,
behind a firewall, etc.
I checked my hardware firewall (a dedicated UnTangle system) and that
UPDATE mysql.user SET Password=PASSWORD('mypassword') WHERE User='root';
GRANT ALL ON mysql.* to 'root'@'127.0.0.1';
GRANT ALL ON mysql.* TO 'root'@'localhost';
GRANT ALL ON mysql.* TO 'root'@'my home IP';
FLUSH PRIVILEGES;
commit;
and I still cannot connect. But the database starts and this cod
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 9:34 AM, ML wrote:
[snip]
>
> I checked my hardware firewall (a dedicated UnTangle system) and that is
> successfully allowing the passage. I know this because the firewall shows:
>
> 2009-12-22 6:29:41 am passed :35606 :3306
>
> I checked the firewall (system-config-secur
ML wrote:
>
> MySQL 5.0.77 on CentOS 5.4
>
> MySQL is running, my Wordpress stuff is working, but I cannot connect to the
> server from my house. This server is in my house, however, but on a public
> IP, behind a firewall, etc.
>
> I checked my hardware firewall (a dedicated UnTangle system) a
Is the maximum permitted value for --hitcount documented anywhere?
I reliably get a iptables-restore error when I specify a hitcount
value greater than 20 but I cannot find any mention of there being a
maximum value.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrne
Hi Les,
>> MySQL is running, my Wordpress stuff is working, but I cannot connect to the
>> server from my house. This server is in my house, however, but on a public
>> IP, behind a firewall, etc.
>>
>> I checked my hardware firewall (a dedicated UnTangle system) and that is
>> successfully al
>> I checked the firewall (system-config-securitylevel-tui) on the server and
>> that has 3306:tcp allowed.
Sure:
> netstat -tlnw
[r...@indie ~]# netstat -tnlw
Active Internet connections (only servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address
State
t
Hi,
James B. Byrne schrieb:
> Is the maximum permitted value for --hitcount documented anywhere?
> I reliably get a iptables-restore error when I specify a hitcount
> value greater than 20
That is a new "phenomenon" I also ran into. You now have to adjust
memory values.
I have added to my /etc
Rick,
> have you tried to telnet to port 3306 of the machine where the mysql
> server is located, from your home machine? if so, what do you get?
> If you're successful you'll get a connect bit that includes a string
> that will show your mysql server version number. if you don't have
> mysql acce
ML wrote:
> Hi Les,
>
>>> MySQL is running, my Wordpress stuff is working, but I cannot connect to
>>> the server from my house. This server is in my house, however, but on a
>>> public IP, behind a firewall, etc.
>>>
>>> I checked my hardware firewall (a dedicated UnTangle system) and that is
ML wrote:
> Rick,
>
>> have you tried to telnet to port 3306 of the machine where the mysql
>> server is located, from your home machine? if so, what do you get?
>> If you're successful you'll get a connect bit that includes a string
>> that will show your mysql server version number. if you don't
On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 02:36 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> Any opinions appreciated!
> jlc
Take a look at zenoss too, I am in the process of deploying it as a
replacement for a rather elderly and under-resourced Nagios server
Liking it a lot so far
http://www.zenoss.com/
there's good help on
MySQL is *not* listening on TCP 3306 since *long* unless you tell it to in
the my.cf. It uses a local Unix socket by default.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS maili
Brendan Minish wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 02:36 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>
>> Any opinions appreciated!
>> jlc
>
> Take a look at zenoss too, I am in the process of deploying it as a
> replacement for a rather elderly and under-resourced Nagios server
> Liking it a lot so far
> http:/
Hi,
I followed the "Optimizing CentOS for gigabit firewall" posting and as
some posters wrote pf is soo sooo sso mutch faster, I was thinking
to give it a try. But I'm not familier to BSD so I was looking for some
tools and found "pfsense"
http://www.pfsense.org/
"pfSense is a free, open
In-Reply-To: <4b30f618.6060...@kinzesberg.de>
On: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:38:48 +0100, "Dirk H. Schulz"
wrote:
> That is a new "phenomenon" I also ran into. You now have to
> adjust memory values.
>
> I have added to my /etc/modprobe.conf
> "options ipt_recent ipt_pkt_list_tot=75"
> Now I can use hi
Hi List;
I didn't found the installation from Centos5.4 LiveCD. Does not have any
installation script inside this distribution? or How can I start to install
LiveCd to HDD?
Thanks a lot...
Sincerely,
Tolun ARDAHANLI
Computer Engineer
web: www.ardahanli.net
E-mail: to...@ardahanli.net
Icq:326600
- "Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I followed the "Optimizing CentOS for gigabit firewall" posting and as
>
> some posters wrote pf is soo sooo sso mutch faster, I was thinking
>
> to give it a try. But I'm not familier to BSD so I was looking for
> some
> tools and fo
On 12/22/2009 07:22 PM, Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I followed the "Optimizing CentOS for gigabit firewall" posting and as
> some posters wrote pf is soo sooo sso mutch faster, I was thinking
> to give it a try. But I'm not familier to BSD so I was looking for some
> too
Brendan Minish wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 02:36 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>
> Take a look at zenoss too, I am in the process of deploying it as a
> replacement for a rather elderly and under-resourced Nagios server
> Liking it a lot so far
> http://www.zenoss.com/
> there's good help
Hi Guys,
OK, I figured out the problem, It would seem that Comcast spelling my DNS entry
wrong would do it!
I have done this a zillion times, I was totally stumped as to what I would be
missing this time.
Thanks everyone for their help.
-Jason
- Original Message -
From: "Kai Schaet
Hi,
Does mount point specification while partitioning (order in which I
specify /, /boot, swap etc..) affect performance? I am not sure about
the syntax, but I guess one can also specify address/block range while
partitioning. Does it affect IO performance? Probably a stupid
question, but just cur
Carlos Santana wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does mount point specification while partitioning (order in which I
> specify /, /boot, swap etc..) affect performance? I am not sure about
> the syntax, but I guess one can also specify address/block range while
> partitioning. Does it affect IO performance? Probab
We had a similar problem copying files between servers on two of our
campuses via SCP. After a while the connection just stalled out and
hung. The problem turned out to be SCP and SFTP interacting a bug in
the SACK (Selective Acknowledgment) algorithm used in Linux. We turned
it off on the t
Hi,
to the use of connlimit, I have found
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-June/059656.html
Is there something new with centos 5.3 or 5.4?
Helmut
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman
On Dec 22, 2009, at 6:13 PM, Robert Nichols
wrote:
> Carlos Santana wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Does mount point specification while partitioning (order in which I
>> specify /, /boot, swap etc..) affect performance? I am not sure about
>> the syntax, but I guess one can also specify address/block rang
Ross Walker wrote:
> Also, for random IO the opposite is true, the rotational latency is
> significantly smaller on the inner tracks than the outer tracks, so
> random OPs perform better there.
>
um, most all hard disks are CAV, so the rotational latency measured in
milliseconds is constan
44 matches
Mail list logo
