[CentOS] Old hd, new machine

What should I do to make an existing CentOS (5.4) disc boot up on a new computer? I just made on CentOS 5.3 installation on that machine, so I know the hardware is compatible. Would it be enough to boot with a DVD in rescue mode, or boot with another hd, and install grub? - Jussi -- Jussi H

Re: [CentOS] Old hd, new machine

> Would it be enough to boot with a DVD in rescue mode, or boot with > another hd, and install grub? Yes. -- Eero ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Old hd, new machine

Hi, > What should I do to make an existing CentOS (5.4) disc boot up on a new > computer? > > I just made on CentOS 5.3 installation on that machine, so I know the > hardware is compatible. > > Would it be enough to boot with a DVD in rescue mode, or boot with > another hd, and install grub? You m

Re: [CentOS] Old hd, new machine

2009/12/16 Michel van Deventer > Hi, > > > What should I do to make an existing CentOS (5.4) disc boot up on a new > > computer? > > > you may be required to rebuild initrd -- Linux counter #213090 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lis

Re: [CentOS] Old hd, new machine

On 16.12.2009 10:18, Michel van Deventer wrote: > If it doesn't boot (normally because the disk numbering is different) you > can use a rescue DVD and grub to fix things (probably grub-install and > maybe /etc/fstab for the /boot filesystem). > Is the old hd using LVM and/or labels for filesystems

Re: [CentOS] Old hd, new machine

I ran into trouble and decided to go another way. The rescue CD did not find CentOS installations, most probably because the ext3 partitions were hidden behind a md layer. I could have stopped the raid devices first, then I would probably have been able to use the rescue CD and rebuild initrd &

Re: [CentOS] Old hd, new machine

Quoting Jussi Hirvi : > I ran into trouble and decided to go another way. > > The rescue CD did not find CentOS installations, most probably because > the ext3 partitions were hidden behind a md layer. > Well, You can use rescue image from www.sysresccd.org -- Eero _

Re: [CentOS] Old hd, new machine

>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of Jussi Hirvi >Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 9:07 AM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: [CentOS] Old hd, new machine > >What should I do to make an existing CentOS (5.4) disc boot up on

Re: [CentOS] Old hd, new machine

>> What should I do to make an existing CentOS (5.4) disc boot up on a new >> computer? >> [...] >> Would it be enough to boot with a DVD in rescue mode, or boot with >> another hd, and install grub? > On 16.12.2009 12:16, Sorin Srbu wrote: > For me it has worked to just install the old hd in the

Re: [CentOS] bnx2 losing connectivity

nate wrote: > James Pearson wrote: > >>It looks like this might be the same issue as: >> >> >> >>Which seems to suggest disabling MSI - i.e. load the bnx2 module with >>"disable_msi=1" > > Wow! that looks interesting, will try it! thanks! Also,

Re: [CentOS] Old hd, new machine

>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of Jussi Hirvi >Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 11:39 AM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Old hd, new machine > >On 16.12.2009 12:16, Sorin Srbu wrote: >> For me it has worke

Re: [CentOS] Old hd, new machine

Jussi Hirvi wrote: >>> What should I do to make an existing CentOS (5.4) disc boot up on a new >>> computer? >>> [...] >>> Would it be enough to boot with a DVD in rescue mode, or boot with >>> another hd, and install grub? > On 16.12.2009 12:16, Sorin Srbu wrote: >> For me it has worked to just in

Re: [CentOS] Using (was: Announcing) Gluster Storage Platform

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Christopher Chan wrote: > A cluster filesystem OK, but you've just given me a circular definition. > When you do not need/want a cluster file system and again ... -- “Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV” - Michael Pollan, author o

Re: [CentOS] Using (was: Announcing) Gluster Storage Platform

Alan McKay wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Christopher Chan > wrote: >> A cluster filesystem > > OK, but you've just given me a circular definition. > >> When you do not need/want a cluster file system > > and again ... > Okay, a cluster/distributed file system that does not have it

Re: [CentOS] LVM, usb drives, Active Directory

On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Scott Ehrlich wrote: > I have a client with a handful of USB drives connected to a CentOS > box. I am charged with binding the USB drives together into a single > LVM for a cheap storage data pool (10 x 1 TB usb drives = 10 TB cheap > storage in a single mount point). I tri

[CentOS] Canon Printer Woe

Hi, Has anyone had any success using a Canon LBP5300 with CentOS or any other RH type os for that matter, using the rpms and intructions downloaded from the Canon website? I have it working on XP and OS X both via USB and network but am having no success with either on CentOS 5.4 . Print jobs s

Re: [CentOS] Canon Printer Woe

On 12/16/09 4:12 PM, Colin Coles wrote: > Hi, > Has anyone had any success using a Canon LBP5300 with CentOS or any other RH > type os for that matter, using the rpms and intructions downloaded from the > Canon website? I have it working on XP and OS X both via USB and network but > am having no

Re: [CentOS] LVM, usb drives, Active Directory

Steve Thompson wrote: > On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Scott Ehrlich wrote: > >> I have a client with a handful of USB drives connected to a CentOS >> box. I am charged with binding the USB drives together into a single >> LVM for a cheap storage data pool (10 x 1 TB usb drives = 10 TB cheap >> storage in

Re: [CentOS] Canon Printer Woe

On Wednesday 16 December 2009 14:19, Eero Volotinen wrote: > By looking page: http://www.openprinting.org/printer_list.cgi?make=Canon > looks like your printer is unsupported? Thanks Eero, but Canon provide a cups driver here: http://software.canon-europe.com/products/0010407.asp However I am havi

Re: [CentOS] LVM, usb drives, Active Directory

On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote: > Steve Thompson wrote: >> On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Scott Ehrlich wrote: >> >>> I have a client with a handful of USB drives connected to a CentOS >>> box. I am charged with binding the USB drives together into a single >>> LVM for a cheap stor

Re: [CentOS] LVM, usb drives, Active Directory

Scott Ehrlich wrote: > I have a client with a handful of USB drives connected to a CentOS > box. I am charged with binding the USB drives together into a single > LVM for a cheap storage data pool (10 x 1 TB usb drives = 10 TB cheap > storage in a single mount point). How about eSATA? Surely an

Re: [CentOS] LVM, usb drives, Active Directory

Steve Thompson wrote: > On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote: > >> Steve Thompson wrote: >>> On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Scott Ehrlich wrote: >>> I have a client with a handful of USB drives connected to a CentOS box. I am charged with binding the USB drives together into a

Re: [CentOS] LVM, usb drives, Active Directory

On 12/16/2009 12:10 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote: > On 12/15/09 2:48 PM, Scott Ehrlich wrote: > >> I have a client with a handful of USB drives connected to a CentOS >> box. I am charged with binding the USB drives together into a single >> LVM for a cheap storage data pool (10 x 1 TB usb drives

Re: [CentOS] LVM, usb drives, Active Directory

On 12/16/2009 9:34 AM, Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote: > Steve Thompson wrote: > >> On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote: >> >> >>> Steve Thompson wrote: >>> On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Scott Ehrlich wrote: > I have a client with a handfu

Re: [CentOS] LVM, usb drives, Active Directory

On 12/15/2009 7:48 AM, Scott Ehrlich wrote: > I have a client with a handful of USB drives connected to a CentOS > box. I am charged with binding the USB drives together into a single > LVM for a cheap storage data pool (10 x 1 TB usb drives = 10 TB cheap > storage in a single mount point). > (sn

Re: [CentOS] LVM, usb drives, Active Directory

On 12/16/2009 9:41 AM, William Warren wrote: > On 12/16/2009 12:10 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote: > Still going to need 10TB of backups. And i can guarantee you the > chances of having a URE during rebuild are almost certain with this > setup so a backup is going to be crucial. Sounds like a nightmare

Re: [CentOS] Subversion server: v1.4 (centos) vs. v1.6 (rpmforge)

On 12/15/2009 4:22 AM, Mathieu Baudier wrote: > Hi, > > I'm planning to upgrade an old public/internal development > infrastructure and will use CentOS 5.4 x86_64 as basis. > > The Subversion version in CentOS 5.4 is v1.4, whereas RPMForge provides v1.6. > I use the RPMForge version as my client on

Re: [CentOS] Old hd, new machine

At Wed, 16 Dec 2009 07:33:38 -0600 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Jussi Hirvi wrote: > >>> What should I do to make an existing CentOS (5.4) disc boot up on a new > >>> computer? > >>> [...] > >>> Would it be enough to boot with a DVD in rescue mode, or boot with > >>> another hd, and install g

[CentOS] sshfs & CentOS 5

Has anyone installed sshfs on CentOS 5 and used it sucessfully? -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers CEO, SoftDux Hosting Web: http://www.SoftDux.com Office: 087 805 9573 Cell: 082 554 7532 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailma

Re: [CentOS] sshfs & CentOS 5

> Has anyone installed sshfs on CentOS 5 and used it sucessfully? Yup, running on 5.4 x86_64, connecting to i386 and FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE/i386. No problems. Timo ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] sshfs & CentOS 5

On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:43 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Has anyone installed sshfs on CentOS 5 and used it sucessfully? Yes, works nicely: http://blog.toracat.org/2008/09/hello-world/ Please note that the blog is a bit old. In step (2), dkms-fuse is no longer needed with the current CentOS kernel

Re: [CentOS] Old hd, new machine

Robert Heller wrote: > At Wed, 16 Dec 2009 07:33:38 -0600 CentOS mailing list > wrote: > >> Jussi Hirvi wrote: > What should I do to make an existing CentOS (5.4) disc boot up on a new > computer? > [...] > Would it be enough to boot with a DVD in rescue mode, or boot with >

Re: [CentOS] Using (was: Announcing) Gluster Storage Platform

Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote: > Alan McKay wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Christopher Chan >> wrote: >>> A cluster filesystem >> OK, but you've just given me a circular definition. >> >>> When you do not need/want a cluster file system >> and again ... >> > > Okay, a cluster/dist

Re: [CentOS] Old hd, new machine

At Wed, 16 Dec 2009 09:55:49 -0600 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Robert Heller wrote: > > At Wed, 16 Dec 2009 07:33:38 -0600 CentOS mailing list > > wrote: > > > >> Jussi Hirvi wrote: > > What should I do to make an existing CentOS (5.4) disc boot up on a new > > computer? > > [

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 58, Issue 3

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ..

Re: [CentOS] sshfs & CentOS 5

On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:43 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: >> Has anyone installed sshfs on CentOS 5 and used it sucessfully? > > Yes, works nicely: > > http://blog.toracat.org/2008/09/hello-world/ > > Please note that the blog is a bit old. In step (

Re: [CentOS] Subversion server: v1.4 (centos) vs. v1.6 (rpmforge)

Thanks for your answers! > Nope.  Works fine.  Between the nightly hot-copy backups and the > internal design of the SVN FSFS storage engine, I'm not terribly worried. I tend to use svnadmin dump for my daily backups. (some time ago, I ran into compatibility issues with hotcopy when trying to res

Re: [CentOS] Subversion server: v1.4 (centos) vs. v1.6 (rpmforge)

> Thanks for your answers! > >> Nope.  Works fine.  Between the nightly hot-copy backups and the >> internal design of the SVN FSFS storage engine, I'm not terribly >> worried. > > I tend to use svnadmin dump for my daily backups. > (some time ago, I ran into compatibility issues with hotcopy when

Re: [CentOS] LVM, usb drives, Active Directory

On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 09:57:38AM -0500, Thomas Harold wrote: > > Yah, RAID-6 at a minimum, I wouldn't depend on RAID-5, even with a > hot-spare. So to get 10TB, you'd need 13 drives (10 data, 2 parity, 1 > hot-spare). 2TB drives are available for ~$300-$400 each. Eight 2TB disks would provi

[CentOS] Problems with nss_ldap - where to start?

I've been unsuccessfully trying to get nss_ldap to work. I've chased down hundreds of google searches over the last 3 days, and I can't seem to get a centos system to authenticate against ldap. Every daemon on the system is running into the same problem: nss_ldap: could not search LDAP server -

Re: [CentOS] Problems with nss_ldap - where to start?

On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 11:24 -0800, Peter Serwe wrote: > I've been unsuccessfully trying to get nss_ldap to work. I've chased > down hundreds of google searches over the last 3 days, and I can't > seem to get a centos system to authenticate against ldap. > > Every daemon on the system is running i

Re: [CentOS] Problems with nss_ldap - where to start?

> I've been unsuccessfully trying to get nss_ldap to work. I've chased down > hundreds of google searches over the last 3 days, and I can't seem to get > a > centos system to authenticate against ldap. > > Every daemon on the system is running into the same problem: > > nss_ldap: could not search

[CentOS] OT: Google Earth - How to uninstall, before installing newest version?

Desktop is CentOS 5.4 (32 bit). I have Google Earth version 4.2.205.5730 (13NOV2007 build date) installed. I have checkinstall (spelling?) installed, but am not sure if that was installed before or after Google Earth was installed. I have the Google Repository installed, but apparently Google Eart

Re: [CentOS] Problems with nss_ldap - where to start?

On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Craig White wrote: > forget 'telnet' > > Can you do an ldapsearch? > > ldapsearch -x -h localhost -D '$YOUR_ROOT_BIND_DN' -W '(ou=*)' > > Craig > > Sure I can, this is the output, slightly sanitized. # extended LDIF # # LDAPv3 # base <> with scope subtree # filt

Re: [CentOS] OT: Google Earth - How to uninstall, before installing newest version?

The easiest way to do this is to navigate to /opt/google-earth then execute the following command from the command line *./uninstall * [r...@commandcenter google-earth]# ./uninstall Product: Google Earth Installed in /opt/google-earth Uninstalling desktop menu entries... Uninstalling mimetypes...

Re: [CentOS] Problems with nss_ldap - where to start?

Peter Serwe wrote: > I've been unsuccessfully trying to get nss_ldap to work. I've chased down > hundreds of google searches over the last 3 days, and I can't seem to get a > centos system to authenticate against ldap. > > Every daemon on the system is running into the same problem: Disable all S

Re: [CentOS] Problems with nss_ldap - where to start?

I was going to say no TLS on either side. Specifically because I wanted to make sure that I was doing it with basic auth prior to using tls, but I found TLS lines in the /etc/ldap.conf. I commented those out, and guess what, no more nss_ldap messages in /var/log/messages.. Now, I'm somewhat gues

[CentOS] Silly question x64 vs i386

I have a really silly question... but just want to ask... I have one box on my home network that is x86_64 capable... My other boxes are all i386. As this x86_64 machine can, at most, house 4 GB of RAM (currently only has 1 GB) - is there any advantage to my running x86_64 on that machine ins

Re: [CentOS] Silly question x64 vs i386

Scot P. Floess wrote: > I have a really silly question... but just want to ask... > > I have one box on my home network that is x86_64 capable... My other > boxes are all i386. As this x86_64 machine can, at most, house 4 GB of > RAM (currently only has 1 GB) - is there any advantage to my runn

Re: [CentOS] Silly question x64 vs i386

Scot P. Floess wrote: > I have a really silly question... but just want to ask... > > I have one box on my home network that is x86_64 capable... My other > boxes are all i386. As this x86_64 machine can, at most, house 4 GB of > RAM (currently only has 1 GB) - is there any advantage to my runnin

Re: [CentOS] Silly question x64 vs i386

Its a Dell Pentium D - basically x86_64 but does not support hardware virtualization. Its a Dell Poweredge SC430 if that helps??? On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, John R Pierce wrote: > Scot P. Floess wrote: >> I have a really silly question... but just want to ask... >> >> I have one box on my home netwo

[CentOS] Desktop/Server 32/64 (was Re: Silly question x64 vs i386)

> I have one box on my home network that is x86_64 capable... My other > boxes are all i386. As this x86_64 machine can, at most, house 4 GB of > RAM (currently only has 1 GB) - is there any advantage to my running > x86_64 on that machine instead of i386... Long story as to why I am > asking -

Re: [CentOS] Silly question x64 vs i386

so to be honest...what really spawned this... I put all my VMs on an NFS share. I've got an F11 VM I run...but on my x86_64 host - starting the F11 VM (its an i386 VM) fails to start. If I run F11 x86_64 it works fine. I' really just trying to simplify things and standards on one type of V

Re: [CentOS] Problems with nss_ldap - where to start?

Found an ldif user recipe for CentOS5.2.. Added the user "tactest" with the password "tactest". Dec 16 12:05:30 ldap sshd[11705]pam_unix(sshd:auth): check pass; user unknown Dec 16 12:05:30 ldap sshd[11705]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=l

Re: [CentOS] Problems with nss_ldap - where to start?

and, of course: Dec 16 12:05:31 ldap sshd[11705]: Failed password for invalid user tactest from 127.0.0.1 port 52949 ssh2 Peter On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Peter Serwe wrote: > Found an ldif user recipe for CentOS5.2.. > > Added the user "tactest" with the password "tactest". > > Dec 16

Re: [CentOS] Desktop/Server 32/64 (was Re: Silly question x64 vs i386)

All my machines - including my desktop - are 32 bit. This lone x86_64 machine is a headless server (well I plug in a monitor from time to time) - but usually its headless (as are all my machines but my desktop)... On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, John Thomas wrote: >> I have one box on my home network t

Re: [CentOS] Silly question x64 vs i386

> I have a really silly question... but just want to ask... > > I have one box on my home network that is x86_64 capable... My other > boxes are all i386. As this x86_64 machine can, at most, house 4 GB of > RAM (currently only has 1 GB) - is there any advantage to my running > x86_64 on that mac

Re: [CentOS] Silly question x64 vs i386

Scot P. Floess wrote: > Its a Dell Pentium D - basically x86_64 but does not support hardware > virtualization. Its a Dell Poweredge SC430 if that helps??? > I believe those were a pair of the P4 "Prescott" chips in a single package, and pretty much what I said, 64bit works, but there's litt

Re: [CentOS] Silly question x64 vs i386

Ah good point... Wasn't thinking in those terms... Well clearly wasn't thinking at all ;) On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> I have a really silly question... but just want to ask... >> >> I have one box on my home network that is x86_64 capable... My other >> boxes are all i386

Re: [CentOS] Silly question x64 vs i386

Hey thats an interesting bit of trivia - thanks :) Large memory - bah - this silly machine maxes out at 4 GB... On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, John R Pierce wrote: > Scot P. Floess wrote: >> Its a Dell Pentium D - basically x86_64 but does not support hardware >> virtualization. Its a Dell Poweredge SC

Re: [CentOS] Problems with nss_ldap - where to start?

On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 12:07 -0800, Peter Serwe wrote: > Found an ldif user recipe for CentOS5.2.. > > Added the user "tactest" with the password "tactest". > > Dec 16 12:05:30 ldap sshd[11705]pam_unix(sshd:auth): check pass; user > unknown > Dec 16 12:05:30 ldap sshd[11705]: pam_unix(sshd:auth):

Re: [CentOS] Silly question x64 vs i386

At Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:53:01 -0500 (EST) CentOS mailing list wrote: > > I have a really silly question... but just want to ask... > > I have one box on my home network that is x86_64 capable... My other > boxes are all i386. As this x86_64 machine can, at most, house 4 GB of > RAM (current

Re: [CentOS] Problems with nss_ldap - where to start?

> > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:33 AM, wrote: > >> >> First question: do you have tls enabled on the client, and not the server, >> or vice versa? >> >> Second question: on the server, can you do a search? >> >> Handy tool: webmin has a whole ldap section, and can give you a *lot* of >> clues as to

Re: [CentOS] Problems with nss_ldap - where to start?

I'm not really seeing what the response is, running tcpdump -vvv -i lo, output of a whole transaction is: tcpdump: listening on lo, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes 12:33:48.197928 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 61456, offset 0, flags [DF], proto: TCP (6), length: 60) ldap.48322 > ldap

Re: [CentOS] Silly question x64 vs i386

On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 14:53 -0500, Scot P. Floess wrote: > is there any advantage to my running > x86_64 on that machine instead of i386... A better question might be, do you have any particular reason not to run x86_64 on that machine? All of my machines and the machines that I look after are

Re: [CentOS] Problems with nss_ldap - where to start?

I think not as well. The tactest user has been blown back out. I can re-add it from ldif again. [r...@ldap home]# getent passwd | grep example [r...@ldap home]# [r...@ldap home]# cat /etc/nsswitch.conf | grep -v \# passwd: files ldap shadow: files ldap group: files ldap hosts:

Re: [CentOS] Desktop/Server 32/64 (was Re: Silly question x64 vs i386)

> > All my machines - including my desktop - are 32 bit. This lone > x86_64 machine is a headless server (well I plug in a monitor from time to > time) - but > usually its headless (as are all my machines but my desktop)... > All of our servers have been 64bit since '04 or '05? Whenever the firs

Re: [CentOS] {Disarmed} Re: Problems with nss_ldap - where to start?

On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 12:39 -0800, Peter Serwe wrote: > I think not as well. The tactest user has been blown back out. I can > re-add it from ldif again. > > [r...@ldap home]# getent passwd | grep example > [r...@ldap home]# > > [r...@ldap home]# cat /etc/nsswitch.conf | grep -v \# > > > pas

Re: [CentOS] {Disarmed} Re: Problems with nss_ldap - where to start?

On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 12:39 -0800, Peter Serwe wrote: > I think not as well. The tactest user has been blown back out. I can > re-add it from ldif again. > and by the way... don't waste time trying to authenticate users/groups that don't exist. If they don't show up when you give commands

Re: [CentOS] Silly question x64 vs i386

On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Scot P. Floess wrote: > I have a really silly question... but just want to ask... > > I have one box on my home network that is x86_64 capable...  My other > boxes are all i386.  As this x86_64 machine can, at most, house 4 GB of > RAM (currently only has 1 GB) -

Re: [CentOS] {Disarmed} Re: Problems with nss_ldap - where to start?

On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 13:44 -0700, Craig White wrote: > On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 12:39 -0800, Peter Serwe wrote: > > I think not as well. The tactest user has been blown back out. I can > > re-add it from ldif again. > > > > [r...@ldap home]# getent passwd | grep example > > [r...@ldap home]# > >

Re: [CentOS] {Disarmed} Re: Problems with nss_ldap - where to start?

getent still fails, now I'm getting can't connect messages again. Dec 16 12:59:58 ldap nscd: nss_ldap: could not search LDAP server - Server is unavailable Also, the People container was removed and not re-added when I re-created the tree with webmin, hence, I modified the lines in /etc/ldap.conf

Re: [CentOS] {Disarmed} Re: Problems with nss_ldap - where to start?

I just had those users in there because I didn't want to attempt to hit ldap for known local users. Peter On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Craig White wrote: > On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 13:44 -0700, Craig White wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 12:39 -0800, Peter Serwe wrote: > > > I think not as we

Re: [CentOS] {Disarmed} Re: Problems with nss_ldap - where to start?

On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Craig White wrote: > allow bind_anon_dn > > access to attrs=userPassword,sambaNTPassword,sambaLMPassword >by self write >by anonymous auth >by * none > > access to dn.regex="^uid=([^,]+)ou=People,dc=azapple,dc=com$$" >by s

Re: [CentOS] C5 updates?

On 12/14/2009 11:12 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > nope - updates will only start flowing once the issues are resolved - > given the way things are looking right now, I'd expect that to be > sometime tomorrow evening. > all pending c5 updates are now syncing to the mirrors, wait for the announcement

Re: [CentOS] OT: Google Earth - How to uninstall, before installing newest version?

Lanny Marcus wrote: > Desktop is CentOS 5.4 (32 bit). I have Google Earth version > 4.2.205.5730 (13NOV2007 build date) installed. I have checkinstall > (spelling?) installed, but am not sure if that was installed before or > after Google Earth was installed. I have the Google Repository > insta

Re: [CentOS] {Disarmed} Re: Problems with nss_ldap - where to start?

On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 13:02 -0800, Peter Serwe wrote: > getent still fails, now I'm getting can't connect messages again. > > Dec 16 12:59:58 ldap nscd: nss_ldap: could not search LDAP server - > Server is unavailable > > Also, the People container was removed and not re-added when I > re-created

Re: [CentOS] C5 updates?

Do any of them happen to include a fix for ldap? ;) Peter On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 12/14/2009 11:12 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > > nope - updates will only start flowing once the issues are resolved - > > given the way things are looking right now, I'd expect t

Re: [CentOS] {Disarmed} Re: Problems with nss_ldap - where to start?

Which part did I discard that was relevant? I don't have a People container at the moment. There was something that looked like ?one on the end of the string, I couldn't make sense of it. Which part are you offended by the discard of? Peter On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Craig White wrote:

Re: [CentOS] {Disarmed} Re: Problems with nss_ldap - where to start?

OMG. My bad. I thought ?one was an artifact of your copy of MailScanner. I added it and logged in. The People container is not present and I didn't put that back in. I can now log in as "exam...@$host". Peter On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Peter Serwe wrote: > Which part did I discard th

Re: [CentOS] {Disarmed} Re: Problems with nss_ldap - where to start?

And since I forgot. Thanks! Silly question, is any of this documented anywhere? Peter On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Peter Serwe wrote: > OMG. > > My bad. > > I thought ?one was an artifact of your copy of MailScanner. > > I added it and logged in. > > The People container is not present an

Re: [CentOS] {Disarmed} Re: Problems with nss_ldap - where to start?

On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 13:38 -0800, Peter Serwe wrote: > Which part did I discard that was relevant? > > I don't have a People container at the moment. > > There was something that looked like ?one on the end of the string, I > couldn't make sense of it. > > Which part are you offended by the dis

Re: [CentOS] Problems with nss_ldap - where to start?

You wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:33 AM, wrote: >> >>> First question: do you have tls enabled on the client, and not the >>> server, or vice versa? >>> >>> Second question: on the server, can you do a search? >>> >>> Handy tool: webmin has a whole ldap section, and can give you a *lot* >>>

Re: [CentOS] Silly question x64 vs i386

m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Longer answer: every single move, down at the machine/assembly level, can > move twice as many bits as on a 32-bit system. That will show up as a very > serious speed increase in your software. > actually, the pentiums have had a 64bit physical memory bus since the fi

Re: [CentOS] Silly question x64 vs i386

On 16/12/09 19:53, Scot P. Floess wrote: > I have a really silly question... but just want to ask... > > I have one box on my home network that is x86_64 capable... My other > boxes are all i386. As this x86_64 machine can, at most, house 4 GB of > RAM (currently only has 1 GB) - is there any adv

Re: [CentOS] OT: Google Earth - How to uninstall, before installing newest version?

On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 2:44 PM, earl ramirez wrote: > The easiest way to do this is to navigate to /opt/google-earth > then execute the following command from the command line > > ./uninstall > > > [r...@commandcenter google-earth]# ./uninstall > Product: Google Earth > Installed in /opt/google-e

Re: [CentOS] OT: Google Earth - How to uninstall, before installing newest version?

On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Robert wrote: > > > Lanny Marcus wrote: >> Desktop is CentOS 5.4 (32 bit).  I have Google Earth version >> 4.2.205.5730 (13NOV2007 build date) installed. I have checkinstall >> (spelling?) installed, but am not sure if that was installed before or >> after Google E

Re: [CentOS] Problems with nss_ldap - where to start?

I am largely, vehemently against webmin or any other gui tools for system administration, including the X11 tools.. And, to be honest, it pisses me off that virt-install is broken, but virt-manager can create a new VM for me just fine, even though it hangs on granular package selection.. gui tool

Re: [CentOS] mod_security

On 12/15/2009 09:03 PM Thomas Dukes wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: centos-boun...@centos.org >> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jim Perrin >> Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 11:13 PM >> To: CentOS mailing list >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] mod_security >> >> On Mon

Re: [CentOS] OT: Google Earth - How to uninstall, before installing newest version?

On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Robert wrote: > Lanny Marcus wrote: >> Desktop is CentOS 5.4 (32 bit).  I have Google Earth version >> 4.2.205.5730 (13NOV2007 build date) installed. I have checkinstall > Lanny, if you don't have an /opt/google-earth/uninstall, welcome to the > club. > There seems

Re: [CentOS] Problems with nss_ldap - where to start?

> I am largely, vehemently against webmin or any other gui tools for system > administration, including the X11 tools.. > I'm not vehemently, but I do almost all of my sysadmin work in shell, also. > And webmin is a big hairy security hole. > > It was useful for a moment though. Yes - it was *rea

Re: [CentOS] {Disarmed} Re: Problems with nss_ldap - where to start?

Right, I was actually trying the things suggested by multiple people at the same time. nss_ldap's connection to ldap was the primary issue. The other stuff was merely fluff. Believe it or not, I actually have that book. I just looked on page 112 where Carter mentions the one level directory sea

Re: [CentOS] Red Hat commercial support for CentOS/Fedora

On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Rogelio wrote: > Someone told me that if you have a CentOS or Fedora server, you can pay a > Red Hat yearly fee and get them to support it (because the environments are > so similar). > > Can anyone here substantiate this claim? No support from Red Hat, as Robert

Re: [CentOS] Red Hat commercial support for CentOS/Fedora

On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Ron Blizzard wrote: > On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Rogelio wrote: >> Someone told me that if you have a CentOS or Fedora server, you can pay a >> Red Hat yearly fee and get them to support it (because the environments are >> so similar). >> >> Can anyone here substantiate

[CentOS] Help With Glade and C5 64-bit?

I have a user with C5.4 64-bit, fully updated, performed a yum install glade, it claimed to have installed everything, but we cannot get it to run. Neither whereis nor locate revleal an executable. We obtained the latest glade source from the project's web site, attempted to configure it, until i

Re: [CentOS] Red Hat commercial support for CentOS/Fedora

Connie Sieh wrote: > On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Ron Blizzard wrote: > >> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Rogelio wrote: >>> Someone told me that if you have a CentOS or Fedora server, you can pay a >>> Red Hat yearly fee and get them to support it (because the environments are >>> so similar). >>> >>>

Re: [CentOS] Red Hat commercial support for CentOS/Fedora

On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Connie Sieh wrote: > On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Ron Blizzard wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Rogelio wrote: >>> Someone told me that if you have a CentOS or Fedora server, you can pay a >>> Red Hat yearly fee and get them to support it (because the environmen

[CentOS] Image conversion with ImageMagick doesn't work on CentOS, but it works fine on Debian Lenny.

I recently came across the need to convert jpg images with IM, did a standard install of "yum -y install ImageMagick" and found that images converted with CentOS's base port of IM would actually corrupt the images, yet using the same (albiet different version, different distro) software didn't corr

Re: [CentOS] Help With Glade and C5 64-bit?

Scott Ehrlich wrote: > I have a user with C5.4 64-bit, fully updated, performed a yum install > glade, it claimed to have installed everything, but we cannot get it > to run. Neither whereis nor locate revleal an executable. > > We obtained the latest glade source from the project's web site, > at

Re: [CentOS] Silly question x64 vs i386

On Wednesday 16 December 2009 21:52:05 Jake Shipton wrote: > On 16/12/09 19:53, Scot P. Floess wrote: > > I have one box on my home network that is x86_64 capable... > > Personally, if you had asked this 3 years ago, I'd have said "Go i686" > due to compatibility. > But now-a-days with up-to-date

  1   2   >