2009/12/10 MHR
> I found out today that Google Chrome is now available for Linux.
> However, and this is a big but:
>
> $ sudo rpm -ivh google-chrome-beta_current_x86_64.rpm
> Password:
> warning: google-chrome-beta_current_x86_64.rpm: Header V3 DSA
> signature: NOKEY, key ID 7fac5991
> error: Fa
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Alvaro Schneider Guevara
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 1:40 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] Linux router with CentOS
Hello everybody.
I'm wondering here if is it possible to setup a CentOS machine a
I noticed that although I'd fetched the latest update to ntp from the
mirror it wasn't being installed.
It seems that the version numbers have got out of step. According to
the changelog the update that was released in August should have had
the version number 4.2.0.a.20040617-8.el4_7.2, whereas
[off list]
Thanks for your eMail, Ross. So, reading all the stuff here I'm really
concerned about moving all our data to such a system. The reason we're
moving is mainly, but not only the longisch fsck UFS (FreeBSD) needs
after a crash. XFS seemed to me to fit perfectly as I
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Ron Yorston wrote:
> I noticed that although I'd fetched the latest update to ntp from the
> mirror it wasn't being installed.
>
> It seems that the version numbers have got out of step. According to
> the changelog the update that was released in August should ha
Akemi Yagi wrote:
>You may want to check upon this CentOS bug report:
>
>http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4060
Which has been closed as 'no change required'. Some change is required.
As things stand my systems are on version 4.2.0.a.20040617-8.el4_8.2,
the CentOS name for the August update. T
Timo Schoeler wrote:
> [off list]
>
>
> Thanks for your eMail, Ross. So, reading all the stuff here I'm really
> concerned about moving all our data to such a system. The reason we're
> moving is mainly, but not only the longisch fsck UFS (FreeBSD) needs
> after a crash. XFS s
From: john blair
> I want to write a script to find the latest version of rpm of a given package
> available from a mirror for eg:
> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/os/x86_64/CentOS/
> Is there any existing script that does this? Or can someone give me a general
> idea on how to go about this
Hello,
does anybody know if quagga for CentOS 5.3 is compiled with
-enable-multipath?
I want to implement ECMP over 2 ISP.
Thanks,
Cristi Carstea
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I don't see how to do it.
I had to telnet into a firewall and run a trace, and I had to stop it,
copy and paste to gedit, then start again, etc.
I find it interesting, and sad, that there is no easy 'output to file'
profile setting.
___
CentOS maili
On 12/10/2009 08:05 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I don't see how to do it.
>
> I had to telnet into a firewall and run a trace, and I had to stop it,
> copy and paste to gedit, then start again, etc.
>
> I find it interesting, and sad, that there is no easy 'output to file'
> profile setting.
man
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 08:05:06AM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I don't see how to do it.
>
> I had to telnet into a firewall and run a trace, and I had to stop it,
> copy and paste to gedit, then start again, etc.
>
> I find it interesting, and sad, that there is no easy 'output to file'
>
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Cristian Carstea wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> does anybody know if quagga for CentOS 5.3 is compiled with
> -enable-multipath?
> I want to implement ECMP over 2 ISP.
>
You can look in the /boot/config-* files. Those are the configs that
it was built with. In my 5.4 syst
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009, MHR wrote:
> $ yum list | grep -i lsb
> redhat-lsb.i3863.1-12.3.EL.el5.centos
> installed
> redhat-lsb.x86_64 3.1-12.3.EL.el5.centos
> installed
when a non-CentOS packaging calls for a CentOS provided
package by
On Dec 10, 2009, at 4:28 AM, Timo Schoeler
wrote:
> [off list]
>
> Thanks for your eMail, Ross. So, reading all the stuff here I'm
> really
> concerned about moving all our data to such a system. The reason
> we're
> moving is mainly, but not only the longisch fsck UFS (
> LVM like md raid and drbd is a layered block device and
> If you turn the wire caches off on the HDs then there is no problem,
> but HDs aren't designed to perform to spec with the write cache
> disabled they expect important data is written with FUA access (forced
> unit access), so performance
I have CentOS 4.x installed on a single 500GB SATA drive. Drive is
about 10 percent used. I would like to migrate to software RAID 5
without reinstalling the OS. Was thinking 3 500GB drives. Is that
possible or must I reinstall?
Matt
___
CentOS maili
I see this virtualization howto for Ubuntu
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UEC/CDInstall
It goes into how to make your own cloud. Is there a similiar howto
anywhere for CentOS 5.4 or anything?
Matt
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://li
Matt:
> It goes into how to make your own cloud. Is there a similiar howto
> anywhere for CentOS 5.4 or anything?
Does the RHEL Virtualization Guide help?
http://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5.4/html/Virtualiz
ation_Guide/index.html
Neil
--
Neil Aggarwal, (281)846
Mathieu Baudier wrote:
>> LVM like md raid and drbd is a layered block device and
>> If you turn the wire caches off on the HDs then there is no problem,
>> but HDs aren't designed to perform to spec with the write cache
>> disabled they expect important data is written with FUA access (forced
>> u
You will have to reinstall because if you add two more 500GB drives to make
your set up into a three drive horse, you then need to format each drive
and synchronise them together creating the new logical RAID volume so no
data can be kept on said disks prior to the creation of the RAID.
HTH!
--
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
> Of Alvaro Schneider Guevara
> Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 1:40 AM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: [CentOS] Linux router with CentOS
>
>
>
> Hello everybody.
Victor Padro wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
>
>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>> Of Alvaro Schneider Guevara
>> Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 1:40 AM
>> To: centos@centos.org
>> Subject: [CentOS] Linux router with
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Victor Padro wrote:
> Another Vote for Pfse3nse, the best router7firewall distro around,
> well just my opinion.
One caveat is hardware support. I assume because it is FreeBSD and not Linux
About a month or two ago I decided to go out and google for firewall
d
Rick Barnes wrote:
> On 12/10/2009 08:05 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> I don't see how to do it.
>>
>> I had to telnet into a firewall and run a trace, and I had to stop it,
>> copy and paste to gedit, then start again, etc.
>>
>> I find it interesting, and sad, that there is no easy 'output to fi
Hi everyone!!
Does someone have configured a plotter HP designjet 500?,
what driver did you use?,
or what did you do?
I'm using centos 5.4
--
Alejandro Rodriguez Luna
E-mail: el_alexl...@yahoo.com.mx
--
Encuentra las mej
yes, that's right, but i am asking here about Quagga, which is a routing
software (OSPF, BGP etc.), not about kernel multipath, i mean if Quagga
is compiled with Equal Cost MultiPath (ECMP), the "-enable-multipath"
compile option. Can someone post here the spec file from which quagga
rpm was bu
At Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:39:25 -0600 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> I have CentOS 4.x installed on a single 500GB SATA drive. Drive is
> about 10 percent used. I would like to migrate to software RAID 5
> without reinstalling the OS. Was thinking 3 500GB drives. Is that
> possible or must I r
I have recently been told I will have to maintain some CentOS servers at
work. Since I have only been using Slackware for the last 16 years, I
decided to install CentOS on one of my servers at home to get an idea of
the differences. I installed CentOS 5.4 from CD with no problems, did a
yum upd
Bob McConnell wrote:
> [...]
> Everything looks ok, but I keep seeing this message on the active
> console. I have no idea where it comes from nor what it means.
>
> type=1400 audit(1260446462.444:9): avc: denied { getattr } for pid=2200
> comm="smbd" path="/proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc" dev=binfmt_
> I have recently been told I will have to maintain some CentOS servers at
> work. Since I have only been using Slackware for the last 16 years, I
> decided to install CentOS on one of my servers at home to get an idea of
> the differences. I installed CentOS 5.4 from CD with no problems, did a
> y
Rick Barnes wrote:
> On 12/10/2009 08:05 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> I don't see how to do it.
>>
>> I had to telnet into a firewall and run a trace, and I had to stop it,
>> copy and paste to gedit, then start again, etc.
>>
>> I find it interesting, and sad, that there is no easy 'output to fi
Google "say no to RAID 5"
http://baarf.com/
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/RAID-5-Doomed-2009,6525.html
--
“Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV”
- Michael Pollan, author of "In Defense of Food"
___
CentOS mailing list
C
On Thursday 10 December 2009, Matt wrote:
> I have CentOS 4.x installed on a single 500GB SATA drive. Drive is
> about 10 percent used. I would like to migrate to software RAID 5
> without reinstalling the OS. Was thinking 3 500GB drives. Is that
> possible or must I reinstall?
>
In theory yo
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 07:23:06PM +0200, Cristian Carstea wrote:
> yes, that's right, but i am asking here about Quagga, which is a
> routing software (OSPF, BGP etc.), not about kernel multipath, i
> mean if Quagga is compiled with Equal Cost MultiPath (ECMP), the
> "-enable-multipath" compile op
Hi all,
I have a PowerEdge 1950 that was acting weird. Network connectivity was
only performing at a quarter of what was expected (if that). Even if I
scp'd something to localhost it would perform poorly. Rather than fight
with it, I just decided to reload it. It was running 5.3, and it is
Benjamin Franz wrote:
> Bob McConnell wrote:
>> [...]
>> Everything looks ok, but I keep seeing this message on the active
>> console. I have no idea where it comes from nor what it means.
>>
>> type=1400 audit(1260446462.444:9): avc: denied { getattr } for pid=2200
>> comm="smbd" path="/proc/s
Ryan Pugatch wrote:
> Wondering if anyone has an idea..
Run hardware diagnostics?
Check power management settings in the bios?
nate
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I don't know why I haven't signed up for this list before since we use
CentOS all over the place. The list is very useful and it is good for
me to participate and "give back" to the community.
Anywho, I wanted to post this response to a thread that was created back
in November 2008 about the n
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
Mathieu Baudier wrote:
LVM like md raid and drbd is a layered block device and
If you turn the wire caches off on the HDs then there is no problem,
but HDs aren't designed to perform to spec with the write cache
disabled they expect important data is written
Alan McKay wrote:
> Google "say no to RAID 5"
>
> http://baarf.com/
>
> http://www.tomshardware.com/news/RAID-5-Doomed-2009,6525.html
>
Say goodbye to whole-disk based RAID solutions and hello to
next generation sub-disk RAID solutions, dramatically
extending the real world lifetime of RAID 5(and
On Thursday 10 December 2009 17:28:45 Bob McConnell wrote:
> I have recently been told I will have to maintain some CentOS servers at
> work. Since I have only been using Slackware for the last 16 years, I
> decided to install CentOS on one of my servers at home to get an idea of
> the differences.
Bob McConnell wrote:
> I also have a problem with syslogd. I added '-r' to SYSLOGD_OPTIONS in
> /etc/rc.d/init.d/syslog, but after a restart it still won't accept
> network traffic, and that flag doesn't show up in the command line in
> the 'ps ax' dump. What do I have to do to enable traffic in
Thanks for all the input everyone,
Basically I trashed the smb.conf and the folder I wanted to share, restarted
the machine, re-wrote the smb.conf (again) and re-made the directory and
set permissions etc, restarted the machine and all is well!
Thanks all for your input it has helped me write an
On Dec 10, 2009, at 1:39 PM, Ausmus, Matt wrote:
Anywho, I wanted to post this response to a thread that was created
back in November 2008 about the ntop daemon failing to start. I’m
currently setting up ntop as a NetFlow & SFlow collector and came
across the issue. A quick refresher, th
On 05.12.2009 18:15, Miguel Medalha wrote:
>> And, as of CentOS 5.4, xfs is now enabled in the kernel, so
>> no need for any external kernel module. But yes, this is available for
>> x86_64 only
>
> ... a decision that many people have trouble at understanding!
XFS is not stable on 32-bit systems.
On 05.12.2009 22:04, John R Pierce wrote:
> that same OS/2 JFS was backported to AIX as JFS2, I believe.
When JFS was implemented on OS/2 it was based on JFS on AIX. After that,
JFS for Linux and JFS2 was based on the same code. Not sure I would say
"backported", but there you go
There are
On 08.12.2009 13:34, Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
>> Speaking for me (on Linux systems) on top of LVM on top of md. On IRIX
>> as it was intended.
>>
> That is a disaster combination for XFS even now. You mentioned some
> pretty hefty hardware in your other post...
If XFS doesn't play well w
> XFS is not stable on 32-bit systems. You should not use it there. You
> need a 64-bit kernel.
>
> Default for servers should be 64-bit now anyway. Not many reasons left
> for a 32-bit system, and more and more 3. party applications have less
> and less support for 32-bit platforms in general.
Mark Caudill wrote:
> Rick Barnes wrote:
>
>> On 12/10/2009 08:05 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>
>>> I don't see how to do it.
>>>
>>> I had to telnet into a firewall and run a trace, and I had to stop it,
>>> copy and paste to gedit, then start again, etc.
>>>
>>> I find it interesting, an
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Rick Barnes wrote:
>
>> On 12/10/2009 08:05 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>
>>> I don't see how to do it.
>>>
>>> I had to telnet into a firewall and run a trace, and I had to stop it,
>>> copy and paste to gedit, then start again, etc.
>>>
>>> I find it interesting, an
Miguel Medalha wrote:
>> XFS is not stable on 32-bit systems. You should not use it there. You
>> need a 64-bit kernel.
>>
>> Default for servers should be 64-bit now anyway. Not many reasons left
>> for a 32-bit system, and more and more 3. party applications have less
>> and less support for 3
> If they do what you want without making you wait, why even consider changing
> the
> filesystem that has been working for years on these machines?
>
Adding new, bigger disks and new filesystems? Wanting these to be the
fastest that is reasonably possible?
As for the system that arose the
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Mark Caudill wrote:
>> Rick Barnes wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/10/2009 08:05 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>>
I don't see how to do it.
I had to telnet into a firewall and run a trace, and I had to stop it,
copy and paste to gedit, then start again, etc.
Hi,
I'm trying to write .htaccess Rewrite rules and it doesn't seem to
work for me:
Match the string between the domain and the question mark: ?
http://www.abc.com/blog:long-name-of-page?action=diff and I want to
redirect it to: http://www.abc.com/blog:long-name-of-page
Any suggestion?
Thanks
You might have to enable re-writes in you Apache conf? Or did I imagine that???
--
Regards,
James ;)
Stephen Leacock - "I detest life-insurance agents: they always argue
that I shall some day die, which is not so."
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos
Miguel Medalha wrote:
>> If they do what you want without making you wait, why even consider changing
>> the
>> filesystem that has been working for years on these machines?
>>
>
> Adding new, bigger disks and new filesystems? Wanting these to be the
> fastest that is reasonably possible?
>
I just created a 4 drive mdadm --level=raid10 on a centos 4.8-ish system
here, and shortly thereafter remembreed I hadn't updated it in a while,
so i ran yum update...
while installing/updating stuff, got these errors:
Installing: kernel ###
[14/
On 12/10/2009 10:39 AM, Matt wrote:
> I have CentOS 4.x installed on a single 500GB SATA drive. Drive is
> about 10 percent used. I would like to migrate to software RAID 5
> without reinstalling the OS. Was thinking 3 500GB drives. Is that
> possible or must I reinstall?
Moving to RAID-1 is g
>> I have CentOS 4.x installed on a single 500GB SATA drive. Drive is
>> about 10 percent used. I would like to migrate to software RAID 5
>> without reinstalling the OS. Was thinking 3 500GB drives. Is that
>> possible or must I reinstall?
>
> Moving to RAID-1 is going to be fairly easy. Movi
Benjamin Franz wrote:
> Bob McConnell wrote:
>> I also have a problem with syslogd. I added '-r' to SYSLOGD_OPTIONS in
>> /etc/rc.d/init.d/syslog, but after a restart it still won't accept
>> network traffic, and that flag doesn't show up in the command line in
>> the 'ps ax' dump. What do I hav
Matt wrote:
>>> I have CentOS 4.x installed on a single 500GB SATA drive. Drive is
>>> about 10 percent used. I would like to migrate to software RAID 5
>>> without reinstalling the OS. Was thinking 3 500GB drives. Is that
>>> possible or must I reinstall?
>> Moving to RAID-1 is going to be fai
I have CentOS 4.x installed on a single 500GB SATA drive. Drive is
about 10 percent used. I would like to migrate to software RAID 5
without reinstalling the OS. Was thinking 3 500GB drives. Is that
possible or must I reinstall?
>>> Moving to RAID-1 is going to be fairly eas
Morten Torstensen wrote:
> On 08.12.2009 13:34, Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
>>> Speaking for me (on Linux systems) on top of LVM on top of md. On IRIX
>>> as it was intended.
>>>
>> That is a disaster combination for XFS even now. You mentioned some
>> pretty hefty hardware in your other pos
> No mention of barriers in the man page, I'm also getting confused. is
> device mapper used for software raid - i.e. /dev/mdX?
Nope. Software raid is the md layer. Nothing to do with dm. Two separate
layers although they share a bit of stuff.
> If so what are the implications of barriers and
John R Pierce wrote:
> I just created a 4 drive mdadm --level=raid10 on a centos 4.8-ish system
> here, and shortly thereafter remembreed I hadn't updated it in a while,
> so i ran yum update...
>
> while installing/updating stuff, got these errors:
>
> Installing: kernel
Christopher Chan wrote:
> If anaconda is doing the update here, I guess it is because anaconda in
> 4.x does not have raid10 personality support. The raid10 personality is
> NOT the same as nested raid1+0. It is an entirely new module from Neil
> Brown that has a poor choice of a name imho. It d
Christopher Chan wrote:
> Morten Torstensen wrote:
>> On 08.12.2009 13:34, Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
Speaking for me (on Linux systems) on top of LVM on top of md. On IRIX
as it was intended.
>>> That is a disaster combination for XFS even now. You mentioned some
>>> pretty
Mark Caudill wrote:
> Wait, just to be clear, are you saying that all use of LVM is a bad idea
> unless on hardware RAID? That's bad it if it's true since it seems to me
> that most modern distros like to use LVM by default. Am I missing something?
>
if LVM is ignoring write barriers, its not
John R Pierce wrote:
> Christopher Chan wrote:
>> If anaconda is doing the update here, I guess it is because anaconda in
>> 4.x does not have raid10 personality support. The raid10 personality is
>> NOT the same as nested raid1+0. It is an entirely new module from Neil
>> Brown that has a poor
John R Pierce wrote:
> Mark Caudill wrote:
>> Wait, just to be clear, are you saying that all use of LVM is a bad idea
>> unless on hardware RAID? That's bad it if it's true since it seems to me
>> that most modern distros like to use LVM by default. Am I missing something?
>>
>
> if LVM is i
Mark Caudill wrote:
> Christopher Chan wrote:
>> Morten Torstensen wrote:
>>> On 08.12.2009 13:34, Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
> Speaking for me (on Linux systems) on top of LVM on top of md. On IRIX
> as it was intended.
>
That is a disaster combination for XFS even now. Yo
On Dec 10, 2009, at 7:52 PM, Mark Caudill wrote:
> Christopher Chan wrote:
>> Morten Torstensen wrote:
>>> On 08.12.2009 13:34, Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
> Speaking for me (on Linux systems) on top of LVM on top of md.
> On IRIX
> as it was intended.
>
That is a di
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of KJS
>Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 6:16 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Linux router with CentOS
>
>PFSense or IPCop, IPCop is a little easier to configure IMO.
Is I
74 matches
Mail list logo
