Billy Huddleston wrote on Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:35:43 -0500:
> I'm trying to install CentOS 5.4 on a machine with a LSI SAS 1068E
> controller.
It should work out of the box. I have several Dell and HP machines that
have cards based on this LSI chip and they worked straight out of the box.
You c
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Tait Clarridge wrote:
>> >> wrote:
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>> I am unable to get my LAN masqueraded using SNAT with CentOS 5.3 and
>> >>> iptables.
>> >>>
>> >>> I have the following setup:
>> >>>
>> >>> eth0: connects to internet with static public IP 1.2.3.1
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009, Tait Clarridge wrote:
> Steve: What module does your Dell Perc use? I don't have access to my
> server to check.
>From one of my Dell R410 systems:
% lspci | grep LSI
03:00.0 RAID bus controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic MegaRAID SAS 1078 (rev
04)
and from /etc/modprobe.c
Finally moved my home desktop from Fedora to CentOS. My spouse was
unhappy with me upgrading from F9-->F10-->f11 etc and wanted something
more stable.
I built a second machine which is now running in parallel to the old F11
desktop. I moved my data (mail and files) from the F11 box to the
CentOS
>>> KERNEL=="eth?", SYSFS{address}=="00:21:e9:17:64:b5", NAME="eth1" #
>>> Now, all three network cards get assigned as eth0! eth1 and eth2 are
>>> no longer found. The pci-express nics (onboard) get detected first,
>>> and the pci nic is last, so it ends up "owning" the eth0 alias.
>> Changing S
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 21:17 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> nate wrote:
> > Tait Clarridge wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Steve: What module does your Dell Perc use? I don't have access to my
> >> server to check.
> >>
> >
> > megaraid_sas is what my PERC 5i and 6i use
> >
>
> I'm pretty sure the PE
Billy Huddleston wrote:
> I'm trying to install CentOS 5.4 on a machine with a LSI SAS 1068E
> controller. I've googled all over the place and found a few different
> drivers for RHEL5 for it.. and tried a few of them.. Some will load,
> some complain that this isn't the correct version.. non o
On 11/22/2009 8:38 PM, Gordon McLellan wrote:
> I have two servers with identical hardware ... TYAN i3210w system
> boards with dual intel gigabit interfaces, and a PCI intel gigabit
> nic. I'm running Centos 5.4, x86_64, 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5
>
> Every other time I reboot, the nics initialize in a
>> Digging around google a bit more I came up with different rules, and
>> fingers crossed, they seem to work!
>> SUBSYSTEM=="net", SYSFS{address}=="00:1b:21:4d:c3:e8", NAME="eth0" #
>> pro/1000gt
>> SUBSYSTEM=="net", SYSFS{address}=="00:e0:81:b5:7a:30", NAME="eth1" #
>> internal 1
>> SUBSYSTE
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 9:53 AM, David McGuffey
wrote:
> Finally moved my home desktop from Fedora to CentOS. My spouse was
and files
> transferred A-OK...but the Evolution address book did not.
>
> Any tips on getting the old /home/.../.evolution/addressbook which
> worked with the version of
>>> Digging around google a bit more I came up with different rules, and
>>> fingers crossed, they seem to work!
>>> SUBSYSTEM=="net", SYSFS{address}=="00:1b:21:4d:c3:e8", NAME="eth0"
>>> # pro/1000gt
>>> SUBSYSTEM=="net", SYSFS{address}=="00:e0:81:b5:7a:30", NAME="eth1"
>>> # internal 1
>>> SUBSYS
Tom H wrote:
Digging around google a bit more I came up with different rules, and
fingers crossed, they seem to work!
SUBSYSTEM=="net", SYSFS{address}=="00:1b:21:4d:c3:e8", NAME="eth0"
# pro/1000gt
SUBSYSTEM=="net", SYSFS{address}=="00:e0:81:b5:7a:30", NAME="eth1"
# in
On Nov 28, 2009, at 2:15 PM, Tom H wrote:
Digging around google a bit more I came up with different rules,
and
fingers crossed, they seem to work!
SUBSYSTEM=="net", SYSFS{address}=="00:1b:21:4d:c3:e8", NAME="eth0"
# pro/1000gt
SUBSYSTEM=="net", SYSFS{address}=="00:
On Nov 28, 2009, at 3:10 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Tom H wrote:
> Digging around google a bit more I came up with different rules,
> and
> fingers crossed, they seem to work!
> SUBSYSTEM=="net", SYSFS{address}=="00:1b:21:4d:c3:e8", NAME="eth0"
> # pro/1000gt
> SUBSYSTEM=
On 11/28/09, David McGuffey wrote:
> Finally moved my home desktop from Fedora to CentOS. My spouse was
> unhappy with me upgrading from F9-->F10-->f11 etc and wanted something
> more stable.
>
> I built a second machine which is now running in parallel to the old F11
> desktop. I moved my data
Starting with a fresh load and after I finish hardening the load
following the Center for Internet Security (CIS) guidance, I'm wondering
whether AIDE or OSSEC would be a better intrusion detection system.
I installed AIDE and did a quick test of AIDE and after initializing the
db and applying the
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 18:30 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On 11/28/09, David McGuffey wrote:
> > Finally moved my home desktop from Fedora to CentOS. My spouse was
> > unhappy with me upgrading from F9-->F10-->f11 etc and wanted something
> > more stable.
> >
> > I built a second machine which is
David McGuffey wrote:
> Seems to me that any IDS must be tied to the yum update process so that
> one is not dealing with hundreds/thousands of changes that were brought
> in by a yum update that I choose to apply.
>
> Is OSSEC any less noisy?
>
Nope.
-Alan
The formula that ended up working for me:
undo modifications to udev rules
comment out the alias ethX lines that anaconda had placed in my modprobe.conf
use HWADDR= in the ifcfg-ethX config files.
slave interfaces have onboot=yes in them, despite no IP address information
The nics are correctly i
David McGuffey wrote:
> Starting with a fresh load and after I finish hardening the load
> following the Center for Internet Security (CIS) guidance, I'm wondering
> whether AIDE or OSSEC would be a better intrusion detection system.
We've just started with OSSEC at work. I'm told they'd tried AID
I have a zone that has several hosts update their ip with Dynamic DNS updates.
This morning a client had updated its ip, but bind wasn't returning the new ip
when queried until I restarted the daemon?
Google hasn't yielded anything useful as I am prolly missing the boat with my
search criteria. An
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 6:57 PM, David McGuffey
wrote:
> Starting with a fresh load and after I finish hardening the load
> following the Center for Internet Security (CIS) guidance, I'm wondering
> whether AIDE or OSSEC would be a better intrusion detection system.
>
> I installed AIDE and did a
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Billy Huddleston wrote:
> I'm trying to install CentOS 5.4 on a machine with a LSI SAS 1068E
> controller. I've googled all over the place and found a few different
> drivers for RHEL5 for it.. and tried a few of them.. Some will load,
> some complain that this is
24 matches
Mail list logo
