Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:How to enable "NAT" on CentOS 5 ?

Sorry. It seems that I didn't illustrate what I mean correctly . I mean that it is appeared to me that my CentOS 5 server will support for NAT by default (as I checked it on VirtualBox) but after Asterisk & DECT installation it does not . Can you please let me know which settings maybe influenced a

[CentOS] APIC error on CPU0: 00(60)

Hi All! I have a some problem: On the my motherboard Intel DG45NB with Processor Box Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 , i see in the dmesg(log file): dmesg | grep CPU0 APIC error on CPU0: 00(60) or the sometime: dmesg | grep CPU1 APIC error on CPU1: 00(60) How can I fix this problem??? This Bug is my

Re: [CentOS] What's wrong with yum-priorities?

Well, I think reality is that most of us have had very good experience with yum-priorities. There is no thing as absolute security. And I'm going to continue to use it, it certainly allows for a more fine- grained control than protect-base. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Co

Re: [CentOS] APIC error on CPU0: 00(60)

Andrey Garkin wrote: > Hi All! > > I have a some problem: > > On the my motherboard Intel DG45NB with Processor Box Intel Core 2 Duo > E6300 , i see in the dmesg(log file): > dmesg | grep CPU0 > APIC error on CPU0: 00(60) > or the sometime: > dmesg | grep CPU1 > APIC error on CPU1: 00(60) >

[CentOS] Logo origin

Hello I was just asked what the logo means and I had to admit that I really had no idea, as it was chosen way before my time. Can someone please enlighten me about the logo. I have tried google but nothing really came up :) Some pointers would be very helpful. Cheers Didi -- My www page: www.r

Re: [CentOS] again, nic driver order

On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Tom H wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Gordon McLellan > wrote: >> KERNEL=="eth?", SYSFS{address}=="00:21:e9:17:64:b5", NAME="eth1"  # >> Now, all three network cards get assigned as eth0! eth1 and eth2 are >> no longer found. The pci-express nics (onboa

Re: [CentOS] smtp+pop3+imap+tls+webmail+anti spam+anti virus

Eugeneapolinary Ju wrote: > hi! > > does anyone has a good howto, docs how to set up an smtp, pop3, imap server, > with webmail, and has anti virus solution, and even spam filtering? :D [plus > secure connection for the clients :D ] > > wich softwares are the best for this? [e.g.: "vsftpd is the

Re: [CentOS] again, nic driver order

On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Gordon McLellan wrote: > Digging around google a bit more I came up with different rules, and > fingers crossed, they seem to work! > > SUBSYSTEM=="net", SYSFS{address}=="00:1b:21:4d:c3:e8", NAME="eth0"  # > pro/1000gt > SUBSYSTEM=="net", SYSFS{address}=="00:e0:81

Re: [CentOS] again, nic driver order

Gordon McLellan wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Gordon McLellan > wrote: >> Digging around google a bit more I came up with different rules, and >> fingers crossed, they seem to work! >> >> SUBSYSTEM=="net", SYSFS{address}=="00:1b:21:4d:c3:e8", NAME="eth0" # >> pro/1000gt >> SUBSYSTEM

[CentOS] SNAT question

Hi, I am unable to get my LAN masqueraded using SNAT with CentOS 5.3 and iptables. I have the following setup: eth0: connects to internet with static public IP 1.2.3.1 (obscured here for privacy) eth1: connects to DMZ with static public IP 1.2.3.2 (obscured here for privacy) eth2: connects to LA

Re: [CentOS] SNAT question

On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Peter Peltonen wrote: > Hi, > > I am unable to get my LAN masqueraded using SNAT with CentOS 5.3 and iptables. > > I have the following setup: > > eth0: connects to internet with static public IP 1.2.3.1 (obscured > here for privacy) > eth1: connects to DMZ with s

Re: [CentOS] again, nic driver order

On Nov 23, 2009, at 8:29 AM, Gordon McLellan wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Gordon McLellan > wrote: >> Digging around google a bit more I came up with different rules, and >> fingers crossed, they seem to work! >> >> SUBSYSTEM=="net", SYSFS{address}=="00:1b:21:4d:c3:e8", NAME="eth0

Re: [CentOS] SNAT question

Hi, On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Giovanni Tirloni wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Peter Peltonen > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am unable to get my LAN masqueraded using SNAT with CentOS 5.3 and >> iptables. >> >> I have the following setup: >> >> eth0: connects to internet with static

Re: [CentOS] APIC error on CPU0: 00(60)

Andrey Garkin wrote: > Hi All! > > I have a some problem: > > On the my motherboard Intel DG45NB with Processor Box Intel Core 2 Duo > E6300 , i see in the dmesg(log file): > dmesg | grep CPU0 > APIC error on CPU0: 00(60) > or the sometime: > dmesg | grep CPU1 > APIC error on CPU1: 00(60) > > >

Re: [CentOS] Logo origin

On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 4:02 AM, Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann wrote: > Hello > > I was just asked what the logo means and I had to admit that I really > had no idea, as it was chosen way before my time. Can someone please > enlighten me about the logo. I have tried google but nothing really > came up :)

[CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

Hi; I don't want sendmail. What's a good secure email server that I can yum? I really only need smtp right now, but who knows what the future will bring? TIA, Suzie ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

Postfix.. Check it out at http://www.postfix.org. Its very powerful and is the future of mailing. Rgds Dhiraj Charles de Gaulle - "The better I get to know men, the more I find myself loving dogs." On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 21:1

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

Hi there -- The postfix e-mail server is one possibility. From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Susan Day Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 10:45 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server Hi; I

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

Susan Day wrote: > Hi; > I don't want sendmail. What's a good secure email server that I can yum? > I really only need smtp right now, but who knows what the future will bring? Postfix -- Eero, RHCE ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://list

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

Susan Day wrote: > Hi; > I don't want sendmail. What's a good secure email server that I can > yum? I really only need smtp right now, but who knows what the future > will bring? SMTP only provides for relaying mail.a mail server typically needs a MTA (message transfer agent, smtp such as

Re: [CentOS] bash variable expansion moment

On 16-Nov-2009 ken wrote: > On 11/15/2009 06:32 PM Stephen Harris wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 06:21:40PM -0500, ken wrote: >> >> >> echo This is line "${BASH_LINENO[0]}" $@ >> >> > > That's all I needed. Thanks. You might also want to check out bash's built in `cal

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

See sendmail, postfix, Exim, qmail, dovecot, cyrus, Zimbra all related mail world. regards, Santiago N. El lun, 23-11-2009 a las 08:55 -0800, John R Pierce escribió: > Susan Day wrote: > > Hi; > > I don't want sendmail. Wha

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 10:45 -0500, Susan Day wrote: > Hi; > I don't want sendmail. What's a good secure email server that I can > yum? I really only need smtp right now, but who knows what the future > will bring? As others have already suggested, consider Postfix. I'm putting in my $0.02(US) so

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-DS Configuration/Setup Issue

All, Thanks for all of the input! Actually, I fixed the issue by using a single yum command: yum -y reinstall centos-ds* It seems that I was using my laptop to work on my server via putty and something 'broke' which caused the original install to have issues. But, the above command

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Ron Loftin wrote: > As others have already suggested, consider Postfix. > > I'm putting in my $0.02(US) so I can add my experience when I first had > a need for a decent MTA. I had used Sendmail in the past, but I didn't > want to fight with the arcane syntax of the config fi

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

thus Susan Day spake: > Hi; > I don't want sendmail. What's a good secure email server that I can yum? > I really only need smtp right now, but who knows what the future will bring? > TIA, > Suzie postfix rocks. :) HTH, Timo ___ CentOS mailing list Cen

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

>> As others have already suggested, consider Postfix. >> >> I'm putting in my $0.02(US) so I can add my experience when I first had >> a need for a decent MTA. I had used Sendmail in the past, but I didn't >> want to fight with the arcane syntax of the config files, and at that >> time the add-on

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:55 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > Susan Day wrote: > > Hi; > > I don't want sendmail. What's a good secure email server that I can > > yum? I really only need smtp right now, but who knows what the future > > will bring? > > SMTP only provides for relaying mail.a mail s

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

Gilbert Sebenste wrote: > On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Ron Loftin wrote: > >> As others have already suggested, consider Postfix. >> >> I'm putting in my $0.02(US) so I can add my experience when I first had >> a need for a decent MTA. I had used Sendmail in the past, but I didn't >> want to fight with t

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

Susan Day wrote: > Hi; > I don't want sendmail. What's a good secure email server that I can yum? > I really only need smtp right now, but who knows what the future will bring? Postfix is probably a reasonable choice, but I'm curious as to how you reached the decision that you don't want to use

Re: [CentOS] Via EPIA m10000 Nemehiah

> I dont seem to have any problems ( use this machine as a cheap h/w > random number generator, so its always under load ~ 1 ) > Same board, same model. Thanks for the information. This looked and felt like an acpi induced problem. I discovered that acpid was turned on for some reason, so I t

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

I know everyone else has said it but postfix is a great replacement for sendmail. Another tool I've found that I like is ssmtp. It's not a replacement for sendmail/postfix by any stretch but if you want a simple down & dirty tool to send email from an internal server to your main email server it's

[CentOS] Is there a CentOS selinux mailing list?

The subject says it all. I've still got that irritating problem of selinux complaining with smagent writing to its own logfile, and as I mentioned here, weeks ago, I've done everything that sealert says, a number of times, and it didn't fix it, and I've determined that it's clearly an error handlin

[CentOS] 3Com 3c940 moel only giving me 100 mb throughput to network switch

Hello all, As the subject states, I have a 3Com 3c940 Ethernet card to a 1 gb network switch. The switch detects it, but it only shows that it is giving me 100 mb/sec throughput. That card is rated for 1 GB...is there a way to force it to try to use 1 GB/sec? System-config-network isn't helping

Re: [CentOS] 3Com 3c940 moel only giving me 100 mb throughput to network switch

Gilbert Sebenste wrote: > Hello all, > > As the subject states, I have a 3Com 3c940 Ethernet card to a 1 gb network > switch. The switch detects it, but it only shows that it is giving me 100 > mb/sec throughput. That card is rated for 1 GB...is there a way to force > it to try to use 1 GB/sec?

Re: [CentOS] 3Com 3c940 moel only giving me 100 mb throughput to network switch

Gilbert Sebenste wrote: > Hello all, > > As the subject states, I have a 3Com 3c940 Ethernet card to a 1 gb network > switch. The switch detects it, but it only shows that it is giving me 100 > mb/sec throughput. That card is rated for 1 GB...is there a way to force > it to try to use 1 GB/sec?

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 10:45 -0500, Susan Day wrote: > Hi; > I don't want sendmail. What's a good secure email server that I can > yum? I really only need smtp right now, but who knows what the future > will bring? > TIA, as root... yum install postfix system-switch-mail # edit /etc/postfix/ma

Re: [CentOS] Is there a CentOS selinux mailing list?

On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 11:01 -0700, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > The subject says it all. I've still got that irritating problem of selinux > complaining with smagent writing to its own logfile, and as I mentioned > here, weeks ago, I've done everything that sealert says, a number of > times, and it di

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Craig White wrote: > yum install postfix system-switch-mail > # edit /etc/postfix/main.conf > system-switch-mail # choose postfix, confirm > # done > Craig, I stopped qmail, which I had installed outside of yum, turning off sendmail first, then I just did a yum i

Re: [CentOS] Is there a CentOS selinux mailing list?

> On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 11:01 -0700, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> The subject says it all. I've still got that irritating problem of >> selinux >> complaining with smagent writing to its own logfile, and as I mentioned >> here, weeks ago, I've done everything that sealert says, a number of >> times,

Re: [CentOS] Is there a CentOS selinux mailing list?

On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 11:41 -0700, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 11:01 -0700, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> The subject says it all. I've still got that irritating problem of > >> selinux > >> complaining with smagent writing to its own logfile, and as I mentioned > >> here, week

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 13:30 -0500, Susan Day wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Craig White > wrote: > yum install postfix system-switch-mail > # edit /etc/postfix/main.conf > system-switch-mail # choose postfix, confirm > # done > > Craig, I stopped qmai

[CentOS] Microsoft .mdb files in Open office

Hi, Is there is anyway to Open Microsoft .mdb files in open office on Centos 5.3 ? Thanks linux ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Craig White wrote: > No but you need to do this then... > > chkconfig postfix on > chkconfig sendmail off > > and if there is some mechanism for starting qmail on startup, you will > have to disable it...perhaps there is a sysv initscript that you can > discover h

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

Susan Day wrote: > Hi; > I don't want sendmail. What's a good secure email server that I can > yum? I really only need smtp right now, but who knows what the future > will bring? See my slightly prior post on: Re: [CentOS] smtp+pop3+imap+tls+webmail+anti spam+anti virus It points you to: ht

Re: [CentOS] 3Com 3c940 moel only giving me 100 mb throughput to network switch

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Les Mikesell wrote: > Gilbert Sebenste wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> As the subject states, I have a 3Com 3c940 Ethernet card to a 1 gb network >> switch. The switch detects it, but it only shows that it is giving me 100 >> mb/sec throughput. That card is rated for 1 GB...is ther

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

Susan Day wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Craig White > wrote: > > No but you need to do this then... > > chkconfig postfix on > chkconfig sendmail off > > and if there is some mechanism for starting qmail on startup, you will > have

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 08:55:38AM -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > Susan Day wrote: > > Hi; > > I don't want sendmail. What's a good secure email server that I can > > yum? I really only need smtp right now, but who knows what the future > > will bring? > > SMTP only provides for relaying mail.

Re: [CentOS] Microsoft .mdb files in Open office

2009/11/23 linux-crazy > Hi, > > Is there is anyway to Open Microsoft .mdb files in open office on > Centos 5.3 ? > > Thanks > linux > _ > > try mdbtools: http://sourceforge.net/projects/mdbtools/files/ -- Linux counter #213090 ___ CentOS mail

Re: [CentOS] Microsoft .mdb files in Open office

linux-crazy wrote: > Hi, > > Is there is anyway to Open Microsoft .mdb files in open office on > Centos 5.3 ? Short of running Access under wine or a virtual machine with windows, I don't think so. Depending on your usage, it might be feasible to convert the tables to a postgresql or mysql d

Re: [CentOS] 3Com 3c940 moel only giving me 100 mb throughput to network switch

Gilbert Sebenste wrote: > >>> >>> As the subject states, I have a 3Com 3c940 Ethernet card to a 1 gb network >>> switch. The switch detects it, but it only shows that it is giving me 100 >>> mb/sec throughput. That card is rated for 1 GB...is there a way to force >>> it to try to use 1 GB/sec? Sys

Re: [CentOS] 3Com 3c940 moel only giving me 100 mb throughput to network switch

>> ethtool eth0 >> Settings for eth0: >> Supported ports: [ TP ] >> Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full >> 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full >> 1000baseT/Full >> Supports auto-negotiation: Yes >>

Re: [CentOS] 3Com 3c940 moel only giving me 100 mb throughput to network switch

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Les Mikesell wrote: > I'd expect that to mean that it was connected to a 100Mb switch port or > a managed switch configured to force 100Mb. Managed switch, yes. >> But then I tried this. Typing: >> >> ethtool --change eth0 speed 1000 duplex full autoneg on >> >> DID work! Bu

Re: [CentOS] 3Com 3c940 moel only giving me 100 mb throughput to network switch

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Eero Volotinen wrote: > Are you using cat 5e or cat 6 (gigabit certified) cable? Yes. *** Gilbert Sebenste (My opinions only!)

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 01:59:40PM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > It points you to: > http://howtoforge.net/virtual-users-domains-postfix-courier-mysql-squirrelmail-fedora-10 > > Now granted this is for FC10, but I suspect it would be easy to fit into > Centos. Please, for the lov

Re: [CentOS] 3Com 3c940 moel only giving me 100 mb throughput to network switch

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Gilbert Sebenste wrote: > On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Les Mikesell wrote: > >> I'd expect that to mean that it was connected to a 100Mb switch port or >> a managed switch configured to force 100Mb. > > Managed switch, yes. D'oh! make that unmanaged switch, sorry. **

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

fred smith wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 08:55:38AM -0800, John R Pierce wrote: >> Susan Day wrote: >>> Hi; >>> I don't want sendmail. What's a good secure email server that I can >>> yum? I really only need smtp right now, but who knows what the future >>> will bring? >> SMTP only provides fo

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 13:25 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: > fred smith wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 08:55:38AM -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > >> Susan Day wrote: > >>> Hi; > >>> I don't want sendmail. What's a good secure email server that I can > >>> yum? I really only need smtp right now, but

Re: [CentOS] 3Com 3c940 moel only giving me 100 mb throughput to network switch

Gilbert Sebenste wrote: > Hello all, > > As the subject states, I have a 3Com 3c940 Ethernet card to a 1 gb network > switch. The switch detects it, but it only shows that it is giving me 100 > mb/sec throughput. That card is rated for 1 GB...is there a way to force > it to try to use 1 GB/sec? Sys

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

John R. Dennison wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 01:59:40PM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > >> It points you to: >> http://howtoforge.net/virtual-users-domains-postfix-courier-mysql-squirrelmail-fedora-10 >> >> Now granted this is for FC10, but I suspect it would be easy to fit into >> Cent

Re: [CentOS] 3Com 3c940 moel only giving me 100 mb throughput to network switch

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, nate wrote: > What kind of switch? many/most? NICs will often set the speed to 100 > or 10Mbps if they can't auto negotiate the connection > > Check the switch config to make sure that it's not trying to force > the connection to some lower speed. I checked; it's not. All see

Re: [CentOS] Via EPIA m10000 Nemehiah

On 23/11/09 17:50, Ben Mohilef wrote: > This looked and felt like an acpi induced problem. I discovered that acpid > was turned on for some > reason, so I turned off the acpid daemon and it has behaved well for the last > day. Are you booting > yours with acpi=off as well ?? nope, just the st

Re: [CentOS] Via EPIA m10000 Nemehiah

- "Karanbir Singh" wrote: > On 23/11/09 17:50, Ben Mohilef wrote: > > This looked and felt like an acpi induced problem. I discovered that > acpid was turned on for some > > reason, so I turned off the acpid daemon and it has behaved well for > the last day. Are you booting > > yours with acp

Re: [CentOS] Via EPIA m10000 Nemehiah

On 23/11/09 21:34, Tim Nelson wrote: > Is it possible you have an application that runs at odd times that is > compiled for the wrong arch? IIRC the C3 is i586 compatible (almost i686 but > missing something stupid like 'cmov' instruction). I've got a handful of C3 > based systems in my persona

Re: [CentOS] Via EPIA m10000 Nemehiah

- "Karanbir Singh" wrote: > On 23/11/09 21:34, Tim Nelson wrote: > > > Is it possible you have an application that runs at odd times that > is compiled for the wrong arch? IIRC the C3 is i586 compatible (almost > i686 but missing something stupid like 'cmov' instruction). I've got a > handful

Re: [CentOS] NFS4 issue

On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 3:00 AM, Philip Manuel wrote: > > > Philip Manuel wrote: >> We are running kernel 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5 with exporting 3 aoe provided >> ext4 directories. For a couple of weeks we had a small number of users >> using the system with no issues, today we added 7 users and the sy

Re: [CentOS] NFS4 issue

That's a little confusing, does that mean all the clients need to change as well as the server ? Has no-one else hit this issue? We are running all our clients and servers on x86_64. Thanks Phil Giovanni Tirloni wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 3:00 AM, Philip Manuel wrote: > >> Philip Ma

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

Les Mikesell wrote: > Susan Day wrote: > >> Hi; >> I don't want sendmail. What's a good secure email server that I can yum? >> I really only need smtp right now, but who knows what the future will bring? >> > > > Postfix is probably a reasonable choice, but I'm curious as to how you > rea

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

Eero Volotinen wrote: > Susan Day wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Craig White > > wrote: >> >> No but you need to do this then... >> >> chkconfig postfix on >> chkconfig sendmail off >> >> and if there is some mechanism for starting qma

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

Susan Day wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Craig White > wrote: > > yum install postfix system-switch-mail > # edit /etc/postfix/main.conf > system-switch-mail # choose postfix, confirm > # done > > > Craig, I stopped qmail, which I had ins

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

Les Mikesell wrote: > Gilbert Sebenste wrote: > >> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Ron Loftin wrote: >> >> >>> As others have already suggested, consider Postfix. >>> >>> I'm putting in my $0.02(US) so I can add my experience when I first had >>> a need for a decent MTA. I had used Sendmail in the pa

[CentOS] hard drive errors

Hello I seem to be getting some messages via email and in var/log/messages as well, i think its a hard drive gone bad but was wondering if anyone has seen something similar to this or would have some ideas if its fixable or not, here are the messages This email was generated by the smartd dae

Re: [CentOS] hard drive errors

lostson wrote: > Hello > > I seem to be getting some messages via email and in var/log/messages as > well, i think its a hard drive gone bad but was wondering if anyone has > seen something similar to this or would have some ideas if its fixable > or not, here are the messages Run manufacturer di

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

Christopher Chan wrote: > Les Mikesell wrote: >> Susan Day wrote: >> >>> Hi; >>> I don't want sendmail. What's a good secure email server that I can yum? >>> I really only need smtp right now, but who knows what the future will bring? >>> >> >> Postfix is probably a reasonable choice, but

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

Les Mikesell wrote: > Christopher Chan wrote: > >> Les Mikesell wrote: >> >>> Susan Day wrote: >>> >>> Hi; I don't want sendmail. What's a good secure email server that I can yum? I really only need smtp right now, but who knows what the future will bring? >>

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

Christopher Chan wrote: > >> By not-monolithic, I mean that now submission queuing, forwarding, and local >> delivery are all different processes, each running with limited credentials >> most >> of the time. And milters also can run under different uids. >> >> > > All that means naught

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

Sent from my iPhone On Nov 23, 2009, at 6:14 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > > On the contrary, having the ability to extend through external > software gives > you unlimited options. Note that postfix eventually got around to > copying this > feature. Also with mimedefang you can do most of y

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:34 PM, Christopher Chan > wrote: Les Mikesell wrote: You probably really want ldap for that sort of thing. You probably really want to reconsider using ldap for anything that gets loads of changes daily. In the case of a mail relay, at one point years back I d

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

Ian Forde wrote: > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Nov 23, 2009, at 6:14 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > >> On the contrary, having the ability to extend through external >> software gives >> you unlimited options. Note that postfix eventually got around to >> copying this >> feature. Also with mi

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

Ian Forde wrote: > > On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:34 PM, Christopher Chan > > wrote: > >> Les Mikesell wrote: >>> >>> You probably really want ldap for that sort of thing. >> >> You probably really want to reconsider using ldap for anything that gets >> load

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

Les Mikesell wrote: > Christopher Chan wrote: > >> >> >>> By not-monolithic, I mean that now submission queuing, forwarding, and >>> local >>> delivery are all different processes, each running with limited credentials >>> most >>> of the time. And milters also can run under differ

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 11:00 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote: > Ian Forde wrote: > > > > On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:34 PM, Christopher Chan > > > > wrote: > > > >> Les Mikesell wrote: > > >>> > >>> You probably really want ldap for that sort of thing. > >> >

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

Craig White wrote: > On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 11:00 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote: > >> Ian Forde wrote: >> >>> On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:34 PM, Christopher Chan >>> >> > wrote: >>> >>> Les Mikesell wrote: > You probably reall

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

Christopher Chan wrote: > > Ian pointed how he needs to 'replicate' a local copy of user 'accounts' > from Exchange so that he does not kill Exchange. I just pointed out that > this sort of thing can be done also for sites with a very large user > base that will want something that is more eff

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

Christopher Chan wrote: > > >> How do you have a remote root exploit if you aren't running as root? >> >> > > Ask the sendmail advisories for 8.12.x. Wasn't the last bug found and fixed 5 or 6 years ago? >>> I fail to see how that becomes an advantage for sendmail. >>> >> It lets y

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

Les Mikesell wrote: > Christopher Chan wrote: > >>> >>> How do you have a remote root exploit if you aren't running as root? >>> >>> >>> >> Ask the sendmail advisories for 8.12.x. >> > > Wasn't the last bug found and fixed 5 or 6 years ago? > > Which is great. Just saying

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

Christopher Chan wrote: > Craig White wrote: > >> On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 11:00 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote: >> >> >>> Ian Forde wrote: >>> >>> On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:34 PM, Christopher Chan >>> > wrote:

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

Les Mikesell wrote: > Christopher Chan wrote: > >> >> Ian pointed how he needs to 'replicate' a local copy of user 'accounts' >> from Exchange so that he does not kill Exchange. I just pointed out that >> this sort of thing can be done also for sites with a very large user >> base that will

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

> And how many LDAP implementations have mysql/postgresql behind the LDAP > syntax? > Okay, I will be honest, I do not have that much ldap experience but I was under the impression that they used Berkeley DB or something. I did not know that some had a sql backend... > So LDAP is frequentl

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

Christopher Chan wrote: > >> If you have a reasonably fast internal mailer you can just let mimedefang on >> your external relay check against it with smtp in real time. Exchange isn't >> one >> of those, though. >> >> > > That internal mailer still has to whack something. You would ju

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

Les Mikesell wrote: > Christopher Chan wrote: > >> >> >>> If you have a reasonably fast internal mailer you can just let mimedefang >>> on >>> your external relay check against it with smtp in real time. Exchange >>> isn't one >>> of those, though. >>> >>> >>> >> That in

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

Christopher Chan wrote: > >> Wasn't the last bug found and fixed 5 or 6 years ago? >> >> > > Which is great. Just saying that if there is one still lurking around, > the current model of operation might still be vulnerable. That was a joke, since you can never know when the last bug is f

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

>> Ho hum. I do not know why you keep insisting that letting mimedefang >> handle say lookups to mysql and perform decisions based on those is >> faster than if sendmail had native support. It is after all, one less >> layer to going through and not run in something that is interpreted. >>

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

Christopher Chan wrote: > >>> >> You are removing a layer if you just pass through the recipient check to the >> ultimate source (the internal delivery machine) before accepting, and it >> does in >> fact need to be able to handle the lookups at the speed real messages come >> in. >> How

Re: [CentOS] APIC error on CPU0: 00(60)

John R Pierce ?: Andrey Garkin wrote: Hi All! I have a some problem: On the my motherboard Intel DG45NB with Processor Box Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 , i see in the dmesg(log file): dmesg | grep CPU0 APIC error on CPU0: 00(60) or the sometime: dmesg | grep CPU1 APIC error on CPU1: 00(6

Re: [CentOS] Recommend Mail Server

Christopher Chan wrote: >>> Ho hum. I do not know why you keep insisting that letting mimedefang >>> handle say lookups to mysql and perform decisions based on those is >>> faster than if sendmail had native support. It is after all, one less >>> layer to going through and not run in something t