Re: [CentOS] post install freezes

On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 08:21:01PM -0400, David Mehler wrote: > Hi, > Just the standard keys that come with centos. Please, stop top posting and trim your replies... Show your ks.cfg, your statement don't match your error report... (%post with only 'yum -y update' then GPG key import, ... what el

[CentOS] Inquiry:What is the equivalent of nmap command on CentOS 5.2 ?

Dear All Please be informed that I have installed CentOS 5.2 on my client but it does not have nmap command . Can you please do me favor and let me know what is the equivalent of nmap command on CentOS 5.2 ? Thank you in advance ___ CentOS mailing list Ce

Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:What is the equivalent of nmap command on CentOS 5.2 ?

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:37:24 +0100 hadi motamedi wrote: > Please be informed that I have installed CentOS 5.2 on my client but it does > not have nmap command . Can you please do me favor and let me know what is > the equivalent of nmap command on CentOS 5.2 ? nmap can be installed using the "yum

Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:What is the equivalent of nmap command on CentOS 5.2 ?

hadi motamedi schrieb: > Dear All > Please be informed that I have installed CentOS 5.2 on my client but it > does not have nmap command . Can you please do me favor and let me know > what is the equivalent of nmap command on CentOS 5.2 ? > Thank you in advance Do you want something else? You may

Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:What is the equivalent of nmap command on CentOS 5.2 ?

On 15/10/2009, at 6:07 PM, hadi motamedi wrote: > Dear All > Please be informed that I have installed CentOS 5.2 on my client but > it does not have nmap command . Can you please do me favor and let > me know what is the equivalent of nmap command on CentOS 5.2 ? > Thank you in advance There

Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:What is the equivalent of nmap command on CentOS 5.2 ?

Thank you very much for your reply . But this time it returns "yum command not found" . Can you please help me ? Thank you in advance On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:42 AM, Frank Cox wrote: > On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:37:24 +0100 > hadi motamedi wrote: > > > Please be informed that I have installed Cen

Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:What is the equivalent of nmap command on CentOS 5.2 ?

On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 09:11:07AM +0100, hadi motamedi wrote: > Thank you very much for your reply . But this time it returns "yum command > not found" . Can you please help me ? Might I direct you to the following sites: http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks http://wiki.c

Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:What is the equivalent of nmap command on CentOS 5.2 ?

he is probably owner of one of those cheap virtuozzo based virtual dedicated servers. their default templates do not include yum to prevent high load of yum usage on the host systems. cheers juergen John R. Dennison wrote > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 09:11:07AM +0100, hadi motamedi wrote: >> Than

Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:What is the equivalent of nmap command on CentOS 5.2 ?

On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 01:04:43PM +0200, Juergen Gotteswinter wrote: > he is probably owner of one of those cheap virtuozzo based virtual > dedicated servers. their default templates do not include yum to prevent > high load of yum usage on the host systems. I'll see your openvz and rai

[CentOS] CentOS 5.4? anyone?

Hi, The last status (from twitter) is 2 days old with the '5.4 is baked! centos internal network will start syncing up today. Release ~ soon!'. Any ETA? - Regards. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/cent

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.4? anyone?

mbneto wrote: > Hi, > > The last status (from twitter) is 2 days old with the '5.4 is baked! > centos internal network will start syncing up today. Release ~ soon!'. > Any ETA? > Just relax and wait, this is a _volunteer_ based project. Want a release date? Go pay for RHEL. ___

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.4? anyone?

On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:45 AM, mbneto wrote: > Hi, > > The last status (from twitter) is 2 days old with the '5.4 is baked! centos > internal network will start syncing up today. Release ~ soon!'. Any ETA? > > - Regards. > > ___ > CentOS mailing lis

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Digest, Vol 57, Issue 14

Thanks for the responses. I think this is what I want to do. I commented out #Defaultsrequiretty in /etc/sudo. But what I really wanted to do was just place it in VPNUSERS: %vpnusers ALL=NOPASSWD: /sbin/service myciscovpn start, \ /sbin/service myciscov

Re: [CentOS] timekeeping on VMware guests

Carlos Santana wrote on 10/14/2009 12:13 PM: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: ... >> I hope you have seen my earlier posts in this thread. If you are not >> running the latest kernel (-164), you want to give it a try because it >> has patches developed by VMWare engineers for

Re: [CentOS] timekeeping on VMware guests

On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 09:00:54AM -0400, Phil Schaffner wrote: > Carlos Santana wrote on 10/14/2009 12:13 PM: > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > ... > >> I hope you have seen my earlier posts in this thread. If you are not > >> running the latest kernel (-164), you want to

[CentOS] VMware server on Linux

Well, one of our boxes is running VMware server, and the admin who set it up is under the impression that the NIC *has* to be in promiscuous mode. We, of course, would rather it wasn't. Is this the case? mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@cento

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Digest, Vol 57, Issue 14

> Thanks for the responses. I think this is what I want to do. I commented > out > >#Defaultsrequiretty > > in /etc/sudo. But what I really wanted to do was just place it in > VPNUSERS: > > %vpnusers ALL=NOPASSWD: /sbin/service myciscovpn start, \ > /sbin

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.4? anyone?

On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:07 AM, Miguel Di Ciurcio Filho < mig...@ic.unicamp.br> wrote: > mbneto wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The last status (from twitter) is 2 days old with the '5.4 is baked! > > centos internal network will start syncing up today. Release ~ soon!'. > > Any ETA? > > > > Just relax an

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.4? anyone?

On 15/10/09 14:41, Jeremy Rosengren wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:07 AM, Miguel Di Ciurcio Filho > mailto:mig...@ic.unicamp.br>> wrote: > > mbneto wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The last status (from twitter) is 2 days old with the '5.4 is baked! > > centos internal network will s

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.4? anyone?

Many of the questions are due to ignorance from many of us not versed in what it take s to come up with the release. For Version 5.5 when we get that far, if some one could work up a quick and dirty web page checklist showing the basic progress and what steps are left to bring the release to

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.4? anyone?

Jeremy Rosengren wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:07 AM, Miguel Di Ciurcio Filho > mailto:mig...@ic.unicamp.br>> wrote: > > mbneto wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The last status (from twitter) is 2 days old with the '5.4 is baked! > > centos internal network will start syncing u

Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:What is the equivalent of nmap command onCentOS 5.2 ?

Then you'll have to install yum first. There should be an RPM out there somewhere for doing that. Chances are you'll need to track down some dependencies first. That can be a bit of a pain. Good luck. Pat - Original Message - From: hadi motamedi To: Frank Cox Cc: CentOS mailin

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.4? anyone?

Jeremy Rosengren wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:07 AM, Miguel Di Ciurcio Filho > mailto:mig...@ic.unicamp.br>> wrote: > > mbneto wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The last status (from twitter) is 2 days old with the '5.4 is baked! > > centos internal network will start syncing u

Re: [CentOS] VMware server on Linux

m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Well, one of our boxes is running VMware server, and the admin who set it > up is under the impression that the NIC *has* to be in promiscuous mode. > We, of course, would rather it wasn't. > > Is this the case? If your running a bridge at least yes, maybe with other mode

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.4? anyone?

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009, Drew Weaver wrote: >> Just relax and wait, this is a _volunteer_ based project. Want a release >> date? Go pay for RHEL. >> >> >> This response is just as annoying as the request for an update. >> >> -- j > +1 > > Annoying and rude. > > > This might be why the Lin

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.4? anyone?

Hi Miguel, Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately it seems that the 'all or nothing' way of thinking is more common that I expected.Anyone that read my post can see that I did not use 'why is it taking so long?' or similar comments that suggests that I am somewhat angry or anything. I was just

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.4? anyone?

Gilbert Sebenste wrote: >> > This whole thread and these answers are uncalled for. All of them, except > for the original above at the top. But virtually guaranteed for any process that isn't transparent. Someone must enjoy it. Maybe the anticipation is supposed to build up excitement. --

[CentOS] CentOS 5.4? anyone? - "debate"

Dear All, If someone asks a question such as "When is Centos 5.4 coming out" bare in mind that it may be because they genuinely want to know when it's coming out, and feel that somehow, they have not been privy to that information. To me, I see CentOS as a polished professional product given wh

[CentOS] CentOS 5.4? anyone?

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009, Les Mikesell wrote: > But virtually guaranteed for any process that isn't transparent. > Someone must enjoy it. Maybe the anticipation is supposed to build up > excitement. Thanks for the jab. It is fun to be punched. If there were not false steps along any path, one would

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.4? anyone? - "debate"

Gabriel - IP Guys wrote: > > > When someone asked “When will **CentOS 5.4 come out??** The answer is, > “When it is good and ready”, and when they ask “Why/What does that > mean?”, ask them to Google “*open source distribution release cycle*”. > That should keep them busy for long enough for m

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 56, Issue 4

vailable Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20091015/33d30553/attachment-0001.bin -- Message: 2 Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:03:59 +0200 From: Tru Huynh Subject: [CentO

Re: [CentOS] VMware server on Linux

> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Well, one of our boxes is running VMware server, and the admin who set >> it up is under the impression that the NIC *has* to be in promiscuous mode. >> We, of course, would rather it wasn't. >> >> Is this the case? > > If your running a bridge at least yes, maybe with

Re: [CentOS] VMware server on Linux

m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > We were hoping we could lock it down. Thanks. Use ESX, the virtual switches in ESX can have promiscuous mode disabled on them, while I suspect the uplinks from the host to the switches have it enabled, the guest VMs cannot access the wire because it's blocked at the virt

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.4? anyone?

R P Herrold wrote: > On Thu, 15 Oct 2009, Les Mikesell wrote: > >> But virtually guaranteed for any process that isn't transparent. >> Someone must enjoy it. Maybe the anticipation is supposed to build up >> excitement. > > Thanks for the jab. It is fun to be punched. It's not fun on the other

[CentOS] Sparc?

HI All, I have acquired a Sun Fire VL 240. I know there is not a SPARC version of CentOS. Can anyone recommend a good OS for a machine that will do apache, postfix, mysql, etc. I know this is sort of a loaded question, but I don't have a lot of knowledge on distros that are stable on Sparc

Re: [CentOS] Sparc?

ML writes: > HI All, > > I have acquired a Sun Fire VL 240. I know there is not a SPARC version > of CentOS. > > Can anyone recommend a good OS for a machine that will do apache, > postfix, mysql, etc. > > I know this is sort of a loaded question, but I don't have a lot of > knowledge on d

Re: [CentOS] Sparc?

ML wrote: > I know this is sort of a loaded question, but I don't have a lot of > knowledge on distros that are stable on Sparc. I *think* debian is the only "major" distro left that supports SPARC to the fullest extent. Though watch out if your running the latest T1/T2 type processors, last I ch

Re: [CentOS] Sparc?

ML wrote: > HI All, > > > Can anyone recommend a good OS for a machine that will do apache, > postfix, mysql, etc. > > > -Jason Hi There are some options, like Debian or Fedora 11 in case of Linux or something different try FreeBSD. Regards mg. ___

Re: [CentOS] Sparc?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 thus Marcelo M. Garcia spake: > ML wrote: >> HI All, >> >> >> Can anyone recommend a good OS for a machine that will do apache, >> postfix, mysql, etc. >> >> >> -Jason > > Hi > > There are some options, like Debian or Fedora 11 in case of Linux or

Re: [CentOS] Sparc?

On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 12:44 PM, ML wrote: > > I have acquired a Sun Fire VL 240. I know there is not a SPARC version > of CentOS. > > Can anyone recommend a good OS for a machine that will do apache, > postfix, mysql, etc. NetBSD? ___ CentOS mailing l

Re: [CentOS] Sparc?

>> I have acquired a Sun Fire VL 240. I know there is not a SPARC >> version >> of CentOS. >> >> Can anyone recommend a good OS for a machine that will do apache, >> postfix, mysql, etc. >> >> I know this is sort of a loaded question, but I don't have a lot of >> knowledge on distros that are st

Re: [CentOS] Sparc?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Larry Vaden wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 12:44 PM, ML wrote: >> I have acquired a Sun Fire VL 240. I know there is not a SPARC version >> of CentOS. >> >> Can anyone recommend a good OS for a machine that will do apache, >> postfix, mysql, etc. >

Re: [CentOS] Sparc?

Hi Nate, >> I know this is sort of a loaded question, but I don't have a lot of >> knowledge on distros that are stable on Sparc. > > I *think* debian is the only "major" distro left that supports > SPARC to the fullest extent. Though watch out if your running the > latest T1/T2 type processors, l

Re: [CentOS] Sparc?

- "ML" wrote: > HI All, > > I have acquired a Sun Fire VL 240. I know there is not a SPARC version > > of CentOS. > > Can anyone recommend a good OS for a machine that will do apache, > postfix, mysql, etc. > > I know this is sort of a loaded question, but I don't have a lot of > know

[CentOS] CentOS build scripts (or equivalent) acessible?

from [CentOS] CentOS 5.4? anyone? > Is that a big problem for the people who write the code and have every > revision preserved for posterity (and for others to learn from) in a > public revision control system? > I'm not sure that I understand. Is there indeed such a public repository of the buil

Re: [CentOS] timekeeping on VMware guests

On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > I hope you have seen my earlier posts in this thread.  If you are not > running the latest kernel (-164), you want to give it a try because it > has patches developed by VMWare engineers for RHEL kernels.  If you > are already running the -164

Re: [CentOS] Sparc?

> HI All, > > I have acquired a Sun Fire VL 240. I know there is not a SPARC version > of CentOS. > > Can anyone recommend a good OS for a machine that will do apache, > postfix, mysql, etc. Don't forget, if you don't put another o/s on it, mark

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.4? anyone? - "debate"

On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > Gabriel - IP Guys wrote: >> > >> When someone asked “When will **CentOS 5.4 come out??** The answer is, >> “When it is good and ready”, and when they ask “Why/What does that >> mean?”,  ask them to Google “*open source distribution release cy

Re: [CentOS] Sparc?

> > Solaris 10. Top notch OS, and comes with ZFS. As does OpenSolaris. > > Recommend to max it out on RAM. > > Max out RAM? 16gb? How do you figure that? Apache and MySQL will definitely benefit from it, but if you don't plan on running a busy production server, 2-4GB will probably do. I was

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.4? anyone?

On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > > It's not fun on the other side of this fence either.  Being kept in the > dark makes you imagine all sorts of scary things. Oh give me a break. The CentOS developers have consistently released a solid distribution. If I have to choose betw

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.4? anyone?

> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Les Mikesell > wrote: >> >> It's not fun on the other side of this fence either. Being kept in >> the >> dark makes you imagine all sorts of scary things. > > Oh give me a break. The CentOS developers have consistently released a > solid distribution. If I

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.4? anyone? - "debate"

Les Mikesell wrote: > > I think for a lot of us, the 'we'll release when it's ready' mentality > is the main reason we aren't using debian. I don't think CentOS should > repeat their mistakes. > So what do you suggest? Release the OS with known problems, just to satisfy a date and the hyster

Re: [CentOS] CentOS build scripts (or equivalent) acessible?

Mathieu Baudier wrote: > > I'm not sure that I understand. > Is there indeed such a public repository of the build scriptds / RPM > specs used by CentOS? > > That would indeed be fascinating and useful to have a look at it. > (I rebuilt libvirt from RedHat SRPM, just to test the some new > virtua

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.4? anyone?

aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Les Mikesell >> wrote: >>> It's not fun on the other side of this fence either. Being kept in >>> the >>> dark makes you imagine all sorts of scary things. >> Oh give me a break. The CentOS developers have consistently released a

[CentOS] openjdk

Hey, folks, yum is telling me that I need to update openjdk on several servers. HOWEVER, they've all got openjdk-plugin installed, and yum doesn't want to update, and tells me there's no openjdk-plugin package to install, at least for 5.3. What I see, googling, is the workaround is to install

Re: [CentOS] openjdk

m.r...@5-cent.us wrote on 10/15/2009 05:01 PM: > Hey, folks, > > yum is telling me that I need to update openjdk on several servers. > HOWEVER, they've all got openjdk-plugin installed, and yum doesn't want > to update, and tells me there's no openjdk-plugin package to install, at > least for 5.

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.4? anyone?

>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Les Mikesell >>> wrote: It's not fun on the other side of this fence either. Being kept in the dark makes you imagine all sorts of scary things. >>> Oh give me a break. The CentOS developers have consistently >>> released a >>> solid distribu

Re: [CentOS] timekeeping on VMware guests

On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:55:40AM -0500, Carlos Santana wrote: >> 1. Kernel options added as: >> divider=10 >> clocksource=acpi_pm >> >> 2. ntp.conf file was modified as per wiki instructions as follows: >> (add to the top of the file) >>

[CentOS] CentOS 5.4 and BitTorrent

If I remember correctly, when version 5.3 was released, about 95% was made available by BitTorrent before the official release date, so that the entire file would be available as soon as possible after the release. Could the same be done this time? -- Yves Bellefeuille "Yves Bellefeuille: E

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.4 and BitTorrent

> If I remember correctly, when version 5.3 was released, about 95% was > made available by BitTorrent before the official release date, so that > the entire file would be available as soon as possible after the > release. > > Could the same be done this time? > > -- > Yves Bellefeuille > "Yves B

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.4 and BitTorrent

Yves Bellefeuille wrote: > If I remember correctly, when version 5.3 was released, about 95% was > made available by BitTorrent before the official release date, so that > the entire file would be available as soon as possible after the > release. > > Could the same be done this time? Could someon

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.4 and BitTorrent

> Yves Bellefeuille wrote: >> If I remember correctly, when version 5.3 was released, about 95% was >> made available by BitTorrent before the official release date, so >> that >> the entire file would be available as soon as possible after the >> release. >> >> Could the same be done this time?

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.4 and BitTorrent

nate wrote: > Yves Bellefeuille wrote: >> If I remember correctly, when version 5.3 was released, about 95% was >> made available by BitTorrent before the official release date, so that >> the entire file would be available as soon as possible after the >> release. >> >> Could the same be done this

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.4 and BitTorrent

Les Mikesell wrote: > nate wrote: > >> Yves Bellefeuille wrote: >> >>> If I remember correctly, when version 5.3 was released, about 95% was >>> made available by BitTorrent before the official release date, so that >>> the entire file would be available as soon as possible after the >>>

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.4 and BitTorrent

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009, Les Mikesell wrote: >> >> Could someone describe to me what the rush is? I mean what drives >> the need that you need to have it _right now_ ? > > There is always the risk that a critical security vulnerability will be > discovered with the fix only made available in an update

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.4 and BitTorrent

Jim Wildman wrote: > On Thu, 15 Oct 2009, Les Mikesell wrote: > >>> Could someone describe to me what the rush is? I mean what drives >>> the need that you need to have it _right now_ ? >> There is always the risk that a critical security vulnerability will be >> discovered with the fix only made

Re: [CentOS] Sparc?

Hi, maybe Gentoo Linux will be up on this server. my buddy has successfully ran it on Sun Blade 1000, but there is a UltraSPARC III and UltraSPARC III Cu CPUs ( UltraSPARC IIIi on the SF240). I think OpenSolaris will be better there ;) really have fun :) On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:44 PM, ML wrot

Re: [CentOS] continuing issues with %post

Am Donnerstag, den 15.10.2009, 04:17 +0200 schrieb David Mehler: > Hello, > I'm trying to do an unattended CentOS 5.3 install. For the most part > it's working. As of right now i'm statically assigning the machine an > IP which i believe will allow %post to resolve names? I also like > knowing wher

Re: [CentOS] post install freezes

Am Mittwoch, den 14.10.2009, 19:37 +0200 schrieb David Mehler: > Hello, > I'm doing an unattended CentOS 5.3 install in a virtual machine > vmware. I'm redirecting output to a serial console because production > boxes won't have monitors. I'm getting to the point of doing the post > installation th

Re: [CentOS] CentOS build scripts (or equivalent) acessible?

Am Donnerstag, den 15.10.2009, 22:02 +0200 schrieb Miguel Di Ciurcio Filho: > Mathieu Baudier wrote: > > > > I'm not sure that I understand. > > Is there indeed such a public repository of the build scriptds / RPM > > specs used by CentOS? > > > > That would indeed be fascinating and useful to have