Re: [CentOS] trying to understand OSS, GPL, BSD & other licensing model for software distribution.

2009-10-07 Thread Rudi Ahlers
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:26 AM, Rainer Duffner wrote: > > Am 07.10.2009 um 00:18 schrieb Rudi Ahlers: > >> Hi all, >> >> We are busy developing some software (some is web based, others not) > > > > Licenses are only about the source-access and how contribution/ > deviations are licensed. > > You c

Re: [CentOS] Embedded Question-Stateless readonly filesystem

2009-10-07 Thread Alok Prasad
Yes This technology preview is amazing . Hope Karan never stop this development. I am trying to make a readonly root filesystem for asterisknow 1.5 which uses centos 5.3 ,if it this works will be amazing.It will always ensure asterisknow1.5 boot cleanly even improperly shutdown or on crash. Some

Re: [CentOS] trying to understand OSS, GPL, BSD & other licensing model for software distribution.

2009-10-07 Thread Frank Cox
On Wed, 07 Oct 2009 10:01:00 +0200 Rudi Ahlers wrote: > But they don't have a commercial version of the same project. So I > want to know how do I license the commercial scripts with this in > mind? i.e. if I license them as GPL, do I need to disclose the source > code? Cause we're going to encryp

Re: [CentOS] Is fr.centos.org dead ?

2009-10-07 Thread Marcus Moeller
Dear Niki. > What's wrong with fr.centos.org? Any news? Site's been dead for quite > some time now. I think, yes. There was a hardware failure on the server, and no restorable backup available. We hope to get the new forums (based on the updated WebInfrastructure) up soon. Best Regards Marcus __

Re: [CentOS] vncserver startup error??

2009-10-07 Thread James Bensley
I have no idea what your issue is but for us vncserver works great. If you are having a lot of difficulties then I would suggest un-installing it and starting again as it works pretty well; i.e. all you have to do is install and configure it like any other program and it works. We didn't have any i

Re: [CentOS] problem installing centos 5.3 on IBM x3200 m2

2009-10-07 Thread Janez Kosmrlj
Update! I tried to install Fedora 10 and Fedora 11 on this box and they both installed without problems. BR On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Janez Kosmrlj wrote: > Hi, > I am trying to install centos 5.3 on ibm x3200 m2 server. The problem > appears when the installer is about to finish the insta

Re: [CentOS] problem installing centos 5.3 on IBM x3200 m2

2009-10-07 Thread Max Hetrick
Janez Kosmrlj wrote: > Hi, > I am trying to install centos 5.3 on ibm x3200 m2 server. The problem > appears when the installer is about to finish the installation. It > detects the RAID correctly, but it doesn't finish formatting the root > partition. I tried the default partition layout and al

[CentOS] Desktop apps, OO and Scribus

2009-10-07 Thread lhecking
I just came across a user who tried to view a Word document on a CentOS5 machine, and it seems that desktop, firefox etc. are trying to view it with Scribus instead of OpenOffice. This needs to change. Is there a system-wide setting for it? On the older, RHEL3 systems we used to have mozplu

Re: [CentOS] trying to understand OSS, GPL, BSD & other licensing model for software distribution.

2009-10-07 Thread Robert Heller
At Wed, 7 Oct 2009 10:01:00 +0200 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:26 AM, Rainer Duffner wrote: > > > > Am 07.10.2009 um 00:18 schrieb Rudi Ahlers: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> We are busy developing some software (some is web based, others not) > > > > > > > > Licenses are

Re: [CentOS] trying to understand OSS, GPL, BSD & other licensing model for software distribution.

2009-10-07 Thread Eduardo Grosclaude
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 5:01 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > What I don't yet fully understand, is how do we license both versions > of the same script, so that if a community member writes an addon for > the free one, that other community members can benefit from it as > well? And more specific, is it p

[CentOS] CentOS-5.3 Inactive device reports error - bugzilla:465442

2009-10-07 Thread James B. Byrne
I am seeing this in the syslog when starting a multi-homed CentOS-5.3 host. Oct 6 08:35:04 inet04 nm-system-settings: initial_add_devices_of_type: could not get device from HAL: An SELinux policy prevents this sender from sending this message to this recipient (rejected message had interface "org

Re: [CentOS] Desktop apps, OO and Scribus

2009-10-07 Thread Lee Perez
lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: > I just came across a user who tried to view a Word document on a CentOS5 > machine, and it seems that desktop, firefox etc. are trying to view it > with Scribus instead of OpenOffice. > > This needs to change. Is there a system-wide setting for it? > > O

[CentOS] selinux...

2009-10-07 Thread m . roth
Have I mentioned that I am less than enthralled with selinux? My latest issue is continuing messages in the /var/log/messages, which complain, for example, that siteminder can't write to smagent log (well, it can, since we've got selinux in permissive mode, and no, we have no control over using ei

Re: [CentOS] selinux...

2009-10-07 Thread Barry Brimer
Quoting m.r...@5-cent.us: > Have I mentioned that I am less than enthralled with selinux? > > My latest issue is continuing messages in the /var/log/messages, which > complain, for example, that siteminder can't write to smagent log (well, > it can, since we've got selinux in permissive mode, and

Re: [CentOS] selinux...

2009-10-07 Thread m . roth
> Quoting m.r...@5-cent.us: > >> Have I mentioned that I am less than enthralled with selinux? >> >> My latest issue is continuing messages in the /var/log/messages, which >> complain, for example, that siteminder can't write to smagent log (well, >> it can, since we've got selinux in permissive mo

Re: [CentOS] selinux...

2009-10-07 Thread Rob Townley
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:45 AM, wrote: >> Quoting m.r...@5-cent.us: >> >>> Have I mentioned that I am less than enthralled with selinux? >>> >>> My latest issue is continuing messages in the /var/log/messages, which >>> complain, for example, that siteminder can't write to smagent log (well, >>>

Re: [CentOS] Disc layout advice

2009-10-07 Thread Ross Walker
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Stephen Harris wrote: > On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 07:29:00PM +, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> >You don't run pvcreate on lvm partitions.  You run pvcreate on the block >> >devices that will be added to the volume groups. >> >> You sure can run pvcreate on a partition

Re: [CentOS] selinux...

2009-10-07 Thread m . roth
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:45 AM, wrote: >>> Quoting m.r...@5-cent.us: >>> Have I mentioned that I am less than enthralled with selinux? My latest issue is continuing messages in the /var/log/messages, which complain, for example, that siteminder can't write to smagent log >

Re: [CentOS] selinux...

2009-10-07 Thread Meenoo Shivdasani
> Then we can go to: > <...> avc:  denied  { write } for  pid=5898 comm="LLAWP" > path="/var/log/httpd/smagent.log" dev=sda3 ino= > scontext=root:system_r:httpd_t:s0 tcontext=root:object_r:httpd_log_t:s0 > tclass=file When selinux is configured for permissive mode, the action is permitted, but sel

Re: [CentOS] selinux...

2009-10-07 Thread nate
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > You begin to see my frustration, esp. when I have to skim through logs > that have a dozen, or two dozen, of these (and others) every hour, to find > other more important messages. How about log filtering? Since your in such a high security environment to need SELinux I

[CentOS] Bring up Networking in Single User Mode

2009-10-07 Thread ML
Hi All, Can anyone provide advice on how to bring up networking in Single User Mode? I need to specify an IP, mask, gateway and bring up the adaptor so I can ssh into another machine to transfer files to it. -ML ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@cento

Re: [CentOS] Bring up Networking in Single User Mode

2009-10-07 Thread nate
ML wrote: > Hi All, > > Can anyone provide advice on how to bring up networking in Single User > Mode? > > I need to specify an IP, mask, gateway and bring up the adaptor so I > can ssh into another machine to transfer files to it. ifconfig ethX IP_ADDRESS netmask NETMASK route add default gw IP_O

Re: [CentOS] Bring up Networking in Single User Mode

2009-10-07 Thread nate
ML wrote: > Hi All, > > Can anyone provide advice on how to bring up networking in Single User > Mode? > > I need to specify an IP, mask, gateway and bring up the adaptor so I > can ssh into another machine to transfer files to it. You could also probably do /etc/init.d/network start my first pos

Re: [CentOS] Bring up Networking in Single User Mode

2009-10-07 Thread A. Kirillov
> Can anyone provide advice on how to bring up networking in Single User > Mode? > > I need to specify an IP, mask, gateway and bring up the adaptor so I > can ssh into another machine to transfer files to it. # service network start ? ___ CentOS

Re: [CentOS] Bring up Networking in Single User Mode

2009-10-07 Thread ML
Nate, > ifconfig ethX IP_ADDRESS netmask NETMASK > route add default gw IP_OF_GATEWAY OK, so I was correct, I am doing ifconfig eth0 172.16.254.80 netmask 255.255.255.240 route add default gw 172.16.254.1 I am getting Network is unreachable. -Jason

Re: [CentOS] Bring up Networking in Single User Mode

2009-10-07 Thread Timo Schoeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 thus ML spake: > Nate, > >> ifconfig ethX IP_ADDRESS netmask NETMASK >> route add default gw IP_OF_GATEWAY > > OK, so I was correct, > > I am doing > > ifconfig eth0 172.16.254.80 netmask 255.255.255.240 > route add default gw 172.16.254.1 > > I a

Re: [CentOS] Bring up Networking in Single User Mode

2009-10-07 Thread ML
Hi Timo, > Try 'ifconfig eth0 172.16.254.80 netmask 255.255.255.240 up' or, after > you already issued those commands, a simple 'ifconfig eth0 up'. Yup did that then: route ass default gw 172.16.254.1 I get: Network is unreachable I can ping 172.16.254.1 from my Mac though. -Jason ___

Re: [CentOS] Bring up Networking in Single User Mode

2009-10-07 Thread Eduardo Grosclaude
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:28 PM, ML wrote: > Nate, > >> ifconfig ethX IP_ADDRESS netmask NETMASK >> route add default gw IP_OF_GATEWAY > > OK, so I was correct, > > I am doing > > ifconfig eth0 172.16.254.80 netmask 255.255.255.240 > route add default gw 172.16.254.1 > > I am getting Network is unr

Re: [CentOS] Bring up Networking in Single User Mode

2009-10-07 Thread Christoph Maser
Am Mittwoch, den 07.10.2009, 20:28 +0200 schrieb ML: > Nate, > > > ifconfig ethX IP_ADDRESS netmask NETMASK > > route add default gw IP_OF_GATEWAY > > OK, so I was correct, > > I am doing > > ifconfig eth0 172.16.254.80 netmask 255.255.255.240 > route add default gw 172.16.254.1 > > I am getting Ne

Re: [CentOS] selinux...

2009-10-07 Thread m . roth
> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> You begin to see my frustration, esp. when I have to skim through logs >> that have a dozen, or two dozen, of these (and others) every hour, to >> find other more important messages. > > How about log filtering? Since your in such a high security > environment to need

Re: [CentOS] Bring up Networking in Single User Mode

2009-10-07 Thread ML
>> ifconfig eth0 172.16.254.80 netmask 255.255.255.240 >> route add default gw 172.16.254.1 >> >> I am getting Network is unreachable. >> > > ipcalc -nbp 172.16.254.80 255.255.255.240 > PREFIX=28 > BROADCAST=172.16.254.95 > NETWORK=172.16.254.80 > > so 172.16.254.1 is not in your network and thus

Re: [CentOS] Bring up Networking in Single User Mode

2009-10-07 Thread m . roth
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > thus ML spake: >> Nate, >> >>> ifconfig ethX IP_ADDRESS netmask NETMASK >>> route add default gw IP_OF_GATEWAY >> >> OK, so I was correct, >> >> I am doing >> >> ifconfig eth0 172.16.254.80 netmask 255.255.255.240 >> route add default gw 172.16.254.1 >> >> I a

Re: [CentOS] Bring up Networking in Single User Mode

2009-10-07 Thread Preston Connors
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jason, 172.16.254.1 is not in the same subnet as 172.16.254.80 when you use a netmask of 255.255.255.240. You would need to use a larger netmask. 255.255.255.128 would be the smallest netmask you could use to enable you to locally reach 172.16.254.1.

Re: [CentOS] How fast?

2009-10-07 Thread m . roth
> On Oct 6, 2009, at 2:23 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote: >>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On >> Behalf >>> Of Paul Heinlein >>> Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 12:35 AM >>> >>> The bigger issue is ensuring that an older computer has enough disk >>> space to house a mode

Re: [CentOS] Disc layout advice

2009-10-07 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>Joesph, > >You can create PVs out of any block device (even LVs). > >You don't need to partition past the raw device storage, even that is >optional, but recommended so other OSs know that, yes the space is >actually used, if your using a volume manager like LVM. If you need to >create a partition

[CentOS] tgtadm and exported iscsi volumes

2009-10-07 Thread Joseph L. Casale
Out of haste I decided for the first time not to pull down and compile iet to export a single volume to a windows machine so I just used tgtd. Well, much more time later than otherwise would be the case had I used iet, when I mount the volume on the windows ini, it can't find and install a driver?

Re: [CentOS] Failing Hard Disk?

2009-10-07 Thread m . roth
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Stewart Williams > lists-at-pinkyboots.co.uk wrote: > >> I am fairly certain that this disk is failing in my server, and I am >> replacing it straight away anyway. > > Good idea. Looks like it's dying. >> I am also getting these errors every 30 minutes: >> >> Oc

Re: [CentOS] how can i configure linux as ppp

2009-10-07 Thread m . roth
> Now I got another modem but this modem is hardcore the DSL login > How can I not use this DSL login and use linux box to ppp0e login and pw > > thank you > Hi. I've just gotten DSL for the first time myself (I've had cable before)...but the DSL modem I got from Verizon has an ethernet jack. I

[CentOS] bind question, please help

2009-10-07 Thread adrian kok
Hi I don't know how to let the dns as zone and also enquriy in local network please help if this. the outside and inside can use this server to enquiry zone, but can't enquriy non zone. but how can I let it enquiry non zone restrict in local network. Thank you allow-query { any;

Re: [CentOS] DNS Serving - Why my own?

2009-10-07 Thread m . roth
> ML wrote: >> HI All, >> >> Can anyone explain why I might want to run my own DNS Server in-house? >> I have a comcast business circuit and use their DNS servers and when I >> need entries, I use GoDaddy where I buy my domains. >> > It depends upon how many PCs / servers you have and what function

Re: [CentOS] bind question, please help

2009-10-07 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>I don't know how to let the dns as zone and also enquriy in local network >please help > >if this. the outside and inside can use this server to enquiry zone, but can't >enquriy non zone. but how can I let it enquiry non zone restrict in local >network. I am not following you well here, but I a

Re: [CentOS] DNS Serving - Why my own?

2009-10-07 Thread Florin Andrei
Ryan Pugatch wrote: > > Another reason would be to avoid your ISP's redirection when a host > doesn't resolve. Comcast, for example, will send your request to their > search page. This can confuse some people, or can potentially end up > leading you to a malicious page (I don't trust their se

Re: [CentOS] bind question, please help

2009-10-07 Thread adrian kok
in my understanding: 1/ this allow internal network can query zone and outside allow-query { localhost; internal-network; }; recursion yes; 2/ this allow internal network can query zone but not outside allow-query { localhost; internal-network; }; recursi

Re: [CentOS] Bring up Networking in Single User Mode

2009-10-07 Thread R.C. Prince
I believe he's onto something there...routable addresses would be 172.16.254.81 thru 172.16.254.94 on 28 bits...and there's that pesky rule about having your gateway on the same subnet as the node. :) --Original Message-- From: Eduardo Grosclaude Sender: centos-boun...@centos.org To: Cent

Re: [CentOS] bind question, please help

2009-10-07 Thread Alan Sparks
Look into allow-recursion. Perhaps something like: options { allow-recursion { localhost; internal-network; }; }; adrian kok wrote: > in my understanding: > > > 1/ this allow internal network can query zone and outside > allow-query { localhost; internal-network; }; > recu

[CentOS] pbond0: received packet with own address as source address

2009-10-07 Thread aurfalien
Hi all, I've been seeing this message fill my logs; pbond0: received packet with own address as source address I've tried; ip set link pbond0 down ip set link pbond0 arp off ip set link pbond0 up in /etc/systcl net.ipv4.conf.bond0.arp_ignore = 8 net.ipv4.conf.bond0.arp_announce = 2 I've 2 ph

Re: [CentOS] bind question, please help

2009-10-07 Thread Dan Carl
adrian kok wrote: > in my understanding: > > > 1/ this allow internal network can query zone and outside > allow-query { localhost; internal-network; }; > recursion yes; > > > 2/ this allow internal network can query zone but not outside > >allow-query { localhost; i

Re: [CentOS] pbond0: received packet with own address as source address

2009-10-07 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>I've been seeing this message fill my logs; > >pbond0: received packet with own address as source address Didn't we just hash this out yesterday? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] pbond0: received packet with own address as source address

2009-10-07 Thread aurfalien
>> I've been seeing this message fill my logs; >> >> pbond0: received packet with own address as source address > > Didn't we just hash this out yesterday? Not really. Yesterday I asked about behavior specific to modes, today I have a specific error. I also saw a few other bond posts but non

Re: [CentOS] CentOS for non-tech user

2009-10-07 Thread m . roth
> m.r...@5-cent.us a écrit : > >> I also have CentOS at home. There are quirks, though: for example, I >> tried to run kaffeine last night, and it couldn't find libkaffeinepart.so. I >> tried adding /opt/kde3/lib to LD_LIBRARY_PATH, to LOAD_LIB, >> and even did an ldconfig, and it *still* can't fin

Re: [CentOS] Dualboot CentOS and Windows

2009-10-07 Thread m . roth
> 2009/9/29 Sorin Srbu > >> >-Original Message- >> >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On >> Behalf >> >Of Frank Thommen >> >Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 3:27 PM >> >To: CentOS mailing list >> >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dualboot CentOS and Windows >> > >> >

Re: [CentOS] CentOS for non-tech user

2009-10-07 Thread Niki Kovacs
Les Mikesell a écrit : > But that means you have to wait many years for new features - that you > probably > want in rapidly developing desktop apps. > One new set of desktop applications about every two years suits me perfectly[1]. Lately I only needed a more recent version of Open Office t

Re: [CentOS] CentOS for non-tech user

2009-10-07 Thread Niki Kovacs
Florin Andrei a écrit : > > I keep an eye on a Kawasaki forum, and they have a knack for doing a lot > of Suzuki bashing. I'm, like, "WTF, they're all awesome sportbikes!" :-) > > Same here. In the end, Linux is the same Right. Got fifteen Hondas and one Yamaha before finally settling for an o

[CentOS] Broadcom chips: TOE or no TOE?

2009-10-07 Thread Florin Andrei
Last time I checked (but that was a while ago) TOE (TCP Offloading Engine) was not supported very well, at least not with Broadcom chips. Did anything change in that regard recently? More specifically, the chip I'm looking at is Broadcom NetXtreme II 5709 and the distribution is 5.3 Any luck w

Re: [CentOS] Broadcom chips: TOE or no TOE?

2009-10-07 Thread nate
Florin Andrei wrote: > Any luck with proprietary drivers? Any problems those drivers may cause > with bonding? I don't think there are proprietary drivers for broadcom NICs, about 5 years ago there was proprietary fault tolerance drivers but I don't see them now. If you go to their site they jus

Re: [CentOS] Broadcom chips: TOE or no TOE?

2009-10-07 Thread Florin Andrei
nate wrote: > Florin Andrei wrote: > >> Any luck with proprietary drivers? Any problems those drivers may cause >> with bonding? > > I don't think there are proprietary drivers for broadcom NICs, > about 5 years ago there was proprietary fault tolerance drivers > but I don't see them now. Right,

Re: [CentOS] ee on CentOS

2009-10-07 Thread Spiro Harvey
> I'm switching a couple of servers from fbsd to CentOS. > In fbsd I'm used to ee as the text editor. > Is that available in CentOS? I've just had time to fiddle with the rpmfind version I pointed you to, and it didn't work very well, so I've rebuilt it as a binary RPM... http://wtf.geek.nz/dl/ea

Re: [CentOS] pbond0: received packet with own address as source address

2009-10-07 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>Any ideas? I do believe it's merely cosmetic and rather unavoidable in some bond schemes such as 0. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] pbond0: received packet with own address as source address

2009-10-07 Thread aurfalien
Thanks for pinging back. It was having reliability issues and so I switched to 802.3ad. Now all is well. Would have liked round robin. On Oct 7, 2009, at 7:32 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> Any ideas? > > I do believe it's merely cosmetic and rather unavoidable in some bond > schemes such as

[CentOS] Linux CD Stores

2009-10-07 Thread ML
HI All, It seems that the days of ordering burned CD's of distros has faded. People just have fast internet now. I recall a number of times that I ordered Slackware CD's or others because it was just easier than downloading and burning myself. I am actually planning on ordering CentOS 5.4

Re: [CentOS] Linux CD Stores

2009-10-07 Thread nate
ML wrote: > HI All, > downloading and burning myself. I am actually planning on ordering > CentOS 5.4 media when available to support the project. Most distros/OSs provide that service built in - https://shipit.ubuntu.com/ http://www.openbsd.org/orders.html http://www.debian.org/CD/vendors/ http: