Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
>>
Ah, well, if you want to keep the landlines, then yeah, I guess asterisk
is the way to go. If your goal is to replace keyline systems, then
asterisk definitely has that kind of support which, it appears, even
Cisco's solution does not (from the mouth of Data
>
> On 09/29/2009 09:21 AM, Geoff Galitz wrote:
> > Ubuntu has the LTS releases, which are long term stable releases. They
> are
> > supported for five years after release.
>
> you might want to look into exactly what is ubuntu-support and how that
> compares with what you get with CentOS. Its n
On Thursday 01 October 2009, Ryan Pugatch wrote:
> Florin Andrei wrote:
> > Last time I saw this issue, no sparse files, nothing legit, it was a
> > corrupted FS. :(
>
> Well, if I mount to another directory the size is right. My next step
> will be to fsck probably.
One possibility is that the m
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 06:30:08PM -0400, Ryan Pugatch wrote:
>
>
> Luciano Rocha wrote:
>
> > Do this:
> > mount /dev/xvda3 /mnt
> > du -hc /mnt
> >
> > And see if you can find the other 12GB.
> >
> > I usually do:
> > du -mc --max-depth 2 /mnt | sort -n
> >
> > Though I've recently learned:
Hi,
So far after the downgrade of the kernel I've been able to surpass the last
uptime (2 days). Perhaps too soon to say but it seems that the kernel is
indeed responsible for that.
The problem is that a new kernel was released yesterday by RH and I could
not find any evidence that it has solve
Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> I forgot to mention that the CentOS Directory Server is already part of
> the regular CentOS Extras repository, and should install from there as a
> dependency for CentOS EIPA
>
Good to know! I was thinking that is was still available on testing
repository.
By the way,
On 10/01/2009 07:22 AM, Miguel Di Ciurcio Filho wrote:
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
>> I forgot to mention that the CentOS Directory Server is already part of
>> the regular CentOS Extras repository, and should install from there as a
>> dependency for CentOS EIPA
>>
>
> Good to know! I was thinking
I have a host that I have been accessing with vncviewer via its fqdn
that had only an IPv4 A record.
I just added a IPv6 record, and vncviewer via fqdn stopped
working. But worked when I provided the IPv4 address instead.
It LOOKS like vncviewer is trying the IPv6 address, eventhough all
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 4:09 PM, nate wrote:
> Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> In Timo's thread about RAM today, I noticed dmidecode and I got the
>> data for my Dell Dimension 2400 (Celeron CPU) box, which is below. I
>
> You running the latest bios for the system?
>
> According to dell 2GB is the max
>
Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
> One possibility is that the missing data is hiding under a mount-point in the
> normal case.
>
> /Peter
So what you're saying is something is mounted on to a directory that had
data in it before the mount. How do I see the data being hidden without
unmounting the poi
Ryan Pugatch wrote:
> So what you're saying is something is mounted on to a directory that had
> data in it before the mount. How do I see the data being hidden without
> unmounting the point?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ryan
After thinking about this, I realized I could mount the partition to
another
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi list,
I have a weird (?) problem here on a setup running CentOS 5.3 x86_64
(and OpenVZ, and some home-brew L2TP daemons, RIPd, BGPd, etc).
There's a (VE in OpenVZ speak) virtual machine that has two ethernet
interfaces, seen as eth0 and eth1, resp
I have been having problems printing web pages with Firefox under CentOS
4.8:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.14) Gecko/2009091009
CentOS/3.0.14-1.el4.centos Firefox/3.0.14
What happens is that some of the text is 'scrambled' (looks like
somehow something is messed up with the fo
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Timo Schoeler
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi list,
>
> I have a weird (?) problem here on a setup running CentOS 5.3 x86_64
> (and OpenVZ, and some home-brew L2TP daemons, RIPd, BGPd, etc).
>
> There's a (VE in OpenVZ speak) virtual
At Thu, 01 Oct 2009 10:13:26 -0400 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
> > One possibility is that the missing data is hiding under a mount-point in
> > the
> > normal case.
> >
> > /Peter
>
> So what you're saying is something is mounted on to a directory that had
> dat
Robert Heller wrote:
> You can't. You must unmount. You should be able to do this from
> single user mode if the file system cannot be unmounted under multiuser
> mode (eg /usr, /var, etc.). Usually other mount points can be
> unmounted, but depends on what is running on the system at the time.
Robert Heller schrieb am 01.10.2009 19:35:20:
> At Thu, 01 Oct 2009 10:13:26 -0400 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
> > > One possibility is that the missing data is hiding under a
> mount-point in the
> > > normal case.
> > >
> > > /Peter
> >
> > So what you'
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 01:35:20PM -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
> At Thu, 01 Oct 2009 10:13:26 -0400 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
> > So what you're saying is something is mounted on to a directory that had
> > data in it before the mount. How do I see the data being hidden without
> > unmounti
Hey
Is there an initiative to get CentOS to work with boot.kernel ?
Cheers Didi
My www page: www.ribalba.de
Email / Jabber: riba...@gmail.com
Skype : ribalba
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Ron Blizzard wrote:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Brian Mathis wrote:
"Not connected to the Internet", and "not connected to a LAN" are very
different things. I doubt VOIP would work if the server was not
connected to a LAN. There could be quite a few things on the LAN,
depending on it
We have a networked HP OfficeJet All-In-One. I have the scanner working
with the CentOS 5.3, except xsane is ignoring SANE_DEFAULT_DEVICE.
scanimage does however take this environment variable just fine:
server1.wendellfreelibrary.org% scanimage -L
No scanners were identified. If you were expec
Hi All,
I have a home business circuit and I am gearing up to host my business
affairs in my place. I have Comcast and 13 static IP's.
I have an extra PIII 1U, 2 9gb SCSI, 1gb RAMm dual NICS.
So I am wanting to build a firewall to front end my traffic. Assign
one of my statics to it and have
ML wrote:
> I used to work with PIX 525's so I have knowledge, I just dont quite
> know how to do this with CentOS and such.
>
> Can anyone offer advice?
Nothing against CentOS, but if this is going to be a dedicated firewall,
have you thought of using an appliance type OS/application?
I've
You don't need to have Comcast route all traffic to that IP. You just
need to put two NICs in the server and place it between Comcast and
your servers. Then using iptables you can configure CentOS to deny /
allow traffic to IPs on specific ports. I know this is a CentOS list,
but if you want someth
Not that it's incredibly difficult to do by hand, but it is a complex
undertaking fraught with some risk in doing it wrong. I believe you'd
be much better served looking at some of the firewall applications out
there, such as IPCop or Smoothwall. Another one to look at is Shorewall
(http://www.sh
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Max Hetrick wrote:
> ML wrote:
>
>> I used to work with PIX 525's so I have knowledge, I just dont quite
>> know how to do this with CentOS and such.
>>
>> Can anyone offer advice?
>
>
> Nothing against CentOS, but if this is going to be a dedicated firewall,
> have
ML wrote:
> Can anyone offer advice?
>
pfSense.
can even boot it off a CD and use a USB flash stick for configuration
storage so you don't need a hard drive. or boot it off a 128MB CF
card. doesn't need a display after initial setup (actually, can even be
configured with a serial termina
On Thursday 01 October 2009 16:56, ML wrote:
> I have a home business circuit and I am gearing up to host my business
> affairs in my place. I have Comcast and 13 static IP's.
>
> I have an extra PIII 1U, 2 9gb SCSI, 1gb RAMm dual NICS.
If you can, I would place a 3rd NIC into this device and
On 1 Oct 2009, at 21:56, ML wrote:
> So I am wanting to build a firewall to front end my traffic. Assign
> one of my statics to it and have Comcast statically route my traffic
> to this IP.
You don't need to do this. You can run all the IPs on the firewall
box, and route them to machines on a
Hi All,
> I've also looked at Vyatta, and heard good things about pfsense.
Some have also recommended IPcop or pfsense.
Has anyone used Untangle? http://www.untangle.com/
What are the differences between these...
-ML
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@ce
Robert Heller wrote:
> We have a networked HP OfficeJet All-In-One. I have the scanner working
> with the CentOS 5.3, except xsane is ignoring SANE_DEFAULT_DEVICE.
> scanimage does however take this environment variable just fine:
>
> server1.wendellfreelibrary.org% scanimage -L
>
> No scanners w
At Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:58:32 -0400 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> Robert Heller wrote:
> > We have a networked HP OfficeJet All-In-One. I have the scanner working
> > with the CentOS 5.3, except xsane is ignoring SANE_DEFAULT_DEVICE.
> > scanimage does however take this environment variable j
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 18:41 -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
> At Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:58:32 -0400 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>
< trimmed >
>
> The beast works just fine as both a printer and a scanner (I have not
> tried to send or receive a fax). xsane, if given the hpaio:
> url on the command
ML wrote:
>
> I used to work with PIX 525's so I have knowledge, I just dont quite
> know how to do this with CentOS and such.
Firewall Builder.
http://www.fwbuilder.org/
But if you've configured the PIX in command-line mode, iptables is not
that hard. You could setup a local firewall right
At Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:54:52 -0400 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 18:41 -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
> > At Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:58:32 -0400 CentOS mailing list
> > wrote:
> >
> < trimmed >
> >
> > The beast works just fine as both a printer and a scanner (I have not
If you want a simple packet filtering firewall then CentOS or one of
the purpose built linux firewall distro's will suit you well. If you
want more then just packet filtering, there are better options.
You haven't mentioned what sort of business applications you are
running. How vital to your busi
36 matches
Mail list logo
