From Karan's blog:
A few of us are going to be getting together for drinks on the Tuesday
29th Oct 2009, everyone is welcome to come along. I'll get there for
about 18:15hrs and plan on being around till about 20:00 - Depending
on how many people are around and what the feeling is - we might nip
a
On 09/28/2009 09:24 AM, Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann wrote:
>Tuesday
> 29th Oct 2009
October 29th is a Thursday. Doesn't he mean September?
Mogens
--
Mogens Kjaer, Carlsberg A/S, Computer Department
Gamle Carlsberg Vej 10, DK-2500 Valby, Denmark
Phone: +45 33 27 53 25, Mobile: +45 22 12 53 25
Email:
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 03:17 +0100, M. Hamzah Khan wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-09-27 at 21:10 -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
> > At Sun, 27 Sep 2009 23:40:17 +0100 CentOS mailing list
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hey everyone,
> > >
> > > My home server just had a disk failure a few weeks ag
On 28/09/09 08:53, Mogens Kjaer wrote:
> On 09/28/2009 09:24 AM, Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann wrote:
>> Tuesday
>> 29th Oct 2009
>
> October 29th is a Thursday. Doesn't he mean September?
oops yes! 29th Sept!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://li
On 28/09/09 04:17, Matt Arnilo S. Baluyos (Mailing Lists) wrote:
> [base]
> name=CentOS-2 base
> baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos-2/i386/CentOS/
> ;baseurl=http://vault.centos.org/2.1/final/i386/CentOS/
that second url looks correct. Is it possible for you to post the
complete trace from y
On 28/09/09 04:17, Matt Arnilo S. Baluyos (Mailing Lists) wrote:
> [updates]
> name=CentOS-2 updates
> baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos-2/updates/
> ;baseurl=http://vault.centos.org/2.1/updates/i386/
actually this one should be :
http://vault.centos.org/2.1/updates/
( without the i386 at t
Hi All,
Thanks for all your replies. I understand what I have to do now and
have read several tutorials to get a good grasp of everything.
All your input has been greatly appreciated. Thank you all.
Regards,
James ;)
--
Jonathan Swift - "May you live every day of your life." -
http://www.brai
Hi all,
First of all I am posting this on two lists for a reason, because the
issue being reported by me could be because of a change delivered by a
Kernel update or due to Xen.
I have recently managed to update all Xen Guest domains running CentOS
5.3 to the latest bunch of updates + Kernel. My
Please Read the information concerning "Guidelines for CentOS Mailing
List posts" at the bottom of this link:
http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=16
Specifically, it is much easier to follow a quoted e-mail on the list if
you do not "top post".
It is also better to set your e-
On 09/27/2009 08:09 AM, Robert Heller wrote:
> At Sun, 27 Sep 2009 09:13:04 +0200 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>
>>
>> m.r...@5-cent.us a écrit :
>>
>>> I'd add in the search RHEL, at least to start. Beyond that,
>>> some other distro, such as mandrake, may have compatible rpms.
>>
>> No! Never
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Marcelo M. Garcia
>Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 8:57 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS for non-tech user
>
>Sorry, but Fedora is no longer a good desktop choic
I'd love to attend, but tomorrow is my birthday and I've already made plans.
Regards,
Rohan.
Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann wrote:
> From Karan's blog:
>
> A few of us are going to be getting together for drinks on the Tuesday
> 29th Oct 2009, everyone is welcome to come along. I'll get there for
> abo
On Monday 28 September 2009 00:30, Eric Clark wrote:
> Boot to linux, and type memtest86 let it run for about 10 or 20
> minutes with the ram that you have installed
>
> Typically anything over 6 errors on a 512 stick will bring mayhem to
> an OS,
Any errors at all when running memtest86 is un
it's all about the open source, baby.
http://candyandaspirin.blogspot.com/2009/09/next-adventure-in-ecm-begins.html
DISCLAIMER: the lady in question is a good friend of mine. but don't
let that scare you off. :-)
rday
--
Hi,
I have a server that is running centos 5.3 x86_64 that until last week was
running fine. With no error messages in console and in /var/log/messages
the server simply stops responding.
After a reboot everything is fine. The only change (that I could find) but
that was not active before the
I went ahead and gave the MIT Kerberos LDAP backed option a try. So far it
seems to work quite well and nothing has crashed (yet :)). I'm going to run
this setup for a couple weeks and see if I can break it.
Regards,
Dan Burkland
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 09:02 -0400, mbneto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a server that is running centos 5.3 x86_64 that until last week
> was running fine. With no error messages in console and
> in /var/log/messages the server simply stops responding.
>
> After a reboot everything is fine. The on
On Sep 27, 2009, at 9:35 PM, Karanbir Singh
wrote:
> On 28/09/09 02:11, Ross Walker wrote:
>>> Eg. to convert this setup into a raid-5 : start with a 1 disk raid-1
>>> degraded, move a disks worth of data onto there, bring in the second
>>> disk and let them sync into a 'normal' raid1 state, th
> Finally, where on the installation cd’s would I place this kickstart file ?
See the instructions I sent out a few weeks ago on how to set up your
own KS server
--
“Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV”
- Michael Pollan, author of "In Defense of Food"
_
Unfortunately too short notice, or I would have welcomed the opportunity
to meet up, have a beer, maybe some curry and say hello.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Karanbir Singh
Sent: 28 September 2009 09:36
To: CentOS
Hi,
Is there any working script, similar to deboostrap, for CentOS 5?
I have found rpmstrap [1] at RPMforge.. but only works for CentOS-4, and
appears that's out of date.
thanks!
[1] http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/rpmstrap/
--
Santi Saez
http://woop.es
__
On 28/09/09 17:27, Santi Saez wrote:
> Is there any working script, similar to deboostrap, for CentOS 5?
yum --installroot ;
tends to do most of what people want with rpmstrap. Does that tick the
box for you ?
the other workaround is to use mock and build the chroot using that.
- KB
__
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 18:27 +0200, Santi Saez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any working script, similar to deboostrap, for CentOS 5?
>
> I have found rpmstrap [1] at RPMforge.. but only works for CentOS-4, and
> appears that's out of date.
>
> thanks!
>
> [1] http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/rpm
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 22:41, Scott Ehrlich wrote:
> Many people have wondered what my rsync syntax was -
>
> [as root]: rsync -av /path/to/source m...@remote-host:/path/to/dest
Is /path/to/source mounted NFS?
What happens if you run it as your own user?
> I'll be adjusting it to adapt to
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 12:08, Daniel Bruno
wrote:
> I did a "ls -la" in /usr/lib/libtcl8.4*, and show this result:
>
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 683136 Jul 25 2008 /usr/lib/libtcl8.4.so
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Set 10 2008 /usr/lib/libtcl8.4.so;48c78993
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 40
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 08:24 +0100, Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann wrote:
> >From Karan's blog:
>
> A few of us are going to be getting together for drinks on the Tuesday
> 29th Oct 2009, everyone is welcome to come along. I'll get there for
> about 18:15hrs and plan on being around till about 20:00 - Dep
> I have a server that is running centos 5.3 x86_64 that until last week was
> running fine. With no error messages in console and in /var/log/messages
> the server simply stops responding.
I posted the following bug to RedHat yesterday for similar symptoms
with RHEL 5.4, same kernel.
https://bu
I am mulling over the thought of replacing my current solution, it
works very well except for the following two issues:
1. LDAP recip verification for only one server, this gateway services multiple
domains who's directories are independent. I need to be able to verify the
various domains off of i
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> I am mulling over the thought of replacing my current solution, it
> works very well except for the following two issues:
>
> 1. LDAP recip verification for only one server, this gateway services multiple
> domains who's directories are independent. I need to be able to ve
Sorin Srbu wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf
>> Of Marcelo M. Garcia
>> Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 8:57 PM
>> To: CentOS mailing list
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS for non-tech user
>>
>> Sorry, but Fedor
>> I'm thinking of giving CentOS to a non-tech user for her new desktop. He
>> needs are small. She has been used to Mozilla for both mail and browsing, so
>> equivalents there are not a problem. She needs grip and lame, for her mp3s -
>> again no problem.
>
> Desktop, non-techie - use Ubuntu in
Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>>
>> 2. I use backup mx's, my current solution probably could work in this
>> scenario but
>> the support mechanism behind it is *very* weak and I can't get a perfect
>> setup
>> working. Spam hits the primary for a domain, gets blocked and then trie
Here is my problem
[r...@shannon CGPMcAfee]# ./updateDatFiles
CGPMcAfee DAT files update program version 2.2
Local avvDAT version is 5726
Connecting to 'update.nai.com' [72.247.238.178:80] via HTTP protocol...
*** failed to connect: socket error
The problem is that I can't change the script and
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 17:49 -0400, Alberto García Gómez wrote:
> Here is my problem
>
> [r...@shannon CGPMcAfee]# ./updateDatFiles
> CGPMcAfee DAT files update program version 2.2
> Local avvDAT version is 5726
> Connecting to 'update.nai.com' [72.247.238.178:80] via HTTP protocol...
> *** failed
At Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:29:12 -0500 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> >> I'm thinking of giving CentOS to a non-tech user for her new desktop. Â He
> >> needs are small. Â She has been used to Mozilla for both mail and
> >> browsing, so
> >> equivalents there are not a problem. Â She needs grip an
I'd like to chime in on this.
Being techy. nothing really bugs me as I think its all POS.
However I do think the Linux desktop is not so good in general.
I've been a big fan of Irix and used to maintain it when it was the
golden child of the Unix desktop.
I've been following the 5dwm project
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> I am mulling over the thought of replacing my current solution, it
> works very well except for the following two issues:
>
> 1. LDAP recip verification for only one server, this gateway services multiple
> domains who's directories are independent. I need to be able to ve
Matt wrote:
>>> I'm thinking of giving CentOS to a non-tech user for her new desktop. He
>>> needs are small. She has been used to Mozilla for both mail and browsing,
>>> so
>>> equivalents there are not a problem. She needs grip and lame, for her mp3s
>>> -
>>> again no problem.
>>>
>>
Alberto, please don't reply to a previous email and change the subject
line. Click on New Message when starting a new topic.
You screw up the threading, and is considered thread hijacking.
--
Spiro Harvey Knossos Networks Ltd
021-295-1923 www.knossos.net.nz
Has a beta been released and if so can anybody say whether it uses Upstart?
or Has anyone worked with Upstart?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
> Eric Clark wrote:
> have you tried getting KDE to run?
>
Eric,
Thanks, that's a good suggestion to try KDE - so far I haven't figured
out how to install it short of a complete reinstall. If I run yom I get
a message to the effect that a database is malformed. It downs't say if
the data
well I finally got Keepass installed on CentOS
The libraries for qt4 are actually located at pbone as well as keepass.
I would love to know how to add pbone.net as a trusted repo in Yum,
just for you guys that like to work with cross operating systems and having
a password manager.
Keepass is pr
Is there a real big need for having an anti-virus on linux?
if so what are some good ones to use?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Christopher Chan
wrote:
> Has a beta been released and if so can anybody say whether it uses Upstart?
>
> or Has anyone worked with Upstart?
> ___
No beta has been released. No ETA for a beta has been released. It
will m
Eric Clark wrote:
> Is there a real big need for having an anti-virus on linux?
Not unless your running a mail server or file server that
serves clients that are vulnerable to viruses.
> if so what are some good ones to use?
I've always liked Sophos myself, very high quality.
nate
__
>Postfix can handle that. You can have multiple lookup tables/maps. They
>do not even have to be the same type of database.
I guess I can leave that part upto Postfix, but I still need a antispam
addin...
I asked on the Postfix list a while ago whether multiple LDAP server lookups
could be config
Eric Clark wrote:
> Is there a real big need for having an anti-virus on linux?
>
> if so what are some good ones to use?
>
Will the software be used in a commercial environment? If not, then you
could use AVG from Grisoft:-
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> Postfix can handle that. You can have multiple lookup tables/maps. They
>> do not even have to be the same type of database.
>>
>
> I guess I can leave that part upto Postfix, but I still need a antispam
> addin...
>
spamassassin via spamass-milter. Fast, no compl
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Marcelo M. Garcia
>Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 11:08 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS for non-tech user
>
>>> Sorry, but Fedora is no longer a good desktop cho
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Matt
>Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 11:29 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS for non-tech user
>
>Thats my thought as well. Ubuntu desktop and CentOS for servers.
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Christopher Chan
>Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 2:35 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS for non-tech user
>
>Ubuntu for desktop is really a give and take. You get
51 matches
Mail list logo
