Hey,
attila.ma...@orange-ftgroup.com wrote:
>
> I’m having a linux box running with Centos 5.3 x86 (kernel
> 2.6.18-128.7.1.el5xen) which is freezing time to time and can’t login
> neither trough console.
>
> The only thing what I can do, to pass the situation is to power off/on
> the pc.
>
>
>
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:55, Marcelo M. Garcia
> wrote:
>> I'm trying to set the terminal size in /usr/share/vte/termcap/xterm, but
>> it seems that CentOS doesn't look at this file.
>
> Works for me (CentOS 4, opening "gnome-terminal").
>
> What does "ec
On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 22:23 -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
> At Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:23:19 +1200 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
> > A fault on our SAN dropped us down to a read-only filesystem
>
> Just run fsck and follow the prompts. Do this in single user mode.
That could be fun in a mode withou
The sound is bad,
/ Lance vanished from the project some time in 2008. Everybody needs
time off from projects from time to time, so there was no real need to
worry about that. What there was to worry about is the following: Lance
is the only one, who can make active changes to the centos.org do
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 16:43 +0700, David Suhendrik wrote:
> The sound is bad,
>
> / Lance vanished from the project some time in 2008. Everybody needs
> time off from projects from time to time, so there was no real need to
> worry about that. What there was to worry about is the following: Lan
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 16:43 +0700, David Suhendrik wrote:
>
>> The sound is bad,
>>
>> / Lance vanished from the project some time in 2008. Everybody needs
>> time off from projects from time to time, so there was no real need to
>> worry about that. What there was to
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 11:48 +0200 schrieb Ralph Angenendt:
> On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 16:43 +0700, David Suhendrik wrote:
> > The sound is bad,
> >
> > / Lance vanished from the project some time in 2008. Everybody needs
> > time off from projects from time to time, so there was no real need to
>
> You could put them into /etc/sysconfig/iptables-config
Excellent! Thanks!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> /etc/syscontfig/network-scripts/rule-ethX
> Check out /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup-routes to see exactly how
> things are processed.
Sorry, but I can't see how ifup-routes will ever process rule-ethX. A
quick search for "rule" on ifup-routes (on any file in the
network-scripts directory)
> Sorry, but I can't see how ifup-routes will ever process rule-ethX. A
> quick search for "rule" on ifup-routes (on any file in the
> network-scripts directory) gets no results.
Are we running the same version? Mine is CentOS release 4.8 (Final).
___
Ce
2009/9/12 Eugene Vilensky :
> I have restricted the port range for passv and opened iptables,
> ip_conntrack_ftp (sp?) is loaded, and port 20 and 21 are opened.
I'm not sure it can solve the problem, but I recommend loading
ip_nat_ftp instead.
___
CentOS
Christoph Maser wrote:
> Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 11:48 +0200 schrieb Ralph Angenendt:
>
>> On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 16:43 +0700, David Suhendrik wrote:
>>
>>> The sound is bad,
>>>
>>> / Lance vanished from the project some time in 2008. Everybody needs
>>> time off from projects from time
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 12:01 +0200, Christoph Maser wrote:
> Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 11:48 +0200 schrieb Ralph Angenendt:
> > Ummm. That mostly has been resolved around a month ago, you might want
> > to check dates on things you mail somewhere.
>
> Btw the homepage says:
>
> "
> More informati
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 12:01 +0200, Christoph Maser wrote:
>
>> Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 11:48 +0200 schrieb Ralph Angenendt:
>>
>>> Ummm. That mostly has been resolved around a month ago, you might want
>>> to check dates on things you mail somewhere.
>>>
>
On 09/14/2009 05:01 AM, Christoph Maser wrote:
> Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 11:48 +0200 schrieb Ralph Angenendt:
>> On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 16:43 +0700, David Suhendrik wrote:
>>> The sound is bad,
>>>
>>> / Lance vanished from the project some time in 2008. Everybody needs
>>> time off from projects
On 09/14/2009 07:28 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> The CentOS project has the domain names in question, we have released
> 4.8, we have some packages from 5.4 in question, and everything is 100%
> solved from a technical stand point.
>
The above SHOULD have said "packages from 5.4 in QA testing" .
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 14:28 +0200 schrieb Johnny Hughes:
> On 09/14/2009 05:01 AM, Christoph Maser wrote:
> > Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 11:48 +0200 schrieb Ralph Angenendt:
> >> On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 16:43 +0700, David Suhendrik wrote:
> >>> The sound is bad,
> >>>
> >>> / Lance vanished from
On 09/14/2009 07:42 AM, Christoph Maser wrote:
> Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 14:28 +0200 schrieb Johnny Hughes:
>> On 09/14/2009 05:01 AM, Christoph Maser wrote:
>>> Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 11:48 +0200 schrieb Ralph Angenendt:
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 16:43 +0700, David Suhendrik wrote:
> T
Hi,
I am running 32-bit Firefox-3.5.3 on Centos-5.3 (64-bit kernel) on a Dell
Precision M65 laptop. This is likely a Adobe problem, but maybe someone else
has seen this before. Please CC me, as I only receive the digest version of the
list.
When using the 10.0.32.18-release version of the f
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 08:11 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Do you ask Slackware or Gentoo or Debian or Ubuntu to explain the same
> things?
>
> However, I am not sure WHY you want to know these things. We do not
> require anyone to donate to the project to use the software.
Tone down, please.
R
> However, we are NOT accepting monetary donations at this point. We will
> not accept monetary donations until there is something in place where
> more than one person has to approve any spending and some kind of
> committee is in place to manage incoming and outgoing funds.
>
>
ooh, ouch.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Chan Chung Hang Christopher spake:
|> However, we are NOT accepting monetary donations at this point. We will
|> not accept monetary donations until there is something in place where
|> more than one person has to approve any spending and some ki
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 15:11 +0200 schrieb Johnny Hughes:
> However, I am not sure WHY you want to know these things. We do not
> require anyone to donate to the project to use the software. We do have
> expenses (like DVDs to hand out, posters to print, rooms to pay for at
> Linux conferenc
On 09/14/2009 08:51 AM, Christoph Maser wrote:
> Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 15:11 +0200 schrieb Johnny Hughes:
>
>> However, I am not sure WHY you want to know these things. We do not
>> require anyone to donate to the project to use the software. We do have
>> expenses (like DVDs to hand out, p
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 06:23, Diogo Sperb Schneider
wrote:
>> Sorry, but I can't see how ifup-routes will ever process rule-ethX. A
>> quick search for "rule" on ifup-routes (on any file in the
>> network-scripts directory) gets no results.
>
> Are we running the same version? Mine is CentOS
Hey folks,
A week or two ago someone mentioned something about using their own
home-grown RPMs for managing config info on their boxes.
I really like this idea and would like to learn more about it. Are
there some examples out there?
I have lots of custom config info and think this would be an
On Monday 14 September 2009 10:59:58 am Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> The release notes will have a section if/which packages have been
> removed or are new to the release (or have been updated).
Thanks for clarifying Ralph. All clear now.
All the best,
Jorge
_
Jorge Fábregas wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Let say 5.4 goes out today; If I fully update (today) my 5.2 system...will
> it
> be equivalent to 5.4 (all RPM packages with same version/release number?)?
>
> Or is it possible for the new point release to include NEW packages that
> weren't on t
Hello everyone,
Let say 5.4 goes out today; If I fully update (today) my 5.2 system...will it
be equivalent to 5.4 (all RPM packages with same version/release number?)?
Or is it possible for the new point release to include NEW packages that
weren't on the base relase (in this case CentOS 5)?
I am working on setting up an NFS server, which will mainly serve files
to web servers, and I want to setup two bonds. I have a question
regarding *which* bonding mode to use. None of the documentation I have
read suggests any mode is "better" than other with the exception of
specific use cases (e.
Rick Barnes wrote:
> Since my switch *does* support 802.3ad, including layers 2,3 and 4
> hashing, should I use mode=4? Or would one of the other modes be
> "better" for providing fail-over and link-aggregation, specifically
> balance-tlb or balance-alb.
Use 802.3ad, also if performance is really
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 09:12 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 09/14/2009 08:51 AM, Christoph Maser wrote:
> > Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 15:11 +0200 schrieb Johnny Hughes:
> >
> >> However, I am not sure WHY you want to know these things. We do not
> >> require anyone to donate to the project to u
> Hi,
>
> I am running 32-bit Firefox-3.5.3 on Centos-5.3 (64-bit kernel) on a Dell
> Precision M65 laptop. This is likely a Adobe problem, but maybe someone
> else has seen this before. Please CC me, as I only receive the digest
> version of the list.
>
>
> When using the 10.0.32.18-release versio
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 10:51 -0400, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Let say 5.4 goes out today; If I fully update (today) my 5.2 system...will
> it
> be equivalent to 5.4 (all RPM packages with same version/release number?)?
Yes.
> Or is it possible for the new point release to i
On 09/14/2009 05:35 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
> A week or two ago someone mentioned something about using their own
> home-grown RPMs for managing config info on their boxes.
this is a really really bad idea. I'd suggest you dont waste your time
around this and instead work with projects like chef /
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 09/14/2009 05:35 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
>> A week or two ago someone mentioned something about using their own
>> home-grown RPMs for managing config info on their boxes.
>
> this is a really really bad idea. I'd suggest you dont waste yo
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Rick Barnes wrote:
8<
> Since my switch *does* support 802.3ad, including layers 2,3 and 4
> hashing, should I use mode=4? Or would one of the other modes be
> "better" for providing fail-over and link-aggregation, specifically
> balance-tlb or balance-alb.
Are y
--Mensaje original--
De: Karanbir Singh
Remitente: centos-boun...@centos.org
Para: CentOS mailing list
Responder a: CentOS mailing list
Asunto: Re: [CentOS] LF examples - using site-specific RPMs for config
Enviado: 14 Sep, 2009 12:11
On 09/14/2009 05:35 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
> A we
2009/9/14 Filipe Brandenburger :
> Hi,
>
> AFAIR, the rule-ethX files (and maybe also route-ethX files) work in
> CentOS 5 only. If you're doing that on CentOS 4, I believe the way for
> you to load those rules during reboot is adding them to
> /etc/rc.local...
I see there are commands for route-e
Alan,
FYI last year, I tried bcfg on Centos5.1 but it was difficult to get
things working. With Puppet things could work, not easily but it
allowed rollback using CVS and ensuring that common config files are
always applied to all machines.
Quoting Karanbir Singh :
> On 09/14/2009 05:35 PM
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:35, Alan McKay wrote:
> A week or two ago someone mentioned something about using their own
> home-grown RPMs for managing config info on their boxes.
I believe you are referring to my suggestion on a thread discussing
creating scripts on the %post section of a kic
Alan McKay wrote:
> I have lots of custom config info and think this would be an ideal way
> to manage it. Others mentioned puppet and CF engine which probably
> have their merits as well. But I don't really have time at the moment
> to learn those. Perhaps in this thread we could even discuss
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 5:35 AM, David Suhendrik wrote:
> =D, Someone make me confused, and just a make sure here...
> I'm so sorry for this...
I was worried too, on the day I first saw the message. But I found (on
that day) that the worst that would have happened would have been a
name change f
At 10:42 PM 9/11/2009, you wrote:
>I have been tasked with having a Buffalo Terastation Pro 2 NAS box,
>likely to be connected to a Linux box via samba, be the storage device
>to back up mostly Ubuntu and Centos systems. The trick is, the
>machines to be backed up need to do so in an automated fas
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 23:55, Dave wrote:
> I've got rpmforge and epel on centos 5.3. I'm trying to do an
> install of perl-Image-Info for spamassassin image scanning. The package was
> picked up in rpmforge since first, but it is failing to install because a
> dependency is missing.
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 22:42, Scott Ehrlich wrote:
> I ONLY plan to use samba to mount the NAS to my Linux server, unless
> someone comes up with a more secure method,
I don't know if I understand what you mean by the sentence above, but
Samba is *not* secure in the sense that nothing is en
On 9/14/2009 9:11 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 09/14/2009 07:42 AM, Christoph Maser wrote:
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 14:28 +0200 schrieb Johnny Hughes:
On 09/14/2009 05:01 AM, Christoph Maser wrote:
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 11:48 +0200 schrieb Ralph Angenendt:
On
On 9/14/2009 9:51 AM, Christoph Maser wrote:
> Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 15:11 +0200 schrieb Johnny Hughes:
>
>
>> However, I am not sure WHY you want to know these things. We do not
>> require anyone to donate to the project to use the software. We do have
>> expenses (like DVDs to hand out
William Warren wrote:
> Why do we want to know? Because of one person's disappearance the
> project nearly went boom. Because by your own admission(the devs) the
> funds were NOT going to further the project. If you can't get a thicker
> skin maybe you need a vacation.
Perhaps it's reversed? T
I have a small fixed ip network at home, running red hat 9 on two
amd k6 500 Mhz boxes. One has 256 M memory and the other 320 M. They
pretty much meet my needs, but lately I have detected that the internet
sites
I frequent are requiring some more modern software than I can run. I
attempted
On 9/14/09 11:14 AM, "Filipe Brandenburger" wrote:
> Another alternative would be setting up an rsync server from where you
> download your config files to all servers, that way you edit once and
> copy them everywhere you need them, but that is certainly more manual
> than what puppet can do.
Th
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Buz Davis wrote:
>
> I have a small fixed ip network at home, running red hat 9 on two
> amd k6 500 Mhz boxes. One has 256 M memory and the other 320 M. They
> pretty much meet my needs, but lately I have detected that the internet
> sites
> I frequent are requir
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Filipe Brandenburger
wrote:
>
> If the problem is with the RPMforge repository (from your e-mail that
> is not completely clear) you should report it on the RPMforge mailing
> list:
> http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/users
>From the sounds of things, hi
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> You need the i586 kernel for the AMD K6 machines. Bad news is CentOS 5
> does not support it. Good news is CentOS 4 supports it.
>
> Visit http://i586.centos.org/centos/4/ and you will find what is
> required to boot your system. Once booted,
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 09/14/2009 05:35 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
>> A week or two ago someone mentioned something about using their own
>> home-grown RPMs for managing config info on their boxes.
>
> this is a really really bad idea. I'd suggest you dont waste your time
> aro
On 9/14/09, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
> Let say 5.4 goes out today; If I fully update (today) my 5.2 system...will
> it
> be equivalent to 5.4 (all RPM packages with same version/release number?)?
> Or is it possible for the new point release to include NEW packages that
> weren't on the base relase
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 13:42 -0500, Ron Blizzard wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 5:35 AM, David Suhendrik wrote:
>
> > =D, Someone make me confused, and just a make sure here...
> > I'm so sorry for this...
>
> I was worried too, on the day I first saw the message. But I found (on
> that day) t
hi All,
thanks for the responses.
After being dropped into the
# Filesystem repair
prompt,
( on account of "inode 27344909 has illegal blocks" )
following warm reboot (via "reboot") after finding (SAN ) filesystem in
read-only
mode yesterday morning (possibly because of HBA fault on SAN) ,
58 matches
Mail list logo
