Re: [CentOS] yum issue with extras repo?

2009-09-10 Thread Ralph Angenendt
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 15:09 -0600, drew einhorn wrote: > On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Dave Stevens wrote: > >> As you can see below I am having a problem checking for updates. This > >> happens repeatedly. I have to kill the process then rer

Re: [CentOS] waiting IOs...

2009-09-10 Thread James Pearson
John Doe wrote: > Hi, > > We have a storage server (HP DL360G5 + MSA20 (12 disks in RAID 6) on a > SmartArray6400). > 10 directories are exported through nfs to 10 clients > (rsize=32768,wsize=32768,soft,intr,nosuid,proto=udp,vers=3). > The server is apparently not doing much but... we have very

[CentOS] Excessive NFS operations

2009-09-10 Thread lhecking
Reading the "waiting IOs" thread made me remember I have a similar problem that has been here for months, and I have no sulution yet. A single CentOS 5.2 x86_64 machine here is overloading our NetApp filer with excessive NFS getattr, lookup and access operations. The weird thing is that the

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 5.4 is out!

2009-09-10 Thread William L. Maltby
On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 11:05 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote: > Obligatory: When will Centos 5.4 be ready? > > > /me goes down into reinforced concrete bunker and locks all hatches and > doors. /me overflies with F-117 and drops latest 9,000 lb "bunker-buster". ;-)) > -- Bill ___

Re: [CentOS] Excessive NFS operations

2009-09-10 Thread Les Mikesell
lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: > Reading the "waiting IOs" thread made me remember I have a similar problem > that has been here for months, and I have no sulution yet. > > A single CentOS 5.2 x86_64 machine here is overloading our NetApp filer with > excessive NFS getattr, lookup and a

Re: [CentOS] Excessive NFS operations

2009-09-10 Thread lhecking
> Do you have anything running that would try to read all the files and build a > search index - like beagle? There's also the nightly run of updatedb but > that > just reads the filenames and normally nfs mounts are excluded. There is no package beagle installed, I don't know if any other

Re: [CentOS] waiting IOs...

2009-09-10 Thread Les Mikesell
James Pearson wrote: > John Doe wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We have a storage server (HP DL360G5 + MSA20 (12 disks in RAID 6) on a >> SmartArray6400). >> 10 directories are exported through nfs to 10 clients >> (rsize=32768,wsize=32768,soft,intr,nosuid,proto=udp,vers=3). >> The server is apparently not d

Re: [CentOS] Excessive NFS operations

2009-09-10 Thread nate
lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: > > Reading the "waiting IOs" thread made me remember I have a similar problem > that has been here for months, and I have no sulution yet. > > A single CentOS 5.2 x86_64 machine here is overloading our NetApp filer > with > excessive NFS getattr, lookup an

Re: [CentOS] Excessive NFS operations

2009-09-10 Thread Lars Hecking
nate writes: > lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: > > > > Reading the "waiting IOs" thread made me remember I have a similar problem > > that has been here for months, and I have no sulution yet. > > > > A single CentOS 5.2 x86_64 machine here is overloading our NetApp filer > > with > > exc

Re: [CentOS] trouble playing quicktimes at apple.com/trailers

2009-09-10 Thread fred smith
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 06:26:16AM +0200, Olaf Mueller wrote: > fred smith wrote: > > Hello. > > > I've been able to view the movie trailers at apple.com/trailers for > > years on my old Centos box (5.3). [...] > > Is anyone else having trouble with that? or to ask another way, can > > any of you

Re: [CentOS] Excessive NFS operations

2009-09-10 Thread Robert Heller
At Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:56:31 +0100 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > > > Do you have anything running that would try to read all the files and build > > a > > search index - like beagle? There's also the nightly run of updatedb but > > that > > just reads the filenames and normally nfs moun

[CentOS] Problems setting terminal size in termcap/xterm

2009-09-10 Thread Marcelo M. Garcia
Hi I'm trying to set the terminal size in /usr/share/vte/termcap/xterm, but it seems that CentOS doesn't look at this file. I know this works in REHL 4.7 and Fedora 10, 11. Does anyone know a work around to this? Thanks Marcelo ___ CentOS mailing li

Re: [CentOS] Excessive NFS operations

2009-09-10 Thread Jens Larsson
> > > A single CentOS 5.2 x86_64 machine here is overloading our NetApp > > > filer with excessive NFS getattr, lookup and access operations. > > There was a kernel update in the 5.2/5.3 time frame that fixed a NFS > > client bug regarding lookups, what kernel are you running? > 2.6.18-92.1.2

Re: [CentOS] Excessive NFS operations

2009-09-10 Thread Chris Murphy
lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: Do you have anything running that would try to read all the files and build a search index - like beagle? There's also the nightly run of updatedb but that just reads the filenames and normally nfs mounts are excluded. There is no package beagle

[CentOS] SIGSEGV at kickstart

2009-09-10 Thread Adrian Sevcenco
Hi! I have a problem that i dont know how to tackle ... i have done kickstarting many times but know it seems i hit an wall ... i try to kickstart through nfs an 64 bit centos .. just after taking ip trough dhcp i receive an SIGSEGV ! i dont know what to do anymore as the same ks.cfg worked very

Re: [CentOS] Excessive NFS operations

2009-09-10 Thread Lars Hecking
> We had a similar issue with 100 CentOS 5 and Fedora 7 desktops mounting > their $HOME directories from a Centos 4 server. We would see a steady > (perfectly linear) increase of getattr and lookup requests from the time > users logged in until they shutoff their machines (logging off stopped

Re: [CentOS] Excessive NFS operations

2009-09-10 Thread Ross Walker
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: > > Do you have anything running that would try to read all the files and build > a > search index - like beagle? There's also the nightly run of updatedb but > that > just reads the filenames and n

Re: [CentOS] Excessive NFS operations

2009-09-10 Thread Lars Hecking
> What IS running on the problem machine? Is it a web server? Someone's > Desktop? (If it is a personal Desktop box, what is the person running -- > are they running find all of the time? Or doing some 'lets update 5 > zillion files now' type of task?) A database server? Something else? It's

Re: [CentOS] yum issue with extras repo?

2009-09-10 Thread drew einhorn
I should probably rewrite the following, moving some paragraphs around. But I'm done for now. On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 3:20 AM, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 15:09 -0600, drew einhorn wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> > On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 1:02 PM

Re: [CentOS] yum issue with extras repo?

2009-09-10 Thread Rex Dieter
drew einhorn wrote: > epel is not concerned about their > compatability with other 3rd party repos. Please, stop the FUD. > And there is > a lot of lingering animosity. Just mentioning epel in some > places is enough to evoke a bitter response. and thank you so much for perpetuating the prob

Re: [CentOS] waiting IOs...

2009-09-10 Thread John Doe
# iostat -m -x 10 Linux 2.6.18-8.1.6.el5 (data1.iol) 09/10/2009 . . . avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle 0.200.000.318.790.00 90.70 Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/srMB/swMB/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await svctm %util cciss/

Re: [CentOS] SIGSEGV at kickstart

2009-09-10 Thread nate
Adrian Sevcenco wrote: > Hi! I have a problem that i dont know how to tackle ... > i have done kickstarting many times but know it seems i hit an wall ... > i try to kickstart through nfs an 64 bit centos .. just after taking ip > trough dhcp i receive an SIGSEGV ! i dont know what to do anymore as

Re: [CentOS] Excessive NFS operations

2009-09-10 Thread nate
Lars Hecking wrote: > 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5. I can test all newer kernels if necessary. Sounds like another poster may of found the root cause but you should still upgrade anyways, I tracked down the specific update to this kernel, which is newer than what you have: * Thu Jul 03 2008 Aristeu Rozan

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 55, Issue 5

2009-09-10 Thread centos-announce-request
-- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20090910/3a0c3145/attachment-0001.bin -- Message: 2 Date: Thu, 10 Sep

Re: [CentOS] waiting IOs...

2009-09-10 Thread Les Mikesell
John Doe wrote: > # iostat -m -x 10 > Linux 2.6.18-8.1.6.el5 (data1.iol) 09/10/2009 > Are you also following the 'Excessive NFS operations' thread? There's some interesting information there about buggy kernels and apps. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com _

Re: [CentOS] Excessive NFS operations

2009-09-10 Thread Lars Hecking
nate writes: > Lars Hecking wrote: > > > 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5. I can test all newer kernels if necessary. > > Sounds like another poster may of found the root cause but you > should still upgrade anyways, I tracked down the specific > update to this kernel, which is newer than what you have: > >

Re: [CentOS] Excessive NFS operations

2009-09-10 Thread John R Pierce
Lars Hecking wrote: > This is an enterprise-wide setup I cannot change, but I will be able to > deploy a newer kernel. It'll have to wait until I return to the office > in a few weeks' time, though. > an enterprise-wide setup that can't get regular security patches?!? _

Re: [CentOS] Excessive NFS operations

2009-09-10 Thread Lars Hecking
John R Pierce writes: > Lars Hecking wrote: > > This is an enterprise-wide setup I cannot change, but I will be able to > > deploy a newer kernel. It'll have to wait until I return to the office > > in a few weeks' time, though. > > > > an enterprise-wide setup that can't get regular securit

Re: [CentOS] yum issue with extras repo?

2009-09-10 Thread drew einhorn
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Rex Dieter wrote: > drew einhorn wrote: > >> epel is not concerned about their >> compatability with other 3rd party repos. > > Please, stop the FUD. > >> And there is >> a lot of lingering animosity.  Just mentioning epel in some >> places is enough to evoke a bit

Re: [CentOS] Excessive NFS operations

2009-09-10 Thread Mogens Kjaer
On 09/10/2009 04:28 PM, Lars Hecking wrote: ... > It's a plain desktop. User is running standard desktop apps like firefox, > thunderbird, vmware, and EDA tools. Which version of thunderbird? Version 3 killed our NFS server when ~/.thunderbird is accessed via NFS. Mogens -- Mogens Kjaer, Carl

Re: [CentOS] Excessive NFS operations

2009-09-10 Thread nate
Lars Hecking wrote: > This is an enterprise-wide setup I cannot change, but I will be able to > deploy a newer kernel. It'll have to wait until I return to the office > in a few weeks' time, though. If you get any flak for deploying a newer kernel remind whoever gives you the flak that the abo

Re: [CentOS] Excessive NFS operations

2009-09-10 Thread Lars Hecking
Mogens Kjaer writes: > On 09/10/2009 04:28 PM, Lars Hecking wrote: > ... > > It's a plain desktop. User is running standard desktop apps like firefox, > > thunderbird, vmware, and EDA tools. > > Which version of thunderbird? Version 3 killed our NFS server when > ~/.thunderbird is accessed via N

Re: [CentOS] Excessive NFS operations

2009-09-10 Thread nate
nate wrote: > Lars Hecking wrote: > >> 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5. I can test all newer kernels if necessary. > > Sounds like another poster may of found the root cause but you > should still upgrade anyways, I tracked down the specific > update to this kernel, which is newer than what you have: > Whoops

[CentOS] Centos 4.7 supports two CPUs?

2009-09-10 Thread Luis campo
Hello people I currently have a ML370 G4 server with a CPU in centos 4.7, this server has the ability to add another CPU. the question is, Centos can recognize the second CPU? and if so, is there any special configuration to be performed. A forward to your comments Greetings ___

Re: [CentOS] Centos 4.7 supports two CPUs?

2009-09-10 Thread nate
Luis campo wrote: > > Hello people > > I currently have a ML370 G4 server with a CPU in centos 4.7, this server > has the ability to add another CPU. > > the question is, Centos can recognize the second CPU? and if so, is there > any special configuration to be performed. Just need a SMP kernel

Re: [CentOS] Excessive NFS operations

2009-09-10 Thread Les Mikesell
John R Pierce wrote: > Lars Hecking wrote: >> This is an enterprise-wide setup I cannot change, but I will be able to >> deploy a newer kernel. It'll have to wait until I return to the office >> in a few weeks' time, though. >> > > an enterprise-wide setup that can't get regular security pat

Re: [CentOS] trouble playing quicktimes at apple.com/trailers

2009-09-10 Thread Olaf Mueller
fred smith wrote: > While I haven't tried that, ? > I don't think that's the problem I'm > having: I can copy and paste the URL of the .mov file into mplayer or > vlc from the commandline, and get the exact same symptoms. I.E., there > is no browser involved in that transaction but it fails the

[CentOS] /etc/sysconfig/autofsck

2009-09-10 Thread Agile Aspect
Hi - I've been asked to turn on autofsck on ext3 filesystems for CentOS 4 and 5 servers on reboot after a crash by adding AUTOFSCK_TIMEOUT=5 AUTOFSCK_DEF_CHECK=yes to the file /etc/sysconfig/autofsck Is this necessary for ext3 filesystems? Is this a safe thing to do for

Re: [CentOS] yum issue with extras repo?

2009-09-10 Thread Les Mikesell
drew einhorn wrote: > > We really need better repository tools, when dealing > with multiple 3rd party repos. It is not easy to see > which packages came from which repos, > much less understand compatibility issues > among packages from different 3rd party repos. > > We would be in a better pl

Re: [CentOS] /etc/sysconfig/autofsck

2009-09-10 Thread nate
Agile Aspect wrote: > Is this necessary for ext3 filesystems? Can't hurt, though I don't do this myself, most of my systems have pretty stable storage, been a while since I used a controller/system that caused problems that would make me want to fsck. > > Is this a safe thing to do for a ext3 fi

[CentOS] repo with eclipse/subclipse?

2009-09-10 Thread Les Mikesell
Is there a 3rd party repo with working eclipse-platform/subclipse versions? Preferably something compatible with an up to date subversion? I'm currently getting: Error: Missing Dependency: libneon.so.25 is needed by package subversion-1.6.5-0.1.el5.rf.i386 (rpmforge) when I try with rpmforge e

Re: [CentOS] repo with eclipse/subclipse?

2009-09-10 Thread Stephen Harris
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 12:40:28PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > Error: Missing Dependency: libneon.so.25 is needed by package > subversion-1.6.5-0.1.el5.rf.i386 (rpmforge) > > when I try with rpmforge enabled. Are you disabling the standard repo's when you do that? neon-0.25.5-10.el5.i386.rpm is

[CentOS] patching from different directory

2009-09-10 Thread Carlos Santana
Howdy, I have a diff file in my /var/tmp and would like to apply patch to a file in a different directory (other than /va/tmp). I tried using patch with -d switch, but that doesn't work. It complains abt 'patch: Can't open patch file tilda.diff : No such file or directory'. Do I need to copy

[CentOS] Fork: Resource Temporarily Unavailable

2009-09-10 Thread Gustavo Pastorino
Hey all, I installed a while ago two CentOS 5.3 servers. One of them was running Samba and another OpenLDAP. I configured Samba to act as a PDC on the network and everything was working fine, I was already on policies rules and desktop migrations. One day, another analyst changed our subnet, and

Re: [CentOS] patching from different directory

2009-09-10 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 14:04, Carlos Santana wrote: > I have a diff file in my /var/tmp and would like to apply patch to a > file in a different directory (other than /va/tmp). I tried using > patch with -d switch, but that doesn't work. It complains abt  'patch: > Can't open patch file

Re: [CentOS] trouble playing quicktimes at apple.com/trailers

2009-09-10 Thread Robert
Olaf Mueller wrote: > fred smith wrote: > > >> While I haven't tried that, >> > ? > > >> I don't think that's the problem I'm >> having: I can copy and paste the URL of the .mov file into mplayer or >> vlc from the commandline, and get the exact same symptoms. I.E., there >> is no bro

Re: [CentOS] Fork: Resource Temporarily Unavailable

2009-09-10 Thread nate
Gustavo Pastorino wrote: > * /etc/rc3.d/S55sshd: fork: Resource Temporarily Unavailable Sounds like too many processes are running, you try to run top (assuming it even works in that condition), if the problem doesn't happen right away I'd cron a script to run once a minute and log the contents o

Re: [CentOS] Fork: Resource Temporarily Unavailable

2009-09-10 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 14:10, Gustavo Pastorino wrote: > * /etc/rc3.d/S55sshd: fork: Resource Temporarily Unavailable > > [...] > > I´m on my last test installation and I am sending now this e-mail > because if it crashes and i have no resolution, they are going to ask > me for another distr

Re: [CentOS] Fork: Resource Temporarily Unavailable

2009-09-10 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 14:19, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > Please post: > * What kernel version are you using? (uname -mri) > * What were the last updates to this machine? (tail -50 > /var/log/yum.log; rpm -qa --last | head -50) > * What are the hardware specs of that machine? How many CPUs

Re: [CentOS] Problems setting terminal size in termcap/xterm

2009-09-10 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:55, Marcelo M. Garcia wrote: > I'm trying to set the terminal size in /usr/share/vte/termcap/xterm, but > it seems that CentOS doesn't look at this file. Works for me (CentOS 4, opening "gnome-terminal"). What does "echo $TERM" output for you? If it does not outpu

Re: [CentOS] patching from different directory

2009-09-10 Thread Carlos Santana
Thanks Filipe. I can do it by cd-ing into file-to-be-patched dir. I think the -d switch in patch command does similar thing (cd). But then it assumes diff file also to be present in that new directory. I guess the problem is not having full dir path in the diff file itself. The diff file mentions

Re: [CentOS] patching from different directory

2009-09-10 Thread nate
Carlos Santana wrote: > Thanks Filipe. > > I can do it by cd-ing into file-to-be-patched dir. I think the -d > switch in patch command does similar thing (cd). But then it assumes > diff file also to be present in that new directory. > > I guess the problem is not having full dir path in the diff f

Re: [CentOS] patching from different directory

2009-09-10 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 14:34, nate wrote: > Could another option be to pipe the diff into patch via STDIN ? > > cat /path/to/filename.diff | patch -p0 That's exactly the same as: $ patch -p0 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] patching from different directory

2009-09-10 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 14:28, Carlos Santana wrote: > Thanks Filipe. > > I can do it by cd-ing into file-to-be-patched dir. So, this means it's fixed for you? > I think the -d > switch in patch command does similar thing (cd). But then it assumes > diff file also to be present in that new

Re: [CentOS] repo with eclipse/subclipse?

2009-09-10 Thread Les Mikesell
Stephen Harris wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 12:40:28PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: >> Error: Missing Dependency: libneon.so.25 is needed by package >> subversion-1.6.5-0.1.el5.rf.i386 (rpmforge) >> >> when I try with rpmforge enabled. > > Are you disabling the standard repo's when you do that?

Re: [CentOS] CentOS vs Fedora?

2009-09-10 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 6:31 PM, David Suhendrik wrote: > I'm newbie and i want to know Your opinion about CentOS vs Fedora, hopefully > this isn't make a flame, and just to curious.. > Actucally now I'm using CentOS as some servers. ^_^' Catching up on reading the list and here are my 2 cents: We

Re: [CentOS] patching from different directory

2009-09-10 Thread Carlos Santana
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 14:28, Carlos Santana wrote: >> Thanks Filipe. >> >> I can do it by cd-ing into file-to-be-patched dir. > > So, this means it's fixed for you? > >> I think the -d >> switch in patch command does similar

Re: [CentOS] CentOS vs Fedora?

2009-09-10 Thread Les Mikesell
Lanny Marcus wrote: > On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 6:31 PM, David Suhendrik wrote: >> I'm newbie and i want to know Your opinion about CentOS vs Fedora, hopefully >> this isn't make a flame, and just to curious.. >> Actucally now I'm using CentOS as some servers. ^_^' > > Catching up on reading the lis

Re: [CentOS] CentOS vs Fedora?

2009-09-10 Thread Michael Semcheski
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Scott Silva wrote: > If you want rock solid stable for up to 7 years, pick CentOS. > If you want the latest versions of PHP, Apache, or whatever else, and don't > mind re-installing every 6 months to a year, choose Fedora. > > Just my $.02... I use CentOS on a num

Re: [CentOS] CentOS vs Fedora?

2009-09-10 Thread Les Mikesell
Michael Semcheski wrote: > > For a (virtual) server that runs GLPI and OCS Inventory, I use Fedora. > Those applications are part of Fedora, so its very easy to get up and > running and keep everything up to date. For this particular case, you could use CentOS with the epel and remi (http://bl

Re: [CentOS] patching from different directory

2009-09-10 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 17:30, Carlos Santana wrote: > Is there any way to get absolute path in the diff o/p? Well, yes, if you run "diff" passing absolute pathnames then (I believe) it will create a path with absolute pathnames... (It might not, considering that this is not very useful. GNU

Re: [CentOS] trouble playing quicktimes at apple.com/trailers

2009-09-10 Thread fred smith
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 07:26:45PM +0200, Olaf Mueller wrote: > fred smith wrote: > > > While I haven't tried that, > ? > > > I don't think that's the problem I'm > > having: I can copy and paste the URL of the .mov file into mplayer or > > vlc from the commandline, and get the exact same sympto

Re: [CentOS] trouble playing quicktimes at apple.com/trailers

2009-09-10 Thread nate
fred smith wrote: > Doggone those Apple folks. why would they be so stingy as to PREVENT people > from using otherwise-compatible players from seeing the trailer? Just > doesn't make sense in any way other than sheer meanness. I mean, what real > business justification could there be? They don't

Re: [CentOS] trouble playing quicktimes at apple.com/trailers

2009-09-10 Thread fred smith
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 05:43:21PM -0700, nate wrote: > fred smith wrote: > > > Doggone those Apple folks. why would they be so stingy as to PREVENT people > > from using otherwise-compatible players from seeing the trailer? Just > > doesn't make sense in any way other than sheer meanness. I mean,

Re: [CentOS] Fork: Resource Temporarily Unavailable

2009-09-10 Thread Ross Walker
On Sep 10, 2009, at 2:10 PM, Gustavo Pastorino wrote: > Hey all, > > I installed a while ago two CentOS 5.3 servers. One of them was > running Samba and another OpenLDAP. I configured Samba to act as a PDC > on the network and everything was working fine, I was already on > policies rules and des

Re: [CentOS] Kickstart help

2009-09-10 Thread Daniel Burkland
Guys I wanted to thank you for your tremendous advice on my kickstart setup. In regards to the removal of the yum update in kickstart config, how do you guys keep your internal repository synced with the public one? Thanks, Dan ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] Kickstart help

2009-09-10 Thread nate
Daniel Burkland wrote: > Guys I wanted to thank you for your tremendous advice on my kickstart > setup. In regards to the removal of the yum update in kickstart config, > how do you guys keep your internal repository synced with the public one? I only update mine a couple times a year but I use rs

Re: [CentOS] trouble playing quicktimes at apple.com/trailers

2009-09-10 Thread Olaf Mueller
fred smith wrote: > So, they're not gaining anything other than ill will by > blocking us from viewing. Yes. An other example for such a behaviour is Amazon.com. Amazon.com has changed their data API to require that all searches be signed with a secret key, unique to each user. As a result my tell