Ned Slider wrote:
Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
Hi! Have anyone any idea why w83793G driver is not in the upstream
vendor kernel? do i have to compile my own kernel for this to work?
Thank you,
Adrian
Hi Adrian,
Hi,
I guess the w83793 driver had not made the 2.6.18.4 kernel that RHEL5 is
based
Ned Slider wrote:
Even better, I've backported the module for you from the latest upstream
kernel (2.6.30.5) as a kABI tracking kmod package and put it in the
elrepo-testing repository here (kmod-w83793):
http://elrepo.org
http://elrepo.org/linux/testing/el5/
As you have the hardware, I'd app
On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 13:52 -0400, Dave wrote:
> Hello,
> Thanks for your reply. How do i access atrpms testing or bleeding
> branches? Here's what i have in my atrpms.repo file:
>
> [atrpms]
> name=CentOS $releasever - $basearch - ATrpms
> baseurl=http://dl.atrpms.net/el$releasever-$basear
Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
> Ned Slider wrote:
>> Even better, I've backported the module for you from the latest
>> upstream kernel (2.6.30.5) as a kABI tracking kmod package and put it
>> in the elrepo-testing repository here (kmod-w83793):
>>
>> http://elrepo.org
>> http://elrepo.org/linux/testing
Hello all,
Came across my first real "problem" in all the years I've been using Linux
today and I'm stumped for an answer.
I've recently built a back-up server on top of Centos 5.3 using a 3Ware 9650SE
4 port SATA card and 4 x 1.5TB drives in a RAID 5 array. I went for the 3Ware
card as it ha
. . wrote:
>
> Can anyone shed any light as to what the issue might be? Is it XFS or
> is it the card? I went with XFS as all the research I did indicated
> that it gave the best performance for the millions of small files in
> the backups we run and doesn't have any many issues with hardlinks as
> However, the OP is looking for a iscsi-target...which, if I am not
> wrong, does not quite exist yet in Centos/RHEL.
> ___
you're right, I am looking to setup an iscsi target, but I couldn't
find a working tutorial, and this is very very new to me.
T
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 4:24 AM, Jim Wildman wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Sep 2009, Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
>
>>
>>> chan, I already have CentOS 5.3 setup, and we need to use this as far
>>> as possible, due to some of the other software that we'll be using.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> See Joseph Casale's pos
On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 12:32 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Andrew Allen wrote:
>
> > Trying to install the driver for my bcm4311 wireless card, I've
> > downloaded the driver package from
> >
> > http://www.broadcom.com/support/802.11/linux_sta.php
> >
> > and followed
>[r...@localhost ~]# /etc/init.d/iscsi start
>iscsid (pid 15037 15036) is running...
>Setting up iSCSI targets: iscsiadm: No records found!
Well,
Have you exported any block devices? Also don't forget to open
the firewall.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@
Ned Slider wrote:
Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
Ned Slider wrote:
Even better, I've backported the module for you from the latest
upstream kernel (2.6.30.5) as a kABI tracking kmod package and put it
in the elrepo-testing repository here (kmod-w83793):
http://elrepo.org
http://elrepo.org/linux/test
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:46 AM, Andrew Allen wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 12:32 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> First make sure you have the kernel-devel package that *matches* your
>> running kernel.
>>
>> Then try:
>>
>> make -C/lib/modules/`uname -r`/build M='pwd'
>>
> Thanks,
> Yum installed ker
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Joseph L.
Casale wrote:
>>[r...@localhost ~]# /etc/init.d/iscsi start
>>iscsid (pid 15037 15036) is running...
>>Setting up iSCSI targets: iscsiadm: No records found!
>
> Well,
> Have you exported any block devices? Also don't forget to open
> the firewall.
> ___
We have CENTOS 5.2 on DELL server. While I run "yum update" and yum start
download files. in middle of download there have power surge and computer
reboot.
Does there has way to clean yum download?
Thanks
___
您的生活即時通 － 溝通、娛樂、生活、工作一次搞定！
ht
>No. I don't know what exactly to setup, which is why I'm looking for a howto :)
Rudi,
How exactly did you expect the daemon to know what you wanted to
export without telling it, was starting the daemon w/o any config
not supposed to yield any errors:)
For RHELs target:
http://kbase.redhat.com/fa
yum clean all :)
- Original Message -
From: "mcclnx mcc"
To: centos@centos.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2009 8:48:06 AM
Subject: [CentOS] how to clean YUM download?
We have CENTOS 5.2 on DELL server. While I run "yum update" and yum start
download files. in middle of download t
mcclnx mcc wrote:
> We have CENTOS 5.2 on DELL server. While I run "yum update" and yum start
> download files. in middle of download there have power surge and computer
> reboot.
>
> Does there has way to clean yum download?
>
> Thanks
man yum => yum clean => headers, packages, metadata,
yum clean all
mcclnx mcc schrieb:
> We have CENTOS 5.2 on DELL server. While I run "yum update" and yum start
> download files. in middle of download there have power surge and computer
> reboot.
>
> Does there has way to clean yum download?
>
> Thanks
>
> _
pwconv, pwunconv, grpconv, grpunconv - convert to and from shadow
passwords and groups
Eugene Vilensky schrieb:
> If shadow passwords are already in use, and new entries are appended to
> /etc/passwd that include password hashes, is it still possible to use
> pwconv to generate /etc/shadow entries
Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
> Ned Slider wrote:
>> Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
>>> Ned Slider wrote:
Even better, I've backported the module for you from the latest
upstream kernel (2.6.30.5) as a kABI tracking kmod package and put
it in the elrepo-testing repository here (kmod-w83793):
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 12:33, Eugene Vilensky wrote:
> If shadow passwords are already in use, and new entries are appended to
> /etc/passwd that include password hashes, is it still possible to use
> pwconv to generate /etc/shadow entries for just the few newly appended
> accounts?
"man pwco
> "man pwconv" answers your questions.
d'oh!
Thanks everyone.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
One of my clients use a software product that is "upgrading" and will
shortly utilize micro$oft SQL server 2005.
Currently the clients are XP on older machines with the database
residing on a Samba / CentOS server and this works very well.
Question: Does anyone run SQL server from XP in a virtua
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Rob Kampen
> Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 11:56
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: [CentOS] SQL Server 2005 and CentOS?
>
> One of my clients use a software product that is "up
Hello All
I made the mistake of assuming all Intel motherboards would be Linux
compatible out of the box and bought one without checking support
information. And now on initial install the Network is not
workingthe Network port is not detected at all.
I have bought an Intel board DG41RQI
(htt
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
> One of my clients use a software product that is "upgrading" and will
> shortly utilize micro$oft SQL server 2005.
> Currently the clients are XP on older machines with the database residing on
> a Samba / CentOS server and this works very well.
How heavy of a workload is the DB managing?
Everything I've read says you have to be very careful if virtualizing
your DB. At very least give the virtual machine a real disk
partition.
Of course, I've only read about it - never done it myself :-) But am
about to do some benchmarking soon to sa
Rob Kampen wrote:
> One of my clients use a software product that is "upgrading" and will
> shortly utilize micro$oft SQL server 2005.
> Currently the clients are XP on older machines with the database
> residing on a Samba / CentOS server and this works very well.
> Question: Does anyone run SQL
>Question: Does anyone run SQL server from XP in a virtualbox on CentOS?
>Any other configuration that works on a linux server?
>I do not want to have to buy another server grade machine just for this
>application.
XP has a tcp connection limit, so unless you have <10 users that won't work.
I sure
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 10:22:56AM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> Rob Kampen wrote:
> > One of my clients use a software product that is "upgrading" and will
> > shortly utilize micro$oft SQL server 2005.
> > Currently the clients are XP on older machines with the database
> > residing on a Samba
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:22 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> Rob Kampen wrote:
>> One of my clients use a software product that is "upgrading" and will
>> shortly utilize micro$oft SQL server 2005.
>> Currently the clients are XP on older machines with the database
>> residing on a Samba / CentOS server
Dear Sirs.
I have a ML370 G4 server with 2 disk SCSI Ultra 320 of 300 GB in RAID-1
through a controller and operating system CentOS 4.7.
My question: CentOS 4.7 could support the expansion of capacity by adding
6 disks SCSI Ultra 320 of 300GB in Raid-1?
Thanks for your reply
Luis
___
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 10:22:56AM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
>> Rob Kampen wrote:
>> > One of my clients use a software product that is "upgrading" and will
>> > shortly utilize micro$oft SQL server 2005.
>> > Currently the clients are XP o
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:31 PM, Sanjay Arora wrote:
> Hello All
>
> I made the mistake of assuming all Intel motherboards would be Linux
> compatible out of the box and bought one without checking support
> information. And now on initial install the Network is not
> workingthe Network port is
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Luis campo wrote:
> Dear Sirs.
>
> I have a ML370 G4 server with 2 disk SCSI Ultra 320 of 300 GB in RAID-1
> through a controller and operating system CentOS 4.7.
>
> My question: CentOS 4.7 could support the expansion of capacity by adding 6
> disks SCSI Ultra 320 o
Luis campo wrote:
>
> Dear Sirs.
>
>
>
> I have a ML370 G4 server with 2 disk SCSI Ultra 320 of 300 GB in RAID-1
> through a controller and operating system CentOS 4.7.
>
>
>
> My question: CentOS 4.7 could support the expansion of capacity by adding
> 6 disks SCSI Ultra 320 of 300GB in Raid-1?
Ar
>SQL Server only runs on Windows SERVER OS's. on a desktop OS like XP,
>youc an only run the 'lite' version aka MSDE or SQL Express depending on
>which version, and this only allows a very few database connections, and
>is mostly suited for standalone single user applications and software
>develop
Luis campo wrote:
> Dear Sirs.
>
> I have a ML370 G4 server with 2 disk SCSI Ultra 320 of 300 GB in RAID-1
> through a controller and operating system CentOS 4.7.
>
> My question: CentOS 4.7 could support the expansion of capacity by
> adding 6 disks SCSI Ultra 320 of 300GB in Raid-1?
Yes, the
Dear Sirs.
I appreciate your response.
Currently the server has set up a Raid-1 with 2 SCSI disks, it adds up to 6
SCSI disks with the following configuration:
- Raid-1 (4 SCSI disks)
- Raid-1 (2 SCSI disks)
Therefore will have 3 SCSI disk arrays.
The server is not configured
Luis campo wrote:
>
> Dear Sirs.
>
>
>
> I appreciate your response.
>
>
>
> Currently the server has set up a Raid-1 with 2 SCSI disks, it adds up to 6
> SCSI disks with the following configuration:
>
>
>
> - Raid-1 (4 SCSI disks)
>
> - Raid-1 (2 SCSI disks)
>
>
>
> Therefore will have 3 SCSI disk
Luis campo wrote:
> Thanks for your reply,
>
> The configuration I mentioned implies that each SCSI disk array would be
> in a new partition?
Yes, if you want raid1. Other raid levels or LVM could group them into one.
> Regarding the size of the disk because it recognizes only 273GB
Drive manu
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 14:12, Sanjay Arora wrote:
> Install is CentOS 5.0. Will be updating after network starts working.
> Tried to install driver file
> realtek-r8169-kmp-smp-8.008.00_2.6.16.60_0.21-0.i586.rpm from the list
> using the rpm command(yum would ask for dependencies and will
Alan Hodgson wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 September 2009, Luis campo wrote:
>
>> Another supplementary question, because CentOS 4.7 only recognizes 273GB
>> if the disk is 300GB?
>>
>
> CentOS recognizes the full size of the disk. Your disconnect is between what
> the manufacturer sells as 300
> I believe this is the one you want:
> http://elrepo.org/linux/elrepo/el5/i386/RPMS/kmod-r8169-6.010.00_NAPI-2.el5.elrepo.i686.rpm
>
> Or if you're running the Xen kernel:
> http://elrepo.org/linux/elrepo/el5/i386/RPMS/kmod-r8169-xen-6.010.00_NAPI-2.el5.elrepo.i686.rpm
>
> Once you get your networ
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Luis campo wrote:
>
>> Thanks for your reply,
>>
>> The configuration I mentioned implies that each SCSI disk array would be
>> in a new partition?
>>
>
> Yes, if you want raid1. Other raid levels or LVM could group them into one.
>
some confusion here, perhaps.
Thanks for your reply,
we have the idea of having 4 disk in a RAID-1 this is feasible or that we
recommend.
greetings
Luis
> Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 14:03:52 -0700
> From: pie...@hogranch.com
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Support for add disk SCSI
>
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>
On Tuesday 08 September 2009, Luis campo wrote:
> Another supplementary question, because CentOS 4.7 only recognizes 273GB
> if the disk is 300GB?
CentOS recognizes the full size of the disk. Your disconnect is between what
the manufacturer sells as 300GB, and the actual size of the disk.
--
Thanks for your reply,
The configuration I mentioned implies that each SCSI disk array would be in a
new partition?
Regarding the size of the disk because it recognizes only 273GB
thanks
Luis
> Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 12:54:13 -0700
> From: cen...@linuxpowered.net
> To: centos@centos.org
Sanjay Arora wrote:
>> I believe this is the one you want:
>> http://elrepo.org/linux/elrepo/el5/i386/RPMS/kmod-r8169-6.010.00_NAPI-2.el5.elrepo.i686.rpm
>>
>> Or if you're running the Xen kernel:
>> http://elrepo.org/linux/elrepo/el5/i386/RPMS/kmod-r8169-xen-6.010.00_NAPI-2.el5.elrepo.i686.rpm
>>
Luis campo wrote:
> Thanks for your reply,
>
> we have the idea of having 4 disk in a RAID-1 this is feasible or that
> we recommend.
again, thats really a raid-10 regardless of what your disk controller
calls it.
sure, we do it all the time, mostly for relational databases such as
Oracle, whe
Ross Walker wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 10:22:56AM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
Rob Kampen wrote:
One of my clients use a software product that is "upgrading" and will
shortly utilize micro$oft SQL server 2005.
Currently
>Any suggestions on least pain way forward?
Just read up on virtual box and set it to respect cache flushes, if your vm
tanks
or your host os tanks, the block device with your db, whether it be SQL Express
or
Enterprise will sh!t the bed:)
I've seen a plethora of news about this on the zfs list
on 9-8-2009 4:31 PM David Suhendrik spake the following:
> Dear All,
> I'm newbie and i want to know Your opinion about CentOS vs Fedora,
> hopefully this isn't make a flame, and just to curious..
> Actucally now I'm using CentOS as some servers. ^_^'
>
If you want rock solid stable for up to 7 ye
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Dave wrote:
> Here is a list of files that I have not (knowingly) modified that do
> not pass rpm verification immediately after I installed centos 5.3. I
> am not really sure what this means - are the packagers sending out
> sloppy rpms, or is something going aroun
Here is a list of files that I have not (knowingly) modified that do
not pass rpm verification immediately after I installed centos 5.3. I
am not really sure what this means - are the packagers sending out
sloppy rpms, or is something going around modifying stuff? Other than
the texmf stuff, the l
Title: no
Dear All,
I'm newbie and i want to know Your opinion about CentOS vs Fedora,
hopefully this isn't make a flame, and just to curious..
Actucally now I'm using CentOS as some servers. ^_^'
--
Regards,
David
./nobody
___
CentOS mailin
Hi all,
Annoying issue.. my ThinkPad T61 has an iwl4965 wireless card. When I
have the wireless switch on, I experience a lot of issues.. system keeps
freezing..unfreezing..freezing..etc.
Sometimes, a soft lockup is logged to /var/log/messages.
psmouse.c also sometimes throws an error saying
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> rpm -qf 'fill in file name here' this will tell you hat RPM owned that file.
>
Then how do I find the rpm? I need to figure out which repo it came
from, then download it from the repo, then unpack it and do a diff.
'yum info ' seems to
Ryan Pugatch wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Annoying issue.. my ThinkPad T61 has an iwl4965 wireless card. When I
> have the wireless switch on, I experience a lot of issues.. system keeps
> freezing..unfreezing..freezing..etc.
>
> Sometimes, a soft lockup is logged to /var/log/messages.
>
> psmouse.c
Ned Slider wrote:
> There is an updated firmware available:
>
> http://elrepo.org/linux/elrepo/el5/x86_64/RPMS/iwl4965-firmware-228.61.2.24-1.elrepo.noarch.rpm
>
> although I'm not sure it will particularly help with your issue.
>
Thanks.. however there is no difference with the newer version
On 09/08/2009 08:15 PM, Dave wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> rpm -qf 'fill in file name here' this will tell you hat RPM owned that file.
>>
> Then how do I find the rpm? I need to figure out which repo it came
> from, then download it from the repo, then unp
Hi all,
I have been using Red Hat for a very long time and run CentOS 4 on some of
my production servers. One of the things that
has bugged me for a long time is the fact in the Time Zone configuration
there is not a selection for UTC or GMT.
As a work around I have been linking the /etc/
Michael Dross wrote:
> Is there a better way to set the system to UTC then the /etc/localtime ->
> /usr/share/zoneinfo/UTC
Try /etc/sysconfig/clock as well as /etc/localtime
There is a UTC option in the clock file as well.
nate
___
CentOS mailing lis
On 09/08/2009 11:55 PM, nate wrote:
> Michael Dross wrote:
>
>> Is there a better way to set the system to UTC then the /etc/localtime ->
>> /usr/share/zoneinfo/UTC
>
> Try /etc/sysconfig/clock as well as /etc/localtime
>
> There is a UTC option in the clock file as well.
>
right ... edit /etc
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:15 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
> Sanjay Arora wrote:
>>> I believe this is the one you want:
>>> http://elrepo.org/linux/elrepo/el5/i386/RPMS/kmod-r8169-6.010.00_NAPI-2.el5.elrepo.i686.rpm
>>>
>>> Or if you're running the Xen kernel:
>>> http://elrepo.org/linux/elrepo/el5/i386/RP
65 matches
Mail list logo
