On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 2:03 AM, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>>
>> A client of ours just requested to increase the max_recipients in Exim
>> to 300, since he keeps getting "554 Too many recipients" error when
>> sending a marketing email from MS Outloo
Han mo wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> does anyone install the oracle on the centos?
> I try to install the oracle on my computer. but fail.
> It has problem on kernel setting and add the swap disk.
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http:/
Rudi Ahlers wrote on Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:05:34 +0200:
> I'll see if I can convince the client to use an alternative method of
> doing this.
-> mailing list
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
_
Dave wrote on Mon, 17 Aug 2009 02:36:39 -0400:
> How can i update just these specific packages
> httpd* and php* without changing my priority options?
You have to exclude them from base and updates.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.con
Hello List,
I've got a somewhat weird question. Let me tell you what my intent is first:
We're running a set of Dell boxes with CentOS 4. Some of them use
OpenVPN. As we need to monitor the system status of these boxes, we use
the Dell supplied OMSA package. As it turns out, OMSA totally breaks if
>How can I create a tun device without using any add on packages using
>only software contained in CentOS?
Just your kernel :) Support is built in. Manipulation of and other commands
might need additional software though...
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Joseph L. Casale
> Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 5:35
> To: 'CentOS mailing list'
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] How to create a tun-device with CentOS
> packages only?
>
> >How can I cre
Jason Pyeron schrieb:
>
> Stabbing in the dark here, but does:
>
> mknod /dev/net/tun c 10 200
>
> Or other partial steps you can think of cause the issue?
>
Not at all. The omcliproxy binary from OMSA starts to segfault once
there is any tun netdevice. If I destroy the tun devices, it works
On 08/17/2009 06:25 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> its possible you had both 32bit and 64bit versions installed, I dunno.
yum list installed firefox;
that will tell you.
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522...@icq
___
CentOS mailing list
Cent
Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Lee Perez wrote:
>
>
>> There is nothing on this server that I can not replace. Did I just get
>> hacked? Should I wipe this thing and start over? Any and all advice is
>> greatly appreciated!!!
>>
>
> If you eventually decide to wi
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Andreas Rogge
> Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 5:51
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] How to create a tun-device with CentOS
> packages only?
>
> Jason Pyeron schri
> I didn't know that IPCOP could run on one that old. I have one like
> that up in the attic, time to bring it back down. Before I upgraded to
> 5.3, I was running 4.7 with FireStarter and did not have any troubles.
> As soon as I get some sleep I will be looking in to setting it up.
>
>
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
>> I didn't know that IPCOP could run on one that old. I have one like
>> that up in the attic, time to bring it back down. Before I upgraded to
>> 5.3, I was running 4.7 with FireStarter and did not have any troubles.
>> As soon as I get some sleep I will b
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>
>>> A client of ours just requested to increase the max_recipients in Exim
>>> to 300, since he keeps getting "554 Too many recipients" error when
>>> sending a marketing email from MS Outlook.
>>>
>>> I would like to know, what are the implications of increasing the
>>> defau
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 07:33 -0500, Lee Perez wrote:
> Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
> >> I didn't know that IPCOP could run on one that old. I have one like
> >> that up in the attic, time to bring it back down. Before I upgraded to
> >> 5.3, I was running 4.7 with FireStarter and did not
I am trying to write a script that can pass cmd line args into an
executable it runs, I need at least 4 args, but I need to pass the rest
to it in the script if they exist.
$@ doesn't help because I use the 1st and 2nd etc, so how do I elegantly
handle passing args 4+ if they exist on the end of t
Chuck wrote:
...
>
> Just curious, why are the 2 identically named packages? Is this just an
> oversight/bug on CentOS's part or does it serve some purpose?
As pointed out elsewhere, it is likely that you are on x86_64 and have
both i386 and x86_64 packages installed. This may be a "misfeature
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Joseph L.
Casale wrote:
> I am trying to write a script that can pass cmd line args into an
> executable it runs, I need at least 4 args, but I need to pass the rest
> to it in the script if they exist.
>
> $@ doesn't help because I use the 1st and 2nd etc, so how
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Rudi Ahlers wrote on Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:05:34 +0200:
>
>> I'll see if I can convince the client to use an alternative method of
>> doing this.
>
> -> mailing list
>
> Kai
>
Mailing list software (like majordomo) are a terrible way to handle
b
>maybe you call shift (more than once) and then pass $...@?
Didn't know bash had a shift!
Thx!
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Brian Mathis wrote:
> Mailing list software (like majordomo) are a terrible way to handle
> bulk mailing to people. They are not intended to be used for one-way
> communication, and by default replies to them will get sent to
> everyone else on the list. It is possible to disable this behavior,
>
John R Pierce wrote:
> I've setup Mailman for announce-only lists for several people and
> they've generally been quite happy with it. You configure it as a
> moderated list and only allow the pre-approved moderators to send to the
> list, and you configure the list so replies go back to a pr
I can't think of the exact syntax at the minute but something like;
if $# => 4 then
for i = 1 to ($# - 4)
echo "arg number $i is $expr($i)"
next
fi
$# is the number of args passed so just pass the total number of args
minus four ($~-4)
That syntax is all wrong, but somebody on t
Hi,
Is there an equivalent of a useradd for systems that are using LDAP user
management? I know I can build an LDIF file and import it, but it is a bit
of a pain to do it manually all the time.
Is there not an easier / faster way?
Thanks,
Eric
_
> Is there an equivalent of a useradd for systems that are using LDAP user
> management? I know I can build an LDIF file and import it, but it is a bit
> of a pain to do it manually all the time.
>
> Is there not an easier / faster way
Smbldap-tools
https://gna.org/projects/smbldap-tools/
_
>> Is there an equivalent of a useradd for systems that are using LDAP user
>> management? I know I can build an LDIF file and import it, but it is a bit
>> of a pain to do it manually all the time.
>>
>> Is there not an easier / faster way
>>
> Smbldap-tools
> https://gna.org/projects/smb
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 15:00, Eric B. wrote:
> Is there an equivalent of a useradd for systems that are using LDAP user
> management? I know I can build an LDIF file and import it, but it is a bit
> of a pain to do it manually all the time.
You can try "libuser", it's available in CentOS 5
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 19:55 +0100, James Bensley wrote:
> I can't think of the exact syntax at the minute but something like;
>
> if $# => 4 then
> for i = 1 to ($# - 4)
> echo "arg number $i is $expr($i)"
> next
> fi
$ echo $*
1 2 3 4
$ \
> while [ "$1" != '' ] ; do
> echo $1
>
"Miguel Medalha" wrote in
message news:4a89a97d.5070...@sapo.pt...
>
>> Is there an equivalent of a useradd for systems that are using LDAP user
>> management? I know I can build an LDIF file and import it, but it is a
>> bit
>> of a pain to do it manually all the time.
>>
>> Is there not an ea
William L. Maltby wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 19:55 +0100, James Bensley wrote:
>> I can't think of the exact syntax at the minute but something like;
>>
>> if $# => 4 then
>> for i = 1 to ($# - 4)
>> echo "arg number $i is $expr($i)"
>> next
>> fi
>
> $ echo $*
> 1 2 3 4
> $ \
> Isn't that only for samba-ldap? Can I still use them if I am not running
> samba? I don't want to install and run Samba for no particular reason..
It can be used to create Posix accounts only.
The documentation resides here:
http://download.gna.org/smbldap-tools/docs/
> You can try "libuser", it's available in CentOS 5 (yum install
> libuser) and apparently has support for LDAP.
>
> "libuser" is an attempt to generalize the useradd/mod/del,
> groupadd/mod/del commands to work with generic backends. The
> implementation includes a module to work with an LDAP bac
> "Filipe Brandenburger"
> wrote in message
> news:e814db780908171213h581bf267m10a95ab837be4...@mail.gmail.com...
> > Is there an equivalent of a useradd for systems that are using LDAP user
> > management? I know I can build an LDIF file and import it, but it is a
> > bit
> > of a pain to do
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Miguel Medalha wrote:
>
>> Isn't that only for samba-ldap? Can I still use them if I am not running
>> samba? I don't want to install and run Samba for no particular reason..
>
> It can be used to create Posix accounts only.
>
> The documentation resides here:
>
> http://dow
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 15:00 -0400, Eric B. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there an equivalent of a useradd for systems that are using LDAP user
> management? I know I can build an LDIF file and import it, but it is a bit
> of a pain to do it manually all the time.
>
> Is there not an easier / faster way?
Am Montag, den 17.08.2009, 08:15 -0400 schrieb Jason Pyeron:
> So to get a clarification, because I am dense. Do you need to have the drivers
> insmoded or just have the /dev entries to make OMSA crash?
Neither, I can have the driver loaded and in /dev/net/tun. The problem
only arises once you cre
will C5.3 support a SmartArray 6i 'out of box', or does it need drivers
to boot from this? I am advising someone else remotely and don't have
the hardware handy to test.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/list
>will C5.3 support a SmartArray 6i 'out of box', or does it need drivers
>to boot from this?
Out of the box.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Aug 17, 2009, at 4:51 PM, "Eric B." wrote:
> Any ideas where I might be able to find some
> help for it? I enabled full logging on my OpenLDAP server, and I
> see it
> failing with TLS negotiaiton for some reason, even when I don't want
> it to
> use TLS.
'man libuser.conf' worked well f
Hello Everyone,
I've installed kvm from the "lfarkas" repo on CentOS 5.3, as per the
CentOS wiki page. I now want to install the virt-manager package, but
yum is giving me this error:
Error: Missing Dependency: python-virtinst >= 0.400.3 is needed by
package virt-manager-0.7.0-5.el5.x86_64 (lfa
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 21:17 -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
> I can't find that package anywhere in that repo. So, where do I get it
> from?
Forget I asked: I'll just grab it from the CentOS base repo.
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.27.29-170.2.78.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/
Hello,
I'm running httpd on a Centos 5.3 machine. I'm trying to use
.htaccess to disable direct linking to site images. I've got the following
rewrite rule, the domain is test.example.com which is at
/var/www/test.example.com under which is a directory called images.
RewriteEngine on
Rewri
James Matthews wrote:
> There is a very large issue with all people running VPS machines that
> are waiting for upgrades.
>
>
Why is that, there is NO upgrade for this issue from upstream. We can
not possibly release something before it is released by Red Hat does.
signature.asc
Description
Dave wrote:
> In my httpd virtual host directive i have:
>
> alias /images "/var/www/test.example.com/images"
>
> Options None
> AllowOverride None
> order allow,deny
> Allow from all
>
>
> Comments appreciated.
>
Assume you mean that the rewrites are ignored. Note that "AllowOverride
None"
44 matches
Mail list logo
