- Original Message
> From: Chan Chung Hang Christopher
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Sent: Friday, 14 August, 2009 3:31:32
> Subject: [CentOS] OT: Fortunate clueless dd chum - lvm recovery
>
> Looks like the chum did not have to lose any data.
>
> Wiping out the MBR and the next 63 blo
Ian Murray a écrit :
> Niki,
>
> I am perfectly comfortable with my email client and I prefer top posting
> because I don't like wading through constantly re-quoted stuff I already
> read. I will on occasion interleave and bottom post if it serves my
> purpose, though. If you don't like it, don
>
> First of all, I would dd a copy of the whole drive off to another drive, so
> you can have a few goes at this.
>
> How do you know only those bits where lost?
>
The dd command zeros the first 64 sectors, that is, the mbr and then the
next 63 sectors which would the bootsector of the firs
- Original Message
> From: Chan Chung Hang Christopher
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Sent: Friday, 14 August, 2009 10:00:41
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: Fortunate clueless dd chum - lvm recovery
>
>
> >
> > First of all, I would dd a copy of the whole drive off to another drive, so
>
Ian Murray a écrit :
>
> Nobody said I was breaking rules, only that I annoyed them.
>
Then let me apologize for having bothered you with outdated concepts
like respect, politeness or consideration. Believe it or not, I just
took a peek in my Oxford Dictionary: "egoism, n (usu derog) state of
Hi all.
Julien Tinnes and Tavis Ormandy from the Google Security Team have
recently found a Linux kernel vulnerability which affects all 2.4 and
2.6 kernels since 2001 on all architectures. Please read the
announcement on LWM: http://lwn.net/Articles/347006/ for further
information about the vulne
>> I get to learn something new at his expense, (which is now just a scare)
>> nice successor eh? :-D
Maybe you could point him to this list for lunch time lesson reading,
however, you won't be able to talk about him behind his back anymore.
:-/
___
Cen
Marcus Moeller wrote on Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:24:39 +0200:
> The only workaroud that is known to me atm is to disable the affected
> kernel modules (which should be handled with care as some of them may
> provide necessary functionality in your operating environment):
If vm.mmap_min_addr is > 0 you
Have you tried the exploit on CentOS 5?
http://grsecurity.net/~spender/wunderbar_emporium.tgz
I only have access to a Fedora 9 machine right now and the exploit is
working with all the modules from the first mail disabled in
modprobe.conf
[r...@localhost ~]# uname -a
Linux localhost.localdomain
Hi again,
>> The only workaroud that is known to me atm is to disable the affected
>> kernel modules (which should be handled with care as some of them may
>> provide necessary functionality in your operating environment):
>
> If vm.mmap_min_addr is > 0 you are also not affected, at least not by t
On Friday 14 August 2009, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Marcus Moeller wrote on Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:24:39 +0200:
> > The only workaroud that is known to me atm is to disable the affected
> > kernel modules (which should be handled with care as some of them may
> > provide necessary functionality in your op
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Chan Chung Hang
Christopher wrote:
>
>>
>> First of all, I would dd a copy of the whole drive off to another drive, so
>> you can have a few goes at this.
>>
>> How do you know only those bits where lost?
>>
>
> The dd command zeros the first 64 sectors, that is, t
Hi again.
> alias net-pf-24 # PPPoE
Sorry, typo in pf-24.
grep -q '^alias net-pf-3 off' /etc/modprobe.conf || \
echo 'alias net-pf-3 off' >> /etc/modprobe.conf
grep -q '^alias net-pf-4 off' /etc/modprobe.conf || \
echo 'alias net-pf-4 off' >> /etc/modprobe.conf
grep -q '^alias net-pf-5 off' /et
Upstream bugzilla to follow:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516949
Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Ross Walker
> Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 10:30
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: Fortunate clueless dd chum - lvm recovery
>
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 5:00 AM
--
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20090814/8fd356e3/attachment-0001.bin
--
Message: 2
Date: Fr
Ross Walker wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Chan Chung Hang
> Christopher wrote:
>
> Question now is, was the first sector of partition 1 damaged (was it
> 63 or 64 sectors dd'd)?
>
> If so it will require a more tricky procedure to fix.
No, the ext2 file system does not use the first 1
Hello all,
Have installed eclipse 3.5 x86_64 from the eclipse site, with CDT and QT
integration.
I am just starting to learn C++ but I would like to know how to set up
the ability to compile for 32 bit as well?
At the moment I am googleing this as well.
Regards,
Coert
___
Hi All:
I am looking for some possible recommendations on the handling of our
internal DNS services. First some background...
Until recently our entire network was located within a single facility
with internal DNS services provided by our CentOS 4.7 (using BIND).
While I had problems with DHCP/D
Coert Waagmeester wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Have installed eclipse 3.5 x86_64 from the eclipse site, with CDT and QT
> integration.
>
>
> I am just starting to learn C++ but I would like to know how to set up
> the ability to compile for 32 bit as well?
>
specify -m32 as a gcc (or g++ or c++) co
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> Upstream bugzilla to follow:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516949
Just a note to say that the issue is also being tracked in the CentOS forums:
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=21740&forum=42
So, if
On Aug 14, 2009, at 12:48 PM, Robert Nichols
wrote:
> Ross Walker wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Chan Chung Hang
>> Christopher wrote:
>>
>> Question now is, was the first sector of partition 1 damaged (was it
>> 63 or 64 sectors dd'd)?
>>
>> If so it will require a more tricky proc
On Friday 14 August 2009 17:17, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
> Here are my questions...
>
> 1. Is the BIND master/slave the appropriate approach?
Yes, you should already have something like this in case the main/master
server would fail.
> 2. Can I have each subnet be a master for itself and a
grace rante wrote:
> Does anybody know how to restart X in centos 5.3? /etc/init.d/gdm | xdm
> seems to be missing.
CTRL+ALT+BACKSPACE ?
nate
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hello,
I'd like to get in to rpm building and am looking for a CentOS
specific document if any to get me going? I want to repackage an existing
rpm and give it different runtime options so it'll work on a server, and
make an rpm at least one probably more, and then submit them to the rpmfor
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 1:31 AM, Dave wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I'd like to get in to rpm building and am looking for a CentOS
> specific document if any to get me going? I want to repackage an existing
> rpm and give it different runtime options so it'll work on a server, and
> make an rpm at le
Dave,
--- On Fri, 8/14/09, Dave wrote:
> From: Dave
> Subject: [CentOS] building CentOS rpms?
> To: centos@centos.org
> Date: Friday, August 14, 2009, 5:31 PM
> Hello,
> I'd like to get in to rpm building and
> am looking for a CentOS
> specific document if any to get me going? I want to
>
Hello,
One of the rpms has a src.rpm file, the other one i need to make.
I'd also like to do this as a nonroot user.
Thanks.
Dave.
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Mfawa Alfred Onen
Sent: Friday, August 14,
Ross Walker wrote:
> On Aug 14, 2009, at 12:48 PM, Robert Nichols
> wrote:
>
>> Ross Walker wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Chan Chung Hang
>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>
>>> Question now is, was the first sector of partition 1 damaged (was it
>>> 63 or 64 sectors dd'd)?
>>>
>>> If so i
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 4:40 PM, nate wrote:
> grace rante wrote:
>> Does anybody know how to restart X in centos 5.3? /etc/init.d/gdm | xdm
>> seems to be missing.
>
> CTRL+ALT+BACKSPACE ?
>
Log out and log back in also works (which will do, too).
mhr
___
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Kristopher
Kane wrote:
>>> I get to learn something new at his expense, (which is now just a scare)
>>> nice successor eh? :-D
>
> Maybe you could point him to this list for lunch time lesson reading,
> however, you won't be able to talk about him behind his back a
From: Robert Spangler Sent: August 14, 2009 16:18
> On Friday 14 August 2009 17:17, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
>
> > Here are my questions...
> >
> > 1. Is the BIND master/slave the appropriate approach?
>
> Yes, you should already have something like this in case the
> main/master server would
On Aug 14, 2009, at 9:22 PM, Robert Nichols
wrote:
> Ross Walker wrote:
>> On Aug 14, 2009, at 12:48 PM, Robert Nichols
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Ross Walker wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Chan Chung Hang
Christopher wrote:
Question now is, was the first sector of partition
On Friday 14 August 2009 21:29, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
> From: Robert Spangler Sent: August 14, 2009 16:18
>
> > On Friday 14 August 2009 17:17, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
> > > Here are my questions...
> > >
> > > 1. Is the BIND master/slave the appropriate approach?
> >
> > Yes, you s
Ross Walker wrote:
>
> Since you don't know if LVM has a recovery path how can you imply it
> doesn't?
I've seen plenty of evidence that tools for LVM recovery are lacking.
I see postings from people asking about recovery of damaged LVM
volumes and not getting any reasonable answers about how t
From: Robert Spangler Sent: August 14, 2009 19:22
>
> I would suggest placing one on each site. That way you can cut
> the traffic between sites for DNS lookups. I would also ensure that
> only one does the updates per domain.
That makes sense and is essentially what I was planning to do.
> T
Hugh:
> I will check those out but what about the ease of use factor. Would
> you suggest something like webmin over had tailoring the config files?
I use Webmin for managing DNS. It is a great tool and makes
life much easier.
Neil
--
Neil Aggarwal, (281)846-8957, www.JAMMConsulting.com
Will y
37 matches
Mail list logo
