Hi all,
If logging all logs via syslog to a central syslog server that are all
Centos based, what GUIs are out there to browse them etc. ? I know
about splunk but don't want to go down that route.
Also, some servers are hosted and would be best not sending their logs
across the net to a central s
John R Pierce wrote:
> is there a list more sutiable for c5-testing discussions? I'd like to
> install the php-5.2.9 on there, but I'm getting a dependency problem
>
> # yum update --enablerepo=c5-testing php
> ...
> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> php-5.2.9-2.el5.centos.i386 from c5-testing
Hi guys,
Sorry for the OT. I've posted it in some IBM related forums but no reply yet.
We've got an IBM pSeries p9115-505 machine from warehouse.
I notice that it doesn't have any port for the monitor.
Where do we plug the monitor?
>From Google it says something about HMC (Hardware Management Cente
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:56 AM, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
> Hi guys,
> Sorry for the OT. I've posted it in some IBM related forums but no reply yet.
> We've got an IBM pSeries p9115-505 machine from warehouse.
> I notice that it doesn't have any port for the monitor.
> Where do we plug the monitor?
>
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
>
> Sorry for the OT. I've posted it in some IBM related forums but no reply yet.
> We've got an IBM pSeries p9115-505 machine from warehouse.
> I notice that it doesn't have any port for the monitor.
> Where do we plug the monitor?
> >From Goo
Fajar Priyanto wrote:
> Hi guys,
> Sorry for the OT. I've posted it in some IBM related forums but no reply yet.
> We've got an IBM pSeries p9115-505 machine from warehouse.
> I notice that it doesn't have any port for the monitor.
> Where do we plug the monitor?
> >From Google it says something ab
> The second options is to use the serial port on the machine itself
> (you will need a null-modem cable for this). Then using things like
> minicom or hyperterminal you can access the console.
On the off-chance you are using a Vista laptop to connect via the serial
port, you can use putty (usua
On Wednesday 12 August 2009 20:34:55 lostson wrote:
> We need to stand up and ask - How may
> I help ? What do you need to get this done. Ask yourself what talents do
> you have that you can offer the project. There are many ways to do this
> and you can find them here
>
> http://wiki.centos.org/C
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Geoff Galitz wrote:
>
>> The second options is to use the serial port on the machine itself
>> (you will need a null-modem cable for this). Then using things like
>> minicom or hyperterminal you can access the console.
>
>
> On the off-chance you are using a Vista l
On Thursday August 13 2009, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Geoff Galitz wrote:
> >> The second options is to use the serial port on the machine itself
> >> (you will need a null-modem cable for this). Then using things like
> >> minicom or hyperterminal you can access the
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
> 1) The Title of the article says "How to Setup a Software RAID on CentOS 5"
> 2) My successor is a real HK bred and born person so his command of the
> English language is like most such persons; that is to say, very poor.
> 3) Regarding not letting him within
Max Hetrick wrote:
> Someone added a very bright disclaimer, so all should be good in the
> future. I do agree with others that using /dev/sdX would probably be
> wise as well in documentation, but that doesn't fix the true root of the
> problem. People really should watch cutting and pasting,
Can any one clarify this, is auto updating at all production servers
recommended or not?
need to know your opinion, how do you manage the update?
-mu
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi,
will this update be released by centos?
Or because it's no security update it gets a lower priority in the queue?
Thx
Rainer
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
It is a new RHBA. I'm guessing it is in the pipeline and should appear soon.
Regards,
Tim
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Rainer Traut wrote:
> Hi,
>
> will this update be released by centos?
> Or because it's no security update it gets a lower priority in the queue?
>
> Thx
> Rainer
> _
madunix wrote:
> Can any one clarify this, is auto updating at all production servers
> recommended or not?
> need to know your opinion, how do you manage the update?
I guess that depends on your situation. For me, if it's a package that I
know isn't going to mess with users being logged on, or s
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:04 AM, Tim
Verhoeven wrote:
> It is a new RHBA. I'm guessing it is in the pipeline and should appear soon.
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Rainer Traut wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> will this update be released by centos?
>> Or because it's no security update
madunix wrote:
> Can any one clarify this, is auto updating at all production servers
> recommended or not?
> need to know your opinion, how do you manage the update?
>
I don't, but I watch the centos-announce list to see when important updates are
released. Our operations dept schedules all ch
> > Can any one clarify this, is auto updating at all production servers
> > recommended or not?
> > need to know your opinion, how do you manage the update?
> >
I've worked on projects where backend configuration files changed in syntax
or architecture between releases, which were released as u
Again, Max, well said ;)
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:53 AM, Max Hetrick wrote:
> Max Hetrick wrote:
>
> > Someone added a very bright disclaimer, so all should be good in the
> > future. I do agree with others that using /dev/sdX would probably be
> > wise as well in documentation, but that doe
madunix ha scritto:
> Can any one clarify this, is auto updating at all production servers
> recommended or not?
> need to know your opinion, how do you manage the update?
>
> -mu
I'm a very lazy sysadmin, and, although I know that is better to have full
control over updates... I let yum-cron do
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 08:53 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Geoff Galitz wrote:
> >>> Can any one clarify this, is auto updating at all production servers
> >>> recommended or not?
> >>> need to know your opinion, how do you manage the update?
> >>>
> >
> >
> > I've worked on projects where backend
Geoff Galitz wrote:
>>> Can any one clarify this, is auto updating at all production servers
>>> recommended or not?
>>> need to know your opinion, how do you manage the update?
>>>
>
>
> I've worked on projects where backend configuration files changed in syntax
> or architecture between release
Max Hetrick wrote:
> Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
>
>
>> 1) The Title of the article says "How to Setup a Software RAID on CentOS 5"
>> 2) My successor is a real HK bred and born person so his command of the
>> English language is like most such persons; that is to say, very poor.
>> 3) R
Thanks for the help. There is a way to get the information, but its
ugly.
Was hoping for a more straight forward method.
If a printer is down, I can us lpstat -l printer name to determine if a
job is stopped, but I could not figure out a way to easily determine the
status of jobs in the queue, su
On 8/13/09, madunix wrote:
> Can any one clarify this, is auto updating at all production servers
> recommended or not?
> need to know your opinion, how do you manage the update?
The NSA Guide to the Secure Configuration of RHEL 5 indicates this is
OK, but not with updatesd which they believe is
When I install some RPMS like openoffice 3 on centos x85_64
is there some command that will leave all the actual files alone (leave
them installed)
but just remove the RPM name from the RPM database so centos now things
the packages are not installed?
Reason is I was wanting to do this so a next
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 13:11, Jerry Geis wrote:
> When I install some RPMS like openoffice 3 on centos x85_64
> is there some command that will leave all the actual files alone (leave
> them installed)
> but just remove the RPM name from the RPM database so centos now things
> the packages are not
Marcelo Roccasalva writes:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 13:11, Jerry Geis wrote:
> > When I install some RPMS like openoffice 3 on centos x85_64
> > is there some command that will leave all the actual files alone (leave
> > them installed)
> > but just remove the RPM name from the RPM database so cen
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Geoff Galitz wrote:
>>
>> ...so I
>> know for a fact updates can break a running system.
>
> On CentOS? Fedora does that all the time but _not_ having behavior-changing
> updates in the long life of a major release is most of the point of
> 'enterprise'
At Thu, 13 Aug 2009 12:11:49 -0400 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> When I install some RPMS like openoffice 3 on centos x85_64
> is there some command that will leave all the actual files alone (leave
> them installed)
> but just remove the RPM name from the RPM database so centos now things
>
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:32, Curt Mills wrote:
> You mean like every time new Apache2 updates come along they
> _shouldn't_ break my failover cluster???
If you are using a cluster, and configuration files in a shared
directory, I believe you should configure your daemon not to use the
confi
> > Reason is I was wanting to do this so a next yum update does not get all
> > confused...
>
> That should not be a problem. yum update will see that your installed
> version (3.) is greater than the version in the repository
> (2.) and will then skip updating openoffice.
That is not what
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> This is certainly not a complete procedure on how to configure things
> so that upgrades don't break your cluster, but I believe the ideas
> outlined above could lead you there if you set up a test environment
> and experiment a little bit with it
Thanks.
-mu
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Curt Mills wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
>
>> This is certainly not a complete procedure on how to configure things
>> so that upgrades don't break your cluster, but I believe the ideas
>> outlined above could lead you there
Curt Mills wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
>
>> This is certainly not a complete procedure on how to configure things
>> so that upgrades don't break your cluster, but I believe the ideas
>> outlined above could lead you there if you set up a test environment
>> and exper
On 8/12/09, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Filipe
> Brandenburger wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 07:24, Lanny Marcus
wrote:
> analytics.linksynergy.com uses an invalid security certificate.
> The certificate is only valid for *.opendns.com
It lo
REPLY-TO: <183c528b0908121238k33c407ah18e4762c48652...@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:38:00 -0400
Brian Mathis
>
> It also helps to understand how people read instructions. When
> they look at a page, they see {big blob of useless introduction
> text}, then they see "Step 1, do this".
James B. Byrne wrote:
REPLY-TO: <183c528b0908121238k33c407ah18e4762c48652...@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:38:00 -0400
Brian Mathis
It also helps to understand how people read instructions. When
they look at a page, they see {big blob of useless introduction
text}, then they see
On 08/13/2009 01:11 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3775
> (originally asked in the CentOS forums)
thanks,
the glibc package needs a bit more attention. Will attempt to get this
done tonight
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522...@icq
___
Does anybody know how to restart X in centos 5.3? /etc/init.d/gdm | xdm
seems to be missing.
thanks,
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 16:59 -0700, grace rante wrote:
>
> Does anybody know how to restart X in centos 5.3? /etc/init.d/gdm |
> xdm seems to be missing.
>
Those scripts never existed. GDM runs from an entry in /etc/inittab,
not from an "rc" script. You should have these two lines
in /etc/init
I found that /usr/sbin/gdm-restart will also do the trick.
thanks,
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Ron Loftin wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 16:59 -0700, grace rante wrote:
> >
> > Does anybody know how to restart X in centos 5.3? /etc/init.d/gdm |
> > xdm seems to be missing.
> >
>
> Those
Hi,
I managed to get my C4580 (4500 series) connected to my router to work
with 64 bit 5.3.
That printer needs at least hplip 2.8.10 which I found at
http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/12086038/com/hplip-2.8.10-0.1.el5.test.x86_64.rpm.html
It was just a matter of following the manual in
Hello Gavin,
We have a large number of locations around the world with a number of
servers in each. We use rsyslog to handle this, as we are able to use
encrypted connections back to the central servers.
Also each location has an aggregation host, so not all servers have to
connect back to the ce
Looks like the chum did not have to lose any data.
Wiping out the MBR and the next 63 blocks apparently only wiped out grub
stage1, partition table, and part of the lvm config data.
I get to try to do a lvm 'recovery' at his expense now but this is my
first time...has anybody ever tried resto
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
> Looks like the chum did not have to lose any data.
>
I cannot believe he actually tried to create a new filesystem on sda
according to the .bash_history file after the dd commands. I think I
need a titanium clueby4. Anybody know where I can get one?
___
Hi Forall,
I use this, and its pretty stable. :D
http://oss.oracle.com/projects/php/files/EL5/i386/
CMIW.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:39 PM, f...@ll wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was looking a "stable" repo when I find php-5.2.10 wich I can use on
> my centos 5.3, previously I used a remi and epel repo but n
Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On 8/13/09, madunix wrote:
>> Can any one clarify this, is auto updating at all production servers
>> recommended or not?
>> need to know your opinion, how do you manage the update?
>
> The NSA Guide to the Secure Configuration of RHEL 5 indicates this is
> OK, but not with
Lars Hecking wrote:
> Marcelo Roccasalva writes:
>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 13:11, Jerry Geis wrote:
>>> When I install some RPMS like openoffice 3 on centos x85_64
>>> is there some command that will leave all the actual files alone (leave
>>> them installed)
>>> but just remove the RPM name from
Lars Hecking wrote:
>>> Reason is I was wanting to do this so a next yum update does not get all
>>> confused...
>> That should not be a problem. yum update will see that your installed
>> version (3.) is greater than the version in the repository
>> (2.) and will then skip updating openoffice.
>
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
> Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
>> Looks like the chum did not have to lose any data.
>>
> I cannot believe he actually tried to create a new filesystem on sda
> according to the .bash_history file after the dd commands. I think I
> need a titanium clueb
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 7:59 AM, madunix wrote:
> Can any one clarify this, is auto updating at all production servers
> recommended or not?
> need to know your opinion, how do you manage the update?
For a production server, I don't auto-update. There are too many
variables involved that may nega
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
>
>> Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
>>
>>> Looks like the chum did not have to lose any data.
>>>
>>>
>> I cannot believe he actually tried to create a new filesystem on sda
>> according to the .bash_history file after
2009/8/14 Darrin Khan :
> Hello Gavin,
>
> We have a large number of locations around the world with a number of
> servers in each. We use rsyslog to handle this, as we are able to use
> encrypted connections back to the central servers.
>
> Also each location has an aggregation host, so not all se
55 matches
Mail list logo
