2009/8/11 Ian Murray :
> In my haste for help, I stupidly hit reply and changed the subject which I
> thought was enough for a new message, not giving much thought for the
> threading, etc. So apologies for the hijack, although I would think it
> fairly obvious that it wasn't deliberate or obvious
Dear listmates,
I've recently moved a server from RHEL5 to CentOS 5.3 after it was
decided not to renew the subscripton. Everything works beautifully
except for Bugzilla, which throws MySQL errors. For example, the
sanitycheck.cgi page says:
# # #
Bugzilla – Sanity Check
* Home
*
Ian Murray wrote on Tue, 11 Aug 2009 05:51:05 + (GMT):
> I hit reply and changed the subject.
Please stop doing that.
That's what I do on my local
> LUG list and nobody complained so, I don't know if I have committed
> some list faux pas, so apologies if I have done.
It's wrong for every ma
Okay, I stand corrected. Not new to the net, though... and I know threading is
not done per subject. I just don't use lists that much and I definitely don't
use threading. Fifteen years of internet emailing and you're the first to
complain.
To be honest, mistake or otherwise, I didn't apprecia
Sorry for top post blame my iPhone
It looks like there is a mySql table missing between the old and new
versions of bugzilla.
Look for a script in the newer version that performs the table updates
HTH
Rob Kampen
407-341-3815
On Aug 11, 2009, at 5:23 AM, Chris Ross wrote:
> Dear listmates,
>
>
On 08/11/2009 11:20 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
> Sorry for top post blame my iPhone
> It looks like there is a mySql table missing between the old and new
> versions of bugzilla.
> Look for a script in the newer version that performs the table updates
> HTH
The nearest would be the checksetup.pl script
On Monday 10 August 2009 22:39:21 Ed Warner wrote:
> > I tried your suggestions without success. ip-up.local is executable in
> > a bash console and if I do so, I get this message: "iptables v1.3.5:
> > invalid mask '255' specified Try 'iptables -h' for more information.
> > A subent mask of 255? I
Dear Bob,
> All I want is something that doesn't reach end of life so rapidly for
> this application. I should have checked more carefully.
>
> I will try Scientific Linux which is supposed to install from the cd.
>
> Thanks for the help.
Patrice has created an installable 5.2 LiveCD, containing
On 8/10/09, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Ron Blizzard wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 5:20 PM, John
>> Thomas wrote:
>>> Ron Blizzard wrote:
Firefox 3.5 and *some* CentOS 5.3 computers (an Xorg graphics card
incompatibility issue?) -- it goes beyond the RPM package released by
>>> For t
Another small sugestion: Look at your iptables configuration file (not a gui).
Here there is an example of a well configured mask in my iptables file:
/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -s 55.66.77.0/24 -j ACCEPT
Regards
--- El mar, 11/8/09, Anne Wilson escribió:
De: Anne Wilson
Asunto: Re: [CentOS] Ce
RedShift wrote:
> Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 13:56, RedShift wrote:
>>> I've installed the JDK 1.5 and used alternatives --config java to use the
>>> 1.5 JDK from Sun. However, the same compilation error still occurs. How do
>>> I tell rpmbuild or the .spec t
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 05:23, Chris Ross wrote:
> [r...@neodymium bugzilla]# rpm -qa bugzilla mysql perl
> mysql-5.0.45-7.el5
> bugzilla-3.2.4-1.el5
> mysql-5.0.45-7.el5
> perl-5.8.8-18.el5_3.1
Where is this Bugzilla package from? CentOS does not include any
Bugzilla packages... I expect tha
On 08/11/2009 02:30 PM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 05:23, Chris Ross wrote:
>> [r...@neodymium bugzilla]# rpm -qa bugzilla mysql perl
>> mysql-5.0.45-7.el5
>> bugzilla-3.2.4-1.el5
>> mysql-5.0.45-7.el5
>> perl-5.8.8-18.el5_3.1
>
> Where is this Bugzilla package from? Cen
Hello,
I was seeing the FSF's GNU site and noticed that CentOS was included as the
proprietary or unendorsed distribution and not as the one following their
free software distribution guidelines. So my question is, is it really not
possible to comply with them or are we just not willing to!
I thi
I ran into this problem as well. My system suddenly made python depend on
tomcat5-admin-webapps which in turn wanted to drag down the entire tomcat55 and
java packages etc, total of 79 extra packages and 119MB.
'yum clean all' fixed it. Now only the python was flagged for download and
upgrade :
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Hello,
I'm setting up an additional repo on a 5.3 machine. I only want
three packages out of it, and to exclude all others. I know there's a line
to add to the repo file, googling didn't give it to me, anyone know how to
get only a selected set of packages from a repo? This is probably a ve
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 12:36, Dave wrote:
> I'm setting up an additional repo on a 5.3 machine. I only want
> three packages out of it, and to exclude all others. I know there's a line
> to add to the repo file, googling didn't give it to me, anyone know how to
> get only a selected se
Ron Blizzard writes:
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> > I have Firefox 3.5 (the mozilla.com version) on CentOS 5.3 using an
> > Intel card and it has caused X to restart on a couple of occasions.
> >
> > I am shifting back to the 3.0 version in the repo.
>
> A grea
James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> Nonetheless, it is very evident from the heated exchanges on this
> mailing list that there exists a substantial divergence on which
> path to take from here. It seems to me insupportable that the past
> practices of a small coterie of initiates deciding on everything
> w
Bassu wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I was seeing the FSF's GNU site and noticed that CentOS was included as
> the proprietary or unendorsed distribution and not as the one following
> their free software distribution guidelines. So my question is, is it
> really not possible to comply with them or are we
They say same about Redhat. But, sure they are too strict about it.
"Red Hat's enterprise distribution doesn't seem to have a clear policy about
what software can be included. Our understanding is that it makes it easy to
obtain nonfree software, even beyond the proprietary firmware included with
>
>
>
>
>Long live the kings
>
>
>-Ray
I must admit, may be I missed something here, but there seems to be quite a bit
of outpouring of appreciation on this thread. I am sure that all that give up
their time and effort to make CentOS happen really deserve all the thanks and
appreciation they g
As much as I agree with the aims of the FSF & GNU, I'm perplexed that
*none* of the mainstream distributions were on that list, especially
Debian which, IMHO, is one of the more "free" versions out there.
--
Drew
"Nothing in life is to be feared. It is only to be understood."
--Marie Curie
Ian Murray wrote:
>
> Part of my professional work is risk assessing system upgrades. I have
> been doing so long now that everything I professionally do is considered
> from a risk perspective. Maybe those of us that have to assess risk on a
> daily basis understand what I am on about and the
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 12:06 PM, David G. Miller wrote:
> I just checked the links with FF 3.5.2 under Fedora Core 11 and they open just
> fine. This would seem to narrow the problem down to FF 3.5 on CentOS 5.3.
> Perhaps someone with a CentOS 4.X could give it a try (assuming FF 3.5 will
> ins
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Ian Murray wrote:
>
>>
>> Part of my professional work is risk assessing system upgrades. I have
>> been doing so long now that everything I professionally do is considered
>> from a risk perspective. Maybe those of us that have to assess risk
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 13:06, David G. Miller wrote:
> I just checked the links with FF 3.5.2 under Fedora Core 11 and they open just
> fine. This would seem to narrow the problem down to FF 3.5 on CentOS 5.3.
> Perhaps someone with a CentOS 4.X could give it a try (assuming FF 3.5 will
> in
I am troubled by the window of opportunity that a hacker has between RH
releasing a point release and CentOS releasing the equivalent. Every RH
published errata for that stream is a known weakness to your system and there
is not a sausage you can do about it until the CentOS project delivers the
Hi,
Thanks for the response.
Under Ubuntu (NB the drive was under /dev/sdb under Ubuntu - is this a
clue?!?):-
HDIO_GET_UNMASKINTR failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device
HDIO_GET_DMA failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device
Under Centos (as /dev/hda):-
Both set to 0, so I tried to set them t
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> Why don't you go with the SL or even pay RH, if you are that concerned about
> hacking attempts? It seems clear that CentOS is not a good distro for you if
> you are not satisfied with its update schedule. I believe it is better to
> make
> a different choice of distro
I believe it is better to make
a different choice of distro, than to ask for substantial changes in the
current one, especially if other people should do that extra work for you.
Believe what you like, but I believe it's better to raise my concern for
discussion in the first instance. For the
On Tuesday 11 August 2009 23:25:23 Ian Murray wrote:
> I am troubled by the window of opportunity that a hacker has between RH
> releasing a point release and CentOS releasing the equivalent. Every RH
> published errata for that stream is a known weakness to your system and
> there is not a sausage
Ian Murray wrote:
> I believe it is better to make
> a different choice of distro, than to ask for substantial changes in the
> current one, especially if other people should do that extra work for you.
>
> Believe what you like, but I believe it's better to raise my concern for
> discussion in t
You are probably right there. I lost interest in Linux for ages because of what
RH did. It was CentOS that re-ignited my interest. I felt like I could 'get
back' what I had lost when Redhat killed RHL. I didn't 'get' the security
implications of the rebuild stuff til it was explained to me the o
Hi
Where remote and local address and subnet I can put for vpn configuration in
linux box?
Thank you
__
Yahoo! Canada Toolbar: Search from anywhere on the web, and bookmark your
favourite sites. Download it now
http://ca.
chloe K wrote:
> Where remote and local address and subnet I can put for vpn
> configuration in linux box?
A little more information would probably be best before anyone can help
you. Do you already have a VPN server/device running that you're trying
to connect to? For instance, are you connec
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
> I am troubled by the window of opportunity that a hacker has between RH
> releasing a point release and CentOS releasing the equivalent. Every RH
> published errata for that stream is a known weakness to your system and
> there is not a sausage y
>I didn't 'get' the security implications of the rebuild stuff til it was
>explained to me the other day.
Share the knowledge:) Aside from the delay involved while the devs build rpm's
from the srpm's, is there more to it?
Thanks,
jlc
___
CentOS maili
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> I didn't 'get' the security implications of the rebuild
>> stuff til it was explained to me the other day.
>
> Share the knowledge:) Aside from the delay involved while
> the devs build rpm's from the srpm's, is there more to it?
This thread will
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> I didn't 'get' the security implications of the rebuild stuff til it was
>> explained to me the other day.
>
> Share the knowledge:) Aside from the delay involved while the devs build rpm's
> from the srpm's, is there more to it?
It's been covered already. When RH doe
On 08/12/2009 01:34 AM, Ian Murray wrote:
...
> Under Ubuntu (NB the drive was under /dev/sdb under Ubuntu - is this a
> clue?!?):-
Some HP machines have the same symptoms you describe:
Slow disk IO with CentOS, fast with Fedora.
The cure is to append
hda=noprobe hdc=noprobe
to the startup pa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Thomas wrote:
> Ron Blizzard wrote:
>> Firefox 3.5 and *some* CentOS 5.3 computers (an Xorg graphics card
>> incompatibility issue?) -- it goes beyond the RPM package released by
>>
> For the record, I have been using Michael Harris' 3.5 Firefox w
43 matches
Mail list logo
