> Guys,
>
> i have heard of vispan, phplistadmin, spamstat from the mailscanner manual
> and
> would like to experiment with them.
>
> 1. Any thoughts on them? ( i am trying to avoid mailwatch bcos i think vispan
> is
> better fit for reporting)
> 2. I have googled for their centos rpms b
Bob Taylor wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 11:54 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>> Bob Taylor wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>>> Exactly the *wrong* response. I wonder if responses similar to this
>>> loses potential users or loses existing customers. Personally, it
>>> disgusts me.
>> It is not *wrong* ... an
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, Marcus Moeller wrote:
> 2009/8/7 R P Herrold :
>> You don't like reputational vetting and a meritocracy, or how
>> it is run by the people in charge who have as one goal: not
>> distributing malware. I get it. Thank you.
> Hey Russ, it's open source. You can just review the
Mark Hedges wrote:
>> You can report problems on the CentOS bug tracker at:
>> http://bugs.centos.org/
>
> Umm, as I said, I couldn't sign up to file a bug report.
> Nope, still broken.
>
>APPLICATION ERROR #2800
>Invalid form security token. Did you submit the form
>twice by accident
Dear Russ.
>>> You don't like reputational vetting and a meritocracy, or how
>>> it is run by the people in charge who have as one goal: not
>>> distributing malware. I get it. Thank you.
>
>> Hey Russ, it's open source. You can just review the spec and
>> comment it until it's ready for release
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 08:28 +0200, Andrew Colin Kissa wrote:
> On 07 Aug 2009, at 8:14 AM, Marcus Moeller wrote:
>
> > (like the Contrib repo) are getting a bit clearer so I
> > guess we are on the right track.
>
> Contib repo !!! What Contrib repo ? The last time i tried to
> contribute i wa
On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 11:05 -0400, JohnS wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 08:28 +0200, Andrew Colin Kissa wrote:
> > On 07 Aug 2009, at 8:14 AM, Marcus Moeller wrote:
> >
> > > (like the Contrib repo) are getting a bit clearer so I
> > > guess we are on the right track.
> >
> > Contib repo !!! Wh
On Aug 8, 2009, at 10:24 AM, Marcus Moeller
wrote:
> Dear Russ.
>
You don't like reputational vetting and a meritocracy, or how
it is run by the people in charge who have as one goal: not
distributing malware. I get it. Thank you.
>>
>>> Hey Russ, it's open source. You can just
On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 05:59 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Mark Hedges wrote:
> >> You can report problems on the CentOS bug tracker at:
> >> http://bugs.centos.org/
> >
> > Umm, as I said, I couldn't sign up to file a bug report.
> > Nope, still broken.
> >
> >APPLICATION ERROR #2800
> >
On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 05:48 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Bob Taylor wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 11:54 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >>> Bob Taylor wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> >>> Exactly the *wrong* response. I wonder if responses similar to this
> >>> loses potential users or loses existi
Bob Taylor wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 05:48 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>>
>> Second, I am supposed to also kiss your ass?
>>
>
> Is it necessary to insult me? I have said *nothing* to you to warrant
> this.
>
>
Jeez, people, take it offline.
-Alan
___
Alan Sparks wrote:
> Bob Taylor wrote:
>> On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 05:48 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
>>> Second, I am supposed to also kiss your ass?
>>>
>> Is it necessary to insult me? I have said *nothing* to you to warrant
>> this.
>>
>>
>
> Jeez, people, take it offline.
> -Alan
>
On Sat, 8 Aug 2009, Bob Taylor wrote:
> Personally, it disgusts me.
> Have I said I don't appreciate it?
Yes, actually -- I call b*llsh*t -- you who have done nothing
are here, and eat without charge at our table, and 'it
disgusts' you
Begone, troll
-- Russ herrold
_
On Sat, 8 Aug 2009, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Aug 2009, Bob Taylor wrote:
>
>> Personally, it disgusts me.
>
>> Have I said I don't appreciate it?
>
> Yes, actually -- I call b*llsh*t -- you who have done nothing
> are here, and eat without charge at our table, and 'it
> disgusts' you
>
Dag
concern is good and you are right about how CentOS people should have a
solid testimony for the projects "big picture"
the thing is that since day one, as near as i have experienced and can tell,
most of them have many years of "rock solid CentOS work" as a testimony.
rock solid!
we haven't
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Robert wrote:
> please stop poking the bears... ;->
>
> it isn't productive and many of you that are critical of CentOS and the
> people running it should just move on and go away as asked
+1 How easy it is to criticize people who have put in a
tremendous am
I'm attempting to install ledgersmb on Centos 5 and I'm sure that I've missed
something.
After doing the initial installation, I get a 404 when I get to the part of the
instructions that tell me to go to http://localhost/ledgersmb/admin.pl
/etc/httpd/conf.d/ledgersmb.conf contains the following l
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 19:31 -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
>
> Yep, I think it is because people often want to travel straight from A
> to Z without having to go through B, C, D, etc. Another subset of
> people, "the talkers" want to dictate to the "doers" how things should
> be done, often with
On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 18:28 +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
>
> Sorry Alan, but with the greatest respect I believe it important that
> these types of discussions are allowed to happen openly within the
> community. This thread was started on a community mailing list by a
> member of that community
On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 15:04 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Robert wrote:
>
>
> > please stop poking the bears... ;->
> >
> > it isn't productive and many of you that are critical of CentOS and the
> > people running it should just move on and go away as asked
>
>
>
> This presents a ripe opportunity for a perception of
> "unwarranted criticism", "whining" by someone who paid
> nothing, "lack of appreciation for all the *free* hard work
> we do", etc.
>
> >
>
> --
> Bill
>
Bill,
Good points...
yet you forgot about "presentation" if a person m
On Sat, August 8, 2009 4:04 pm, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Robert wrote:
>
>
>> please stop poking the bears... ;->
>>
>> it isn't productive and many of you that are critical of CentOS and the
>> people running it should just move on and go away as asked
>
> +1 Ho
On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 16:14 -0700, Robert wrote:
> >
> > This presents a ripe opportunity for a perception of
> > "unwarranted criticism", "whining" by someone who paid
> > nothing, "lack of appreciation for all the *free* hard work
> > we do", etc.
> >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Bill
> >
>
> B
> Who is the project serving? The "core" themselves or a "community" of
> users as well? If that is effectively and accurately answered, then the
> dynamics of the relationship(s) between users of the project and the
> "core" can be more clearly stated and understood.
In the end, most F/LOSS proje
William L. Maltby wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 19:31 -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
>>
>
>> Yep, I think it is because people often want to travel straight from A
>> to Z without having to go through B, C, D, etc. Another subset of
>> people, "the talkers" want to dictate to the "doers" how thi
On 8/8/09, Marko A. Jennings wrote:
> On Sat, August 8, 2009 4:04 pm, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Robert wrote:
>>
>>> please stop poking the bears... ;->
>>>
>>> it isn't productive and many of you that are critical of CentOS and the
>>> people running it should just
Marko A. Jennings wrote:
> On Sat, August 8, 2009 4:04 pm, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Robert wrote:
>>
>>
>>> please stop poking the bears... ;->
>>>
>>> it isn't productive and many of you that are critical of CentOS and the
>>> people running it should just move on a
On Sat, August 8, 2009 8:44 pm, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Marko A. Jennings wrote:
>> On Sat, August 8, 2009 4:04 pm, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Robert wrote:
>>>
>>>
please stop poking the bears... ;->
it isn't productive and many of you that are critical
On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 19:37 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> William L. Maltby wrote:
>
> >
> > I only have one question that I want to add to this gawd-awful thread
> > now.
> >
> > Who is the project serving? The "core" themselves or a "community" of
> > users as well? If that is effectively and
Marko A. Jennings wrote:
> On Sat, August 8, 2009 8:44 pm, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> Marko A. Jennings wrote:
>>> On Sat, August 8, 2009 4:04 pm, Lanny Marcus wrote:
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Robert wrote:
> please stop poking the bears... ;->
>
> it isn't productiv
I can't say I have been following this thread in its entirety, but the beauty
(?) of free speech is that even the ill-informed get to have a say. :o)
Anyway, I think there is a general problem with the name Community ENterprise
OS. Well, Community can't refer to us users because every O/S has a
Ian Murray wrote:
> I can't say I have been following this thread in its entirety, but the
> beauty (?) of free speech is that even the ill-informed get to have a
> say. :o)
>
> Anyway, I think there is a general problem with the name Community
> ENterprise OS. Well, Community can't refer to us us
On Sunday 09 August 2009 00:50:16 Marko A. Jennings wrote:
> Your statement implies that people that have not contributed to a certain
> goal cannot possibly have a good suggestion.
Of course, this is a very common and useful line of reasoning in human
society. Put shortly, it increases signal-t
On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 20:01 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> If you mean that I can be an arrogant SOB sometimes, then YES, we (and
> my wife) can agree.
>
> I also can certainly try to be nicer, yes.
I am very tired of this whole thread - I think you have covered it well.
But I will say this..
Frank Cox wrote:
> I'm attempting to install ledgersmb on Centos 5 and I'm sure that I've missed
> something.
>
> After doing the initial installation, I get a 404 when I get to the part of
> the
> instructions that tell me to go to http://localhost/ledgersmb/admin.pl
>
> /etc/httpd/conf.d/ledge
> 4 million unique machines do not agree with you, regardless of what you
> want to believe.
I don't think the machines have an opinion, either way. :o) Seriously, I
suppose you are using the '4 million machines we must be doing something right'
argument which is fair comment, if perhaps a to
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> If you mean that I can be an arrogant SOB sometimes, then YES, we (and
> my wife) can agree.
>
Before making an admission like that, you should re-read
http://wwwf.centos.org/127_story.html?storyid=127
I thought then and think now that you were 'way too humble
in de
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
> I can't say I have been following this thread in its entirety, but the
> beauty (?) of free speech is that even the ill-informed get to have a say.
> :o)
>
> Anyway, I think there is a general problem with the name Community
> ENterprise OS. Well,
On Sat, 08 Aug 2009 21:53:21 -0500
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> maybe replace "WORKING_DIR" with ledgersmb (and awap the order of the 2)
Much thanks for the steer! I now have LedgerSMB up and running. (Haven't a
clue what to do with it yet, but it's running and I can log into it.)
For anyone else w
39 matches
Mail list logo
