On Thursday 30 July 2009 19:23:24 Kwan Lowe wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Rob Kampen
> wrote: [snip]
>
> > I have read many hundreds of pages, have purchased O'reilly's LDAP System
> > Administration but cannot seem to get my dirsrv based LDAP to function.
> > I do understand that ds us
Dear all,
I got weird permission on one of my server, when I ls -l the / i got
permission for all directory set to "drwxr-xr-x." there are dot after
the executable permission for others. what dot mean in permission and
how to fix it? the actual problem is I could login via ssh but cannot
login via
Muhammad panji wrote on Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:48:29 +0700:
> I got weird permission on one of my server, when I ls -l the / i got
> permission for all directory set to "drwxr-xr-x." there are dot after
> the executable permission for others. what dot mean in permission and
> how to fix it?
I have n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
muhammad panji wrote:
> Dear all,
> I got weird permission on one of my server, when I ls -l the / i got
> permission for all directory set to "drwxr-xr-x." there are dot after
> the executable permission for others. what dot mean in permission and
> h
On 07/31/2009 02:27 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> I don't have any legal obligation to help old ladies cross the street,
>> or rescue cats from trees. It's what you do because you're a good
>> person. Doing this in a community sense is what makes you a good
>> neighbor, and what helps build community re
Hi,
i have configured a Master DNS server, i have also created
records to delegate a zone to child dns server
But when named service is started it says
Jul 31 14:33:30 localhost named[21581]: dns.zone:9: ignoring out-of-zone data
(child.dns.com)
I am using bind-9.3.4-10.P1.el5
Friday, July 31, 2009, is the 10th annual System Administrator
Appreciation Day. On this special international day, give your System
Administrator something that shows that you truly appreciate their hard
work and dedication. (All day Friday, 24 hours, your local timezone).
http://www.s
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 05:46:53AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> IIRC, the "." at the end of the permissions indicates that the file has
> additional permission controls beyond the standard DAC bits, such as
> filesystem ACLs, filesystem capabilities, or other attributes.
FACLs are normally indic
In article <20090730170329.ge4...@roque.1407.org>,
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
> If possible, maintain the centos name.
>
> Is there a .os tld? cent.os ? :)
No:
$ host -tns com.
com name server g.gtld-servers.net.
com name server h.gtld-servers.net.
com name server i.gtld-servers.net.
com na
I have very basic question:
I have downloaded *CentOS-5.3-i386-LiveCD* from CentOS website. Now I need
to install it on my Acer Laptop permanently not as a liveCD. How do I burn
it to a DVD to be able to install it by simply restarting my laptop?
Thank you,
Sam
__
At Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:56:14 +0300 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
>
>
> I have very basic question:
>
> I have downloaded *CentOS-5.3-i386-LiveCD* from CentOS website. Now I need
> to install it on my Acer Laptop permanently not as a liveCD. How do I burn
> it to a DVD to be able to install it
Tom Brown wrote:
> why is everyone getting so jumpy - its only a domain name thats at
> stake, he's been AWOL for a year or more and the project has been OK
>
> people should worry less
I understand the worries. The news have reached the front page of
Slashdot, and thus might reach certain tec
On Friday 31 July 2009 13:05:52 Robert Heller wrote:
> At Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:56:14 +0300 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
> > I have very basic question:
> >
> > I have downloaded *CentOS-5.3-i386-LiveCD* from CentOS website. Now I
> > need to install it on my Acer Laptop permanently not as a liveCD.
> I understand the worries. The news have reached the front page of
> Slashdot, and thus might reach certain technically inclined managers,
> which in turn may cause questions about contingency plans to be directed
> at the IT staff. I have a feeling that "I have no contingency plan,
> don't w
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:55:42 -0400, Clint Dilks
wrote:
> Hi People,
>
> I have a user who is regularly having X Crash. This seemed to happen
> once a month but has increased to once or twice a week. It doesn't seem
> to be application specific. The only information about whats causing
> the c
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 21:15 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Akemi Yagi wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Jim Perrin wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >
> >>> Why ... we are under no obligation to tell people how how we spend
> >>> monies. There are costs
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 08:20 +0100, Tony Molloy wrote:
> On Thursday 30 July 2009 19:23:24 Kwan Lowe wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Rob Kampen
> > wrote: [snip]
> >
> > > I have read many hundreds of pages, have purchased O'reilly's LDAP System
> > > Administration but cannot seem to ge
Hi,
I've installed recently OpenOffice.org 3.1 on Centos 5.3. I use OOo in
headless mode. I have no problem when running as root, but I'd prefer
run it as non-root user (oooserver user). When I run the script in
debug mode this is the output:
sh -x/tmp/ooo-headless-nonroot start
+ . /etc/rc.d
--On Friday, July 31, 2009 4:54 PM +0530 Gopinath Achari
wrote:
> i have configured a Master DNS server, i have also created
> records to
> delegate a zone to child dns server But when named service is started it
> says
>
> Jul 31 14:33:30 localhost named[21581]: dns.zone:9: ignor
Alan,
We set actimeo=3 and this has significantly improved our problem.
I saw this value in an HP thread and seemed reasonable.
Thanks for the heads up.
_
"He's no failure. He's not dead yet."
William Lloyd George
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun.
Connie Sieh wrote:
>
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> Ralph Angenendt wrote:
>>> Les Mikesell wrote:
Has anyone considered joining forces with Scientific Linux to reduce the
workload and give both a more robust infrastructure?
>>> Yes, but the goals are rather different
On Friday 31 July 2009 15:05:29 Craig White wrote:
> > I'm going through the Howto:Samba from at
> > the moment and hopefully that will get me started.
> >
> > But what would be nice is:
> >
> > 1. Howto:migtate existing NIS to CentosDS
> > 2. Howto:migrate existing Samba to CentosDS
>
>
>
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 16:00 +0100, Tony Molloy wrote:
> > But this all would be virtually impossible without a decent
> knowledge of
> > how LDAP works and that is regardless of whether you use CentOS-DS
> or
> > OpenLDAP.
> >
> > Craig
>
> After reading Carter's book I think i've got some idea of
Marcelo M. Garcia wrote:
> Connie Sieh wrote:
>>> Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Has anyone considered joining forces with Scientific Linux to reduce the
> workload and give both a more robust infrastructure?
Yes, but the goals are rather different.
>>> I thought b
On Friday 31 July 2009 16:12:12 Craig White wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 16:00 +0100, Tony Molloy wrote:
> > > But this all would be virtually impossible without a decent
> >
> > knowledge of
> >
> > > how LDAP works and that is regardless of whether you use CentOS-DS
> >
> > or
> >
> > > OpenLDA
onkey
Tru
--
Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
U
I have 2 video devices LML33 and PV155
$ lspci
06:00.0 Multimedia video controller: Zoran Corporation ZR36057PQC Video
cutting chipset (rev 02)
07:08.0 Multimedia video controller: Brooktree Corporation Bt878 Video
Capture (rev 11)
07:08.1 Multimedia controller: Brooktree Corporation Bt878 Audio
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 3:20 AM, Tony Molloy wrote:
> Installing centos-ds is not a problem. It's what you do after it. Especially
> for people like me who have no experience with OpenLDAP.
>
>>
>> Linux and Windows user authentication is straightforward, with GUI
>> based setup and editing.
>>
>
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Marcelo M. Garcia wrote:
>> Connie Sieh wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Has anyone considered joining forces with Scientific Linux to reduce the
>> workload and give both a more robust infrastructure?
> Yes, but the goals are rathe
Hi all,
It appears that on my nice little CentOS 5.3 machines Apache only
allows me to store content in directories which are under /var/www/
For instance, putting content in /var/www/test and defining the following alias:
Alias /test /var/www/test
then accessing it under http://hostname/test w
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:17, Boris Epstein wrote:
> Any idea why that would be?
It's SELinux. Files exported by Apache must have context
httpd_sys_content_t. You can use "ls -Z" to see the context of a
certain file. You can use "chcon -R httpd_sys_content_t /home/test" to
change the context
--On Friday, July 31, 2009 1:24 PM -0400 Filipe Brandenburger
wrote:
> In general I would advise you to try to adapt your application so that
> the files that need to be seen by Apache are under /var/www, if you
> have that flexibility it will be simpler and have less chance of
> breaking in the
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Filipe Brandenburger
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:17, Boris Epstein wrote:
> > Any idea why that would be?
>
> It's SELinux. Files exported by Apache must have context
> httpd_sys_content_t. You can use "ls -Z" to see the context of a
> certain fi
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> I found an even simplier solution - disabled SELinux. I've got a
> firewall and that is plenty.
No. It's really not. If someone exploits apache, or php, they'll be
coming in via port 80 or 443 which your firewall has helpfully allowed
so th
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Jim Perrin wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
>
>> I found an even simplier solution - disabled SELinux. I've got a
>> firewall and that is plenty.
>
> No. It's really not. If someone exploits apache, or php, they'll be
> coming in via
>
> tell said managers to open the coffers and pay for support if they are
> that worried
Maybe they would, but there is no content on the Centos wiki on the
commercial support page. Considering the allegations of mishandling
of funds, I doubt any organization would donate directly Centos
at
sounds like current default apache security
near the begining you of httpd.conf you will find
Options FollowSymLinks
AllowOverride None
Options Indexes FollowSymLinks
AllowOverride None
Order allow,deny
Allow from all
This effectively blocks you from sharing any
--On Friday, July 31, 2009 2:07 PM -0400 Boris Epstein
wrote:
> I am running mod_security and also if the intruder gets to the shell
> level they will be able to bypass the SELinux entirely.
How? The selinux commands require root access. First you'd have to get a
root escalation exploit to pro
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> I am running mod_security and also if the intruder gets to the shell
> level they will be able to bypass the SELinux entirely. I believe in
> security too but security should not be crippling.
Agreed, however your statement is contradictory.
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:36:51 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
[]
> My 'dream' OS has always been one where the base install was extremely
> minimal - just enough to install the rest over the network. Then there
> would be a way that anyone could 'publish' their installed list of
> repositor
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 06:59 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 21:15 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > Akemi Yagi wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Jim Perrin wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > >
> > >>> Why ... we are under no obligati
Tom Brown wrote:
> tell said managers to open the coffers and pay for support if they are
> that worried
Well, it hasn't happened to me (yet). I just thought that it might be
why some people seem to be somewhat worried.
Regards
Ingemar
___
CentOS mai
Hi,
>> My 'dream' OS has always been one where the base install was extremely
>> minimal - just enough to install the rest over the network. Then there
>> would be a way that anyone could 'publish' their installed list of
>> repositories and packages and anyone else could duplicate that machine's
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Marcus Moeller wrote:
>
> But please note: CentOS itself has a clear strategy which means
> upstream compatibility. Nothing more and nothing less. No focus on
> specialized systems (which does not mean you can create a custom spin
> for an specific purpose, e.g. a C
Boris Epstein wrote:
>
> I found an even simplier solution - disabled SELinux. I've got a
> firewall and that is plenty.
>
Wow, not sure I'd place all my faith in a firewall.
There is an SELinux tutorial on the Wiki that explicitly covers how to
handle Apache serving content outside of Documen
Since 2004 or so, I have donated each year to the CentOS project, at
the requested rate, for each of our servers. While I never really
gave the matter any thought (fool that I am) I presumed that any
organisation that solicited funds would, at a minimum, be
incorporated, have a board of directors,
Are you talking about this one:
http://ftp.itu.edu.tr/Mirror/CentOS/5.3/isos/i386/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-DVD.iso
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
> At Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:56:14 +0300 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > I have very basic question:
> >
> > I have do
Beartooth wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:36:51 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> []
>> My 'dream' OS has always been one where the base install was extremely
>> minimal - just enough to install the rest over the network. Then there
>> would be a way that anyone could 'publish' their install
Marcus Moeller wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>> My 'dream' OS has always been one where the base install was extremely
>>> minimal - just enough to install the rest over the network. Then there
>>> would be a way that anyone could 'publish' their installed list of
>>> repositories and packages and anyone else
Marcelo M. Garcia wrote:
>
>> My 'dream' OS has always been one where the base install was extremely
>> minimal - just enough to install the rest over the network. Then there
>> would be a way that anyone could 'publish' their installed list of
>> repositories and packages and anyone else coul
First issue: I did an upgrade from 4.7 to 5.3 on an HP DL380G3 box.
I got yum working again and upgraded 160+ packages. During that
process I saw:
---
Installing : kernel-PAE[157/322]
WARNING: No module mptscsi found for kernel 2.6.
Hello:
I keep getting these
An IOException occurred at
scim_bridge_client_imcontext_set_cursor_location ()
messages -- and I'd like to turn them off. I won't mind having scim
just plain turned off.
However, in using Google, I find a hint such as "right click on the
tray, ..." -- so where's
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 2:45 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> However, having been bitten once, I feel that I must ask this more
> formal question. What steps, if any, have been taken to establish
> the CentOS project as a separate legal entity distinct from any
> individual contributor? What protect
On 07/30/2009 08:45 PM, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 18:56 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
>> see around (it's there since 06.28):
>> http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/centos/5/x86_64/virt/RPMS/libvirt-0.6.4-2.el5.x86_64.rpm
>
> FYI: when I try to install libvirt from your r
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 15:01 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> >
> > The idea of a minimal installation is interesting. Could this be done
>Les Mikesell
> lesmikes...@gmail.com
In spite of the fact that all thse ideas for what the new CentOS org
could or would do, they really don't belo
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 6:56 AM, sam R wrote:
> I have very basic question:
> I have downloaded CentOS-5.3-i386-LiveCD from CentOS website. Now I need to
> install it on my Acer Laptop permanently not as a liveCD. How do I burn it
> to a DVD to be able to install it by simply restarting my laptop?
On 31/07/09 22:01, Lanny Marcus wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 6:56 AM, sam R wrote:
I have very basic question:
I have downloaded CentOS-5.3-i386-LiveCD from CentOS website. Now I need to
install it on my Acer Laptop permanently not as a liveCD. How do I burn it
to a DVD to be able to inst
James B. Byrne wrote on Fri, 31 Jul 2009 15:45:21 -0400 (EDT):
> However, having been bitten once, I feel that I must ask this more
> formal question. What steps, if any, have been taken to establish
> the CentOS project as a separate legal entity distinct from any
> individual contributor? What
Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Craig White wrote:
t> totally agree and just want to add one more thing...I am very happy to
> see Johnny posting to this list. It has been a long time and I hope you
> are well.
+1 :-) I was planning to begin a new thread, "welcome
back Johnny!" until I
William L. Maltby wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 15:01 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>
>
>>> The idea of a minimal installation is interesting. Could this be done
>
>
> In spite of the fact that all thse ideas for what the new CentOS org
> could or would do, they really don't belong cluttering
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Jake Shipton wrote:
> May also want to consider using the "netinstall" images if you have a
> constant network connection during install. Saves downloading a whole
> DVD or a bunch of CD's
> ;-)
>
> Although do try the LiveCD as stated above.
Netinstall is about t
On 07/31/2009 08:56 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
> Sounds like all you folks need to get together, start a "CentOS minimal
> install CD" SIG and get on with it :)
or a shared editor, and write a kickstart :)
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522...@icq
__
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 16:17 -0400, Charles E Campbell Jr wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I keep getting these
>
> An IOException occurred at
> scim_bridge_client_imcontext_set_cursor_location ()
>
> messages -- and I'd like to turn them off. I won't mind having scim
> just plain turned off.
> However,
> I'm already hearing
> rumblings about risks from others in the company who don't know much
> about the situation but know we are using Centos and saw a news posting
> somewhere - and I suspect that is happening in every large company.
No doubt. And if the people who mange the CentOS servers in t
At Fri, 31 Jul 2009 22:49:46 +0300 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
>
>
> Are you talking about this one:
>
> http://ftp.itu.edu.tr/Mirror/CentOS/5.3/isos/i386/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-DVD.iso
Yes, this is the install DVD image.
>
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
>
> > At
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> muhammad panji wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> I got weird permission on one of my server, when I ls -l the / i got
>> permission for all directory set to "drwxr-xr-x." there are dot after
>> the exe
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Muhammad panji wrote on Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:48:29 +0700:
>
>> I got weird permission on one of my server, when I ls -l the / i got
>> permission for all directory set to "drwxr-xr-x." there are dot after
>> the executable permission for others.
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 13:55 -0500, Ron Blizzard wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Marcus Moeller wrote:
> >
> > But please note: CentOS itself has a clear strategy which means
> > upstream compatibility. Nothing more and nothing less. No focus on
> > specialized systems (which does not mean
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 20:56 +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
> Marcus Moeller wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >>> My 'dream' OS has always been one where the base install was extremely
> >>> minimal - just enough to install the rest over the network. Then there
...
>
> Sounds like all you folks need to get togethe
I've just built a new system and installed latest Centos 5.3 on it. My old
box also has an up to date Centos 5 on it.
Some things are just plain different between the two installations, and
it's stumping me why that would be. Example:
on the old box, the shutdown dialog offers restart, cancel, s
On 07/31/2009 08:45 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
> What steps, if any, have been taken to establish
> the CentOS project as a separate legal entity distinct from any
> individual contributor? What protections are being put in place to
> prevent future misappropriations of donations and advertising
> r
On 07/30/2009 06:34 AM, R P Herrold wrote:
> This is an Open Letter to Lance Davis from fellow CentOS Developers
People looking for info about this and recent progress will find
relevant info being updated on http://www.centos.org/ as things develop.
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ :
72 matches
Mail list logo
